1916 election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 03:41:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1916 election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1916 election  (Read 3293 times)
CJK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 671
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 21, 2009, 07:14:28 PM »

Why was this election so close? Usually incumbents who win win big, but until 2004 this was the smallest incumbent victory in American history. I understand that Wilson's electoral votes had to shrink due to the three way split that let him win in 1912, but what exactly kept this election from being a bigger victory for either side? What were the issues?
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,599
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2009, 07:38:06 PM »

The Democrats had never really recovered from 1894, and the period from 1894-1930 was a Republican era. It was incredibly difficult for any Democrat to win a national election period, much less in a landslide.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2009, 08:01:12 PM »

Also, the only reason Wilson was the incumbent was because of Republican disunity.  Very few Taft or Roosevelt voters would have voted for him in 1912.  Wilson used his incumbency to improve his share of the vote considerably from 1912, so that his share of the PV in 1916 was largest any Democrat had had since Tilden in 1876.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2009, 01:21:25 PM »

Colorado is the state I don't get.  It gave Wilson over 60% of the vote in 1916, for no apparent reason.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2009, 03:43:01 PM »

Colorado is the state I don't get.  It gave Wilson over 60% of the vote in 1916, for no apparent reason.
  The incumbent Republican Governor, George Alfred Carlson, was defeated for reelection that year as well, so it might have been a case of local politics spilling over into the national ticket, but that's rank speculation on my part.

Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2009, 04:17:59 AM »

World War I = Iraq, in a way. Both were enormously controversial; Wilson had to simultaneously pretend he didn't want to get America involved and appease those sympathetic to the Allies.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2009, 02:34:06 PM »

The country was in an era of Republican dominance, and the reason why it was so close in the first place (why the Republicans did not win in a landslide) is due to Wilson's incumbency.
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2009, 10:09:45 PM »

The war was very unpopular in the west, for various reasons (German heritage, so far away from home, isolationist Republican tradition) and thus voted for Wilson. If you look at Taft+Roosevelt in 1912 you get a GOP landslide, so it's not surprising that it was so close.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,417
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2009, 08:32:29 AM »

I'm guessing tarriffs was used to fund the functions of gov't up until 1913. Once the income tax was established, it appeared to some as a war tax and where the war was unpopular at, the Republicans did their best at.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 10 queries.