DWS: superdelegates exist to stop grassroot activists (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 09:23:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  DWS: superdelegates exist to stop grassroot activists (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: DWS: superdelegates exist to stop grassroot activists  (Read 3428 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« on: February 13, 2016, 07:58:00 AM »
« edited: February 13, 2016, 08:01:47 AM by Mr. Morden »

My God, Hillary wouldn't want to win off the back of superdelegates. If that looks like it'll happen, then whatever happens, HRC won't be the nominee.

I think the point is that the choice won't be up to her because the superdelegates, realizing that creating 1968 redux would look terrible and damage her electability so that it would be worse than that of Sanders, won't actually back her if Sanders is the pledged delegate winner.

Thus, sure, the rules are the rules and she's entitled to take a victory via superdelegates.  But it wouldn't happen, because the superdelegates wouldn't go through with it*.

* Should clarify: They wouldn't go through with it, unless some kind of John Edwards 2008-esque scandal befalls Sanders after the primary is over.  Sure, if people vote, and a majority pick one candidate, and then before the convention some huge scandal come out about the presumptive nominee, then in *that* case the superdelegates could overturn the verdict of the primary voters.  But otherwise, I don't see it happening.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2016, 08:12:05 AM »

My God, Hillary wouldn't want to win off the back of superdelegates. If that looks like it'll happen, then whatever happens, HRC won't be the nominee.

To be fair, could such a result be compared with Bill Shorten winning the parliamentary caucus but not the membership?

It's not really comparable, since in Australian political culture, there is not a similar expectation that the party leader is chosen "by the people".  Whatever the intent was when the current party nomination rules were being written decades ago, the American electorate now has the expectation that they get to pick presidential party nominees in some kind of "democratic" manner, even if they don't understand the nuts and bolts of it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.