Quinnnipiac national poll: Sanders leads all GOPers; Clinton only leads Trump
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 07, 2024, 08:55:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Quinnnipiac national poll: Sanders leads all GOPers; Clinton only leads Trump
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Quinnnipiac national poll: Sanders leads all GOPers; Clinton only leads Trump  (Read 2551 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2016, 09:10:48 PM »

You know what's going to be insufferable? If Hillary loses the general, all we're going to hear about is how we would've won in a landslide had we nominated Sanders instead, using polls conducted 8-9 months before the election as "evidence." Roll Eyes

Even if Hillary wins, we'll probably still hear about how we would've won the Senate and House in a landslide too if only we nominated Bernie and swept to victory on his 400+ EV coattails.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2016, 01:30:35 AM »

I doubt that these bad numbers would hold for Clinton. She has been held to the most scrutiny.

Her numbers are 37-58...how could she bounce back from that in a general??

This is one poll. I highly doubt her favorability ratings are actually that low. Even so, she could certainly improve them, and low favorability ratings don't doom every candidate.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,782


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2016, 02:14:30 AM »

I doubt that these bad numbers would hold for Clinton. She has been held to the most scrutiny.

Her numbers are 37-58...how could she bounce back from that in a general??

This is one poll. I highly doubt her favorability ratings are actually that low. Even so, she could certainly improve them, and low favorability ratings don't doom every candidate.

They are pretty bad in other polls, too. Her ratings will be a massive liability in the general election.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,968
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 20, 2016, 06:08:27 AM »
« Edited: February 20, 2016, 06:11:39 AM by Da-Jon »

Bernie Sanders or Clinton has the hard core Dem base to vote for them. And other than Pa or Iowa being a tossup, Demsare closer to the 272 electors needed for the win.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,152
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 21, 2016, 09:56:48 AM »

"Establishment" politicians of both the GOP and the Democratic Party are doing badly this year.  Hillary Clinton is as Establishment as they get.

It could be in her case that the Clinton coalition is no more. It could not get Al Gore elected. Kerry did worse in trying to resuscitate it. Obama got clobbered by margins larger than 10% in five states (Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia that Clinton won) -- twice. Democrats have a better chance of winning Virginia (a state that neither Carter nor Clinton carried) than any of the New Orleans-Charleston (WV) arc.

At this point I practically see Hillary Clinton losing much like Kerry in 2004 -- but Bernie Sanders winning much like Obama in 2008 or 2012.

Agree.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,782


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 22, 2016, 09:12:24 PM »

You know what's going to be insufferable? If Hillary loses the general, all we're going to hear about is how we would've won in a landslide had we nominated Sanders instead, using polls conducted 8-9 months before the election as "evidence." Roll Eyes

Even if Hillary wins, we'll probably still hear about how we would've won the Senate and House in a landslide too if only we nominated Bernie and swept to victory on his 400+ EV coattails.

You're already preparing for how to ignore the people saying "We told you so"? Not good.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 13 queries.