What If: Nixon/Rockefeller vs. Kennedy/Johnson 1960 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 05, 2024, 04:12:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  What If: Nixon/Rockefeller vs. Kennedy/Johnson 1960 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If Nelson Rockefeller had been Nixon's running mate instead of Henry Cabot Lodge in 1960, who would you have voted for?
#1
Nixon/Rockefeller (R)
 
#2
Kennedy/Johnson (D)
 
#3
Someone Else
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Author Topic: What If: Nixon/Rockefeller vs. Kennedy/Johnson 1960  (Read 6254 times)
johnpressman
Rookie
**
Posts: 159
« on: June 25, 2012, 01:28:29 PM »

First, there was NO WAY that Nelson Rockefeller would accept the V.P. candidacy on a Nixon ticket. Nixon even prevailed upon Eisenhower to ask Rocky to take be the VP slot (Ike refused).  I am one that believes that, great campaigner that he was,  Rockefeller would not have been able to swing New York to Nixon and the Republican ticket would have lost. Also, he would have undermined Nixon's "common man" appeal vs Kennedy as the name "Rockefeller" is synonymous with great wealth, even eclipsing that of "Kennedy" who was not as well known at the time.  As for Henry Cabot Lodge, the less said the better.

Only a candidate with strong ties to the Midwest, running a regional campaign akin to LBJ's, could have tipped two or three of the crucial states; Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota and/or Missouri to the Nixon column and given him the victory in 1960.  Everett Dirksen, anyone?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.