MO-SEN 2018: The Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 09:43:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MO-SEN 2018: The Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Rate this race
#1
Safe D
 
#2
Likely D
 
#3
Lean D
 
#4
Tilt D
 
#5
Tossup
 
#6
Tilt R
 
#7
Lean R
 
#8
Likely R
 
#9
Safe R
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 284

Author Topic: MO-SEN 2018: The Megathread  (Read 131672 times)
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« on: July 11, 2018, 09:40:07 AM »


Yeah, starting to see McCaskill as lean D. IN and ND need more help.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2018, 09:28:21 PM »

Well the primary is Tuesday. I've sort of been wondering if Hawley might actually lose. I don't think there is actually that much enthusiasm for him among Republican primary voters, and I have seen a lot of signs touting other candidates.
It would be hilarious if he loses, that would ensure a D hold on MO.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2018, 03:38:03 PM »

Remington GOP Internals:

Early July 2017
Hawley 50-44

Mid August 2017
Hawley 50-45

Mid October 2017
Hawley 48-45

Early January 2018
Hawley 49-45

Early July 2018
Hawley 48-46

Early August 2018
47-47 tie

these are Republican internals, keep that in mind...

pattern?









But muh MO +20 Trump

But muh Claire didnt vote for Gorsch

But muh excellent candidate Hawley

On a more serious note, Hawley really is blowing this race. Not only is his own internals going against him, but based on the primary, which was 53R-47D overall, it seems that Claire will have an easier time than thought.

This race is starting to lose its tossup nature, but IN.....
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2018, 03:40:57 PM »

Remington GOP Internals:

Early July 2017
Hawley 50-44

Mid August 2017
Hawley 50-45

Mid October 2017
Hawley 48-45

Early January 2018
Hawley 49-45

Early July 2018
Hawley 48-46

Early August 2018
47-47 tie

these are Republican internals, keep that in mind...

pattern?









But muh MO +20 Trump

But muh Claire didnt vote for Gorsch

But muh excellent candidate Hawley

On a more serious note, Hawley really is blowing this race. Not only is his own internals going against him, but based on the primary, which was 53R-47D overall, it seems that Claire will have an easier time than thought.

This race is starting to lose its tossup nature, but IN.....

Bruh, even I think we hold this seat lol and I'm the Balderson by 6 and Moore by 8 guy lol.
heh, yeah.

Im starting to see the only possible seats that will flip from our column being IN, and ND, and those states have no polling so I could be incredibly wrong about that.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2018, 03:57:21 PM »

Remington GOP Internals:

Early July 2017
Hawley 50-44

Mid August 2017
Hawley 50-45

Mid October 2017
Hawley 48-45

Early January 2018
Hawley 49-45

Early July 2018
Hawley 48-46

Early August 2018
47-47 tie

these are Republican internals, keep that in mind...

pattern?









But muh MO +20 Trump

But muh Claire didnt vote for Gorsch

But muh excellent candidate Hawley

On a more serious note, Hawley really is blowing this race. Not only is his own internals going against him, but based on the primary, which was 53R-47D overall, it seems that Claire will have an easier time than thought.

This race is starting to lose its tossup nature, but IN.....

Bruh, even I think we hold this seat lol and I'm the Balderson by 6 and Moore by 8 guy lol.
heh, yeah.

Im starting to see the only possible seats that will flip from our column being IN, and ND, and those states have no polling so I could be incredibly wrong about that.

I think I migt change my Cramer by 8 prediction because it is starting to sound a bit ridiculous, I'm thinking 3-4 points for Cramer now, but I have no idea about IN. I've heard they have had really draconian polling laws or something like that which is why we really don't have enough data to accurately characterize this race. Rn I would say Braun by a point, but I really think we need more info to really characterize this race well, and also the factor of how involved will Pence get in this race.
Both states are terrible with polling. In ND, registration doesnt exist, and so poll samples are always off. This is the reason Heidi was trianged in 2012, because polling showed her consistently 6 points down, and, well, you know what happened.

In IN, calling is not allowed, so polls are terribley expensive to do, so the only polls we get out of there are Gravis, which is not the best in terms of quality.

For all I know, we could be leading in both states and sitting on a senate majority, but I dont know, because the polling sucks.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2018, 04:14:39 PM »

Lol...Hawley got snubbed


whoa, thats like, Trump's best demographic
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2018, 08:08:21 PM »

Wow, Claire wont vote for a man whos having a sexual assault charge, how terrible. Its not like polling has shown that voting for Kavenaugh would be worse for her than voting for him. Yeah, this is a likely R race now, Bagel is right, as always. /s
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2018, 10:02:57 PM »

Wow, Claire wont vote for a man whos having a sexual assault charge, how terrible. Its not like polling has shown that voting for Kavenaugh would be worse for her than voting for him. Yeah, this is a likely R race now, Bagel is right, as always. /s

I said Lean R and you know it.

Nah, its definitely likely R, Bagel, for once you may be incorrect. You see, even though Claire has lead in polling, fundraising, and has the advantage, the court seat that Democrats care more about than Republicans will juice up turnout for Rs, causing Claire to lose, cause she didnt win that one Conservative, Trump supporting Republican who was "undecided". We should just swear in Hawley now, saves the trouble of counting votes. /s
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2018, 08:51:22 PM »

ooooof


cool story bro.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2018, 10:12:15 PM »

Take this with a grain of salt, but apparently there’s quite a big discrepancy between public polls and R internal tracking here:



Cool, R internals are a good way to judge this race.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2018, 08:00:13 PM »

Just FYI... for St. Louis County, MO which Claire may need to win nearly 2 to 1 to win statewide that there is a correlation between how trumpy an area is and how many bunnies you see in the wild. The more  bunnies there are the more trumpy it is.

Didnt know the Boston Suburbs were hardcore Trumpers.....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 13 queries.