Any Strong opinions on who will win FL & Missouri Senate races? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 03:24:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Any Strong opinions on who will win FL & Missouri Senate races? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Any Strong opinions on who will win FL & Missouri Senate races?  (Read 2361 times)
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,774
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« on: November 21, 2017, 05:06:41 PM »

Nelson v. Scott will be tight, FL is polarized and Scott can outspend Nelson significantly. But on a good night for Dems, Nelson should pull it out.

McCaskill will lose unless Hawley loses the primary or has an Akin moment. Missouri has gone from a state that voted 5 points to the left of the nation in 1992, to voting 22 points to the right of the nation in 2016. In that time frame, it trended republican in every presidential election. In 2016, democrats were soundly defeated in all statewide races as the state decided that the time for downballot Dems had passed. It is clear that in 2018, all that is needed is a competent opponent to take down McCaskill and the state Auditor. The political climate holds no relevance as the state trended republican even in '08.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,774
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2017, 06:15:09 PM »
« Edited: November 21, 2017, 06:17:31 PM by Dwarven Dragon »

McCaskill will lose unless Hawley loses the primary or has an Akin moment. Missouri has gone from a state that voted 5 points to the left of the nation in 1992, to voting 22 points to the right of the nation in 2016. In that time frame, it trended republican in every presidential election. In 2016, democrats were soundly defeated in all statewide races as the state decided that the time for downballot Dems had passed. It is clear that in 2018, all that is needed is a competent opponent to take down McCaskill and the state Auditor. The political climate holds no relevance as the state trended republican even in '08.

What? Anyway, Kander came within 3 points of unseating Blunt in 2016, so MO is hardly "gone" for Ds in statewide/Senate races. It's just that McCaskill is a poor cultural fit for her state, if the Dems replaced her with a stronger candidate the race would probably be a Tossup (I mean, even with McCaskill running it is way too close for comfort!). Also, using your logic WV would be Safe R as well, but it obviously isn't.   

Missouri voted four points to the nation's right in 2004 and seven points to the nation's right in 2008. That's how Dave defines trending R, so it's the definition I use too. Also, Manchin being an actual moderate in a state that has yet to elect an R over an incumbent D for the Senate is why his race is a Toss-Up. Also notice I rate neither race Safe.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.