If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 05, 2024, 11:46:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century?
#1
Yes--- Top 3 or 4
 
#2
Yes--- Top 5 or 6
 
#3
Maybe---- but gets bumped off the top of the charts
 
#4
No--- Decent Pres but issues with social and economic policies
 
#5
No--- One of the worst Ever
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century?  (Read 4224 times)
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


« on: November 13, 2017, 06:41:57 PM »

Low marks for LBJ given the fact that he appointed two liberal activists to the Supreme Court. Thurgood Marshall was chosen for appointment because he was an icon of progress in racial justice, not because he was dedicated to objectivity as a judge -- which he wasn't. Marshall once said that his philosophy of how to decide cases he hears is, "You do what you think is right and let the law catch up." LBJ appointed Abe Fortas because Fortas was Johnson's crony.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.