Recent Posts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 01:53:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Filter Options Collapse
        


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 01:52:43 PM 
Started by EJ24 - Last post by 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
Can someone explain me how the democrats won the Senate elections in NJ and MI in 1922?

Edwards was governor of NJ and his stance against Republican efforts to enforce Prohibition in the state gave him popularity among those who had become alienated with the party of Wilson.

 2 
 on: Today at 01:52:34 PM 
Started by PSOL - Last post by AltWorlder
Parody account or state Constitution Party chapter going rogue for votes? Who knows!




 3 
 on: Today at 01:52:12 PM 
Started by iceman - Last post by Arizona Iced Tea
Honestly almost every state east of the Mississippi + Texas, with the exception of New England and Iowa.

 4 
 on: Today at 01:51:45 PM 
Started by Hnv1 - Last post by LAKISYLVANIA
Israel should tell the ICC any attempt to arrest Israeli officials will be treated as a declaration of war and we should tell the ICC that we support Israel in doing that

That would simply END the ICC once and for all, with mass defections.

Which I am very in favor of, as a nationalist. It’s just fun to watch that the same people here (not referring to you, I am talking about red avis) posing as liberal internationalists only when it’s on THEIR national interests - ie: Putin being condemned - and then suddenly turning against international institutions whenever it’s NOT, like Netanyahu being condemned.

I’ve said this before, but we’re not in XX century anymore. USA will be forced to choose between being an interventionist + internationalist power or a non-interventionist + nationalist power.

World is becoming way more decentralized for it to successfully maintain its natural instinct of interventionist + nationalist without expecting major setbacks in return. And it’s becoming more and more clear that all of you guys - not just Trumpists, but Democrats too - will eventually choose to give up on your internationalist prestige first (and which gives you credibility that allows for interventionism) in order to protect national interests.

I'm not a nationalist by any means, but yeah "liberal internationalism is good until it no longer is". That's very much true. This forum (or portions of this forum) can be ridicilously hypocrite sometimes.

Probably everyone cheered the decision to issue a warrant for Putin, but now that one has been issued for Netanyahu we even hear calls here to ignore it, and that nations that decide not to ignore it Israel should declare war against.

You can't even make this up anymore. The credibility some had is completely gone and the shamelessness of some users is just hilarious to watch.

Unlike people like me who has stand morally consistent on both conflicts so I can hate all of you hypocrites 😊
?

Explain your positions (and from the beginning) and what you think i am?

 5 
 on: Today at 01:50:16 PM 
Started by jojoju1998 - Last post by 💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
I don't remember this much backlash from media (social media or broadcast/news media) when the Chiefs had multiple domestic abusers (Frank Clark, Tyreek Hill) on their roster.

 6 
 on: Today at 01:50:08 PM 
Started by WV222 - Last post by soundchaser
Objecting to the photo seems like something of an own goal by the defense? Now it's a big deal, and a witness is going to have to testify about it. Again, I'm no lawyer, but "we're really trying to keep this piece of evidence out" has to be a bad look.

Does the jury know they're trying to keep it out though? I assume this all happened in sidebar.
They would if they were calling a witness back, right? (But it seems like we won't have to worry about that either way.)

 7 
 on: Today at 01:49:49 PM 
Started by wbrocks67 - Last post by GAinDC
Oddly enough, Biden is getting more Trump 2020 voters than Trump is getting Biden 2020. Turns out barely any Biden 2020 voters are defecting - any of Trump's strength once again comes from - you guessed it - 2020 non-voters

Biden 2020 voters:
Biden 85%
Trump 4%
Not sure/don’t know 6%
Would not vote 3%

Trump 2020 voters:
Trump 69%
Biden 22%
Not sure/don’t know 7%
Would not vote 1%

Did not vote in 2020
Biden 38%
Trump 19%
Not sure/don’t know 16%
Would not vote 23%

https://x.com/blkprofcct/status/1790427325106123239

what is the Republican Party's plan to turn out these people who didn't bother to vote in the highest turnout election since 1960?

 8 
 on: Today at 01:48:57 PM 
Started by lfromnj - Last post by xavier110
It’s funny because R*fo checks a lot of the boxes of in*elligence. Manhattan institute, Georgetown, under Tucker’s wing, etc

 9 
 on: Today at 01:48:40 PM 
Started by President Johnson - Last post by SnowLabrador
I wonder if it could have saved Donnelly. Heitkamp lost by too much and McCaskill was never going to vote against him because she's a resist lib at heart despite being from a red state.

No. If anything he'd have lost by more than 6 points. Donnelly ran a horrible campaign by alienating his own base; that being said, I doubt there was any way he was winning anyway.

 10 
 on: Today at 01:48:13 PM 
Started by wbrocks67 - Last post by GAinDC




Black voters are very pragmatic. They're not about to roll out the red carpet for Trump just because prices are high.


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 12 queries.