Not seeking a confrontation or to be disrespectful, but I feel I should address that:
Quite frankly, I don't think it's fear-mongering or hostility to note that a bill is deeply flawed and even irresponsible, and to point out those flaws and why they would actually do more harm than good. There was a broad agreement on those flaws being a reality, and that particular bill in the version that went for a final vote was not accounting for that.
In that sense, I would note that we all have our beliefs on how healthcare should be, but that is not so say one vision of it is automatically the right one and therefore criticism of, say, single player constitutes fear-mongering. Passing a flawed and unworkable solution is not necessarily better than passing nothing, and so I feel pointing out the problems in a bill to be a positive rather than a negative excerise.
