I too would like to express that I think universalism would end up killing the Atlasian system
X $Dan$(Devilman88), a begging citzen
Do you care explaining why?
The universalism system would need alot of active members, that we don't have. Just look at the past election, people only show up for the elections and that is it. Also this would end up killing the regions and their governments. Maybe the universalism system will be able to work at one point, but right now I believe we don't have the numbers of active members we need.
I have said in the past that I support making some kind of activity requirement for members to vote in the lower house, to prevent just that. Maybe with a universal system, those voters who just turn out to vote but can't do anything in Atlasia since they don't hold an office could just get involved in a universal system and they could propose stuff. Both ways, it's too early to speculate who will get involved and who will not.
I don't believe this would kill the regions, most of which are effectively dead right now to begin with. Either because of downright incompetent crap administrations or voters being more interested in federal matters than regional matters. If universalism passes, I think that an amendment allowing lower house members
only to hold a regional office would be necessary.
We need to stimulate activity in Atlasia, and I believe universalism is the best system to provide that. I have yet to hear why the other systems would effectively stimulate activity and encourage non-members to join.
I too would like to express that I think universalism would end up killing the Atlasian system
X $Dan$(Devilman88), a begging citzen
Do you care explaining why?
Ive done so in more than simple detail. Perhaps you would like to be the first person to actually respond to it?
I don't specifically recall asking for
your opinion, now. I think I've heard it enough already.