Wisconsin Senate Recall-a-palooza: 2012 Edition (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 03:04:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Wisconsin Senate Recall-a-palooza: 2012 Edition (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Wisconsin Senate Recall-a-palooza: 2012 Edition  (Read 96472 times)
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2011, 09:44:23 PM »

The Olsen/Clark race is past over.

King now up 52-48.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #26 on: August 09, 2011, 09:49:24 PM »

There's a black State Senator on MSNBC right now saying that one of the Milwaukee wards had 56 voters in the April Supreme Court race but had more than 1,000 (!) voters today.

I mention that she's black because low African-American turnout in the April race was what killed Kloppenberg.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #27 on: August 09, 2011, 09:53:57 PM »

AP added in the Fond du Lac numbers and Hopper is only ahead by 500.

ALL of Fond du Lac.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #28 on: August 09, 2011, 09:57:03 PM »

The Winnebago County website has a few more precincts in than the AP does and they have King going from 53% to 54%.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #29 on: August 09, 2011, 10:12:08 PM »

I know you shouldnt read too much into these elections, but the fact that the GOP is managing to do as well as they (especially with the tv drama of the angry left and protesting) are, should be an indication of how strong the GOP is in the state compared to even 10 years ago.  It bodes well for 2012.

With low turnout and $30 million spent, mostly from shadow right-wing groups, we shouldn't be surprised....

These are also all Republican districts with the exception of SD-32...
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #30 on: August 09, 2011, 10:15:36 PM »

This dude on MSNBC keeps claiming that Oshkosh hasn't reported yet which if true bodes very well for King.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #31 on: August 09, 2011, 10:18:04 PM »

The rest of Washington County just came in, Pasch is still up 51-49.

15 precincts left in Milwaukee; 15 precincts left in the suburbs.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #32 on: August 09, 2011, 10:18:58 PM »

Luther Olsen ended up only winning 52-48.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #33 on: August 10, 2011, 01:50:07 AM »

Good to see we picked up two but obviously a tad disappointing. However, this was just the appetizer. If this swing is extrapolated statewide it means Walker's recall next year will be a toss-up. I look forward to it.

Additionally, anyone trying to draw "messages" from this result - on either side - needs to stop. If 1,000 votes in SD-14 had flipped then this would have been heralded as the rebirth of the modern labor movement. Since that didn't happen it's apparently a rejection of Democratic politics and the power of organized labor and an endorsement of Walker's agenda. Both interpretations are foolish. These were six individual races with unique dynamics fought on a variety of issues. What happened happened.

J.J. has also really outdone himself in this thread. Your cluelessness knows no bounds, old chap!
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #34 on: August 10, 2011, 02:04:42 AM »
« Edited: August 10, 2011, 02:10:42 AM by Meeker »

Good to see we picked up two but obviously a tad disappointing. However, this was just the appetizer. If this swing is extrapolated statewide it means Walker's recall next year will be a toss-up. I look forward to it.

Additionally, anyone trying to draw "messages" from this result - on either side - needs to stop. If 1,000 votes in SD-14 had flipped then this would have been heralded as the rebirth of the modern labor movement. Since that didn't happen it's apparently a rejection of Democratic politics and the power of organized labor and an endorsement of Walker's agenda. Both interpretations are foolish. These were six individual races with unique dynamics fought on a variety of issues. What happened happened.


And, if a certain Senator hadn't had a marital split that may have resulted in his losing even less than a 1,000 voters, the message of this election to Democrats would have been "pound sand."

Yes. That's correct. Thank you for proving my point.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #35 on: August 10, 2011, 02:20:36 AM »

You clearly missed the point entirely. I guess that's why I have you on ignore and will continue to.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #36 on: August 17, 2011, 08:12:35 AM »

Final poll roundup:

SD-12
PPP: 55-41 Holperin (Holperin +14)
WAA: 51-49 Holperin (Holperin +2)
Final (more or less) result: 55-45 Holperin (Holperin +10)

PPP was off by 4, they weren't as far off as everyone thought. WAA was off by 8.

SD-22

PPP: 55-42 Wirch (Wirch +13)
Final result: 58-42 Wirch (Wirch +16)

And PPP underestimated Wirch a bit, but they were only off by 3.

lulz Krazen
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #37 on: June 05, 2012, 10:53:15 PM »

Comparing the precincts in that are in so far in SD-21 to their 2010 results actually has the Democrat doing well enough to win the seat if it's extrapolated out. No telling whether that will hold once the remaining 78% of precincts come in though.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #38 on: June 05, 2012, 11:07:31 PM »

... and now he's 1/4 of a percent below where he needs to be with a few more precincts reporting. Won't know this one for a while at the rate Racine County is counting.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #39 on: June 05, 2012, 11:32:29 PM »

... and now he's 1/4 of a percent below where he needs to be with a few more precincts reporting. Won't know this one for a while at the rate Racine County is counting.
How do you know which precincts are reporting, I thought you could only see the total county report?

http://www.elections.racineco.com/voting/index.aspx
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #40 on: June 06, 2012, 01:10:40 AM »

We won! The Democrat is ahead by 900 votes with one precinct left.

Cheesy
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #41 on: June 06, 2012, 01:19:06 AM »

We won! The Democrat is ahead by 900 votes with one precinct left.

Cheesy

It's not even close to over.  I have the Democrat up by 796 votes with two precincts left.  One of the precincts gave Walker a 800 vote margin in 2010... So...

Local paper disagrees: http://www.journaltimes.com/racine-county-recall-election-results/html_3bf1be68-ae8d-11e1-bcb9-001a4bcf887a.html
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #42 on: June 06, 2012, 01:20:58 AM »

Lehman and the DLCC have declared victory
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #43 on: June 06, 2012, 01:38:36 AM »

We won! The Democrat is ahead by 900 votes with one precinct left.

Cheesy

It's not even close to over.  I have the Democrat up by 796 votes with two precincts left.  One of the precincts gave Walker a 800 vote margin in 2010... So...

Local paper disagrees: http://www.journaltimes.com/racine-county-recall-election-results/html_3bf1be68-ae8d-11e1-bcb9-001a4bcf887a.html

825 doesn't equal 900 - and is closer to my 796 tally.

Anyway, if the missing precinct is the village of Waterford, it went to Walker by 854 and Kleefisch by 809 in this election.  The results for the SD-21 race are still missing.  Regardless of whether the margin is 796 or 825, it should be razor thin and go to absentees and a recount.

It's not in Waterford; it's a precinct in Mount Pleasent that Walker won by less than 100 votes in 2010 (933-853 to be exact).

Lehman will finish election night ahead by at least 650 votes.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #44 on: June 06, 2012, 01:43:33 AM »

Final election night results from Racine County:

LEHMAN (D): 36,255
WANGGAARD (R): 35,476   
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #45 on: June 06, 2012, 01:51:08 AM »

Final election night results from Racine County:

LEHMAN (D): 36,255
WANGGAARD (R): 35,476   
Freedom Fighters
So I am guessing nothing destructive will happen in WI until November now, or will Democrats cross the floor?

No State Senate Democrat who wants any political future whatsoever will touch anything that comes out of Scott Walker's office.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #46 on: June 06, 2012, 02:17:47 AM »

Final election night results from Racine County:

LEHMAN (D): 36,255
WANGGAARD (R): 35,476   
Freedom Fighters
So I am guessing nothing destructive will happen in WI until November now, or will Democrats cross the floor?

No State Senate Democrat who wants any political future whatsoever will touch anything that comes out of Scott Walker's office.

Another way of looking at this is that the Democratic State Senate caucus now consists of the Wisconsin 14 (who left for Illinois in 2011 to stall the collective bargaining bill) and three recall winners. Pretty safely anti-Walker crew.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #47 on: June 06, 2012, 09:31:11 PM »

Yeah, having a new set of voters recall someone that a different set of voters elected is pretty obviously not a fair thing.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 9 queries.