With this election right now a dead heat, could foreign policy play into the game? This election, by and large, is not about foreign policy, but Obama has a huge, rare strength in FP with the killing of Osama Bin Laden, the ouster of Hasni Mubarak, and the ouster and death of Col. Moammar Ghadafi and the imminent ouster of President Assad of Syria.
Obama gets 0 credit for Mubarak's fall. That is all the Egyptian people and their military.
Also, this isn't 2004, the debate is going to be on economic policy, not foreign.
The Obama foreign policy is the opposite of 2008. He rivals Romney in flip-floppiness.
How is that, exactly?
Invading Libya, sending more troops into Afghanistan, sending troops down into Uganda, preparing action on Iran and Syria among other things.
Obama campaigned on sending more troops to Afghanistan, we didn't "invade" Libya, we quietly assisted in resource procurement and sent temporary air support for the rebels, the Uganda forces are reported to be a grand total of 100 soldiers, and the latter is pure speculation.
Obama campaigned against large and poorly planned military excursions; not short-lengthed and limited engagements for a narrow purpose. He's performed exactly within the style of foreign policy he campaigned in, and most of his foreign policy efforts have been successful and near-perfectly planned. There are plenty of things to criticize Obama for, but his foreign policy is miles smarter than the Bush administration and a potential Romney administration.
$896 million is "quietly assist[ing] in resource procurement"?
LOL
$896 million is practically a rounding error relative to the entire DoD budget.
