Midwest Proposition Thread V (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 04:43:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Midwest Proposition Thread V (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Midwest Proposition Thread V  (Read 924 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: March 10, 2010, 02:59:55 PM »

Midwest Regional Legislature Act


Article I: Regional Legislative Authority
1. The legislative power of the Midwest shall be vested in the Midwest Regional Legislature.
2. The Regional Legislature shall be composed of four members, each of whom shall be registered citizens residing in the Midwest Region.
3. The Regional Legislature shall have the power to choose its own officers, including a Speaker, and judge the qualifications of its members.
4. Elections to the Regional Legislature shall take place on the second to last weekend of January, March, May, July, September, and November.
5. The method of election shall be approval voting.
6. In the event that more candidates are elected than there are seats to be filled, a runoff election shall be held the following weekend between all elected candidates with the fewest preferences.
7. In the runoff election, voters will only be allowed to preference one candidate.
8. If after the runoff election there is still more elected candidates than there are seats to be filled, then from among those elected candidates who are tied for the fewest preferences the winner(s) shall be determined by a game of chance agreed upon by all those candidates affected.
9. Vacancies in the Regional Legislature shall be filled in a manner specified by Law, and until such determination is made, by Gubernatorial appointment.

Article II: Legislation
1. All ordinary legislation shall first be considered in the Regional Legislature.
2. Legislation shall be considered by the Regional Legislature upon petition of any Regional Legislature member, the Governor, or two Midwest citizens.
3. Should the Regional Legislature pass ordinary legislation by a majority vote, then the Governor may sign such legislation into Law, or veto such legislation. A veto may be overturned upon the unanimous vote of the Regional Legislature.
4. The Governor shall have seven days to sign or veto ordinary legislation passed by the Regional Legislature. After seven days, legislation which the Governor has not signed or vetoed shall be considered as Law.
5. Should the Regional Legislature pass legislation that subsequently enters law, whether sign by the governor or via a veto override, and a group of 3 or more citizens publicly protest the measure in either the Midwest Regional Legislature or a separate thread, a public referendum shall be held on that legislation.
Opposed. We ought all to remain legislators.

Because That's Just Cruel

The intentional killing of wolves for any reason in the Midwest shall be illegal. Violating this law will result in up to six months in jail and/or a $50,000 fine. Killing in self defense or the defense of another   shall not violate this law.
Wolves do not attack people. Strike the dumbass edit if you don't want to be laughed at.

Now, wolves are not actually an almost eradicated species across much of the Midwest I suppose, and thus the situation is very different from the situation in Germany. (Here, I do not think the legal distinction between the murder of a man and the murder of a wolf is justified.)
Maybe put something in to the effect that the purpose of the law is to facilitate the spread of wolves to areas they were formerly extinct in, and that it does not apply in areas where there always has been a healthy wolf population?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

x Lewis Trondheim

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Well intentioned, but not likely to have any effect in practice. And I'm not sufficiently versed to write legislation that would.
Transportation though. ie, vehicular transportation of live mammals to slaughter. We might require a strict maximum distance here. Actually I suppose "nearest slaughterhouse + x%" sounds about right.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.