SENATE BILL: 2011 Tax Code Bill (On the President's desk) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 13, 2024, 05:39:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: 2011 Tax Code Bill (On the President's desk) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: 2011 Tax Code Bill (On the President's desk)  (Read 6679 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« on: September 26, 2011, 03:59:49 PM »

I'll vote against this.

The idea that anyone should work for the government more than everything/everyone else combined is unacceptable.

Um... can you translate?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2011, 04:17:15 PM »

I'll vote against this.

The idea that anyone should work for the government more than everything/everyone else combined is unacceptable.

Um... can you translate?

A 60% tax rate (the proposed rate for individuals making more than $2.5M per year) means that 60% of your income goes to the government. I refuse to vote for a rate higher than 50%.

EDIT: Also, see here.

NO, I didn't understand what you meant - it wasn't clear at all.

The 60% tax rate is what it is now, my plan as discussed is to reduce those 2 top brackets (but not yet)... but since I don't believe in the tax cut cure all - they will be slow drops, but drops, I don't like a 60% federal tax rate when you have regional income taxes as well... but given the current financial situation I don't think it's wise for such a large cut.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2011, 12:39:22 AM »

I couldn't sign a Bill that has that large a tax cut involved.

I don't support the upper bracket being that high, but equally don't support sucking all of that revenue out when the economy is just starting to get back on its feet... I guess it's because I don't believe in the 'job creator persecution' stuff.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2011, 10:21:39 AM »

Absolutely no way I'd agree to that structure.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2011, 06:29:52 AM »


Yours to me seems more of a long-term aspiration.

I don't agree with a double-income tax regime then a 50%+ tax rate ... so I support yours in theory, but it's MASSIVE loss in tax revenue in a short time, without a plan for what will have to be cut to make up the difference.

I could support a more phased version of your proposal, but I would NEVER support Jbrase's proposal - if I think your amendment has financial risks, his is a kamikaze mission.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2011, 08:00:56 AM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.