Unearthed audio of Tucker Carlson defending paedophilia etc.

[Fuzzy Bear]

Carlson needs to get his story straight on Florida Law.  A minor can marry at 17 with a parent's consent as long as there is no more than a two (2) year age difference.

There is no defense for Warren Jeffs.  One can argue about whether or not his sentence is overly harsh or not.  (I'll leave that task to others.)  But there's no defense for Jeffs' actions, and I don't feel sorry for him in his situation.

As for Carlson, he's a knothead to defend Warren Jeffs.  That's what lawyers are for.

[Fuzzy Bear]

Was prepared to come in here and throw Tucker under the bus, because the bastard deserves to be.

Was disappoited.

Basically, I don't see what the big deal is. He never defended paedophilia or anything of that nature and made a technically correct point. That's it. I really can't see what I am supposed to be offended at here and this is coming from someone who despises Tucker Carlson.

CARLSON: Look, just to make it absolutely clear. I am not defending underage marriage at all. I just don't think it's the same thing exactly as pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting that child.

CO-HOST: Yeah, it's -- you know what it is? It's much more planned out and plotted.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah, it should be almost -- you almost should put a premeditation --

CARLSON: Wait, wait! Hold on a second. The rapist, in this case, has made a lifelong commitment to live and take care of the person, so it is a little different. I mean, let's me honest about it.

This is indefensible. He's saying "statutory rape is ok if you marry your victim". Sure, he says he's not defending underage marriage, but then he goes on and repeatedly does so over the course of the transcript.  That doesn't somehow absolve him, it just means that he's lying about what he's doing!

No he isn't. He is saying that there is a difference between underage marriage and raping a strange underage person and he is right. He is also explicitly stating that he does not condone underage marriage. I'm sick of nuances leaving political discourse. Saying that X is worse than Y does not equal defending Y. Both things can be wrong without them being equally wrong.

He is technically right, but it's in the context of defending Warren Jeffs.  That's the creepy part.  That's a nuance that's a bit hard to take, tbh.