The white middle class and conservatism: a history (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 02:03:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  The white middle class and conservatism: a history (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The white middle class and conservatism: a history  (Read 1047 times)
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,610
United States


« on: February 17, 2012, 06:01:16 PM »
« edited: February 17, 2012, 06:06:12 PM by IDS Legislator Progressive Realist »

After WWII, the largest middle class in American history was created by the Depression-era generation. However, this new (at  the time) middle class was homogenous in terms of culture (not just race, but also the shared experiences of the Depression and WWII)-so this group of people becoming very conservative and protective of their own status was, in retrospect, predictable.  

Thus, when liberal leaders and intellectuals in the institutions of American society pushed for extending the same opportunities that the white middle class enjoyed to black people (and other marginalized minority groups), a type of right-wing grassroots populism was activated and mobilized. This was also a response to other cultural phenomenons in the 60s, including women's rights, the counterculture movement, the New Left, and the general protest culture surrounding Vietnam.

However, that right-wing populism was actually an updated version of the right-wing movements of the 50s, which included the John Birch Society, Young Americans for Freedom, and other groups that collectively made up the grassroots base that propelled Barry Goldwater to the Republican nomination. But while those earlier conservatives were limited in their appeal to certain parts of the country (mainly the Southwest and the Deep South-the 'Sun Belt") and were ultimately discredited because of their rigid fanaticism and conspiratorial views regarding communism, the populist conservatives that followed them after 1965 were able to avoid being tagged with the "extremist" label. Suddenly, the mainstream American middle class was the main base of the conservative movement.

Concerns over civil rights, out-of-touch "liberal elites", busing, an alleged breakdown in "moral values", "law and order", "welfare chiselers", student radicals, and other more immediate concerns other than (and in addition to) Communism were what changed the white American middle class in the 1960s from being vaguely supportive of the liberal state, to, in the following decades, becoming much more hostile to it. Government, and the liberal intellectuals and leaders associated with it, was becoming more and more of an "enemy" in the eyes of the white middle class-and many outside of it as well. Meanwhile, many on the Left were equally disgusted with  racial violence, the war in Vietnam, and  poverty at home, and they blamed liberals in government as much as they blamed conservatives for all of those problems.

The end result of all this; liberal policies that had broad, but not very "deep" support, among the white middle class became discredited in favor of Reagan-style conservatism. I suppose the Presidency of George W Bush and the actions of the Tea Party Republicans have done a lot to discredit "conservative" policies in the more diverse electorate of the modern day.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,610
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2012, 09:18:36 PM »

What are you talking about? People weren't conservative at all after WWII. It was the age of the great liberal consensus.

I mean "conservative" in a traditional/cultural attitudes sense, not the modern American sense.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,610
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2012, 11:26:24 PM »

What are you talking about? People weren't conservative at all after WWII. It was the age of the great liberal consensus.

I mean "conservative" in a traditional/cultural attitudes sense, not the modern American sense.

You think moving to the suburbs to live in air-conditioned and television induced euphoria was in line with traditional society? The postwar years were HUGELY transformative. What about them do you find conservative?

Attitudes  about race, gender roles, sexuality, Communism, etc.?
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,610
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2012, 10:29:56 AM »

I suppose the Presidency of George W Bush and the actions of the Tea Party Republicans have done a lot to discredit "conservative" policies in the more diverse electorate of the modern day.


The former is certainly untrue given the latter came into being.

The Tea Party is NOT reflective of the electorate in general.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,610
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2012, 12:13:48 PM »

I think that government policies that give a "hand up" are better than the ones that give a "hand out."  That's where I draw the line.  Anything unconditional doesn't have my support.  That's what most Americans believe, it's just that polarization is so appealing to both parties.
Not true at all. The biggest handouts, Social Security and Medicare, are the most popular.

^^^^^
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.