Charlottesville voted just 13% for Trump, has been trending D for decades (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 09:44:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Charlottesville voted just 13% for Trump, has been trending D for decades (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Charlottesville voted just 13% for Trump, has been trending D for decades  (Read 924 times)
Alabama_Indy10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


« on: August 13, 2017, 09:26:38 AM »

Wikipedia Table

Found it interesting in light of it being in the news. Trump got only 13%, the worst performance by a Republican since 1912, and 9% worse than Romney. Though it's been on a rapid decline - from R-leaning in the 50s and 60s, to voting in the 40%s from 1976 to 1988, 30%s from 1992 to 2000, then 20%s from 2004 to 2012.

(Not saying that this really tells us anything about the white supremacist rally).

Then why'd you post it?
Logged
Alabama_Indy10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2017, 12:42:22 PM »

Wikipedia Table

Found it interesting in light of it being in the news. Trump got only 13%, the worst performance by a Republican since 1912, and 9% worse than Romney. Though it's been on a rapid decline - from R-leaning in the 50s and 60s, to voting in the 40%s from 1976 to 1988, 30%s from 1992 to 2000, then 20%s from 2004 to 2012.

(Not saying that this really tells us anything about the white supremacist rally).

Then why'd you post it?

Because it's interesting, and this is a forum about political data?

Oh, my bad. Interesting!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.