AL Supreme Court orders probate judges not to license same sex marriages (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 02:52:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  AL Supreme Court orders probate judges not to license same sex marriages (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AL Supreme Court orders probate judges not to license same sex marriages  (Read 13655 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« on: February 10, 2015, 12:49:52 AM »
« edited: February 10, 2015, 12:52:31 AM by Ebowed »

Just in case there was any misconception about Alabama and the obstacles to progress coming solely in the form of a bunch of cigar-smoking, old fat white plantation owners:



What are those percentages of?  The counties?  It seems like a bit of a misleading statistic.  It's pretty evident that Obama voters are, by and large, not the architects of an orchestrated plot to dismantle marriage equality in this state.

Interesting to note the absence of Macon county from either list.  I would be surprised if it were not recognizing same-sex marriages.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2015, 02:46:52 AM »

Marriage will lose almost all its meaning. It will be seen as little more than a friendship. This is probably already the case in Massachusetts.

I remember when I used to find this sort of satire fresh and amusing...
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2015, 04:31:04 PM »

Even if the court had done nothing the racial restrictions would have eventually have been abolished. It would have been better to do that than traumatize both races.
Separate but equal has been vilified over the years but it is a lot more nuanced than its critics let on.
The traditional marriage they espouse has a definition of marriage based on property.  Clearly men can only be owners and women can only be the owned.

Same-sex marriage is as bad as race mixing and women's rights!!!

LMAO
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.