Would people please stop misusing the word "revisionist" as if it were a pejorative? Most of what history as a discipline is is revision of previous work about topics based on new archival research, discoveries, theories, etc. It's one of my pet peeves, and watching both Republicans and Democrats here fervently denouncing "revisionism" is like nails on a chalkboard in how wrong an understanding of what history as a discipline is.
Sentiments shared absolutely (and absolutely predictably), but if there was ever a battle lost before it started...