Who will get a higher percentage of votes?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 10:06:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who will get a higher percentage of votes?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who will get a higher percentage of votes?
#1
Rick Santorum		  
#2
Mike McGavick		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Who will get a higher percentage of votes?  (Read 1681 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 21, 2006, 08:30:18 PM »
McGavick
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2006, 08:59:50 PM »
McGavick easily.
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2006, 09:02:37 PM »
Santorum.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,249
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2006, 09:05:12 PM »
Santorum, but only because there are no third parties in that race. McGavick will get a higher percentage of the two main parties vote.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2006, 01:06:13 AM »
Quote from: Red on October 21, 2006, 09:05:12 PM
Santorum, but only because there are no third parties in that race. McGavick will get a higher percentage of the two main parties vote.

Agreed
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2006, 03:41:07 AM »
Well my predictions are:

PENNSYLVANIA SENATE
Casey (D) 55%
Santorum (R) 45%

WASHINGTON SENATE
Cantwell (D) 52%
McGavick (R) 45%
Other 3%
Logged
merseysider
militant centrist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 524


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2006, 09:22:03 AM »
I would expect both to get very similar results, in the low-to-mid forties.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2006, 10:12:04 AM »
I'll say

Casey 54, Santorum 46
Cantwell 54, McGavick 44
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2006, 11:37:06 AM »
It'll be close, but I'd say McGavick, at least as a percentage of the two-party vote. As has been mentioned Santorum's actual percentage might be higher due to no 3rd parties but I think he'll lose by more than McGavick will.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2006, 01:29:11 PM »
obviously both will win. but santorum will break 60% against the silly populist, so ill vote for him.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2006, 07:13:42 PM »
McGavick

He could very well win.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2006, 12:20:16 AM »
Probably McGavick.


Uh, why?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 14 queries.