Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion => Past Election What-ifs (US) => Topic started by: Bo on February 06, 2010, 08:19:48 PM



Title: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Bo on February 06, 2010, 08:19:48 PM
Assume that the Bush DUI story is not revealed until after the election. Everything else stays the same. How would this election turn out? Discuss, with maps. Please list the EV, the exact PV, and Bush's victory margin in Florida (both percentagewise and numerically).


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Sasquatch on February 07, 2010, 08:00:53 AM
Assume that the Bush DUI story is not revealed until after the election. Everything else stays the same. How would this election turn out? Discuss, with maps. Please list the EV, the exact PV, and Bush's victory margin in Florida (both percentagewise and numerically).

(
)


Bush - 50%  302EV
Gore - 46%  236EV
Nader - 3%
Others - 1%


[Florida]
Bush - 50%
Gore - 47%
Nader - 2%
Others - 1%


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Bo on February 08, 2010, 12:54:06 PM
Anyone else?


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: #CriminalizeSobriety on February 09, 2010, 03:36:52 PM
No, Sasquatch's map seems pretty spot on.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on February 13, 2010, 09:56:24 AM
Gore would have lost either ME, OR or WI in the map but it would have staid close.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on April 27, 2010, 07:44:39 PM
Tell you what a DUI is a learning experience. Bush should have came out with his DUI story in March of that year and not allowed people to forget what his lessons learned were. He should have joined MADD and gotten involved with them somehow. I've gotten a DUI, I've talked to MADD, it is quite an experience to learn from. Had he done that, conservatives who did not vote on election day that year would've seen him as very human and been able to relate to him as a fellow human learning from a mistake. I'm not sure what W was thinking here.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Bo on April 27, 2010, 07:54:09 PM
Tell you what a DUI is a learning experience. Bush should have came out with his DUI story in March of that year and not allowed people to forget what his lessons learned were. He should have joined MADD and gotten involved with them somehow. I've gotten a DUI, I've talked to MADD, it is quite an experience to learn from. Had he done that, conservatives who did not vote on election day that year would've seen him as very human and been able to relate to him as a fellow human learning from a mistake. I'm not sure what W was thinking here.

I agree with you here. If the DUI story would have been released sooner, Bush could have responded to it effectively and people would have forgotten about it by election day (similar to how they forgot about Obama attending Reverend Wright's racist church). Thus, Bush Jr. would have won by a larger margin than he did in RL.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on April 28, 2010, 02:36:36 PM
Hey, tell me we're finally agreeing on something! That was a big error on Bush's behalf not to use it as a learning experience.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on April 29, 2010, 03:55:43 PM
I dont think it changes alot. Maybe a few conservatives stayed home but, not that much. Jeb would  still have "delivered" Florida for his little brother.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Bo on April 29, 2010, 05:13:34 PM
I dont think it changes alot. Maybe a few conservatives stayed home but, not that much. Jeb would  still have "delivered" Florida for his little brother.

Yeah, but Bush Jr. might not have needed FL without the DUI story. He might have won IA, OR, NM, and WI (which together have more EV's than Florida).


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on April 29, 2010, 05:34:25 PM
I wouldn't have seen 2000 being close and would've predicted a 51-47 victory for Bush with an electoral amount in the mid-lower 300s. While expecting FL to go to him by 5-7. I don't see why FL is close at the presidential level. That state is very conservative internally, has some of the most libertarian laws, and has been run by the GOP in Tallahassee for over a decade. Another thing is if you look at close elections where the GOP loses it still goes to the Republicans. Only when Democrats win in landslides have they carried FL by even small margins.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on April 30, 2010, 10:26:49 AM
I just really don't think it made that big of difference really. His cocaine use was pretty common knowledge long before the dui story as well as his wild days in college.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on April 30, 2010, 12:58:12 PM
I don't remember him saying he did cocaine.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on April 30, 2010, 01:00:14 PM
He never really admitted it , but it was very common knowledge.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Mechaman on April 30, 2010, 02:44:46 PM
Tell you what a DUI is a learning experience. Bush should have came out with his DUI story in March of that year and not allowed people to forget what his lessons learned were. He should have joined MADD and gotten involved with them somehow. I've gotten a DUI, I've talked to MADD, it is quite an experience to learn from. Had he done that, conservatives who did not vote on election day that year would've seen him as very human and been able to relate to him as a fellow human learning from a mistake. I'm not sure what W was thinking here.

Considering that one of the biggest appeals of Bush was that he was a "born again", I agree.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on April 30, 2010, 02:45:39 PM
I had a dewey and it sux. lol


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Bo on April 30, 2010, 05:34:15 PM

Huh?


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey on April 30, 2010, 06:11:09 PM

A DUI?


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 01, 2010, 07:36:29 PM
lol ya dewey sounds alot better than dui


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 02, 2010, 03:38:55 AM
that's what they're called


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 02, 2010, 01:46:31 PM
i took mine all the way to a jury trial


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 02, 2010, 02:52:51 PM
i took mine all the way to a jury trial

beating a DUI is unheard of


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 03, 2010, 06:46:14 AM
Nah its happened before, i didnt blow on the breat test, and prosecution refused to submit the tape into evidence. My lawyer thought we had a good chance and the hury was out over two hours, i though i was gonna beat it.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 03, 2010, 11:43:50 AM
What state are you from? In PA it's automatically a year without a license and the same consequences for having a DUI if you refuse to blow or do the testing. The tests though are NOT PERMISSABLE IN COURT other than blood tests and non-portable breathalizers.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 03, 2010, 12:40:14 PM
Alabama, I lost my license for 90 days


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 03, 2010, 01:16:31 PM
Alabama is a good state for alot of reasons, mainly its conservatism.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 03, 2010, 01:19:50 PM
Lol yea are democrats here are republicans, and our republicans are nazi's. There more neo-cons instead of conservatives.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 03, 2010, 10:14:19 PM
Lol yea are democrats here are republicans, and our republicans are nazi's. There more neo-cons instead of conservatives.

I can't tell what party you're in lol. I'd say Alabama is to the right of me.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Tuck! on May 03, 2010, 11:05:15 PM
Bush would pick up Oregon, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Iowa, and Minnesota.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Bo on May 03, 2010, 11:29:29 PM
Bush would pick up Oregon, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Iowa, and Minnesota.

What do you think the PV and Bush's Florida margin would be?


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Tuck! on May 03, 2010, 11:30:08 PM
Bush would pick up Oregon, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Iowa, and Minnesota.

What do you think the PV and Bush's Florida margin would be?

Bush +3 in Florida. Bush wins popular vote 50-46.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 04, 2010, 08:20:09 AM
Dream on.


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 04, 2010, 04:00:30 PM
PV would be Bush 50-47
EV would be Bush 311-227


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: cpeeks on May 05, 2010, 06:46:32 AM
lol get real


Title: Re: Bush vs. Gore 2000 with no Bush DUI story
Post by: Derek on May 06, 2010, 07:10:32 PM
He should have used it to his advantage as if he learned something and hopefully he did learn something. It is inexcusable for him to leave that in the hands of the media.