Why Paul Ryan is the wrong messenger (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 03:01:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why Paul Ryan is the wrong messenger (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Paul Ryan is the wrong messenger  (Read 2284 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,079
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: April 16, 2012, 11:08:34 PM »
« edited: April 16, 2012, 11:13:45 PM by Torie »

Ryan is very smart, but somewhat immature. He needs some seasoning. He does not yet know how to frame issues in a manner that effectively explains how his social safety net will comport with those with a reasonable conscience, while saving the US from going down the fiscal rat hole - to wit sailing reasonably between the Scylla and Charybdis, without sinking into Neptune's realm, never to be seen again. The Pubs in general are not very effective at that. They need me. Tongue

I might add that when a majority of Pubs oppose medicare cuts, you know you have a problem. It isn't easy. The voters need to be educated. Few politicians have the capacity to do that effectively. But it needs to be done. Insolvency is not an acceptable alternative. Some tough choices need to be made. I know my priorities. Cut medical subsidies for the olds based on an intelligent triage, and reform inner city secondary schools, which will cost more money, since we will need to hire very talented and highly paid teachers. That is my choice. I would try to sell it with all the passion etc. that I could muster.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,079
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2012, 10:48:12 AM »
« Edited: April 18, 2012, 08:48:25 AM by Torie »

Ryan is very smart, but somewhat immature. He needs some seasoning. He does not yet know how to frame issues in a manner that effectively explains how his social safety net will comport with those with a reasonable conscience, while saving the US from going down the fiscal rat hole - to wit sailing reasonably between the Scylla and Charybdis, without sinking into Neptune's realm, never to be seen again. The Pubs in general are not very effective at that. They need me. Tongue

I might add that when a majority of Pubs oppose medicare cuts, you know you have a problem. It isn't easy. The voters need to be educated. Few politicians have the capacity to do that effectively. But it needs to be done. Insolvency is not an acceptable alternative. Some tough choices need to be made. I know my priorities. Cut medical subsidies for the olds based on an intelligent triage, and reform inner city secondary schools, which will cost more money, since we will need to hire very talented and highly paid teachers. That is my choice. I would try to sell it with all the passion etc. that I could muster.
... What? How is that a safety net if one doesn't exist already.

I don't understand your point. We have a vast social safety net, which is fashioned in a way that we simply cannot afford. So it needs to be changed. The changes need to be outlined in a way that seems reasonable and rational, intelligently balancing the competing considerations that a majority of voters deem conscionable. It is a horrifically difficult task.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.