Why are all you lefties denying this? You actually think Udall has nothing to fight? Seriously??
1. It's Rasmussen.
2. Gardener is from the most Republican district in the state, which is points more Republican than the state as a whole.
3. It's Rasmussen.
Rasmussen has been mostly accurate since the one guy left the company. You guys have never bashed rasmussen until now. We'll see about another poll, but immediately dismissing a poll because its not PPP is hackish.
Why does #2 even matter? With that logic you're telling me that Tammy Baldwin was at a disadvantage in 2012 because she was from the most far left district in the state.
Why are all you lefties denying this? You actually think Udall has nothing to fight? Seriously??
Because Udall is safe? Nothing about this race has changed...Garder at the Republican floor as per usual.
Yeah, he's so safe he's leading by a whole point? If Rubio was leading by a point you would all be calling it a toss-up, guaranteed. (Not speaking directly to anybody here) Some of you guys just block what you don't want to hear and make up alternate realities.
Except Colorado polling is always unfavorable for the Dems so Udall is doing much better than this poll would suggest. Also, how is Cory Gardner a better get than Ken Buck?
Cory Gardner is much better than Ken Buck, how can you not realize this? He's not insane and not attracted to gaffes unlike Buck.
Rasmussen has yet to be proven accurate, 2012 had plenty of inaccuracies.
It matters because Gardener has no connection to any swing voters in the state, his district is far removed from where the votes critical to a win are and he's not a moderate. He isn't Ken Buck, but he's still very conservative. In Baldwin's case, Wisconsin leans more Democratic than Colorado leans Republican, so it was less of an issue for her.
