UNH-NH: Obama leads by nine percent

[krazen1211]

Registered Democrat 96% 3% 1% 235
Registered Undeclared 80% 11% 9% 295
Registered Republican 90% 4% 6% 207



Lol, junk. This poll does not reflect the war on whites.

[krazen1211]

Registered Democrat 96% 3% 1% 235
Registered Undeclared 80% 11% 9% 295
Registered Republican 90% 4% 6% 207



Lol, junk. This poll does not reflect the war on whites.

krazen, in which universe are Democrats waging a "war on whites?" Think carefully; the answer is not 'reality' or 'this one.'

To quote you liberals and use your logic:

The universe in which a half dozen national pollsters have whites voting Republican by 20 points.



Obviously then, this poll is absurd due to a heavy mispolling of whites. Republicans have a large edge in voter registration in New Hampshire.

[krazen1211]

Registered Democrat 96% 3% 1% 235
Registered Undeclared 80% 11% 9% 295
Registered Republican 90% 4% 6% 207



Lol, junk. This poll does not reflect the war on whites.

"War on whites".

..........

.........



Racist p.o.s.

Hmm? What is racist about pointing out the fact that this junk poll polls more Registered Democrats than Registered Republicans in a state that has more Registered Republicans than Registered Democrats?

PPP correctly pointed out that the Democratic party's collapse with whites in this nation is likely to be reflected in New Hampshire.

[krazen1211]

You really don't see what's racist about announcing there's a "war on whites" in this country? Don't act like that comment was anything close to dispassionate "boservation" about the presidential race in NH.

You've let your sheet show too many times in public to pretend otherwise, you goon.

What is racist exactly when Romney is winning whites by margins not seen since 1984 in the latest polls?

[krazen1211]

You really don't see what's racist about announcing there's a "war on whites" in this country? Don't act like that comment was anything close to dispassionate "boservation" about the presidential race in NH.

You've let your sheet show too many times in public to pretend otherwise, you goon.

What is racist exactly when Romney is winning whites by margins not seen since 1984 in the latest polls?

Please Kraven, explain in as much detail as your notorious level of scrupulousness will allow, what do YOU see as the ongoing "war on whites"?

I suspect the answer is the policies of 2009-2010 signed and enacted by Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama. The result was a skyhigh performance among white voters by the Republican party.

[krazen1211]

Can you list specifics of these policies that constituted a 'war on whites', and elaborate on how they constituted one?

I suspect that some of those policies included free cash for the teachers unions, free cash for the autoworkers unions, an attempt at free cash for the environmentalists, free cash for these green energy lobbying companies, and free cash for the recipients of the explosion in welfare spending.

Meanwhile, married Joes and Janes in the 53% felt that such was not consistent with their ideals of government and they would have to pay for all that stuff. And, the San Francisco social agenda was not consistent with their faith. Thus, whites had to flee to the Republican party to get the draconian spending cuts.

[krazen1211]

Can you list specifics of these policies that constituted a 'war on whites', and elaborate on how they constituted one?

I suspect that some of those policies included free cash for the teachers unions, free cash for the autoworkers unions, an attempt at free cash for the environmentalists, free cash for these green energy lobbying companies, and free cash for the recipients of the explosion in welfare spending.

Meanwhile, married Joes and Janes in the 53% felt that such was not consistent with their ideals of government and they would have to pay for all that stuff. And, the San Francisco social agenda was not consistent with their faith. Thus, whites had to flee to the Republican party to get the draconian spending cuts.

Yes, yes, I've heard all of these talking points before, even the whimsical idea that happening to be in one of the economic classes that pay federal income tax somehow makes one an ontologically better citizen or person, but how is any of this relevant to race?

Well, those Joes and Janes are overwhelmingly white. I suppose they could be considered collateral damage rather than intended targets.