i understand why he was the leader. but he bores me. he doesnt have any passion about things. he reminds me of a robot.
Was Harry Reid the best man for the job considerring how important it is for the dems to fight and be tough in the senate? Harry Reid is running in 08 so i understand why he got the pick. But should we have picked someone with more passion and stubborness.
Harry Reid seems to be doing a fine job holding the caucus together in defeating any possibility that President Bush could privatize Social Security, and sowing dissensions in Republican ranks through his intransigence on refusing to compromise. i was skeptical of him at first, but after what i have seen over the past several months, i think he is the right man for the job. he should stay right where he is, and not run for any higher office. he is magnificent as minority leader, considering the straits the Democratic Party is in.