SB 19-36: Lacey Jones Needs Help Act (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 07:44:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 19-36: Lacey Jones Needs Help Act (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 19-36: Lacey Jones Needs Help Act (Failed)  (Read 960 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: August 08, 2019, 08:48:02 PM »

Quote from: Amendment Offered based on House debate
LACEY JONES NEEDS HELP ACT

Quote
SECTION I: NAME
a. This act shall be known as the Lacey Jones Needs Help Act

SECTION II: LACEY ACYT REFORMS
a. The regulations required under the Lacey Act shall not apply to hardwood trees or products thereof. 16 USC 3371 - 3378 shall be amended accordingly.
b. The regulations required under the Lacey Act for applying foreign law shall only consider environmental and conservation laws. 16 USC 3371 – 3378.

SECTION III: JONES ACYT REFORM
a. The regulations on foreign vessels or domestic vessels without a requisite percentage of Atlasian crew members on engaging in cabotage in Atlasia is hereby repealed. 46 U.S.C. § 55102 - 55113, 46 U.S.C. § 55116 - 55122, 46 U.S.C. § 8103, and 46 U.S.C. § 12103 (Jones Act) is hereby repealed.

SECTION IV: TIMING
a. This act shall go into effect ninety (90) days after the date of passage.
House of Representatives
Passed in the House of Representatives 6-2-0-1

X YE
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2019, 03:20:48 AM »

AYE
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2019, 12:47:48 AM »


As long as a quorum is present, then yes, even a 1-1 should as far as I know constitute a tie to be broken by the VP. The two affirmed abstentions (by which I mean they actually posted abstentions instead of not voting) would count towards the quorum.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.