Atlas Forum

Election Archive => 2010 Elections => Topic started by: Хahar 🤔 on January 18, 2010, 06:53:04 pm



Title: Attention hacks
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on January 18, 2010, 06:53:04 pm
(
Img
)
(
Img
)

And the former image is your wet dream, no less.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: You kip if you want to... on January 18, 2010, 06:56:56 pm
Well put. :)


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Psychic Octopus on January 18, 2010, 07:01:03 pm
lol


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: SvenssonRS on January 18, 2010, 07:03:25 pm
Um...what?


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home. on January 18, 2010, 07:13:50 pm
Um...what?

something about conceding both sides of Congress in 2010 and Obama winning reelection 2012


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Meeker on January 18, 2010, 08:40:38 pm
For those confused, the first map is the 1994 Senate results. The second is the 1996 Presidential results.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on January 18, 2010, 08:46:24 pm
Good thing the GOP won't be regaining the Senate this year. :P LOL


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Vepres on January 18, 2010, 08:49:38 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Devilman88 on January 19, 2010, 12:22:36 am
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on January 19, 2010, 04:07:23 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on January 19, 2010, 06:07:19 pm
Just for the record my wet dream consists of the following

(
Img
)

(
Img
)

Don't see either happening anytime soon in any situation.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: perdedor on January 19, 2010, 06:24:05 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Lief 🐋 on January 19, 2010, 08:17:09 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

Sorry, but you're both dumb. His agenda is more ambitious than any president since LBJ.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on January 19, 2010, 11:30:40 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

Sorry, but you're both dumb. His agenda is more ambitious than any president since LBJ.

What is it?


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on January 22, 2010, 01:59:14 am
Just for the record my wet dream consists of the following

Well my wet dream is...

..uh, nothing I should post on the Atlas forum.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Mechaman on January 22, 2010, 02:12:46 am
Here's my wet dream:

()


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on January 22, 2010, 10:12:34 pm
Just for the record my wet dream consists of the following

Well my wet dream is...

..uh, nothing I should post on the Atlas forum.

::)

I was using his terminology. I just forget to use quotation marks. I mistake I make, regulary.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on February 28, 2010, 05:41:46 pm
Don't see either happening anytime soon in any situation.

My response:

(
Img
)
(
Img
)


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: benevolent democracy on March 11, 2010, 12:17:46 am
the reality of the situation:
(
Img
)

what people think:
(
Img
)


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Meeker on March 11, 2010, 01:19:54 am
^^^ What the hell does that even mean?


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: The Mikado on March 11, 2010, 01:29:05 am
the reality of the situation:
(
Img
)

what people think:
(
Img
)

(
Img
)

(
Img
)


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: benevolent democracy on March 11, 2010, 01:43:25 pm
What I am saying is imagine the insanity of trying to cast electoral votes based on county instead of state. On that same note, re: image 1, it shows both the great thing about democratic process and also the horror... See the grey area? I suspect its larger, it represents the people who vote, but might not have a clue about what, who, or even why they are voting. I was once counted among them and let me tell ya, we really do have no clue...

The reality of the situation is that of course, we as a diverse nation will never 'ALL' agree on one candidate, but we do agree on at least one thing, they should represent the majority. I am not saying the ECS is broken, but I do think it could be reformed, after all, we are quite a different nation from when it was formed...

Quote: "The ECS's main and very important advantage is that it acts as a way to moderate the possible tyranny of an empassioned majority, by preventing the people in larger states to completely dictate their will onto the people who live in the smaller ones. As in many other countries, this will lead to further concentration of political and economic power in certain regions of the country, at the expense of other less populated regions. In turn, that will lead to the uneven development of the country, in all tangible spheres, with its familiar consequences."

on this note,  do we really still need a group to choose the President indirectly from the "Electoral College."?

What if the President could be elected with a system closer to 'popular vote', but not in such a way that the will of the majority becomes potentially tyrannical?

RE: image 2, this is how I feel the media trys to portray the system, its not that simple, we do not all fit into nice neat little boxes or voteing blocks. Obama proved that there is a huge block of voters who can and will come out of left field, too bad he was not a Libertarian or an Independant.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on August 09, 2010, 02:47:53 am
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

He has passed Health Reform and Financial Reform during his first two years, he's gotten a fair amount done.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: ajc0918 on August 09, 2010, 11:25:23 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

He has passed Health Reform and Financial Reform during his first two years, he's gotten a fair amount done.

There's a difference between getting things done and getting things accomplished.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Badger on August 11, 2010, 08:32:27 am
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

He has passed Health Reform and Financial Reform during his first two years, he's gotten a fair amount done.

There's a difference between getting things done and getting things accomplished.

???

There's also a difference between being subtle and being incomprehensible. ;)


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Keyboard Jacobinism on August 11, 2010, 08:57:36 am
Here's my wet dream:

()

Then here's my wet dream:

()


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Bo on August 11, 2010, 04:50:04 pm
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

Sorry, but you're both dumb. His agenda is more ambitious than any president since LBJ.

I agree with Lief here. Obama passed healthcare reform, financial reform, Lilly Ledbetter, the jobs bill, and might pass a global warming bill sometime soon as well. That is the most extensive legislative record out of any President since LBJ. And Vepres, Clinton won reelection in 1996 in large part due to the good economy and due to the fact that he presented himself as a bulwark against Republican extremism (and not to mention that he had a lousy opponent as well). Where exactly did Clinton sell out his principles after 1994? He promised to reduce the deficit and reform welfare back in 1992, before the GOP took over Congress.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 02, 2010, 02:05:24 am
Well, Clinton only won because he sold out on all his principles (not that I'm complaining).

What he said. Also, I don't see Obama doing the same thing. He will push his plans even if they aren't popular with the people.

He has no plans.

A sad truth. His Presidency to date has been nothing more than a PR campaign.

Sorry, but you're both dumb. His agenda is more ambitious than any president since LBJ.

I agree with Lief here. Obama passed healthcare reform, financial reform, Lilly Ledbetter, the jobs bill, and might pass a global warming bill sometime soon as well. That is the most extensive legislative record out of any President since LBJ. And Vepres, Clinton won reelection in 1996 in large part due to the good economy and due to the fact that he presented himself as a bulwark against Republican extremism (and not to mention that he had a lousy opponent as well). Where exactly did Clinton sell out his principles after 1994? He promised to reduce the deficit and reform welfare back in 1992, before the GOP took over Congress.

     He ultimately did them exactly because the Republicans wanted him to do so & the public wanted him to do so. The idea that Clinton actually had principles to begin with is a lark.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Keyboard Jacobinism on October 02, 2010, 07:09:30 am
Good thing the GOP won't be regaining the Senate this year. :P LOL

Well, I guess you may be wrong.


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 07, 2010, 09:07:24 pm
You guys have boring wet dreams.:P


Title: Re: Attention hacks
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 08, 2010, 09:49:38 pm
Good thing the GOP won't be regaining the Senate this year. :P LOL

Well, I guess you may be wrong.

Check my latest Predictions, its 50-48 GOP to Dem. Which is a Democratic Senate.

Back in January, I saw pickups in CT, PA, DE, ILL, CO, NV and ND max with Simmons, Toomey, Castle, Kirk, Norton, Lowden and Hoeven. Thats eight seats or 49 max. CA was supposed to be "competative" with Tom Campbell, and off limits with the other two (Basically ended up that way). Feingold was save without Tommy Thompson, Bayh was still running, Byrd still had a pulse and Rossi hadn't decided that the third time was the charm.