Recent Posts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 04:27:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Filter Options Collapse
        


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 04:24:55 PM 
Started by Burke Bro - Last post by heatcharger
If Trump wins and does a good job in his second term then I will gladly support him if he wants a third term. There might be a way around the 22nd Amendment by nominating a puppet Republican nominee and putting Trump in as VP and market the ticket as Trump's 3rd term. Then if they win, the President resigns, and Trump takes power. This would likely have to go to court because the 22nd Amendment talks about being "elected" specifically but not necessarily the office itself. 

If Trump wins and he likely will Republicans will ignore the 22nd amendment and nominate him for a third term if he wants it.

We live in interesting times. We’ll have to take a look.

 2 
 on: Today at 04:24:54 PM 
Started by lfromnj - Last post by dead0man
Its pretty frightening that a majority of this forum support physical assault of people that are annoying.
well no one is doing that for people being "annoying", do you want to try again?

 3 
 on: Today at 04:24:42 PM 
Started by Smash255 - Last post by Smash255
Meant to post this last week, but damn on the 15th, I hit the 20 year mark posting on here.   Not quite as active on the site as I use to be, but wow that's a long time.  Makes me feel old  Smiley

 4 
 on: Today at 04:22:20 PM 
Started by Burke Bro - Last post by ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
If the loophole is allowed, I don't see how it's not supporting the constitution.
Supporting a Trump third term in any way is unconstitutional.

Also, if Trump is allowed to be president for a third term, do you think that he will ever leave office? Yeah right.

 5 
 on: Today at 04:21:29 PM 
Started by Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon - Last post by West_Midlander
Nay

 6 
 on: Today at 04:18:25 PM 
Started by Meclazine for Israel - Last post by Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
There's huge protests in Tunisia about African migrants trying to get to Europe but then just staying in Tunisia.

In that contet I should mention that the Bourguibist tour guide was an at-least-second-generation Sahelian or Tuareg Tunisian who was an avowed atheist and disapproved of Muslims and Christians equally because "all used African slave labor".

 7 
 on: Today at 04:17:55 PM 
Started by Burke Bro - Last post by Duke of York
If Trump wins and does a good job in his second term then I will gladly support him if he wants a third term. There might be a way around the 22nd Amendment by nominating a puppet Republican nominee and putting Trump in as VP and market the ticket as Trump's 3rd term. Then if they win, the President resigns, and Trump takes power. This would likely have to go to court because the 22nd Amendment talks about being "elected" specifically but not necessarily the office itself.  

If Trump wins and he likely will Republicans will ignore the 22nd amendment and nominate him for a third term if he wants it.

 8 
 on: Today at 04:17:22 PM 
Started by Obama24 - Last post by Hindsight was 2020
Crimea+Donetsk+Luhansk going to Russia and Ukraine joining NATO (or some other defensive agreement that has teeth to ensure this doesn't happen again) is the absolute floor. Ideally of course, Russia leaving entirely and Ukraine joining NATO, but that seems unlikely.

One of the few serious posts here and about what I would say.

Good lord Putin got under you guys's skin with the election interference stuff which is about the only reason I can think of why you're being so intense about this. You wuss out in Afghanistan, want Israel to roll over and just let Hamas take over their country, but then you don't want Ukraine to give up one foot of land even if it means WWII casualties. Some of you are even talking about regime change in Russia which presumably means starting WWIII and invading and hoping it goes better than all the other times in history that's been tried.

As I've said before if this is what it looks like when you're on someone's side in a war than you clearly weren't on the US's side against the Taliban in Afghanistan.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucha_massacre Now kindly go shove it

Well the Taliban committed all kinds of atrocities against civilians and it took significantly less loss of life to stop them than it would for the kind of total victory against Russia that all of you seem to want here. Yet most of you were fine letting them take over Afghanistan, it's not logical so have those two positions in concert, there's just some kind of emotional bias here.
Or Afghanistan was a 20 year, several thousand US troops died, trillion dollar project that ended up being in vain as the local population didn’t care if the Taliban was in charge or not vs Ukraine a 3 year war, no U.S. troop death project for a country that actually wants to fight the enemy. But why worry about details when you can do a fake virtual signal like a douche

 9 
 on: Today at 04:16:57 PM 
Started by GAinDC - Last post by Beet
The less you've been indoctrinated by Mockingbird media, the more likely you are to support Trump.

That's what I was about to say. The more you receive news from centralized establishment sources, one could say soft propaganda, the more pro Biden you are. This is a major advantage for Biden in this election. It's almost impossible for anyone to get elected president in the face of a strong media onslaught.

 10 
 on: Today at 04:16:04 PM 
Started by GAinDC - Last post by Duke of York
is this a general election for this seat?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.