Second, where does the "unqualified" part come in?
Please respond with reference to 1) the Attorney General and 2) the one hired for the agricultural position who had a childhood love of cows.
I know that there is no convincing you, but I am shocked to see you defend the indefensible to other people. If you can disprove the article, go to it, but you can not possibly read these facts and conclude anything other than that Palin has a heckuva "Brownie" problem.
The Attorney General was a lawyer - and that's all that matters. You don't need to hire someone who is part of the political elite for that job - especially if you're trying to shake things up.
And the Mat-Su Valley is the agricultural heartland of Alaska, to the extent there is such a thing in Alaska. So naming someone from the Valley makes sense.
Palin has no "Brownie" problem. Prove any one of these people is incompetent AND wasn't replaced when proven that they weren't.
By the way, when is the New York Times going to look into who Obama hired on his staff? Or Biden? When are they going to look into Obama's political allies, like William Ayres.
