Why would I go into detail when you've already covered the bases? (I would add, "James I filling his court with cronies", the "execution of Walter Raleigh", being "completely financially incapable", and a couple more, but you catch my drift)
The claim that the Stuarts were instituting "tyranny" by attempting to allow a limited measure of religious freedom is something of a 17th-century mirror of the modern argument that allowing same-sex marriage is "tyranny." Complete with the role of "activist judges" replaced by "absolute monarchs."
...
Poll
