Recent Posts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 10:56:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Filter Options Collapse
        


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 10:53:42 AM 
Started by Anzeigenhauptmeister - Last post by Hindsight was 2020
So has the ads just lost all momentum going into these elections?
Sorry, I can't comprehend. What is "the ads"?
Sorry afd my damn phone autocorrected it for some reason

 2 
 on: Today at 10:52:48 AM 
Started by wbrocks67 - Last post by wbrocks67



 3 
 on: Today at 10:52:15 AM 
Started by I spent the winter writing songs about getting better - Last post by Del Tachi
We should also start requiring businesses to list the after tax price too.

The U.S. has tens of thousands of tax districts.  Showing the price exclusive of taxes keeps taxes transparent and allows consumers to make direct comparisons between the prices of products across different regions.

This would be for in person sales. Obviously wouldn’t work online.

It even breaks down at a local level. It would be hard to make a direct price comparison between doing your grocery shopping in one county vs another if they applied different local taxes, for example.   

I'm not understanding this. Why would someone care about doing a "direct price comparison" between two prices they're not going to actually pay? The final price (including tax) is what matters to consumers.

Because by displaying the base price and itemizing taxes separately, consumers are more informed about the components of the final price that they pay.  It's a more straightforward and transparent pricing system; it ensures producers cannot artificially lower their advertised retail prices by selectively misapplying or excluding certain taxes and gives consumers full transparency into the taxes they are paying (which should be important to a lolbertarian.)   

 4 
 on: Today at 10:47:04 AM 
Started by 2016 - Last post by Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
I always is a pipe dream to go after FL and TX that's why you don't go all out in for no candidate in either state I have donated 40.00 to Allred and only 25 to Powell because of the Abbott and DeSantis machine. Some people donated to ALLRED alot of money and it was a waste of time. No one CARED if he was a Football star because he wasn't a QB or Travis Kelce player


 5 
 on: Today at 10:45:21 AM 
Started by Gass3268 - Last post by Joe Republic
This case ought to have been a slam dunk, but now seems like a complete waste of time and effort due to the bare-faced bias of the judge that the defendant appointed.

 6 
 on: Today at 10:43:01 AM 
Started by Harry Hayfield - Last post by AustralianSwingVoter
Debate next week confirmed for ITV. Sunak and Starmer only. More specific details have yet to be announced.

Well this seems silly there. With the way things are going, it is not outside the realm of possibility for Reform or Lib Dem to perform effectively as well as the Conservatives. You can always direct more questions to the two leading parties. But they should have the five largest national parties for a national debate.

I can’t see the Tories agreeing to a multi party debate, certainly not with Rishi attending. It’d be three against one (well four as they’d also invite the SNP). The Tories want a horse race that marginalises the legitimacy of the Lib Dems and Reform, they’d have to be morons to agree to a multi party debate (then again…)

And unlike in America there isn’t some historical norm of debating that he’d be embarrassingly breaking. Iirc 2010 was the first ever live debate, and just about every election before then one was mooted but rejected by a leader.
Completely wrong. The Tories would love nothing more than forcing Keir Starmer to share a stage with a load of minor party leaders (Greens, SNP, Plaid) hitting him from his left about Gaza, and it allows them to lean into their 'coalition of chaos' messaging.
Why would they do that? Rishi is a consistently poor speaker and has no debating chops. They'd take turns getting free hits on the weak target that can generate soundbites for the News at Ten and social media. And ultimately however much they dislike Keir they all have far bigger beefs with this Tory government.
And for the realists in the Tory camp, the election is already lost and it's about saving the furniture. And the single biggest threat to the Tory backbenches is Reform being legitimised on a national stage and splitting the vote.

The (successful) Tory tactics in debates in 2015, 17 and 19 was to widen out the debates as far as they can to take in as many shades of fringe left opinion as possible and have their own representative try to stand above the fray. Of course that allows e.g. Plaid Cymru to have a shot at them, but those 'moments' only really serve to galvanise some strand of leftish opinion rather than actually weakening the Conservatives.

The Greens / SNP / Plaid would all absolutely take their shots against Labour, and strategically they would be correct to do so. Labour are a much bigger threat to their chances than the Conservatives.

And Sunak isn't a great debater, but he did fine standing in for Johnson in 2019. And let's not kid ourselves that there is some magnetic speaker in one of the opposition parties. Starmer, Davey, Tice, Swinney and whatever no mark is currently leading the Green Party are just as uncharismatic as Sunak.

Sunak's real weakness is not in debating his opponents (not that he's brilliant) but in interacting with the public.

When you're 20 points underwater it's a bit late to try and scheme to split the opposition vote. That's irrelevant at this point. To hold whatever furniture they can the Tories need to squash Reform and try and woo some voters back from Labour. 2 hours of fearmongering about Labour Danger while pretending Reform doesn't exist vaguely serves those goals.

Something to note is that the audiences for televised debates are already significantly smaller than in 2010. The novelty factor has worn off, which in turn means that a higher proportion of people watching will be partisans.
Given that Reform voters are apparently disproportionately politically engaged, they may make up an outsized proportion of the TV audience. Given the whole campaign seems targeted towards them Rishi might play it up even more.

 7 
 on: Today at 10:41:53 AM 
Started by GregTheGreat657 - Last post by Alcibiades
Based! I support free “gender-affirmative care” for violent criminals. Castration is proven to work for sex offenders. Let’s also bring back actually using the death penalty, and flogging too, and we’ll be back on the right track of civilized justice instead of slave morality.

It’s amusing how few people who like to drop this term have any idea what it means. Violent revenge fantasies like this were exactly what Nietzsche was deploring.

 8 
 on: Today at 10:31:31 AM 
Started by Harry Hayfield - Last post by Filuwaúrdjan
Something to note is that the audiences for televised debates are already significantly smaller than in 2010. The novelty factor has worn off, which in turn means that a higher proportion of people watching will be partisans.

 9 
 on: Today at 10:31:01 AM 
Started by TheReckoning - Last post by CumbrianLefty
Sure, but the thread title says "invading" so that is what I meant.

 10 
 on: Today at 10:30:45 AM 
Started by GAinDC - Last post by EliteLX
It seems like these Gaza protestors (many of them young, white and from privileged backgrounds) want fellow progressives and Democrats to abandon Biden over this issue, even if it means Trump wins and we move backwards on this and other priorities.

This is a raw deal and one that only the most chronically online, ivory tower progressive would even consider. Here are the questions I want to ask them when they continually make this appeal:

1) Do you think Trump would be better for Palestinians? Have you looked at his record and his statements on the matter? Do you not see at least some contrast between Trump and Biden?

2) If not, what's the plan to free Gaza if Trump gets into office?

3) Also, what's the plan for LGBTQ rights, student loan forgiveness, climate change and other priorities that will surely move backward if Trump wins?

4) How will you navigate a Democratic Party that will likely blame you heavily for Trump's win and won't consider you a good faith partner in shared objectives?


Eventually you are going to figure out the reason leftist initiatives even exist are because they are generally propped up by younger white, privileged, naive people not held consequence to them.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.