UK General Election 2019 - Election Day and Results Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 12:22:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Election 2019 - Election Day and Results Thread (search mode)
Thread note
Any attempt at thread derailing will result in banishment. (Edit: damn, you guys really behaved yourselves)


Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UK General Election 2019 - Election Day and Results Thread  (Read 75719 times)
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« on: December 12, 2019, 07:31:23 AM »

I'll turn on BBC for the exit poll. If it says Tory majority, I'm going to bed. If it says no overall majority, I'll go down the corner shop to get some cheap cans of cider and settle in for a long one.

MAKE PLANS TO GO TO BED!

STFU
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2019, 01:57:27 AM »

NI

DUP 8
SF 7
SDLP 2
Alliance 1

First HoC election with a unionist minority.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2019, 03:09:52 AM »
« Edited: December 14, 2019, 08:48:47 AM by Lord Halifax »



Turnout hasn't often borne much correlation to how well Tories or Labour do - for instance, turnout was consistently higher during the Thatcher & Major years than the Blair-Brown ones. It also - before the more recent elections - tended to be higher in Conservative seats than in Labour areas, and the highest-turnout election in modern times (1992) saw the Tories - not Labour - do much better than polls expected.

How would those Labour voters who stayed home in previously loyal constituencies have voted? No way to know, of course, but the idea that Labour was defeated by low turnout or 'suppressed votes' (who exactly was doing the suppressing?) I just don't find believable. Certainly the opinion polls pointed almost exactly to yesterday's outcome, so it seems unlikely that turnout rates disproportionately benefited one side or the other.

Its not true that there is "no" relation. Low turnouts *tend* to favour the Tories and always have done whereas higher ones mean the pro-Labour demographics tend to vote in bigger numbers. Though a qualifier here is that *very* high turnouts tend to favour the right again - in the 1992 GE as you say and also the 2016 EU referendum (*may* have helped "no" in the 2014 ScotIndy vote as well)

Why is that? Who are the people that vote in very high turnout elections and not in "ordinary" high turnout elections?
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2019, 03:39:31 AM »


that assumes Scottish independence never happens
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2019, 05:03:11 AM »


that assumes Scottish independence never happens

Well, if Scottish independence does happen, that's even more reason for Labour not to compete there.

The whole prospect of independence (which isn't some unrealistic dream given that Brexit is likely to have very negative effects on the Scottish economy) means that it's unrealistic for Labour to turn SNP into a "permanent satellite". Any Labour-SNP alliance will be temporary and likely fraught with tension.

Question to British posters: Would Scottish Labour benefit from ditching unionism and becoming neutral ("let the people decide") on independence?
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2019, 11:35:07 AM »


that assumes Scottish independence never happens

Well, if Scottish independence does happen, that's even more reason for Labour not to compete there.

The whole prospect of independence (which isn't some unrealistic dream given that Brexit is likely to have very negative effects on the Scottish economy) means that it's unrealistic for Labour to turn SNP into a "permanent satellite". Any Labour-SNP alliance will be temporary and likely fraught with tension.

It's really not that complicated. Either independence succeeds and the Scottish Question stops being an issue for Labour (they're going to have to work their ass off to win a majority of English and Welsh seats, but it can be done). Or it fails, the SNP eventually has to accept that, and settles with a partnership with Labour. I mean I guess they could keep asking for a new IndyRef every 5 years or so, but they'll get tired of it eventually.

SNP is a broad tent populist party like Fianna Fail in Ireland. They have no reason to be permanently allied with Labour if it doesn't give them a referendum.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2019, 03:44:52 PM »

Question to British posters: Would Scottish Labour benefit from ditching unionism and becoming neutral ("let the people decide") on independence?

It seems some members are thinking along those lines.

Is Scottish Labour's position on independence changing?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-50808996
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2019, 09:24:06 AM »


that assumes Scottish independence never happens

Well, if Scottish independence does happen, that's even more reason for Labour not to compete there.

The whole prospect of independence (which isn't some unrealistic dream given that Brexit is likely to have very negative effects on the Scottish economy) means that it's unrealistic for Labour to turn SNP into a "permanent satellite". Any Labour-SNP alliance will be temporary and likely fraught with tension.

It's really not that complicated. Either independence succeeds and the Scottish Question stops being an issue for Labour (they're going to have to work their ass off to win a majority of English and Welsh seats, but it can be done). Or it fails, the SNP eventually has to accept that, and settles with a partnership with Labour. I mean I guess they could keep asking for a new IndyRef every 5 years or so, but they'll get tired of it eventually.

SNP is a broad tent populist party like Fianna Fail in Ireland. They have no reason to be permanently allied with Labour if it doesn't give them a referendum.

Did you even read my post?? When did I say anything about not giving them a referendum?

You implied they would eventually get tired of demanding one all the time and would then remain allies of Labour ("the SNP eventually has to accept that, and settles with a partnership with Labour").
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.