is the "but what about the constitution" argument a cop out? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 11:19:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  is the "but what about the constitution" argument a cop out? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: is the "but what about the constitution" argument a cop out?  (Read 1745 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,947
United States


WWW
« on: March 09, 2019, 01:13:00 PM »

The "living document" idea is ridiculous.  Great weight should be attached to the intent of the Framers, as they wrote the Constitution as an ongoing Framework to both organize government and limit government.

Judicial activism has given us Roe v. Wade.  It has also given us Citizens United.  Much to dislike on both sides.  The Judicial Activism wrought by the "Living Constitution" paradigm has negated the will of elected legislatures in favor of the will of an unelected Court.  There are times where that should be.  But we have gotten to the point where self-rule is a diminishing concept.   
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.