2000: A third Clinton term (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 04:15:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  2000: A third Clinton term (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2000: A third Clinton term  (Read 2587 times)
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


« on: December 21, 2010, 03:46:10 PM »

1) A comfortable victory, although probably less so then in 1992 or 1996. He gets a majority of the vote for the first time, however. Republicans, likely, would hang the "he lied" over his head and there might be some negative fallout for trying for another term. Nader still runs.



I would imagine something like this, give or take a few states. So, he ends up with 349 Electoral Votes. And considering that the GOP lost seats in 2000, I think that there is a realistic possibility that the House goes Democratic.

2) His third term probably would not be much different then Bush's, except for no Bush Tax Cuts and no Invasion of Iraq. His approval would sag a bit during the recession, but 9/11 would launch his approval rating into the stratosphere.

3) Who knows? Clinton may want to try again if it looks like he can win. The man still, obviously, wants to be president. If not him, then Gore, probably. Gore would lose. Clinton would, likely, face Clinton-fatigue and a closer election. Probably a tossup should Clinton decide to run again.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.