muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
Posts: 16,816
|
 |
« on: June 09, 2012, 09:07:07 PM » |
|
I find the phrase largely unhelpful. Under the doctrine of Casey v Planned Parenthood which largely supplanted Roe v Wade the question should be when does the state's interest in the fetus exceed the woman's right to privacy. There is a great deal of law pertaining to the definition of the state's interest at the end of life. Under Casey, we have failed to recognize that one can apply a parallel standard to the onset of life for the question of law.
|
