What do you think of gay rights in your country? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 08:21:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  What do you think of gay rights in your country? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you feel they have:
#1
Gone as far as you would wish them to
#2
Gone too far
#3
Not gone far enough
#4
Other (please specify)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: What do you think of gay rights in your country?  (Read 3456 times)
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« on: August 19, 2017, 02:11:05 PM »

I support full marraige rights.

In 50 or so years, it'll probably be a reality.

Damn, that was fast 50 years. Tongue
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2017, 09:52:25 AM »

MarkD is 100% correct that the marriage decision should have been made by legislators and voters, not by unelected judges. However, at this point it is simply not worth it to try to undermine and overturn the decision. We fought the good fight in court, but should accept the loss and move on to more important issues.

As far as discrimination outside of marriage goes, while the Equality Act of 2017 goes too far, we do need a new law to expand rights in the 29 states where you can be fired if your employer thinks you are gay, while also clarifying that democratic executive rewriting of the Civil Rights Act of 1965 is illegal.

Boy, you and I think so much alike on almost everything you mentioned it's almost scary. I just don't know what "Equality Act of 2017" you're referring to as having gone too far.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2282

Tbh defining sexual orientation as "homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality" strikes me as flawed.

"Your honor, the equality act does prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, but it defines sexual orientation 'homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality'. The woman I fired identifies as Pansexual, so she isn't protected by the law."

Pansexuals are just edgy bisexuals.

Even if we assume that pansexuality falls under the category of bisexuality, which TBH kind of makes sense to me, what about asexuality?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.