States' most partisan results compared to the national average (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 03:50:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  States' most partisan results compared to the national average (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: States' most partisan results compared to the national average  (Read 9451 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« on: April 09, 2008, 09:51:24 PM »
« edited: April 09, 2008, 09:56:50 PM by nclib »

I made a table of every state's margins compared to the national average for the years 1960-2004. Below is for each state, which year was most Democratic and most Republican, compared to the national average.

                 D              R
Alabama         1960      1964
Alaska         1964      2000
Arizona         1996      1964
Arkansas         1976      1972
California         2004      1980
Colorado         1964      1980
Connecticut      2000      1976
Delaware         2000      1988
Florida         1976      1972
Georgia         1976      1964
Hawaii         1964      1972
Idaho         1960      2000
Illinois         2004      1976
Indiana         1984      2004
Iowa         1988      1960
Kansas         1988      1996
Kentucky         1980      2004
Louisiana         1960      1964
Maine         1964      1960
Maryland         2000      1972
Massachusetts      1972      1980
Michigan         1964      1976
Minnesota      1984      1960
Mississippi      1960      1964
Missouri         1964      2004
Montana         1972      2000
Nebraska         1988      2004
Nevada         1960      1980
New Hampshire      1964      1984
New Jersey      2000      1988
New Mexico      1992      1968
New York         2000      1976
North Carolina      1976      1972
North Dakota      1972      1980
Ohio         1964      1960
Oklahoma         1976      2004
Oregon         1972      1960
Pennsylvania      1984      1976
Rhode Island      1964      1976
South Carolina      1976      1964
South Dakota      1972      2000
Tennessee      1976      1972
Texas         1964      2000
Utah         1960      2004
Vermont         2004      1960
Virginia         1980      1964
Washington      2004      1976
West Virginia      1980      2004
Wisconsin         1972      1960
Wyoming         1964      2000


Year by year, which years resulted in which states' most partisan results compared to the national average:       D                                   R

1960 AL,ID,LA,MS,NV,UT     IA,ME,MN,OH,OR,VT,WI
1964 AK,CO,HI,ME,MI,MO,NH,OH,RI,TX,WY     AL,AZ,GA,LA,MS,SC,VA
1968                                            NM
1972 MA,MT,ND,OR,SD,WI     AR,FL,HI,MD,NC,TN
1976 AR,FL,GA,NC,OK,SC,TN     CT,IL,MI,NY,PA,RI,WA
1980 KY,VA,WV                       CA,CO,MA,NV,ND
1984 IN,MN,PA                        NH
1988 IA,KS,NE                         DE,NJ
1992 NM
1996 AZ                                   KS
2000 CT,DE,MD,NJ,NY               AK,ID,MT,SD,TX,WY
2004 CA,IL,VT,WA                    IN,KY,MO,NE,OK,UT,WV

Comments?

Edit: the format is a bit off, but the first column is Dem states/years, and the second column is Repub states/years.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2008, 07:10:43 PM »


Given that these three states all border each other, does anyone know why Carter was relatively popular (or Reagan relatively unpopular) in that region?

Also, does anyone think any state(s) will be the most Democratic/Republican in 2008 relative to the national average? (I'm sure Illinois will if Obama is the nominee, but any others?)
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2008, 06:19:49 PM »


Given that these three states all border each other, does anyone know why Carter was relatively popular (or Reagan relatively unpopular) in that region?

Also, does anyone think any state(s) will be the most Democratic/Republican in 2008 relative to the national average? (I'm sure Illinois will if Obama is the nominee, but any others?)

Well, Carter did relatively well with white working class voters in 1980, compared to his national average. That's one thing that comes to mind. A lot of the Reagan Democrats didn't actually vote for Reagan until 1984.

That sounds about right, since Carter did reasonably well in the western part of VA, while Reagan won the DC suburbs, even Arlington and Alexandria.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2008, 05:55:08 PM »

Minnesota      1984      1960

I guess that result shouldn't be at all surprising, given how Republican the country was in 1984 and how Minnesota was the one state that Reagan didn't win that year (nor did he win DC).

True, and it was also Mondale's home state. Most states that had a home state nominee (AZ,CA,GA,KS,MI,SD,TX) had their highest relative performance the year the home stater was on the ballot, though these were the exceptions:

Ark. Dem. was 1976, not 1992 or 1996 (Clinton).
Mass. Dem. was 1972, not 1960 (Kennedy), 1988 (Dukakis), or 2004 (Kerry).
Tenn. Dem. was 1976, not 2000 (Gore).
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2008, 08:32:38 PM »

bump for 2008 results

Counting 1960 thru 2008, the following states had their most partisan results compared to the national average in 2008:

Dem: CA, CO, DE, HI, IL, IN, MD, NV, NM, VT, VA, WA
Rep: AR, KY, MO, OK, TN, WV
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2008, 04:58:05 PM »

bump for 2008 results

Counting 1960 thru 2008, the following states had their most partisan results compared to the national average in 2008:

Dem: CA, CO, DE, HI, IL, IN, MD, NV, NM, VT, VA, WA
Rep: AR, KY, MO, OK, TN, WV

So the new spreads are:

1960 AL,ID,LA,MS,UT            IA,ME,MN,OH,OR,VT,WI
1964 AK,ME,MI,MO,NH,OH,RI,TX,WY     AL,AZ,GA,LA,MS,SC,VA
1968                                            NM
1972 MA,MT,ND,OR,SD,WI     FL,HI,MD,NC
1976 AR,FL,GA,NC,OK,SC,TN     CT,IL,MI,NY,PA,RI,WA
1980 KY,WV                             CA,CO,MA,NV,ND
1984 MN,PA                             NH
1988 IA,KS,NE                         DE,NJ
1992
1996 AZ                                   KS
2000 CT,NJ,NY                       AK,ID,MT,SD,TX,WY
2004                                          IN,NE,UT
2008 CA,CO,DE,HI,IL,IN,MD,NV,NM,VT,VA,WA      AR,KY,MO,OK,TN,WV

So this election was extremely polarized into "red" and "blue" states, more so than even those previous years (1964, 1972, 1976) when the South voted pretty much as a bloc.

True, though it is a bit deceptive since trends often occur gradually, and for the most recent election, it is only bordered on one side.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2009, 05:52:00 PM »

I calculated each state's 2nd best Dem/Rep result compared to the national average, and listed states where the top two Dem/Rep results are both for or against the same candidate.

Dem:

ID: anti-Nixon (1960,1972)
LA: anti-Nixon (1960,1968)
MA: anti-Nixon (1968,1972)
MS: anti-Nixon (1960,1968)
NY: anti-Bush II
SC: Carter
TN: Carter
WV: Carter

Rep:

CO: anti-Carter
HI: Nixon (1960, 1972)
ID: Bush II
IN: Bush II
IA: Nixon (1960, 1968)
MD: Nixon (1968, 1972)
MT: Bush II
NV: Reagan
NH: Reagan
OR: Nixon (1960, 1968)
SD: Bush II
TX: Bush II
WA: anti-Carter
WI: Nixon (1960, 1968)

by candidate:

Nixon (1960, 1968): IA, OR, WI
anti-Nixon: (1960, 1968): LA, MS
Nixon (1960, 1972): HI
anti-Nixon: (1960, 1972): ID
Nixon (1968, 1972): MD
anti-Nixon: (1968, 1972): MA
Carter: SC, TN, WV
anti-Carter: CO, WA
Reagan: NV, NH
Bush II: ID, IN, MT, SD, TX
anti-Bush II: NY

-------

Comments?
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2009, 11:04:09 PM »

I calculated each state's 2nd best Dem/Rep result compared to the national average, and listed states where the top two Dem/Rep results are both for or against the same candidate.

Dem:

ID: anti-Nixon (1960,1972)
LA: anti-Nixon (1960,1968)
MA: anti-Nixon (1968,1972)
MS: anti-Nixon (1960,1968)
NY: anti-Bush II
SC: Carter
TN: Carter
WV: Carter

Rep:

CO: anti-Carter
HI: Nixon (1960, 1972)
ID: Bush II
IN: Bush II
IA: Nixon (1960, 1968)
MD: Nixon (1968, 1972)
MT: Bush II
NV: Reagan
NH: Reagan
OR: Nixon (1960, 1968)
SD: Bush II
TX: Bush II
WA: anti-Carter
WI: Nixon (1960, 1968)

by candidate:

Nixon (1960, 1968): IA, OR, WI
anti-Nixon: (1960, 1968): LA, MS
Nixon (1960, 1972): HI
anti-Nixon: (1960, 1972): ID
Nixon (1968, 1972): MD
anti-Nixon: (1968, 1972): MA
Carter: SC, TN, WV
anti-Carter: CO, WA
Reagan: NV, NH
Bush II: ID, IN, MT, SD, TX
anti-Bush II: NY

-------

Comments?

Some of them are fairly obvious. Maryland is probably an Agnew-effect for instance. But some I really don't get.

I would imagine this (below) has nothing to do with Nixon (Nixon was of course strong here in 1972), rather 1960 was the last year that Dems were dominant in the South, and in 1968 although Humphrey ran ahead of Nixon in these areas, obviously Wallace dominated.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2009, 11:37:37 PM »

Actually in Ohio's case, it hasn't varied far from the national average--its highest GOP showing was 6.73 more Republican in 1960, and its highest Dem showing was 3.3 more Democratic in 1964.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2013, 09:30:51 PM »

bump for 2012 results

Counting 1960 thru 2012, the following states had their most partisan results compared to the national average in 2012:

Dem: CA, HI, MD, VT, VA, WA
Rep: AR, KY, MO, TN, UT, WV, WY

Actually not as polarizing as in 2008, 13 states set records in 2012 as opposed to 18 in 2008.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2013, 06:06:20 PM »

So the new spreads are:

1960 AL,ID,LA,MS,UT            IA,ME,MN,OH,OR,VT,WI
1964 AK,ME,MI,MO,NH,OH,RI,TX,WY     AL,AZ,GA,LA,MS,SC,VA
1968                                            NM
1972 MA,MT,ND,OR,SD,WI     FL,HI,MD,NC
1976 AR,FL,GA,NC,OK,SC,TN     CT,IL,MI,NY,PA,RI,WA
1980 KY,WV                             CA,CO,MA,NV,ND
1984 MN,PA                             NH
1988 IA,KS,NE                         DE,NJ
1992
1996 AZ                                   KS
2000 CT,NJ,NY                       AK,ID,MT,SD,TX
2004                                          IN,NE
2008 CO,DE,IL,IN,NV,NM      OK
2012 CA,HI,MD,VT,VA,WA    AR,KY,MO,TN,UT,WV,WY
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2017, 07:41:32 PM »

The following states set their extremes in 2016:

Dem: WA, CA, AZ, CO, VA, MD
Rep: WY, ND, SD, MN, MO, AR, TN, KY, WV, IN, OH, PA
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2017, 10:07:53 PM »

The following states set their extremes in 2016:

Dem: WA, CA, AZ, CO, VA, MD
Rep: WY, ND, SD, MN, MO, AR, TN, KY, WV, IN, OH, PA

PA was more right of center in 1948.

I made a table of every state's margins compared to the national average for the years 1960-2004.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2017, 05:26:51 PM »

So the new spreads are:

1960 AL,ID,LA,MS,UT            IA,ME,OR,VT,WI
1964 AK,ME,MI,MO,NH,OH,RI,TX,WY     AL,AZ,GA,LA,MS,SC,VA
1968                                            NM
1972 MA,MT,ND,OR,SD,WI     FL,HI,MD,NC
1976 AR,FL,GA,NC,OK,SC,TN     CT,IL,MI,NY,RI,WA
1980 KY,WV                             CA,CO,MA,NV
1984 MN,PA                             NH
1988 IA,KS,NE                         DE,NJ
1992
1996                                      KS
2000 CT,NJ,NY                       AK,ID,MT,TX
2004                                          NE
2008 DE,IL,IN,NV,NM            OK
2012 HI,VT                            UT
2016 AZ,CA,CO,MD,VA,WA      AR,IN,KY,MN,MO,ND,OH,PA,SD,TN,WV,WY
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2017, 05:44:12 PM »

                 D              R
Alabama         1960      1964
Alaska         1964      2000
Arizona         2016      1964
Arkansas         1976      2016
California         2016      1980
Colorado         2016      1980
Connecticut      2000      1976
Delaware         2008      1988
Florida         1976      1972
Georgia         1976      1964
Hawaii         2012      1972
Idaho         1960      2000
Illinois         2008   1976
Indiana         2008      2016
Iowa         1988      1960
Kansas         1988      1996
Kentucky         1980      2016
Louisiana         1960      1964
Maine         1964      1960
Maryland         2016      1972
Massachusetts      1972      1980
Michigan         1964      1976
Minnesota      1984      2016
Mississippi      1960      1964
Missouri         1964      2016
Montana         1972      2000
Nebraska         1988      2004
Nevada         2008      1980
New Hampshire      1964      1984
New Jersey      2000      1988
New Mexico      2008      1968
New York         2000      1976
North Carolina      1976      1972
North Dakota      1972      2016
Ohio         1964      2016
Oklahoma         1976      2008
Oregon         1972      1960
Pennsylvania      1984      2016
Rhode Island      1964      1976
South Carolina      1976      1964
South Dakota      1972      2016
Tennessee      1976      2016
Texas         1964      2000
Utah         1960      2012
Vermont         2012      1960
Virginia         2016      1964
Washington      2016      1976
West Virginia      1980      2016
Wisconsin         1972      1960
Wyoming         1964      2016
Washington, DC      1984     1964

Indiana stands out as having had its most Republican year in 2004 followed immediately by its most Democratic year in 2008.

Three states flipped 1960-64: Louisiana (D-R), Mississippi (D-R) and Ohio (R-D). Two states flipped 1972-76: North Carolina (R-D) and Florida (R-D). There were no other instances of back-to-back strongest performances for each party.

Interestingly, while 1960 and 1964, as well as 1972 and 1976, demonstrated radical regional shifts due to different factions rising and falling within the Democratic Party, 2004 and 2008 demonstrated no such radical regional shifts. Indiana was just weird. (Then again, the change in Ohio from 1960 to 1964 cannot be explained by regional shifts in those years, either.)

After all that, Indiana now had its most relative Repub year, yes it is Pence's home state and Trump is a good fit for the state, but still.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2021, 06:45:13 PM »

The only states to set a record in 2020 for most relatively D/R are:

D: WA, AZ, CO, VA, MD
R: AR, OH, PA

Far fewer than 2016.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2021, 11:14:42 PM »

1960-2012 stay the same, and 2016 and 2020 are now:

        D                                R
2016 CA                          IN, KY, MN, MO, ND, SD, TN, WV, WY
2020 WA, AZ, CO, VA, MD    AR, OH, PA
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 12 queries.