Opinion of texarkana

[Mr. Morden]

In addition to being creepy as hell, he's also an insufferable spammer. He's posted almost 700 times in November so far.

Would that have been a terribly unusual posting rate for you 10 years ago? 

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

In addition to being creepy as hell, he's also an insufferable spammer. He's posted almost 700 times in November so far.

How is that spamming? it's not like I'm just posting tons of one word comments or something. I try to post well thought-out comments and I only comment when I feel I can add something to the discussion.

[Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

how are Daesh beheading videos any different than what you'd see on gore sites? a lot of which is perfectly legal?

(not saying either is okay, nor is it even remotely something I'm interested in, just asking a general question).

That was the point I was making. Children are physically harmed in the making of child porn, and people are physically harmed in the making of terrorist propaganda videos as well. And by watching either you're satisfying a demand for that kind of content, and for more to be produced. That's why I think both should be legal to view.

Child pornography isn't made for terrorist propaganda purposes.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

how are Daesh beheading videos any different than what you'd see on gore sites? a lot of which is perfectly legal?

(not saying either is okay, nor is it even remotely something I'm interested in, just asking a general question).

That was the point I was making. Children are physically harmed in the making of child porn, and people are physically harmed in the making of terrorist propaganda videos as well. And by watching either you're satisfying a demand for that kind of content, and for more to be produced. That's why I think both should be legal to view.

Child pornography isn't made for terrorist propaganda purposes.

My point is that people are harmed in the making of either one, and if you watch either one you satiate a demand for more to be made.

[Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

how are Daesh beheading videos any different than what you'd see on gore sites? a lot of which is perfectly legal?

(not saying either is okay, nor is it even remotely something I'm interested in, just asking a general question).

That was the point I was making. Children are physically harmed in the making of child porn, and people are physically harmed in the making of terrorist propaganda videos as well. And by watching either you're satisfying a demand for that kind of content, and for more to be produced. That's why I think both should be legal to view.

Child pornography isn't made for terrorist propaganda purposes.

My point is that people are harmed in the making of either one, and if you watch either one you satiate a demand for more to be made.

There's a demand for terrorist propaganda videos?

[Mr. Morden]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

how are Daesh beheading videos any different than what you'd see on gore sites? a lot of which is perfectly legal?

(not saying either is okay, nor is it even remotely something I'm interested in, just asking a general question).

That was the point I was making. Children are physically harmed in the making of child porn, and people are physically harmed in the making of terrorist propaganda videos as well. And by watching either you're satisfying a demand for that kind of content, and for more to be produced. That's why I think both should be legal to view.

Child pornography isn't made for terrorist propaganda purposes.

My point is that people are harmed in the making of either one, and if you watch either one you satiate a demand for more to be made.

There's a demand for terrorist propaganda videos?

Even if there was, the argument makes no sense.  ISIS isn't selling their propaganda videos in the same way that child porn producers are selling theirs.  The latter make $ off of people watching their videos, while the former do not.  If I go to NBC News and they show me the latest video release from Baghdadi or Zawahiri, I am making NBC rich by doing so, not Baghdadi or Zawahiri.

[Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God]

Even if there was, the argument makes no sense.  ISIS isn't selling their propaganda videos in the same way that child porn producers are selling theirs.  The latter make $ off of people watching their videos, while the former do not.  If I go to NBC News and they show me the latest video release from Baghdadi or Zawahiri, I am making NBC rich by doing so, not Baghdadi or Zawahiri.

I mean, obviously there are sites like BestGore where one can go if they want to see that stuff.  But generally people aren't looking for internet moneys when that stuff is, uh, "produced."

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Well these results show that this forum has a bit more clarity in regards to him than they do in regards to "nice guy FF " jfern at least.

[Sir Mohamed]

Voted HP. Certainly he doesn't act like a grown-up, more like an immature 14 year old. The signature is foolish and bizarre, especially for a political forum.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Voted HP. Certainly he doesn't act like a grown-up, more like an immature 14 year old. The signature is foolish and bizarre, especially for a political forum.

You're obviously just offended by curvy black women.

[Sir Mohamed]

Voted HP. Certainly he doesn't act like a grown-up, more like an immature 14 year old. The signature is foolish and bizarre, especially for a political forum.

You're obviously just offended by curvy black women.

Like many other commentators? I think it's just not grown-up, especially in a political forum.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Voted HP. Certainly he doesn't act like a grown-up, more like an immature 14 year old. The signature is foolish and bizarre, especially for a political forum.

This is a fair statement. I do act rather childish at times.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Voted HP. Certainly he doesn't act like a grown-up, more like an immature 14 year old. The signature is foolish and bizarre, especially for a political forum.

You're obviously just offended by curvy black women.

Like many other commentators? I think it's just not grown-up, especially in a political forum.

Sarcasm. Some people have literally accused his detractors of not liking his sig or him for that exact reason.