NY-20 Special Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 05:02:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NY-20 Special Election (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: NY-20 Special Election  (Read 179576 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« on: March 19, 2009, 07:22:31 PM »

No matter who wins, this race means little to nothing.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2009, 08:27:27 PM »

No matter who wins, this race means little to nothing.

Ah. Tedisco is struggling then...

Actually, I think he is still favored, but one district doesn't mean anything in terms of national momentum.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2009, 06:48:28 PM »

He was basically saying that there are more important things to worry about than Rush Limbaugh.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2009, 08:35:31 PM »

The AP is reporting that a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit could delay next week’s special election in the 20th CD.

Here’s the story:

ALBANY — A U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit could delay next week’s special election in the 20th Congressional District because military and overseas absentee voters might not have enough time for their votes to be counted.

The complaint says the Department of Defense has determined that overseas voters need at least 30 days to receive and return ballots. The DoD recommends at least 45 days.

In New York, a special election must happen within 30 days of the governor calling for it. The ballot for this vote was certified March 11.

Republican Jim Tedisco is running against Democrat Scott Murphy in the March 31 election.

The state Board of Elections is still reviewing the complaint. No court date has been set.

Calls to the Department of Justice weren’t immediately returned.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2009, 07:37:46 AM »

I'm expecting a close race, +/- 3 points either way.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2009, 08:41:43 AM »

Ugh.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2009, 09:46:03 AM »

I'm just mad that Tedisco is giving up 27% of Republicans. He must utterly suck.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2009, 05:52:17 PM »

Stupid ad. Just stupid. I swear the GOP loves losing elections. Complete morons.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2009, 11:11:05 AM »

My prediction(as of now): Murphy by 2.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2009, 11:50:45 AM »

RowanBrandon's Election Rule #1:
Once a candidate starts commenting on public polls, said candidate will lose.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2009, 12:06:43 PM »

Isn't that one of J.J.'s rules, Rowan?

It might be. But it fits perfectly.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2009, 04:46:43 PM »

Tedisco doing "Miles for Middle Class" Night Shift tonight from 8 PM- 6 AM, according to his Twitter.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2009, 04:52:07 PM »


I think thats what Tedisco calls his tours of the district visiting residents.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2009, 06:56:22 PM »


I think thats what Tedisco calls his tours of the district visiting residents.
Wow... what a bad time to do it. No one's gonna be out from like 11pm - 6am.....

If he wanted to GOTV, he could've done it like, during the day. Tongue

No one ever said this guy was the brightest campaigner. Smiley
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2009, 12:13:26 PM »

Sources are telling me a 4-6 point win for Murphy tonight...
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2009, 02:28:36 PM »

Let's do some math, shall we? Number of absentees submitted by party:

Democrat: 2,105

Republican: 2,863

Other: 904(includes Independents, Conservative Party, Independence Party, Working Families party)

Let's say Tedisco wins 70% of the Rep vote(reasonable), and Murphy gets 90% of the Dem vote(reasonable), and the "other" splits 50/50(again reasonable), Tedisco wins by 100 votes.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2009, 02:33:18 PM »

Let's do some math, shall we? Number of absentees submitted by party:

Democrat: 2,105

Republican: 2,863

Other: 904(includes Independents, Conservative Party, Independence Party, Working Families party)

Let's say Tedisco wins 70% of the Rep vote(reasonable), and Murphy gets 90% of the Dem vote(reasonable), and the "other" splits 50/50(again reasonable), Tedisco wins by 100 votes.

Where did you get those absentee numbers?

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M2Q1MjdiOGQ2NTAyNGZmOTAyM2E5NGNhODkzZTg2NzE=
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2009, 02:36:56 PM »

Let's do some math, shall we? Number of absentees submitted by party:

Democrat: 2,105

Republican: 2,863

Other: 904(includes Independents, Conservative Party, Independence Party, Working Families party)

Let's say Tedisco wins 70% of the Rep vote(reasonable), and Murphy gets 90% of the Dem vote(reasonable), and the "other" splits 50/50(again reasonable), Tedisco wins by 100 votes.

But a hundred votes is practically nowt when over a hundred thousand have been cast in total.

He would win though. That's my point.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2009, 02:43:39 PM »

Let's do some math, shall we? Number of absentees submitted by party:

Democrat: 2,105

Republican: 2,863

Other: 904(includes Independents, Conservative Party, Independence Party, Working Families party)

Let's say Tedisco wins 70% of the Rep vote(reasonable), and Murphy gets 90% of the Dem vote(reasonable), and the "other" splits 50/50(again reasonable), Tedisco wins by 100 votes.

That's reasonable, but it's just a fucking mindless guess as to what the breakdown will be.  Those numbers could easily be adjusted to other reasonable numbers that would show Murphy gaining.  If we're using the district as a  base, Murphy did better among Independents.  Remember that Murphy ended up winning on election night despite the fact that far more Republican ballots were cast than Democratic ones.


How do we know Murphy did better among Independents? There's no confirmation of that. No exit polls were taken.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2009, 02:48:07 PM »

Well, we do have normal polls, which count for something (exit polls are flawed too).  And we have the raw facts on the ground that the Republicans enjoy a significant registration advantage.

I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that Murphy likely won Independents, either that, or did freakishly well among Republicans.  Either way, your assumptions about what leads to a narrow Tedisco win, while reasonable, aren't the only reasonable prediction out there.  I could slightly adjust your numbers to something else "reasonable" and Murphy would end up winning.  To just make a random crapshoot guess and then declare flatly that "Tedisco will win" is an exercise is ridiculousness


I didn't say he will win, I said using that projection he would win by 100 votes. Also the Siena poll had Tedisco up 45-44 among Independents...
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2009, 02:50:56 PM »

what will RowanBrandon say if the Democrat wins here, considering Murphy was ahead on election night?

Was it still rigged?

This isn't a recount. These are votes still needing to be counted. If Murphy's up when these ballots are counted than so be it.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2009, 05:52:06 PM »

what will RowanBrandon say if the Democrat wins here, considering Murphy was ahead on election night?

Was it still rigged?

This isn't a recount. These are votes still needing to be counted. If Murphy's up when these ballots are counted than so be it.

Now you're contradicting yourself.

You were complaining that Coleman's lead went down from 700 to 200 or something like that between election night and the begin of the recount, implying that such changes were not normal.

Now what if Tedisco jumps into the lead before the count is over? How is that different?

I never said anything about that part of the count. Maybe someone else did, but I didn't. What I objected to was the actual recount portion.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #22 on: April 03, 2009, 03:47:11 PM »

The Albany Project:

I'm hearing from a tipster in Washington County that, due to a reporting error on election night that has now been rectified, Scott Murphy just picked up a net of 198 votes. Says the tipster, the news "took the wind right out" of the Republican observers.

There's still thousands of absentee votes to count, but the bigger the cushion Murphy has before then the better.

This is huge news.

http://www.thealbanyproject.com/diary/6198/ny20-wow-murphy-picks-up-198-votes-in-washington-county
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #23 on: April 03, 2009, 04:32:08 PM »

Confirmed. Murphy gains 198.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/murphy-picks-up-198-votes-as-county-fixes-errors.php
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #24 on: April 03, 2009, 04:35:20 PM »


A few more counties are still canvassing including the rest of Columbia where Murphy gained the 198. Saratoga still has to recanvass so maybe there is a big chunk of Tedisco votes out there somewhere.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.