Some VERY amusing results I just found (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 02:09:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Some VERY amusing results I just found (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Some VERY amusing results I just found  (Read 2358 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,437
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« on: November 05, 2014, 01:21:52 AM »
« edited: November 05, 2014, 01:24:11 AM by black and white band photos »

Ideally this would wait until we have full results for the statewide elections (about 86% in) but this was too amusing to not share right away.

Here are the (incomplete) downballot statewide elections:

Secretary of State   
Party   Candidate   Totals   Pct   Graph
Independence      BOB HELLAND   83904   4.86%   
Republican      DAN SEVERSON   781767   45.33%   
Democratic-Farmer-Labor      STEVE SIMON   821286   47.62%   
Libertarian Party      BOB ODDEN   36722   2.13%   
Write-In      WRITE-IN**   1043   0.06%   

State Auditor   
Party   Candidate   Totals   Pct   Graph
Independence      PATRICK DEAN   68144   3.95%   
Republican      RANDY GILBERT   680899   39.44%   
Democratic-Farmer-Labor      REBECCA OTTO   899944   52.12%   
Libertarian Party      KEEGAN IVERSEN   27344   1.58%   
Grassroots - Legalize Cannabis      JUDITH SCHWARTZBACKER   49510   2.87%   
Write-In      WRITE-IN**   736   0.04%
   
Attorney General   
Party   Candidate   Totals   Pct   Graph
Independence      BRANDAN BORGOS   39670   2.28%   
Republican      SCOTT NEWMAN   668629   38.50%   
Democratic-Farmer-Labor      LORI SWANSON   921869   53.08%   
Green Party      ANDY DAWKINS   27231   1.57%   
Libertarian Party      MARY O'CONNOR   27099   1.56%   
Legal Marijuana Now      DAN R. VACEK   51542   2.97%   
Write-In      WRITE-IN**   704   0.04%   

Simon was clearly the weakest one right? Well let's look at my precinct:

Secretary of State
Party   Candidate   Totals   Pct   Graph
Independence      BOB HELLAND   52   5.51%   
Republican      DAN SEVERSON   87   9.22%   
Democratic-Farmer-Labor      STEVE SIMON   769   81.46%   
Libertarian Party      BOB ODDEN   34   3.60%   
Write-In      WRITE-IN**   2   0.21%   

State Auditor
Party   Candidate   Totals   Pct   Graph
Independence      PATRICK DEAN   36   3.83%   
Republican      RANDY GILBERT   72   7.67%   
Democratic-Farmer-Labor      REBECCA OTTO   724   77.10%   
Libertarian Party      KEEGAN IVERSEN   24   2.56%   
Grassroots - Legalize Cannabis      JUDITH SCHWARTZBACKER   82   8.73%   
Write-In      WRITE-IN**   1   0.11%   

Attorney General
Party   Candidate   Totals   Pct   Graph
Independence      BRANDAN BORGOS   22   2.30%   
Republican      SCOTT NEWMAN   72   7.52%   
Democratic-Farmer-Labor      LORI SWANSON   686   71.61%   
Green Party      ANDY DAWKINS   87   9.08%   
Libertarian Party      MARY O'CONNOR   25   2.61%   
Legal Marijuana Now      DAN R. VACEK   62   6.47%   
Write-In      WRITE-IN**   4   0.42%   

Simon did by far the best. So why is that? Well take a look at the third party results...and the names of the parties and note which one doesn't appear for Secretary of State. Cheesy Now consider that neither of these candidates ran a campaign, I had never heard of either one's name until I saw it on the ballot, and neither one even has a website. In other words they had absolutely NOTHING going for them aside from the party name.

(I'll admit the temptation struck me when I saw that on the ballot for those races, but I ended up voting for Swanson and Otto.)
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,437
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2014, 03:34:55 AM »

I thought Otto was weaker than Simon, but her opponent completely imploded.

Otto is an uncontroversial incumbent, Simon is a very boring legislator whose entire campaign didn't consist of anything besides "I'm a Democrat and I'm running for Secretary of State." Of course his opponent's platform was basically that it needs to be more difficult to vote in Minnesota.

Simon did by far the best. So why is that? Well take a look at the third party results...and the names of the parties and note which one doesn't appear for Secretary of State. Cheesy Now consider that neither of these candidates ran a campaign, I had never heard of either one's name until I saw it on the ballot, and neither one even has a website. In other words they had absolutely NOTHING going for them aside from the party name.

Secretary of State:

http://stevesimonmn.com/
http://danseverson.com/
http://bobhelland4mnsos.tumblr.com/

The only person who didn't have a website was the Libertarian.

I'm talking about the non-SoS races.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,437
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2014, 12:19:46 PM »

Um yeah I stated that in the OP.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.