Presidential Poll for Democrats

[Tintrlvr]

Harris, no question. Sanders is way too old and also I feel would not be a very good executive. Warren has a lot of baggage that would make her a weak candidate.

Lack of experience is a positive for Harris, not a negative. Anyway, she'll be more experienced than Obama was.

[President Johnson]

Harris, no question. Sanders is way too old and also I feel would not be a very good executive. Warren has a lot of baggage that would make her a weak candidate.

Lack of experience is a positive for Harris, not a negative. Anyway, she'll be more experienced than Obama was.

No, it will be equal. Both served four years in the senate. Obama was also a state senator for seven years while Harris Attorney General of California for five years. But she would have more life experience in 2021 at the age of 56. She would be one year older than Obama is now.

[Devout Centrist]

Please don't be Warren or Sanders.

[Tintrlvr]

Harris, no question. Sanders is way too old and also I feel would not be a very good executive. Warren has a lot of baggage that would make her a weak candidate.

Lack of experience is a positive for Harris, not a negative. Anyway, she'll be more experienced than Obama was.

No, it will be equal. Both served four years in the senate. Obama was also a state senator for seven years while Harris Attorney General of California for five years. But she would have more life experience in 2021 at the age of 56. She would be one year older than Obama is now.

State AG is definitely more experience than State Senate. There isn't a State Senator in the country who wouldn't consider state AG a trade-up. She also had other elected experience earlier as an elected DA. Not a huge difference, but the point is people talking about her inexperience are making a strange argument.

She is also older, but I was not considering that.