Question for the masses - if the North Carolina judge's ruling regarding the invalidation of laws passed by an illegally gerrymandered legislature is upheld, could activists aggressively follow their lead and use a future progressive Wisconsin Supreme Court to essentially demolish most if not all of Walker's legacy, or does the state have provisions against this?
I don't think they would have to use the same argument as North Carolina, but there are a lot of items (RTW, Act 10, Voter ID, etc.) that could probably get struck down with a liberal court.
I actually think the opposite - the ruling in North Carolina accomplishes a huge percentage of liberal activist goals in essentially one ruling. I anticipate it will become a powerful tool in the coming years.