Well defense spending has been the biggest reason for the deficit and I guess i believe in letting the people have their own money to spend.
Yeah just keep building those deficits...
Well, that doesn't tell the entire story.
The Office of Management and Budget projected record federal budget deficits of $455 billion in 2003 and $475 billion in 2004.
The ratio of the budget surplus/deficit to GNP has fallen from being +2.4% in 2000 (a $236 billion surplus) .... to -4.2% for 2003 (a $455 billion deficit).
This -6.6% swing was accounted for in 3 ways.
1) 4.5% was due to lower revenues
2) 2.0% was due to increased non-defense spending
3) 1.0% was due to higher defense spending
Its true that defense is the single biggest spending program, but it is only 1/3 of the total spending increases. Since the expiration of the Budget Enforcement Act in September, spending discipline appears to be softening. Government spending ex-interest expense is now growing at a 7.5% annual rate. Some people blame this on existing programs, but even discretionary spending, the most easily controlled part of the budget, has increased at an 8.7% annual rate over the last three years after rising only 1.6% per annum over the preceding 10 years.
This leads to the question ... why is a Republican Congress, with a Republican President, spending more than it did with a Democratic President and more than the Democratic Congress did with a Democratic President?