BRTD, it was an unreasonable prediction. It was an unreasonable prediction in May. It was an unreasonable prediction in 2006.
It's stupid that he won't own up to it.
It's stupid that he won't reform his predictions accordingly.
But you should criticize his current predictions on their merit (or lack thereof) instead of mining the archives like this.
Why? Because it makes it seem like you can't articulate a current criticism of his ideas and have to attack the messenger. Which is, by the way, a logical fallacy.
And it's creepy.
Quit it, or stop using my work product to justify it
.