Beth Fukumoto switching parties (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 08:34:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Beth Fukumoto switching parties (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Beth Fukumoto switching parties  (Read 4619 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: February 04, 2017, 04:54:10 PM »

FF! Hope she gives Gabbard a nice primary challenge.
Tulsi should also switch parties.
No Tulsi is a Democrat in that she is Center-Left.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2017, 04:57:56 PM »

Very sad that the GOP is becoming increasingly homogenous in it's thinking, background, and makeup.

Moderate/Pragmatic Republicans are being stabbed to death with a rusty knife.
No she didn't leave the Party due to idealogical differences she left or is leaving because of Trump. I respect her decision.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2017, 05:03:13 PM »

Someday the moderates in the Hawaii Democratic Party are going to become Republicans.  After the Northern Strategy phase is over the GOP will be competitive there again.

Not sure. They have no stimulus for that. Just as Southern conservatives win nothing now from becoming Democrats, or Massachusetts (or Rhode Island or Vermont) moderates - from becoming Republicans. It's much more profitable for southern conservatives to remain Republicans, and for Massachusetts (and other) moderates - Democrats. The same in Hawaii

The Democratic Party will eventually move too far left and will alienate the moderate Democrats in Hawaii.

For the record, I'm predicting this to happen after 2040.

And Republican - move too far to the right to alienate relatively moderate Republicans in South Carolina?Huh?

I doubt it.  After Republicans realize the Northern Strategy was a bad idea, they will drop the anti-immigration rhetoric and will be more inclusive in some respects.
Most dropped the anti-Immigration Rhetoric after 2014 except for Trump. What is the Northern Strategy anyway? Its not like Republican Presidential Candidates are going to be winning a lot of Northeastern States anytime soon.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2017, 05:16:17 PM »

Someday the moderates in the Hawaii Democratic Party are going to become Republicans.  After the Northern Strategy phase is over the GOP will be competitive there again.

Not sure. They have no stimulus for that. Just as Southern conservatives win nothing now from becoming Democrats, or Massachusetts (or Rhode Island or Vermont) moderates - from becoming Republicans. It's much more profitable for southern conservatives to remain Republicans, and for Massachusetts (and other) moderates - Democrats. The same in Hawaii

The Democratic Party will eventually move too far left and will alienate the moderate Democrats in Hawaii.

For the record, I'm predicting this to happen after 2040.

And Republican - move too far to the right to alienate relatively moderate Republicans in South Carolina?Huh?

I doubt it.  After Republicans realize the Northern Strategy was a bad idea, they will drop the anti-immigration rhetoric and will be more inclusive in some respects.
Most dropped the anti-Immigration Rhetoric after 2014 except for Trump. What is the Northern Strategy anyway? Its not like Republican Presidential Candidates are going to be winning a lot of Northeastern States anytime soon.

The Northern Strategy involves dropping traditional social issues and becoming populist.  The idea is that immigrants are eternal enemies of the GOP, and that instead of minority outreach, Republicans need to appeal to white Democrats.
Well you want to appeal to some White Democrats so that isn't a bad idea.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2017, 05:18:43 PM »

Yea, the Northern Strategy is not one I support. It may have worked in 2016, but it won't long term.

Minority Outreach is a must have for a future GOP.
Well I call that "The Rust Belt Strategy" in 2016 and not a "Northern Strategy" since that sounds like you want to win Northeastern States which the GOP has no interest in unless its PA(a Rust Belt State) or NH.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2017, 06:07:14 PM »

Whatever, won't miss her. Not like we will compete anytime soon in Hawaii.

Yeah. You value right-wingers only. Religious bigots, Trumpish idiots and their like. 40 years ago Republicans had Jacob Javits and Clifford Case, while Democrats - Bob Stump and Phil Gramm. And it was good and interesting. Now - yawn. In most cases there are 2 hordes of fanatics..
Yeah call it the "missing middle" if you will in both parties but activists on both the right and left control both parties right now.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2017, 06:18:17 PM »
« Edited: February 04, 2017, 06:37:32 PM by hopper »

But, certain politicians will always be exceptions to the rule. Beth Fukumoto seems to be one of those exceptions.

You gave no explanations what wrong she did? Dared to criticize Trump, and reserved her right to do so in the future? IMHO, she was absolutely correct. May be that's because i have absolutely no respect for him, but i don't see anyone as standing above the criticism, being it Trump, Obama, Clinton. What else?Huh That she conducted politics in bipartisan way? Again - absolutely correct by me, especially in Hawaii, where Republican presence in legislature is neglidgeable. What else?Huh

And i sincerely dislike that "we" (i saw a lot of it on DKE too). Who "we", and why these "we" decide for everybody?Huh?

There are points in your post i agree with, but not these one...
It went beyond criticizing trump(there are several gop governors and senators who do so) it's the constant grandstanding against her own party and appearing at far-left rallies that went too far

LOL at Women's Marches being far-left. Women's Marches happened in every state and in plenty of conservative cities/towns. It's not like Trump has only insulted and harmed far-left women.

As for the topic, I have mixed feelings (though it may not affect other states noticeably). It is very good that plenty of Republicans are alienated from the GOP because of Trump since Trump is repulsive beyond his far-right political beliefs, and most of the GOP defends him. On the other hand since the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, the Presidency, soon the Supreme Court, most Governors, and most state legislatures are in Republican hands, it is good to have some anti-Trumpers in the Republican Party.
He is not far-right but he acts like a dofus at times.

Some women marched because of Trump and some didn't.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2017, 03:18:46 AM »

She didn't leave the party.  The party left her.
Not so much left her, as literally forced her out.
She wasn't forced out she decided to leave.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2017, 03:26:33 AM »
« Edited: February 05, 2017, 03:31:46 AM by hopper »

She didn't leave the party.  The party left her.
I take it she is/was a Liberal Republican. That wing of the party mainly left during the Reagan Years anyway and that was a long time ago. Of course there were some Liberal Republicans hanging around in the 2000's like Connie Morella(R-MD) till redistricting killed her political career in 2002 and she was defeated by current US Senator Chris Van Hollen(D-MD.)

I do get what she is going through since I am a "tweener" between the 2 parties but lean towards the Republicans and I do not take a favorable view of Trump.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2017, 03:13:04 PM »

Yea, the Northern Strategy is not one I support. It may have worked in 2016, but it won't long term.

Minority Outreach is a must have for a future GOP.

You had that chance after 2012, you've lost that chance after 2016. The base hates minorities and the fiscal conservatives want to cut off all aid to anyone who's poor, especially minorities. Threatening to send in the Feds to minority areas isn't going to work.
Hate is a strong word but you are always gonna have people that have crazy views wether it be on the left or the right. The Republicans have had chances to cut off aid to the poor in the from 2001-2006 when they had control of the whole government and they didn't do it and I doubt Trump is gonna sign off on cutting aid to the poor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.