Red Eagle Politics AMA

[redeagleofficial]

This doesn’t bother you?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=glpE_m8OE2A

They are there voluntarily and the border detention centers have been there for years, so no, because I have a brain.

[redeagleofficial]

Where do you see yourself in 20 years? Do you see your channel continuing to grow.

I see myself in the oval office in 20 years.  My channel probably can grow to around 100-200k subscribers within the next few years if I play my cards right.  Not just for elections, but for my commentary as well.

[redeagleofficial]

What got you into politics in the first place?

Seeing left wing posts on my left wing friends facebook and questioning their narrative.  Also got into Infowars sometime around April 2016 (not Alex Jones, but particularly the Owen Shroyer street interviews) and I never went back

[redeagleofficial]

Opinion of the Order of the Red Eagle?

I had no idea what that was until now

[redeagleofficial]

How many hours do you think right wingers have wasted on YouTube fantasizing about election results that are never going to happen?

I call it like I see it.  I could see a scenario where he loses, but not at the moment.  Maybe in a year or so I will reconsider.

[redeagleofficial]

How could you have thought Matt Bevin would win by more than Tate Reeves?

We all make mistakes.  Honestly I never saw the polls that had Bevin down 17 and 19.  I may have reconsidered.

[redeagleofficial]

Would 2018 have been a red wave if Hillary Clinton won?

I even think Elizabeth Warren's seat would have flipped red.  Clinton would have been an absolute disaster because she would not have done anything and would not have energized anyone to vote in the midterms.

[redeagleofficial]

Would 2018 have been a red wave if Hillary Clinton won?

I even think Elizabeth Warren's seat would have flipped red.  Clinton would have been an absolute disaster because she would not have done anything and would not have energized anyone to vote in the midterms.

On a scale of 1-10 how high are you? 11 is an acceptable answer.

I don't do drugs, I only smoke weed once a year to test its potency like cops do.

[redeagleofficial]

Can I ask you a question Red Eagle politics?

Yes

[redeagleofficial]

- Opinion on Atlas using Blue for GOP and Red for Dems

- Why did you think people on here saying Kansas is tossup were mostly serious when with the exception of 2 people it was a meme

1. It doesn't bother me anymore but it was a bit confusing at first
2. I was referring to the people who did not just meme it, but it probably was more than 2 people.

[redeagleofficial]

Opinion on Cenk Uygur for congress?

Very reeeeasonable of coooourse he has my full endorsement!

[redeagleofficial]

Why are the people that chanted “Jews will not replace us” fine people?

They aren't, thats why GEOTUS denounced them as criminals and thugs.  The fine people were the local confederate presevationists who did not chant that that got beat up by antifa for no reason.

[redeagleofficial]

Why are the people that chanted “Jews will not replace us” fine people?

They aren't, thats why GEOTUS denounced them as criminals and thugs.  The fine people were the local confederate presevationists who did not chant that that got beat up by antifa for no reason.

Except there weren’t any there. It was a neo-Nazi rally, organized by neo-Nazis, lead by neo-Nazis, and all the speakers were neo-Nazis

Thats false.  There were black neo-confederates there as well as Jews.  Even the New York Times and Jake Tapper from CNN admits this to be true.  The alt right hijacked the event (some of which was paid actors, KKK members got off the same bus as the BLM per videos) and the media jumped all over it.  Here's a good analysis of the case: https://www.scottadamssays.com/2019/04/30/the-fine-people-hoax-funnel/

[redeagleofficial]

Why are the people that chanted “Jews will not replace us” fine people?

They aren't, thats why GEOTUS denounced them as criminals and thugs.  The fine people were the local confederate presevationists who did not chant that that got beat up by antifa for no reason.

Except there weren’t any there. It was a neo-Nazi rally, organized by neo-Nazis, lead by neo-Nazis, and all the speakers were neo-Nazis

Thats false.  There were black neo-confederates there as well as Jews.  Even the New York Times and Jake Tapper from CNN admits this to be true.  The alt right hijacked the event (some of which was paid actors, KKK members got off the same bus as the BLM per videos) and the media jumped all over it.  Here's a good analysis of the case: https://www.scottadamssays.com/2019/04/30/the-fine-people-hoax-funnel/

Saving that one

I guess you have amnesia and fail to remember the meme with the black confederate and the white guy with the BLM sign...

[redeagleofficial]

Do you see yourself ever voting Democrat in the future at this point?

Not with morons like those people lying about what Trump said at Charlottesville in the party.  I wouldn't vote for those clowns to save my life.

[redeagleofficial]

Why are the people that chanted “Jews will not replace us” fine people?

They aren't, thats why GEOTUS denounced them as criminals and thugs.  The fine people were the local confederate presevationists who did not chant that that got beat up by antifa for no reason.

Except there weren’t any there. It was a neo-Nazi rally, organized by neo-Nazis, lead by neo-Nazis, and all the speakers were neo-Nazis

Thats false.  There were black neo-confederates there as well as Jews.  Even the New York Times and Jake Tapper from CNN admits this to be true.  The alt right hijacked the event (some of which was paid actors, KKK members got off the same bus as the BLM per videos) and the media jumped all over it.  Here's a good analysis of the case: https://www.scottadamssays.com/2019/04/30/the-fine-people-hoax-funnel/

The event was organized by Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer. Spencer led a rally four months prior, on May 13th. A month before the Unite The Right rally, a KKK branch from North Carolina held a protest at the Stonewall Jackson statue in Charlottesville.

The groups that attended Charlottesville included the National Policy Institute (Spencer's self made 'think tank'), the Traditionalist Worker's Party (a neo-nazi group), Identity Evropa (an 'identitarian' alt-right group), representatives of the Daily Stormer, The Right Stuff (which features a podcast called The Daily Shoah), and the Nationalist Front (a group of alt right and neo nazi protestors).

David Duke, Chris Cantwell, Eric Striker (of Daily Stormer infamy), Mike Enoch (of Daily Shoah infamy), and Nathan Damago (of IE) all attended the rally.

The organizers were alt-right, the attendees were members of the KKK, and their message was a racist one. You do not get to lie about this. You do not get to feign ignorance.

The only one lying is you.  Trump repeatedly condemned the Unite the Right neonazis/alt right people.  There's no debate there.  However, they were not the only group there protesting, and you know this.  Here's an excerpt from a site referencing an article from the New York Times (such a right wing source, right?):

Michelle Piercy, who travelled to Charlottesville to participate as a neutral peacekeeper for American Warrior Revolution, a group that stands up for individual free speech rights and acts as a buffer between competing voices, knew there was going to be violence, but went anyway.

“We were made aware that the situation could be dangerous, and we were prepared.” Piercy says. The Wichita night-worker for a Kansas retirement home said that “the situation was completely disorganized, the police were responsible for herding white supremacists on the street where Antifa and BLM were located. All chaos broke out. I witnessed police officers say, ‘that’s not our problem’ and ‘you shouldn’t have come’ and refused to help the injured.”

Piercy says that she doesn’t support white supremacy, Naziism, or alt-right causes. Nor does she believe the president has that in his heart.

“My partner is a black man who travelled to Charlottesville for the same reason I did [to protect free speech]. We were in groups and he’s a very good man. What we were trying to do is talk to Antifa and Black Lives Matter and let them know that the way they were protesting is the wrong way to go about it.”

Blaming the police is one thing, but criticizing President Trump’s handling of the violence that led to the deaths of three people is another. Piercy says “I believe President Trump is doing what he can.”

In a story headlined, “Trump’s Embrace of Racially Charged Past Puts Republicans in Crisis”, The Times cited two polls stating that “barely one-third of Americans now say they approve of the job he is doing – a fresh low for a president who was already among the most unpopular in modern times.”

Wait, what? Isn’t this the same NYT whose polling showed Hillary Clinton for the win in 2016? More on those in a moment.

“Good people can go to Charlottesville,” says Piercy, who drove all night with other people who she says “also love and defend free speech, who are the furtherest thing from bigots, Nazis or white supremacists.

These are very fine people, there were on both sides.  The nazis were very bad people, and Trump condemned them.  You do not get to lie about this.

[redeagleofficial]

opinion of chugging Natty Light until u puke lmao

no opinion

[redeagleofficial]

The only one lying is you.  Trump repeatedly condemned the Unite the Right neonazis/alt right people.  There's no debate there.  However, they were not the only group there protesting, and you know this.  Here's an excerpt from a site referencing an article from the New York Times (such a right wing source, right?)

You have the reading comprehension of a five year old, I swear to god. You, and your useful idiot Dilbert Man, seem intent on misconstruing basic facts to fit your narrative.

The men who got the permit for the rally were Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer. The former is a noted member of the alt right associated with such luminaries as VDare and The Daily Caller. He is a well known antisemite too. Gavin McInnes kicked him out of the Proud Boys as soon as his views became well known.

The latter needs no introduction, but it's informative to include Spencer. Why? Because this rally was created to normalize white nationalism. The whole purpose of 'Unite the Right' was to give the movement (your movement, I might add) a respectable, human face. Thankfully, due to the incompetence of its attendees and supporters, it failed. No amount of lying or misdirection changes this fact.

Michelle Piercy, who travelled to Charlottesville to participate as a neutral peacekeeper for American Warrior Revolution, a group that stands up for individual free speech rights and acts as a buffer between competing voices, knew there was going to be violence, but went anyway.

“We were made aware that the situation could be dangerous, and we were prepared.” Piercy says. The Wichita night-worker for a Kansas retirement home said that “the situation was completely disorganized, the police were responsible for herding white supremacists on the street where Antifa and BLM were located. All chaos broke out. I witnessed police officers say, ‘that’s not our problem’ and ‘you shouldn’t have come’ and refused to help the injured.”

Now we get to the 'half right, but completely wrong' part of your misdirection. The police failed at Charlottesville, there can be little dispute there. There was little attempt to separate the demonstrators from the counter-demonstrators; crowd control efforts were particularly poor.

However, here come the crocodile tears for the alt right and neo nazi demonstrators, as usual. The attendees of the rally were well armed. Many had guns. True, the counter-demonstrators were not inactive bystanders, but the demonstrators came bearing weapons, armor, and a mentality to fight. It's no surprise, then, that a group of them managed to assault a black man who was isolated from a group of counter-demonstrators.

Piercy says that she doesn’t support white supremacy, Naziism, or alt-right causes. Nor does she believe the president has that in his heart.

I don't care.

“My partner is a black man

Hahahaha of course! Of course! "I get ploughed by a black man, I am not racist!"

who travelled to Charlottesville for the same reason I did [to protect free speech]. We were in groups and he’s a very good man. What we were trying to do is talk to Antifa and Black Lives Matter and let them know that the way they were protesting is the wrong way to go about it.”

And the people at the main rally, who assaulted the counter-demonstrators weren't? My god, how stupid can you get?!

“Good people can go to Charlottesville,” says Piercy, who drove all night with other people who she says “also love and defend free speech, who are the furtherest thing from bigots, Nazis or white supremacists.

So we have one woman who went to Charlottesville as a bystander saying that there were
'good people' on the side of the demonstrators. Hm.

Let me provide a run down of the 'very fine' non-nazi protestors at Charlottesville:

--National Policy Institute (white nationalist, disavows nazism)
--Loyal White Knights (KKK affiliated)
--The Right Stuff (Daily Shoah and Holocaust Denial; disavows nazism)
--Altright.com
--Fraternal Order of All-Knights (Male only; chauvinist)
--David Duke (disavows nazism)
--Nationalist Front (non-Nazi aligned)

This formed the core of the 'Unite the Right' rally. The vast majority of these groups are KKK aligned or 'alt right' aligned. Tell me, which of these folks are 'fine' to you?

These are very fine people, there were on both sides.  The nazis were very bad people, and Trump condemned them. You do not get to lie about this.

I never said a word about Trump. Your reaction to me calling your fellow travelers (dare I say friends?) 'bad people' is telling indeed.

1. To your first point, Trump condemned the neonazis several times.  There is no debate there. The UTR people were bad guys.  I believe Trump knows this.
2. You did not have a relevant retort here.  The point was that groups in attendance apart of the pro statue group were not nazis did exist, independent of the UTR people.  Several groups had permits on both sides.
3. Ok, I don't expect you to.  You will just relish in your reccomendations from a 85% left forum
4. Childish IMO, but okay.  This proves me right that black people did attend the rally for the statue.  I dont care if you agree with this stance, but 44% of black voters say leave the statue up
5. Antifa and alt rightards were throwing punches at each other and innocent people.  Thats on video.
6. I know that those are very bad people, but they were not everyone in attendance.  We should agree on this.  The bottom line is Trump condemned them all.  I consider all those groups fascist/nazi anyways, and i could care less if antifa punches them.
7. I said most of them are bad, and most of them (spencer and duke) disavow Trump and now back Gabbard.  They are not my fellow travelers.

[redeagleofficial]

I believe I need to make clear that I, as well as many others, acknowledge that the majority of people on the statue side were bad (80%+), but there were other groups there unaffiliated with them apart of the statue group.  Those 10-20% were treated unfairly and lumped in with the 80%.  That's why Trump said they were treated unfairly when he said "fine people on both sides".  That's all I am saying.  Screw nazis, the klan, groypers, the alt right, any other militant racial identitarian groups and "anti"fa.  Enough said.

[redeagleofficial]

I believe I need to make clear that I, as well as many others, acknowledge that the majority of people on the statue side were bad (80%+), but there were other groups there unaffiliated with them apart of the statue group.  Those 10-20% were treated unfairly and lumped in with the 80%.  That's why Trump said they were treated unfairly when he said "fine people on both sides".  That's all I am saying.  Screw nazis, the klan, groypers, the alt right, any other militant racial identitarian groups and "anti"fa.  Enough said.

Just one problem with that, THEY MARCHED WITH NEO NAZIS DUDE! The rally was called 'Unite the Right' for a reason! They marched with these folks because they agreed with their beliefs and their ideology.

All of these groups came together in support of one another. Those are the facts. You brought all of this controversy on yourself when you said there were Jews and Blacks there (not to mention paid actors), and that, the alt-right hijacked the event. That's not even remotely true! The people who filed the permit for the rally were two members of the alt-right. C'mon man!

There is no claim that “fine people” were “marching with” the neo-Nazis, or supporting them in any way. There is a claim that such people were in the same zip code.  We're going around in circles, dude, let's just agree to disagree.

[redeagleofficial]

Because when you run out of arguments, resort to baseless accusations of fascism! (Fascists and commies can both drown in a river--i don't know why you think that is an appropriate retort).  I'm a paleolibertarian, which is nearly the opposite of fascism.

[redeagleofficial]

This video sums up the whole situation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM6k8uNAQBA

There were 4 groups:
1. Anti racists who wanted the statue down
2. Anti racists who wanted to keep the statue.
3. Violent antifa protesters
4. The neo nazis and confederates.

Everyone forgets about group 2.

I saw a poorly made 12-minute debunking video of that that spend 70% of the video half-debunking a five second claim about the media that ironically debunked the second half of the debunking video.  It was cringe.

[redeagleofficial]

Do you agree that D*vid *ge, whose demonic visage haunts every corner of our God-forsaken planet, is the Earthly avatar of Satan?

Why is the Hawaii governor so hated?

[redeagleofficial]

I'm willing to bet you $100, and give you three-to-one odds in your favor, Trump loses Oregon in 2020.

Surely if you thought Trump had even a prayer in Oregon as you have ridiculously stated, you would take that bet in a heartbeat.

So will you? Put up or shut up time.

No.  I said the margin could be under 10.  Not that he could win.

[redeagleofficial]

What's the most/least accurate political prediction you've made to date (for any race)?

I was off by 6 on Bevin and right on about Bishop winning.