Paul, Santorum, Gingrich, and Huntsman: Mitt Romney's downfall (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 10:20:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Paul, Santorum, Gingrich, and Huntsman: Mitt Romney's downfall (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Paul, Santorum, Gingrich, and Huntsman: Mitt Romney's downfall  (Read 21911 times)
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« on: September 15, 2012, 11:02:06 PM »
I think Florida was supposed to allocate delegates proportionally, as no state could use a winner take all system til after April 1st. I don't know why the RNC never used its own rules. But this is great. I'm working on something similar.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2012, 06:24:08 PM »
This is great. But Huntsman is the one candidate that I and Obama was afraid of. He'll beat him sadly.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2012, 05:28:30 PM »
Couldn't Santorum have just not endorsed Huntsman and let the party activists nominate a "conservative"?
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2012, 06:22:51 PM »
Why does it seem like Samtorum is sapping more support from Obama than from Huntsman?
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2012, 02:40:01 PM »
1996 anyone?
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2012, 04:29:57 PM »
Unless Shumlin or Newsom get the Dem Nomination, because of the sorry batch of candidates I'd probably cross-over and vote Flake or Sandoval for President.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2012, 04:17:10 PM »
Can we see some head-to-head matchup polling. I'm convinced that unless we run Shumlin or Newsom, Cory Booker will be the nominee and we'll lose.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2012, 01:30:07 AM »
How did Shumlin lose NH? And how'd he win the PV by 5 points, but only the EV by 3?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 9 queries.