Title: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 12, 2010, 12:14:34 AM () LESLIE M FROST INSTITUTE FOR DEMOCRACY Title: Re: DSoFE's Office Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 12, 2010, 12:18:27 AM ELECTION CALENDAR EXACT DATES FOR 2011 PENDING REVIEW January 3rd Wkd: Mideast Regionals - JAN 13 February 1st Wkd: Northeast Regionals - FEB 3 3rd Wkd: Southeast Regionals - FEB 17 2nd Last Wkd: President & Class A Senators (Regions) - FEB 17 March none April 3rd Wkd: Southeast Regionals - APR 14 2nd Last Wkd: Class B Senators (STV/PR/At Large) - APR 14 2nd Last Wkd: Midwest Regionals - APR 14 2nd Last Wkd: Pacific Regionals - APR 14 May 3rd Wkd: Mideast Regionals - MAY 19 June 1st Wkd: Northeast Regionals 3rd Wkd: Southeast Regionals 2nd Last Wkd: President & Class A Senators (Regions) July none August 3rd Wkd: Southeast Regionals 2nd Last Wkd: Class B Senators (STV/PR/At Large) 2nd Last Wkd: Midwest Regionals 2nd Last Wkd: Pacific Regionals September 3rd Wkd: Mideast Regionals October 1st Wkd: Northeast Regionals 3rd Wkd: Southeast Regionals 2nd Last Wkd: President & Class A Senators (Regions) November none December 2nd Wkd: Class B Senators (STV/PR/At Large) - DEC 9 2nd Wkd: Pacific Regionals - DEC 9 2nd Wkd: Midwest Regionals - DEC 9 3rd Wkd: Southeast Regionals - DEC 16 Title: Re: DSoFE's Office Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 12, 2010, 12:19:08 AM Federal Election Calendar NEXT MIDTERMS: December Election Deadline to file for Class B (At-large) Senate seats: 23:59, December 8 Absentee voting application for Class B (At-large) Senate seats opens: 23:59, December 8 Election Days: 23:59 December 9 to 23:59 December 12 NEXT PRESIDENTIAL: February Election Deadline to file for President and Vice President: 23:59 February 10 Absentee voting application for President and Vice President opens: 23:59 February 10 Deadline to file for Class A (Regional) Senate seats: 23:59 February 16 Absentee voting application for Class A (Regional) Senate seats: 23:59 February 16 Election Days: 23:59 February 17 to 23:59 February 20 Political Parties should FINISH endorsing people (for fusion act purposes) by the end of the day, on Feb 16. Parties, ideally, should START by at least the end of the day on Feb 13. Meaning people who want to get a party endorsement, should declare so by Feb 10th. Title: Re: DSoFE's Office Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 31, 2010, 06:46:05 PM CANDIDATES LIST
none at this time. Title: Re: DSoFE's Office Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 08, 2010, 05:34:59 AM My Political Office is here: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=120384.msg2572179#msg2572179
Title: Re: DSoFE's Office Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 12, 2010, 06:35:36 PM Old Thread:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=120481.0 Title: Re: DSoFE's Office Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 13, 2010, 06:57:44 PM placeholder
Title: Re: Secretary of Federal Elections (Designate) thread Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 29, 2010, 07:06:46 AM I've been adding some data in here, it may be worthwhile for you to check it out!
Title: Re: Secretary of Federal Elections (Designate) thread Post by: Purple State on August 29, 2010, 09:59:51 AM I like the integration of the federal and regional election calendars Teddy. Would it be possible to also include (at least the federal) deadlines for registration, absentee, candidacy declaration, etc.? And maybe color coding for federal/regional.
Looks great so far! :) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 25, 2010, 09:30:37 PM I've updated the deadlines above.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: SPC on September 25, 2010, 10:46:54 PM Could you update the candidate list?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 26, 2010, 10:06:06 AM So updated. If you are not on the list please post in the declaration thread ASAP.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on September 28, 2010, 05:49:05 PM Is there a Special Election being held in the very near future?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 28, 2010, 06:40:02 PM I will look into this. I've been on vacation as of late and may have missed any resignations. Conversely, if anyone knows that there should be a special election, please PM me or post here.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on September 28, 2010, 10:24:36 PM Well, ummm, yeah...Badger just got confirmed as GM.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Badger on September 30, 2010, 02:46:40 PM I'm now officially an ex-Senator and current GM. My previous at-large senate seat is vacant.
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=36934.msg2666652#msg2666652 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2010, 09:19:05 PM I do beleive that according to protocol, I am the one who is to inform the DoFE that a vacancy has occured.
SoFE Teddy, Due to the ascension of the At-Large Senator Badger to the office of Game Moderator, his At-Large Senate seat is now vacant and needs to be filled via special election according to the current rules under which Special elections are to be conducted. NC Yankee, PPT Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 30, 2010, 09:21:51 PM Having received notification I hear-by schedule a by-election to occur 10 days from today (October 10th 2010)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Barnes on September 30, 2010, 11:33:41 PM Having received notification I hear-by schedule a by-election to occur 10 days from today (October 10th 2010) I thought the election took place over an entire weekend? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 01, 2010, 05:49:12 AM Yes, but there is always an official "date" tied to it.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on October 01, 2010, 07:08:50 AM You're confusing us all, Teddy. On what day/date will the election begin?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 01, 2010, 11:33:47 AM If my understanding of the law is correct, the election will begin at 00:01 on October 8th and end at 23:59 on october 10th
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 06, 2010, 02:55:55 AM Please note that I am ill. While I'll still be around for the next 2-3 days, it wont be for hours at a time.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 04:53:39 AM I've been looking, but cannot find anything that prohibits Naso from running. If I've missed something, please let me know. This seems extremely fishy.
Also, note that the at-large by-election begins in less than 24 hours. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on October 07, 2010, 05:52:51 AM He can run, he needs a running mate.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 12:44:26 PM Corret...ish
Point of Clarification: Example Election: Barack Obama/Joe Biden --- 48 votes Sarah Palin/Glenn Beck --- 46 votes Sarah Palin/Mitt Romney --- 6 votes The winner would be Obama and Biden. While Palin may have got a total of 52 votes herself, remember that according to law a person is not elected, a ticket is. That means that Palin-Beck is considered one entity, while Palin-Romney is another. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 03:02:55 PM The SoFE is planning for a total of 110 ballots to be cast in this election, and is ready should the actual number be far higher or lower than this.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 09:23:26 PM Sample Ballot for the impending Special Election
-------------------------------------------------------------------- () () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The special election begins at 23:59 EDT October 7th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, October 10th. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. Keep posts to votes only. However, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to be fair in consideration of the above matter and will give voters the benefit of the doubt. Explanations of one's vote or simple expressions of approval for a candidate will not be construed as acts of campaigning, unless they obviously violate the above criteria. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=116017.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. [ ] Roy Barnes 2010 (Barnes) Jesus Christ Party - JCP [ ] Vepres Regional Protection Party - RPP [ ] wormyguy Populares - POP [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Barnes on October 07, 2010, 09:25:39 PM Start time is wrong. ;)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 09:28:46 PM How so exactly?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on October 07, 2010, 09:30:15 PM I believe its '"wormyguy", as opposed to "wormguy"
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Barnes on October 07, 2010, 09:31:18 PM How so exactly? Well, it says "23:59 EDT October 7th", but I was under the impression that the election start after midnight. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 09:33:00 PM I believe its '"wormyguy", as opposed to "wormguy" How so exactly? Well, it says "23:59 EDT October 7th", but I was under the impression that the election start after midnight. Actually it legally cannot! It must start between midnight on Thursday Morning, and Midnight on Friday Morning. I can pick any time, but due the confusion from last round, I've chosen 23:59 for clarity. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Barnes on October 07, 2010, 09:34:39 PM I believe its '"wormyguy", as opposed to "wormguy" How so exactly? Well, it says "23:59 EDT October 7th", but I was under the impression that the election start after midnight. Actually it legally cannot! It must start between midnight on Thursday Morning, and Midnight on Friday Morning. I can pick any time, but due the confusion from last round, I've chosen 23:59 for clarity. Ah, I see. This is why you're SoFE and not me, Teddy. ;D Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 09:39:23 PM I believe its '"wormyguy", as opposed to "wormguy" How so exactly? Well, it says "23:59 EDT October 7th", but I was under the impression that the election start after midnight. Actually it legally cannot! It must start between midnight on Thursday Morning, and Midnight on Friday Morning. I can pick any time, but due the confusion from last round, I've chosen 23:59 for clarity. Ah, I see. This is why you're SoFE and not me, Teddy. ;D Hum, actually technically it could start at 00:01 on Friday Morning, but that would require the election to end at 00:01 on Monday Morning, and that would probably throw people off. I think 23:59 is good to stick to for now :P Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 07, 2010, 10:25:48 PM Unfortunately, I am still ill, and my medication is kicking in very strongly, and I doubt I can remain awake for the next 35 minutes. I will therefore post this shortly with a notification that voters need to wait 30 minutes before voting.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 08, 2010, 08:29:00 AM Temporary Tracker.
Last voter = GM3PRP 15 - Barnes 6 - Vepres 1 - Wormyguy Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 08, 2010, 02:47:37 PM Temporary Tracker.
Last voter = Ben 21 - Barnes 8 - Vepres 1 - Wormyguy Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 08, 2010, 06:49:31 PM Temporary Tracker.
Last voter = SPC 24 - Barnes 10 - Vepres 6 - Wormyguy (all second preference Vepres) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 09, 2010, 11:49:08 AM Temporary Tracker.
Last voter = officepark 30 - Barnes 16 - Vepres 11 - Wormyguy (9 second preference Vepres, 2 for Barnes) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 09, 2010, 10:47:51 PM 70 valid ballots cast so far.
1 Invalid ballot cast so far: abaleman Registered too late to qualify to vote. Ballot invalid. Temporary Tracker: ROUND ONE: Barnes - 33 Vepres - 22 Wormyguy - 14 * Sewer - 1 ** ** = Eliminated since this vote will not change the result. 14+1=15 15+22=23 23<33. * = Eliminated since he is last once the above is taken into account. ROUND TWO: Barnes - 36 Vepres - 34 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 08:07:03 AM As of MJ
ROUND ONE: Barnes - 35 Vepres - 23 Wormyguy - 15 Sewer - 1 ROUND TWO: Barnes - 38 Vepres - 36 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 07:00:13 PM Reaganfan's ballot has been additionally disqualified as the 7 day provision does indeed apply to special elections and not just regular elections as other laws had stated.
As of Verily ROUND ONE: Barnes - 40 Vepres - 23 Wormyguy - 16 Sewer - 1 ROUND TWO: Barnes - 41 Vepres - 23 Wormyguy - 16 ROUND THREE (hypothetical): Barnes - 43 Vepres - 37 A Note. My count has Sewer with one vote while some private counts have Lewis. Sewer wrote himself in, though, not in the #1 slot. Lewis wrote Sewer in above himself. This Sewer would get this ballot. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 08:46:31 PM As of Duke
ROUND ONE: Barnes - 40 Vepres - 24 Wormyguy - 16 Sewer - 1 Lewis - 1 ROUND TWO: Barnes - 42 Vepres - 24 Wormyguy - 16 ROUND THREE (hypothetical): Barnes - 44 Vepres - 38 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 09:23:28 PM TRACKER:
As of Rowan ROUND ONE Barnes - 42 Vepres - 25 Wormyguy - 16 Lewis - 1 Sewer - 1 ROUND TWO Barnes - 44 Vepres - 25 Wormyguy - 16 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 11:09:29 PM PERLIM AND UNCERTIFIED RESULTS
ROUND ONE Barnes - 42 Vepres - 26 wormyguy - 16 Lewis Trondheim - 1 Sewer - 1 ROUND TWO Barnes - 44 Vepres - 26 wormyguy - 16 CERTIFICATION IS EXPECTED BY 12:45 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 11:14:55 PM OFFICIAL VOTING SHEET
Quote Franzl - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy PiT - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Barnes - Barnes Hannibal - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Marokai - Barnes Yankee - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Dr. Cynic - Barnes Polnut - Barnes Jbrase - Wormyguy Vepres Barnes bullmoose88 - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Sewer - Barnes Sewer Lewis Bgwah - Barnes J. J. - Vepres Wormyguy Ebowed - Barnes Kalwejt - Barnes Vepres Filliatre - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Tmthforu94 - Vepres Barnes Wormyguy Fritz - Barnes Vepres Oakvale - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Antonio - Barnes Vepres Gramps - Barnes Hashemite - Barnes Lewis - Sewer Lewis Barnes Vepres Hans - Barnes Archangel - Barnes Wormyguy Vepres Dead0man - Vepres Wormyguy Vepres - Vepres Wormyguy px75 - Barnes Ben - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Feeblepizza - Wormyguy Feeblepizza Vepres RodPresident - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Thomas D - Vepres Barnes Wormyguy Han - Wormyguy Vepres Barnes Yelnoc - Wormyguy Vepres Barnes AndrewCT - Barnes Wormyguy Vepres Wormyguy - Wormyguy Vepres A-Bob - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Hawkeye59 - Barnes SPC - Wormyguy Vepres Texasgurl - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes EarlAW - Barnes Dallasfan - Wormyguy Vepres SamSpade - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Shua - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Cynic - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes SvenssonRS - Wormyguy Barnes Vepres Tb75 - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Snowguy - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Morgan - Wormyguy Vepres Phknrocket - Wormyguy Vepres Jfern - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Mechaman - Wormyguy Barnes Vepres Junkie - Barnes Vepres Badger - Barnes Officepark - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Fezzy - Vepres BrandonH - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Tender Branson - Barnes Torie - Vepres Barnes Wormyguy Ajc0918 - Wormyguy Vepres Republican95 - Wormyguy Vepres Inks - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Purple State - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy N!K - Vepres Wormyguy Barnes Fuzzybigfoot - Barnes Ronnie - Vepres Barnes Wormyguy Electoraljew2 - Wormyguy Vepres Barnes Bacon King - Barnes BRTD - Barnes Eraserhead - Barnes MaxQue - Barnes OgreMage - Barnes Redcommander - Wormyguy Vepres Barnes MasterJedi - Vepres Deldem - Barnes Vepres Republitarian - Wormyguy Vepres Barnes Meeker - Barnes Giovanni - Vepres Barnes Lief - Barnes Opebo - Barnes Boris78 - Barnes Verily - Barnes Vepres Wormyguy Al - Lewis Barnes Vepres Duke - Vepres Barnes RowanBrandon - Vepres Winfield - Vepres Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 11:39:06 PM ROUND ONE
Barnes - 42 Vepres - 26 wormyguy - 16 Lewis Trondheim - 1 Sewer - 1 ROUND TWO Barnes - 44 Vepres - 26 wormyguy - 16 () I declare Barnes duly elected to the Senate. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/October_2010_Special_Senate_Election#Results Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Purple State on October 10, 2010, 11:45:21 PM Bravo on a well-run election Teddy.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 10, 2010, 11:47:44 PM Bravo on a well-run election Teddy. Thanks. While I do run into bumps in the road, I am trying to ensure that these things will never be a problem again. The more problems I run into now, the better we will be in the future as I am adding more and more to the Guidebook. My goal is that we will never have repeated problems again. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Badger on October 11, 2010, 11:01:32 AM Bravo on a well-run election Teddy. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on October 11, 2010, 11:44:51 AM Bravo on a well-run election Teddy. ^^ Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Oakvale on October 11, 2010, 01:22:05 PM Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on October 11, 2010, 02:13:24 PM Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 13, 2010, 05:59:37 AM Note that I've been updating the Candidates list.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on October 18, 2010, 06:16:40 PM Hello,
As JCP Chairman, it is my duty to inform you that the JCP has endorsed HappyWarrior for ME Senator and NCYankee for SE Senator, and both candidates may appear on our ballot line. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 19, 2010, 12:57:09 AM Thank you, and noted.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 19, 2010, 08:59:34 PM The RPP has endorsed AndrewCT for President on a ticket with RPPer Duke
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 19, 2010, 09:05:05 PM also noted
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 19, 2010, 09:11:13 PM Forgot about this one.
The RPP has endorsed the honorable Dallasfan65 for NE Regional Senator and the honorable Hantheguitarman for Governor of the Northeast, which I forgot to include with the endorsement of the honerable AndrewCT. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 19, 2010, 09:22:03 PM Gubernatorial elections are a regional affair and not within the purview of this department. I do however note the senatorial endorsement.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 19, 2010, 09:26:26 PM Hello, As JCP Chairman, it is my duty to inform you that the JCP has endorsed HappyWarrior for ME Senator and NCYankee for SE Senator, and both candidates may appear on our ballot line. Yankee has accepted, and will be listed as such. I will contact HappyWarrior. The RPP has endorsed AndrewCT for President on a ticket with RPPer Duke Andrew has accepted, and will be listed as such. Forgot about this one. The RPP has endorsed the honorable Dallasfan65 for NE Regional Senator and the honorable Hantheguitarman for Governor of the Northeast, which I forgot to include with the endorsement of the honerable AndrewCT. I will contact Dallasfan Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 19, 2010, 09:47:04 PM HappyWarrior has accepted and will be listed as such.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 19, 2010, 10:01:50 PM I've been contacted by the dallasfan team that they accept, but it is a grey zone and I dont think I can accept from a team member without the official say-so of dallas. Therefore I will lodge the request as having come in now (an hour before the deadline) and check in with dallas ASAP to get official confirmation.
EDIT - he has accepted Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 20, 2010, 10:36:08 PM SAMPLE BALLOT
() () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The regular election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, October 21th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, October 24th. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. In short, the department will be taking a liberal interpreation of this, so Keep posts to votes only. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=116017.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. Note that voting begins at the proper time, and not immediately. Any votes cast before 23:59 shall be determined invalid. -- May be removed from final ballot if I am awake at the proper time. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT [ ] AndrewCT (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1799)/AHDuke99 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1151) POP - Populares RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Fritz (JLD) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=436)/Kalwejt (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3776) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] Reaganfan (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=234)/dead0man (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2343) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above NORTHEAST SENATE [ ] Dallasfan65 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4137) POP - Populares RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Eraserhead (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1665) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above SOUTHEAST SENATE [ ] North Carolina Yankee (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2811) RPP - Regional Protection Party JCP - Jesus Chirst Party [ ] SPC (Chuck Hagel 08) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1877) POP - Populares [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above MIDEAST SENATE [ ] HappyWarrior (Hannibal) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2235) IND - Independent JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] A-Bob (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3739) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above MIDWEST SENATE [ ] Kalwejt (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3776) JCP - Jesus Chirst Party [ ] SvenssonRS (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4469) POP - Populares [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above PACIFIC SENATE [ ] bgwah (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=152) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 20, 2010, 11:47:45 PM A sample ballot has been posted (above).
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on October 21, 2010, 12:02:43 AM What are the time deadlines for the fusion thingy? I tried to get it in on time, though I don't know whether or not the endorsed candidates accepted in time. Not that anyone really cares, I'm just curious.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 21, 2010, 12:07:33 AM Everyone managed to get in under the deadline, though some by less than an hour.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 21, 2010, 09:00:33 PM 2 hours before voting begins!
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 21, 2010, 09:48:00 PM A-Bob
afleitch agooji AHDuke99 ajc0918 albaleman Alcon AndrewCT Antonio V ArchangelZero Arescan azmagic Bacon King badger benconstine bgwah boris78 brandonh BRTD bullmoose88 CalebR change08 Chuck Hagel 08 cinyc ColinW Cosmo Kramer Cuivienen CultureKing cutie_15 Dallasfan65 Daniel Adams dead0man deldem Dessie Potter Devilman88 Dr. Cynic EarlAW Earth East Coast Republican Ebowed electoraljew2 Eraserhead Ernest FallenMorgan feeblepizza fezzyfestoon filliatre Flyers2004 Franken Franzl Frodo Fuzzybigfoot Giovanni GM3PRP gporter Gren Gustaf Hannibal hantheguitarman Hashemite hawkeye59 hcallega Holmes ilikeverin Inks.LWC Iosif italian-boy J.J. James Rivington Jas Jbrase jfern JLD Joe Republic John Dibble JOHN91043353 JulioMadrid junkie justW353 Kalwejt KS21 KyleGordon2016 Lahbas Lewis Trondheim Liberalkid Libertas Lief Lunar MagneticFree Mark Warner 08 Marokai Blue Mart MasterJedi MaxQue Mechaman meekermariner Mike Keller MilesC56 Mint Mquinn mrk Mr. Moderate nclib nickjbor North Carolina Yankee oakvale officepark Ogre Mage olawakandi opebo Peter phknrocket1k PiT (The Physicist) Progressive Realist Polnut Psychic Octopus Purple State px75 realisticidealist Realpolitik Reaganfan rebel_libertarian Redcommander Republican95 Republitarian Rochambeau RodPresident Ronnie RosettaStoned RowanBrandon Roy Barnes 2010 Sam Spade Sbane senseiofj324 sg0508 shua silent_spade07 Smash255 Smid snowguy716 SpaceCommunistMutant StatesRights SvenssonRS tb75 texasgurl24 Thomas D tmthforu94 Torie tuckerbanks useful idiot Vepres Vosem Warren_E_Dodge wdecker1 Winfield Winston Disraeli wormyguy Xahar xavier110 xfactor99 Yelnoc yougo1000 Zacoftheaxes Zarn Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on October 21, 2010, 10:04:48 PM Can the RPP have two tickets running for President with their party name?
I believe that since the RPP endorsed the Andrew/Duke ticket, and not Reaganfan/Dead0man, that the party name should not be put on that ticket. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 21, 2010, 10:35:26 PM The RPP has not stricken reaganfan from using the name.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 21, 2010, 10:40:40 PM https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Fusion_Ballot_Reform_Act this relates to this act, which, as I read it, says:
that although official endorsements must come from the party, that the party also retains the right to prohibit someone from running on their party line. There is about 20 mins to go before the ballot is posted. I am confidant enough that the simple fact that section 4 exists means that section 2 mainly applies to endorsements of candidates not already having the party label. I have been specifically informed by the RPP chair that the RPP will not be striking Reganfan from using the RPP name. (I, as a citizen asked the chair to do so, but the chair then informed me as SoFE that he will not be doing so) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 21, 2010, 11:15:23 PM the department has contacted all but three of the members who have not voted in past elections (save the ones who have specifically requested to not be contacted) to encourage them to vote! I am attempting to contact the remaining three now.
Quote The Department of Federal Elections would like to encourage all members to vote in this Federal Election: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126485.0 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2010, 09:52:21 PM It does not look like we will reach our target of 110 valid votes. We are currently sitting on 106. Currently this, https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/April_2010_Senate_Election is our largest election ever in terms of valid votes. We need 2 more valid votes to push us over the edge and make this the largest election ever in terms of valid votes!
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2010, 11:08:11 PM Certification expected by 1am.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2010, 11:34:58 PM FOR PRESIDENT FIRST ROUND Fritz/Kalwejt - 52 AndrewCT/AHDuke - 42 Reaganfan/dead0man - 12 There being no ticket capturing 50%+1 of the vote we advance. SECOND ROUND Fritz/Kalwejt - 55 AndrewCT/AHDuke - 49 Fritz/Kalwejt is declared the winner of the election to the offices of President and Vice President. () ======================== ------------------------------------------- ======================== NORTHEAST SENATE Eraserhead - 14 Dallasfan65 - 13 Eraserhead is declared the winner of the election to the office of Northeast Senator. () ======================== ------------------------------------------- ======================== SOUTHEAST SENATE North Carolina Yankee - 16 SPC - 3 North Carolina Yankee is declared the winner of the election to the office of Southeast Senator. () ======================== ------------------------------------------- ======================== MIDEAST SENATE Happy Warrior - 11 A-Bob - 10 Happy Warrior is declared the winner of the election to the office of Mideast Senator. () ======================== ------------------------------------------- ======================== NORTHEAST SENATE Kalwejt - 14 WI: SvenssonRS - 4 WI: ilikeverin - 3 WI: Jas - 1 Kalwejt is declared the winner of the election to the office of Midwest Senator. () ======================== ------------------------------------------- ======================== PACIFIC SENATE bgwah - 15 bgwah is declared the winner of the election to the office of Pacific Senator. () ======================== ------------------------------------------- ======================== Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on October 25, 2010, 05:51:43 AM NORTHEAST SENATE Eraserhead - 14 Dallasfan65 - 13 Eraserhead is declared the winner of the election to the office of Northeast Senator. That was the thing I still expected last. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2010, 07:58:02 AM The wiki page will be created within 24 hours. Until then I will put something basic in it's place.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2010, 07:59:08 AM The wiki page will be created within 24 hours. Until then I will put something basic in it's place. Oh! Wow! Nevermind!! 3 cheers to Kal for doing this already!! https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/October_2010_Senate_Election Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on October 25, 2010, 08:13:42 AM The wiki page will be created within 24 hours. Until then I will put something basic in it's place. Oh! Wow! Nevermind!! 3 cheers to Kal for doing this already!! https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/October_2010_Senate_Election Thanks for providing %, Teddy. My math sucks ;) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2010, 08:18:47 AM https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/October_2010_Presidential_Election#Results
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2010, 08:25:44 AM Thanks to help from the AG, we are moving up our schedule. We will spend the next 24 hours cleaning our offices, and updating our calenders for the next season of elections.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2010, 08:39:50 AM Thanks to help from the AG, we are moving up our schedule. We will spend the next 24 hours cleaning our offices, and updating our calenders for the next season of elections. I also plan on PMing governors as their elections approach! Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Purple State on October 25, 2010, 01:01:54 PM Some real squeakers in this election. Good to see the regions keeping things mostly lively, especially given that the margins in some regions (the IDS in particular) belie the competitiveness of the race.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 25, 2010, 05:50:48 PM Some real squeakers in this election. Good to see the regions keeping things mostly lively, especially given that the margins in some regions (the IDS in particular) belie the competitiveness of the race. The bad polls motivated my people to not take it for granted. :P Not sure if this is necessary but, SoFE Teddy, The NE Senate seat is now vacant due to the resignation of Senator Dallasfan65 (POP-MA). NC Yankee, PPT Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2010, 06:05:55 PM Rowan is able to appoint a Senator to sit until November 5th if he so choses.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 07:56:12 AM It feels so weird to have so much "down time" after the election. Is there anything around here that needs doing?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 31, 2010, 02:18:07 PM SoFE Teddy,
It is with great saddness that I announce the vacancy of Bacon King's At-Large STV2 Senate seat effective October 31st, due to going 21 consecutive days without any Senate activity. NC Yankee, PPT Edit to reflect the last minute discovery of a vote on the tenth. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on October 31, 2010, 05:33:53 PM This vote, on October 10, was Senate business, not Con-Con business: Yes, it relates to the Con-Con, but it was a vote taken by the Senate. So Bacon King has until end of day TODAY to some Senate business. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 07:02:42 PM SoFE Teddy, It is with great saddness that I announce the vacancy of Bacon King's At-Large STV2 Senate seat effective October 31st, due to going 21 consecutive days without any Senate activity. NC Yankee, PPT Edit to reflect the last minute discovery of a vote on the tenth. At least now I have something to swear at the senate about :P I'll do all the official departmental etc once I fully wake up in a few hours. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 31, 2010, 07:10:10 PM SoFE Teddy, It is with great saddness that I announce the vacancy of Bacon King's At-Large STV2 Senate seat effective October 31st, due to going 21 consecutive days without any Senate activity. NC Yankee, PPT Edit to reflect the last minute discovery of a vote on the tenth. At least now I have something to swear at the senate about :P I'll do all the official departmental etc once I fully wake up in a few hours. No need to hurry now. Check the thread. It could be a while before an election is held if at all. ;) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Bacon King on October 31, 2010, 07:26:45 PM I note to the SOFE that I posted official Senate business several minutes before NCYankee noted to you a vacancy, and that leeway is implicitly allowed here with the bylaws saying "not less than 21 days" rather than just "21 days"; in addition, it says "21 days" rather than something like "504 hours" which implies this goes by calender days so my seat would not have been vacant until midnight.
Therefore, I do not consider my seat to be vacant. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 07:31:10 PM I will give time for the courts to examine this at minimum.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 31, 2010, 09:49:10 PM Do to a close re-evaluation of the situation, I come to the conclusion that the seat of the Senator in question did not yet become vacant and as such I withdraw the "notification" of this state of affairs having occured.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 09:50:10 PM Also noted.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 05, 2010, 04:45:38 PM REQUEST: Vacation
TIME: 36 hours RATIONALE: drunk Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Purple State on November 05, 2010, 04:48:03 PM REQUEST: Vacation TIME: 36 hours RATIONALE: drunk () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 05, 2010, 04:49:53 PM You are not president anymore :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on November 05, 2010, 04:54:09 PM No elections coming up, so yeah, sure
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 23, 2010, 01:50:31 AM I am still around, but I've had a bout of depression that got really low recently, so I'm on the "recovery". I am always able to respond to anything, but, I am unable to be "pro-active" at this time.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 23, 2010, 06:02:20 PM I am still around, but I've had a bout of depression that got really low recently, so I'm on the "recovery". I am always able to respond to anything, but, I am unable to be "pro-active" at this time. That sucks man, sorry to hear it. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Thomas D on November 28, 2010, 10:31:50 PM I am still around, but I've had a bout of depression that got really low recently, so I'm on the "recovery". I am always able to respond to anything, but, I am unable to be "pro-active" at this time. I'm sorry. I've delt with depression off and on since I was 12 or so. I know it's tough. I hope you feel better. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 28, 2010, 10:58:28 PM Current and full list of Candidates for the December At-Large elections:
Keystone Phil Libertas benconstine Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Sewer on November 28, 2010, 11:26:12 PM Current and full list of Candidates for the December At-Large elections: Keystone Phil Libertas benconstine Nope. https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=40247.msg2732811#msg2732811 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 28, 2010, 11:28:32 PM I missed you and wormy.
Current and full list of Candidates for the December At-Large elections: Keystone Phil SpaceCommunistMutant wormyguy Libertas benconstine Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Sewer on November 28, 2010, 11:30:59 PM SpaceCommunistMutant My name is Sewer. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Keystone Phil on November 28, 2010, 11:31:59 PM When is the deadline to declare for this December's At Large election?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 28, 2010, 11:36:15 PM December 8th
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: The Artist Formerly Known As and Now Again Known As Ogis on December 01, 2010, 01:41:27 AM There is a typo on the front page. All of the elections in April are dated February 14th. I have yet to perfect my time travel, and I feel other Atlasians will have difficulty voting in the past. ;)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 01, 2010, 05:30:52 AM FYI, I'm running for December Senate elections. ;)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Junkie on December 01, 2010, 08:08:47 PM FYI, I'm running for December Senate elections. ;) As am I. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 02, 2010, 02:33:48 AM Please ensure you also post in the declaration thread so it's all nice 'n legal.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 02, 2010, 05:07:26 AM Please ensure you also post in the declaration thread so it's all nice 'n legal. I did. ;) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Junkie on December 02, 2010, 10:38:18 AM I did as well.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: tpfkaw on December 02, 2010, 10:39:14 AM I did a while ago.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 02, 2010, 12:55:41 PM I'll be updating the list shortly :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 02, 2010, 01:20:57 PM It has come to my attention that Libertas has been banned. I will be examining what, if any, impact this will have on elections.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Hash on December 02, 2010, 01:28:05 PM It has come to my attention that Libertas has been banned. I will be examining what, if any, impact this will have on elections. wow Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 02, 2010, 01:30:40 PM It has come to my attention that Libertas has been banned. I will be examining what, if any, impact this will have on elections. Oh. My. God. Please, please tell me this is not a bad joke... *joins hands to pray* Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 02, 2010, 01:39:46 PM It has come to my attention that Libertas has been banned. I will be examining what, if any, impact this will have on elections. Oh. My. God. Please, please tell me this is not a bad joke... *joins hands to pray* It's true !!! :D Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on December 02, 2010, 03:02:14 PM What did he do?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 02, 2010, 04:05:34 PM It was on grounds of incivility, essentially. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on December 02, 2010, 04:09:06 PM It was on grounds of incivility, essentially. Who's ready to play spot the the Libertas sock?! Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on December 02, 2010, 05:47:21 PM As the election for his seat is in less than 21 days, there will not be a special election.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 02, 2010, 06:18:37 PM That's what I figured. From what I can find, he stops being a senator the day he is banned, but the 21 day thing. I will have to remove him from the list of candidates, and, since he's banned, I can not accept write-ins for him either.
At least that's what I've been able to figure. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 04, 2010, 12:37:06 AM Keystone Phil (NI) SpaceCommunistMutant (UDL) wormyguy (POP) benconstine (UDL) Junkie (RPP) Winston (UDL) Antonio V (UDL) Bacon King (JCP) Dallasfan65 (POP) RowanBrandon (RPP) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Sewer on December 04, 2010, 12:42:39 AM SpaceCommunistMutant not my name Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 04, 2010, 10:26:00 PM Keystone Phil (NI)
Sewer (UDL) wormyguy (POP) benconstine (UDL) Junkie (RPP) Winston (UDL) Antonio V (UDL) Bacon King (JCP) Dallasfan65 (POP) RowanBrandon (RPP) Lief (JCP) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 04, 2010, 11:02:27 PM Did Duke drop out and I miss it or did you leave his name off? :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 05, 2010, 01:32:57 AM AHDuke(RPP)
Antonio V (UDL) Bacon King (JCP) benconstine (UDL) Dallasfan65 (POP) Junkie (RPP) Keystone Phil (NI) Lief (JCP) RowanBrandon (RPP) Sewer (UDL) Winston (UDL) wormyguy (POP) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 06, 2010, 09:36:16 PM Reminder that the deadline for filing to run is getting very close.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 07, 2010, 08:40:26 AM Ok, so it seems that alea jacta est...
Also, Rowan dropped out if I well understood. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 07, 2010, 09:47:12 AM AHDuke(RPP)
Antonio V (UDL) Bacon King (JCP) benconstine (UDL) Dallasfan65 (POP) Junkie (RPP) Keystone Phil (NI) Lief (JCP) Sewer (UDL) Winston (UDL) wormyguy (POP) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 07, 2010, 11:08:13 PM A reminder, if anyone wants to be listed under more than one party, they need to contact me (post here or PM me) to let me know, and, the party needs to contact me (post here or PM me) to confirm this is true.
The same applies if a party wishes to bar someone from running on their tag, but, only the party need to contact me in this case. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 07, 2010, 11:11:57 PM https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1151 AHDuke (RPP)
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3451 Antonio V (UDL) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1478 Bacon King (JCP) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2270 benconstine (UDL) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4137 Dallasfan65 (POP) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4846 Junkie (RPP) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=701 Keystone Phil (NI) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2010 Lief (JCP) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3497 Sewer (UDL) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3252 Winston (UDL) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=5440 wormyguy (POP) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 08, 2010, 12:01:49 AM https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=120461.msg2573768#msg2573768 update to this post to prevent confusion next time. I will also do this kind of update to the calendar moving forward.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 08, 2010, 05:30:27 AM https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=120461.msg2573768#msg2573768 update to this post to prevent confusion next time. I will also do this kind of update to the calendar moving forward. So the election is tomorrow ? :o Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 08, 2010, 07:08:24 AM Yes. Balloting begins in 40 hours or so.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 09, 2010, 10:57:32 AM () () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the third and current Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The regular election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, December 9th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, December 12th. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. In short, the department will be taking a liberal interpreation of this, so Keep posts to votes only. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127882.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. Note that voting begins NOW and ends in exactly 72 hours. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. SENATE, AT LARGE Five candidates to be elected. [ ] AHDuke99 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1151) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Antonio V (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3451) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] Bacon King (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1478) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] benconstine (Ben) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2270) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] Dallasfan65 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4137) POP - Populares [ ] Junkie (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4846) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Keystone Phil (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=701) FLA - Futuro e Libertà per L'Atlasia [ ] Lief (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2010) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] SpaceCommunistMutant (Sewer) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3497) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] Winston Disraeli (Winston) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3252) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] wormyguy (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=5440) POP - Populares [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 09, 2010, 11:20:09 AM The above is a sample ballot. I welcome feedback.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Purple State on December 09, 2010, 12:28:47 PM Sooo many candidates. Have fun counting this one. :)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 09, 2010, 12:38:39 PM Don't highlight the space after the party abbreviation.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: tpfkaw on December 09, 2010, 12:42:36 PM The regular election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, December 9th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, December 12th. ... Note that voting begins NOW and ends in exactly 72 hours. So does voting begin now or at 11:59 PM? ??? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 09, 2010, 01:04:41 PM Sooo many candidates. Have fun counting this one. :) Actually, there have already been more (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/April_2008_Senate_Election) or the same number (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/August_2008_Senate_Election) or almost the same number (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/April_2010_Senate_Election) of candidates. The idea that this election is particularly overcrowded isn't as evident as it may seem. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 09, 2010, 06:42:51 PM () () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the third and current Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The regular election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, December 9th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, December 12th. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. In short, the department will be taking a liberal interpreation of this, so Keep posts to votes only. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127882.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. Note that voting begins NOW and ends in exactly 72 hours. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. SENATE, AT LARGE Five candidates to be elected. [ ] AHDuke99 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1151) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Antonio V (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3451) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] Bacon King (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1478) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] benconstine (Ben) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2270) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] Dallasfan65 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4137) POP - Populares [ ] Junkie (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4846) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] Keystone Phil (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=701) FLA - Futuro e Libertà per L'Atlasia [ ] Lief (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2010) JCP - Jesus Christ Party [ ] SpaceCommunistMutant (Sewer) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3497) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] Winston Disraeli (Winston) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3252) UDL - Union of the Democratic Left [ ] wormyguy (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=5440) POP - Populares [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 09, 2010, 06:45:24 PM I will check in prior to the election; if I fail to check in between now and 11:58pm, I'd ask another authorized person to post this.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 09, 2010, 10:13:36 PM I'm back, and will post the ballot at the proper time.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on December 10, 2010, 12:03:33 AM cough
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on December 10, 2010, 12:16:01 AM wait, are we still voting according to EDT ? shouldn't we be on EST now?
(or at least call it AST, if we are waiting until 1 am EST) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: #CriminalizeSobriety on December 10, 2010, 01:06:24 AM I will check in prior to the election; if I fail to check in between now and 11:58pm, I'd ask another authorized person to post this. Is somebody else authorized? I remember seeing Lief create a voting booth, so... If the President is in any capacity to do so, I implore him to open the voting booth immediately. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on December 10, 2010, 02:19:22 AM I will check in prior to the election; if I fail to check in between now and 11:58pm, I'd ask another authorized person to post this. Is somebody else authorized? I remember seeing Lief create a voting booth, so... If the President is in any capacity to do so, I implore him to open the voting booth immediately. Wouldn't anyone else in the Administration technically be authorized? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 10, 2010, 02:23:58 AM MOTHER @$%#&ER. I"M GOING TO KILL MY GOD DAMN ALARM CLOCK >.<
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 10, 2010, 02:24:41 AM I will check in prior to the election; if I fail to check in between now and 11:58pm, I'd ask another authorized person to post this. Is somebody else authorized? I remember seeing Lief create a voting booth, so... If the President is in any capacity to do so, I implore him to open the voting booth immediately. the President can; and if I understand my FA laws right, so can the RG. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 02:29:50 AM ELECTION RESULTS... will be posted later in the day
Sadly, a MMSTV election is not something you can "pre-work" on. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:23:08 AM OFFICIAL FIRST ROUND RESULTS
15 - Antonio 15 - Lief 14 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 9 - Wormy 5 - Sewer 4 - Ben 1 - Key Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:28:19 AM With 0 ballots cast in this round, both write-in candidates are dropped.
With 97 total valid ballots, there is a quota of 17. With no one meeting that quota, the lowest placed candidate is dropped. In this case, Keystone Phil. OFFICIAL SECOND ROUND RESULTS 15 - Antonio 15 - Lief 15 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 9 - Wormy 5 - Sewer 4 - Ben With no one meeting the quota, Ben is dropped and we go on to round 3. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:34:51 AM 97 valid ballots case results in a quota of 17. No one meeting the quota, the lowest placed candidate; ben, is dropped.
17 - Antonio ☑ 16 - Lief 16 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 9 - Wormy 5 - Sewer Reaching the quota exactly, Antonio is elected without an overflow. No one meeting the quota, the lowest placed candidate; sewer, is dropped. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:39:29 AM An error was detected
GOD DAMN IT Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:41:50 AM first round
15 - Antonio 15 - Lief 14 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 5 - Sewer 4 - Ben 2 - Winston 1 - Key second round 15 - Antonio 15 - Lief 15 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 5 - Sewer 4 - Ben 2 - Winston third round 17 - Antonio ☑ 15 - Lief 15 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 5 - Sewer 4 - Ben Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:45:02 AM fourth round
17 - Antonio ☑ 16 - Lief 16 - Duke 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 7 - Sewer with more original first preferences, Wormy wins the tie, and sewer is dropped. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:48:21 AM fifth round
17 - Antonio ☑ 20 - Lief ☑ 18 - Duke ☑ 13 - BK 11 - Dallas 10 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 1 - Exhausted Lief, reaching 20, 3 above the quota, is elected. Duke, reaching 18, 1 above the quota, is elected. Our first overflows. This will take some time to calculate. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:54:49 AM 17 - Antonio ☑
20 - Lief ☑ 17 - Duke ☑ 13.056 - BK 11.224 - Dallas 10.728 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 1 - Exhausted 17 - Antonio ☑ 17 - Lief ☑ 17 - Duke ☑ 15.456 - BK 11.224 - Dallas 11.178 - Junkie 7 - Wormy 1.15 - Exhausted No further candidates reaching quota, Wormy is dropped. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 08:57:23 AM ROUND SIX
17 - Antonio ☑ 17 - Lief ☑ 17 - Duke ☑ 18.224 - Dallas ☑ 15.456 - BK 11.178 - Junkie 1.15 - Exhausted Dallasfan is elected with an overflow. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 09:03:24 AM 17 - Antonio ☑ 17 - Lief ☑ 17 - Duke ☑ 17 - Dallas ☑ 15.668 - BK ☑ 11.618 - Junkie 1.623 - Exhausted Being the lowest candidate, Junkie is eliminated, and BK is elected. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 09:08:59 AM 17 - Antonio ☑ 17 - Lief ☑ 17 - Duke ☑ 17 - Dallas ☑ 15.668 - BK ☑ 11.618 - Junkie 1.623 - Exhausted Being the lowest candidate, Junkie is eliminated, and BK is elected. () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:35 AM Congrats Phil on these results!
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 13, 2010, 11:39:59 AM Teddy, it's not to piss you off, but I think your reasoning for closing the vote and thus discounting the votes of Snowguy and Phil. It is clearly stated that the vote shall last for 72 hours, and you opened the booth at 2:23 AM last friday. I think the 72 hours requirements is superior to the requirement that the election should end at due time.
Not that it matters so much, since Snowguy invalidated his vote by editing him 20 minutes and 4 seconds (LOL !!! :P) after voting. But Phil's vote counts, and that gives Lief 16 votes instead of 15. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 02:20:43 PM Phils vote was counted. Snowguys was not because of his edit.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 13, 2010, 02:30:47 PM Phils vote was counted. Snowguys was not because of his edit. Sorry, that's my mistake. I didn't see RodPresident's vote was invalid. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: minionofmidas on December 13, 2010, 02:38:06 PM Sadly, a MMSTV election is not something you can "pre-work" on. You can draw up a big table with every vote sorted by complete pref. flow. This works better on paper than on anything I've ever seen on a computer (excel and whatnot) because paper is infinitely flexible with subheadings, blank areas etc - improving usability. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Eraserhead on December 13, 2010, 04:45:49 PM Phils vote was counted. Snowguys was not because of his edit. Ridiculous. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Keystone Phil on December 13, 2010, 04:47:42 PM Phils vote was counted. Snowguys was not because of his edit. Ridiculous. If this is about my vote being counted, why the hell shouldn't have been counted? I don't understand the controversy. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on December 13, 2010, 05:40:50 PM Phils vote was counted. Snowguys was not because of his edit. Ridiculous. If this is about my vote being counted, why the hell shouldn't have been counted? I don't understand the controversy. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 07:18:04 PM Personal emergency
away for the time being. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Thomas D on December 13, 2010, 08:00:31 PM Personal emergency away for the time being. Hope everything is okay. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 09:38:27 PM http://www.thestar.com/news/article/906365--york-u-exams-cancelled-residence-students-evacuated-after-fire-cuts-heating?bn=1 note that I live here.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 13, 2010, 11:22:38 PM http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/2004/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=413 full explanation of what happened today.
Secondly. I encourage anyone who wishes to do so, to sue me over snowguy's vote. My feeling is that I can only obey the letter, not the spirit of the law. I want to include as many votes as possible, and thus, and I will make this as clear as possible: I want the court to tell me I should have counted it, so that I may do so in the future. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 13, 2010, 11:34:04 PM Oh dear.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Marokai Backbeat on December 13, 2010, 11:45:10 PM http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/2004/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=413 full explanation of what happened today. Secondly. I encourage anyone who wishes to do so, to sue me over snowguy's vote. My feeling is that I can only obey the letter, not the spirit of the law. I want to include as many votes as possible, and thus, and I will make this as clear as possible: I want the court to tell me I should have counted it, so that I may do so in the future. I think it's fairly clear, personally, that you did the right thing. Twenty minutes is twenty minutes. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 14, 2010, 12:17:08 AM http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/2004/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=413&p=3966#p3966
I am now home, with the cats, with the heat on... 6 hours of my life I'll never get back (and $60 too >.< ) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 14, 2010, 04:40:55 AM You're 100% right about Snowguy, Teddy. It may look ridiculous, but the law is the law.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: minionofmidas on December 14, 2010, 05:17:46 AM Yeah, I don't see what you can do about that.
What's that about a fire? The fire was in some other part of the campus, didn't directly impact your building but destroyed the furnace for it? (I guess it's very cold right now, and/or the building not very well insulated, if one day might have led to cats freezing. Or maybe you were just mildly panicking. Although I can sympathize with someone panicking in that situation. ;) ) Good to hear it worked out fine, anyways. :) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Grumpier Than Uncle Joe on December 14, 2010, 09:15:00 AM So how come, once again, no one notifies people that elections are being held?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 14, 2010, 10:06:47 AM We are allowed 20 PM's per hour here at the atlas, and people love to respond to them even when they are crystal clear.
PMing everyone would take 7 hours, which is fine when I'm not busy with other things, unlike this weekend. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 14, 2010, 10:16:44 AM If one doesn't even know when there is an election in Atlasia, he is a zombie unworthy to vote.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: minionofmidas on December 14, 2010, 11:45:05 AM I hope you people didn't make a law requiring such notification.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Badger on December 14, 2010, 12:31:22 PM http://www.thestar.com/news/article/906365--york-u-exams-cancelled-residence-students-evacuated-after-fire-cuts-heating?bn=1 note that I live here. Well, sabatoge was the most creative way I've ever seen of delaying finals, Teddy. ;) Kidding. Glad everything is basically back to normal (- $60 >:(). Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: tmthforu94 on December 14, 2010, 03:57:57 PM We are allowed 20 PM's per hour here at the atlas, and people love to respond to them even when they are crystal clear. PMing everyone would take 7 hours, which is fine when I'm not busy with other things, unlike this weekend. You are more than welcome to sign my petition: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=96912.0 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 15, 2010, 11:53:43 AM Also, if you didn't notice in the other thread :
Now, time for some graphs ! :D Evolution of the votes for each candidate hour by hour : () Evolution of the % of votes for each candidate hour by hour : () Evolution of the share of each party by hour : () Final election results, count by count : () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 19, 2010, 05:36:41 AM I'm itchin for a deputy. If you are interested, please let me know. No guarantee that any of my applicants will be selected, as it is the President's choice (well mine and his, but if he has someone in mind, I wont oppose him)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 19, 2010, 06:03:52 AM I'm itchin for a deputy. If you are interested, please let me know. No guarantee that any of my applicants will be selected, as it is the President's choice (well mine and his, but if he has someone in mind, I wont oppose him) I won't take a formal office, but if it can reassure it I manually recalculate the results of many elections, so I'm able to tell you if you do any mistake. ;) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 19, 2010, 06:45:14 AM I may be unable to discharge my duties for a time (depending on what's going to happen) and thus I will need something official.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 19, 2010, 09:45:40 PM the charger on my laptop is broken :|
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 20, 2010, 06:43:23 AM God has worked his magic, and my job is now safe.
I'll also invest in a laptop charger some time this week. Until then I will go netless at work. Perhaps I can break myself of this addiction :P I do have a desktop at home (where I am on right... now) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 21, 2010, 05:26:28 PM Anyways, time for some more interesting data ! :D I've collected the second and third preferences for last elections, and here are the results :
First of all, ranked by 1st pref : Antonio V votes (15) - Sewer : 6 (40%) - Bacon King : 3 (20%) - Ben : 2 (13%) - Winston : 2 (13%) - Duke : 1 (7%) - Lief : 1 (7%) Lief votes (15) - Bacon King : 10 (67%) - Antonio V : 3 (20%) - Junkie : 1 (7%) - Exhausted : 1 (7%) Duke votes (14) - Junkie : 10 (71%) - Dallasfan : 3 (21%) - Bacon King : 1 (7%) Bacon King votes (13) - Lief : 9 (69%) - Dallasfan : 1 (8%) - Junkie : 1 (8%) - Sewer : 1 (8%) - Exhausted : 1 (8%) Dallasfan votes (11) - Wormyguy : 10 (91%) - Duke : 1 (9%) Junkie votes (10) - Duke : 6 (60%) - Keystone Phil : 2 (20%) - Bacon King : 1 (10%) - Dallasfan : 1 (10%) Wormyguy votes (7) - Dallasfan : 5 (71%) - Duke : 1 (14%) - Keystone Phil : 1 (14%) Sewer votes (5) - Duke : 2 (40%) - Antonio V : 1 (20%) - Winston : 1 (20%) - Exhausted : 1 (20%) Ben votes (4) - Antonio V : 2 (50%) - Duke : 1 (25%) - Lief : 1 (25%) Winston votes (2) went all for Antonio V. Keystone Phil votes (1) went all for Duke. Overall, second prefs are shared as follows : - Bacon King : 15 - Duke : 13 - Junkie : 12 - Lief : 11 - Dallasfan : 10 - Wormyguy : 10 - Antonio V : 8 - Sewer : 7 - Winston : 3 - Keystone Phil : 3 - Ben : 2 - Exhausted : 3 And now for third prefs : - Dallasfan : 17 - Antonio V : 11 - Keystone Phil : 9 - Junkie : 8 - Winston : 8 - Lief : 7 - Duke : 7 - Bacon King : 7 - Sewer : 6 - Ben : 6 - Wormyguy : 4 - Exhausted : 7 Look at Phil's performance !!! :P Anyways, most common sets of 3 preferences : - Duke>Junkie>Dallasfan : 6 - Junkie>Duke>Dallasfan : 6 - Lief>BK>Antonio V : 4 Five trios are tied with 3 votes each. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 21, 2010, 05:43:24 PM A kind of "partisanship rate" (the percentage time when someone who has voted for a party's candidate has given his 2nd pref to a candidate of the same party) :
- POP : 15/18 (83%) - JCP : 21/28 (75%) - RPP : 16/24 (67%) - UDL : 17/26 (65%) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 22, 2010, 06:39:04 PM SoFE Teddy,
Since I don't beleive I did this before (Since no special was going to be held with regular election so close), the STV3 At-Large Senate seat occupied by Senator Libertas (POP-NY) has been vacated due to the banning of the said Libertas and thus him no longer constituting a poster able to serve as a Senator. Under the Proportional Representation Act (recently amended) the major party to which Libertas belonged is to pick a replacement. NC Yankee, President Pro-Tempore of the Senate Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Purple State on December 28, 2010, 12:29:14 AM A kind of "partisanship rate" (the percentage time when someone who has voted for a party's candidate has given his 2nd pref to a candidate of the same party) : - POP : 15/18 (83%) - JCP : 21/28 (75%) - RPP : 16/24 (67%) - UDL : 17/26 (65%) This is a neat statistic I wouldn't mind seeing done through past elections. Personally, I'm interested in seeing how the partisanship of the UDL matches up with that of the DA. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 28, 2010, 03:01:54 AM "Dont PM List"
Lunar Joe Republic Fezzy Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Antonio the Sixth on December 28, 2010, 05:43:18 AM A kind of "partisanship rate" (the percentage time when someone who has voted for a party's candidate has given his 2nd pref to a candidate of the same party) : - POP : 15/18 (83%) - JCP : 21/28 (75%) - RPP : 16/24 (67%) - UDL : 17/26 (65%) This is a neat statistic I wouldn't mind seeing done through past elections. Personally, I'm interested in seeing how the partisanship of the UDL matches up with that of the DA. Well, it's a kind of big work. :P I've done it for August 2010 : - JCP : 41/42 (98%) :o - POP : 20/32 (63%) - RPP : 16/26 (62%) I don't have it for other periods, though. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 28, 2010, 07:25:23 PM On vacation to the new year; whereupon I shall check my poll thread, and follow the wisdom of the people as a whole.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on January 01, 2011, 11:56:09 PM I've asked Taft4Prez to assist me, and thus, become DSoFE.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on January 02, 2011, 10:33:57 PM I've blocked hash. His inability to behave himself in public has lead me to do so.
If he needs something from the DoFE, I'd ask him to post here; but if he abuses this (IE posting here to question my decision, or, to insult me) I will not read his posts in this thread, and will direct his inquiries to my deputy. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Thomas D on February 04, 2011, 07:00:22 PM Bumped.
To remind everyone that we're two weeks from an election and this office is still vacant. EDIT: Sorry. I made this post before I saw the latest posts in the White House thread. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on February 04, 2011, 07:38:14 PM Hopefully, we can have Franzl confirmed in time, to handle this matter :)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 01, 2011, 07:32:24 PM If I get confirmed, I'll just bring this old thread back to life as it has a structure I'm comfortable with.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 06, 2011, 09:39:11 PM A by-election needs to be held for Oakvale's vacant Senate seat.
As I can't find anything forcing a date, I'm tentatively setting the date of the election at the 14th of July. I will confirm (or change) this date within 48 hours, based on my further research into election law. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 06, 2011, 09:44:01 PM 14th of July is the only date that I feel to be valid. The law says 10 days of a vacancy, however I believe that Oakvale's appointment may have been at such a time that TODAY is the only day; however, given that I feel the spirit of the law never intended for 24 hours and 77 minutes of time for people to declare their candidacies, and run a full campaign, I'm setting the date as the 14th of July.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 06, 2011, 09:54:06 PM Yes, after reading though the laws again and checking all the dates, this is what I am going with. The law actually gives me 7 days to CALL the election, which means, legally, I could call the election 1 minute prior to the polls opening.
Needless to say this is faulty. Quote a special election shall be called to fill the remainder of the vacated term within one week of the vacancy occurring; Special elections to the Senate shall begin within ten days of the vacancy occurring and shall begin between midnight Eastern Standard Time on a Thursday and 0001 Eastern Standard Time on the first Friday thereafter, and shall conclude exactly 72 hours after beginning. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Article_I_of_the_Third_Constitution 4. (5)The law would suggest I must hold the election in 24 hours and 66 minutes, however it is my belief that this part of the Constitution, which would allow me to shaft you, the voters, violates this part of the preamble Quote support equality for all forum members and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity . It seems thus that our Constitution is Unconstitutional. As it is my judgement that 24 hours is not enough time to declare, and run a full campaign. Therefore the date is the 14th. ...My first act and I'm already opened myself up to legal challenge :P Ah well, I firmly believe that I am acting in the best interests of democracy here. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on July 07, 2011, 12:34:19 AM In the special election I was in the time was extended well beyond one week, though I don't recall what the legal reasoning was. This issue is definitely worth considering to fix, but I think your action here is in the right.
If you are planning on using this as the Dept thread, you ought to ask Gustaf to sticky this and unsticky the other one. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 07, 2011, 01:42:30 AM Already did, but I should post a notice in the old thread.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 07, 2011, 08:13:42 AM Just in case it is required that you are formerly informed so to speak by some law:
Quote SoFE Teddy, I announce the vacancy of Oakvale At-Large Senate Seat #2, effective July 3rd, due his resignation to become an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. NC Yankee, Senate Dean ;) That should tidy up that loose end. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 08, 2011, 09:34:52 PM Thanks yankee, and that's something I want to address. Please read this:
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/985014--elections-canada-powerless-to-prosecute-defiant-social-media-users The third paragraph. Also notice this Quote The fact that many of Canada’s elections laws are complaint-driven — even if Elections Canada is aware of transgression Elections Canada is powerless to take the initiative. This prevents any bias; IE them from taking the initiative to investigate one person but not another. Please note that I will (generally) operate under the same rules. While I may be aware of certain things, I will not take action. If I see that it is important, I may PM the person and (as silly as it sounds) ask you to PM me back, officially letting me know about an event. I follow the ethical guidelines of Elections Canada. The only person in Canada who can not vote is the Chief Electoral Officer, and I never vote while holding the SoFE position (I always cast invalid ballots to close the booth) By the same token, I will not take it upon myself (usually) to take the initiative of investigating something. This includes party endorsements. I don't think it's a huge secret that the RPP has an off-atlas forum. The RPP may one day decide to use this forum to endorse someone; and unless I have access to the forum, I'd never know. This may well apply to other parties in the future. This is one of the reasons why I require people to tell me if they are endorsing someone. I also require the person to tell me they are accepting. The ability for abuse - IE going out of your way to look for helpful things from your friends but not your enemies - is the key reason why I do this. I'm going to make this notice more visible, but note that I will normally operate under Elections Canada rules; and thus, require you guys to let me know about events and other things. I'd ask everyone to keep this in mind when it comes to declaring candidacies, (If you do it in the proper thread, I wont miss it) endorsements (PM me saying you've endorsed someone, and, the endorsee should also PM me saying you accept) and anything else that you think I should be aware of as SoFE. This does not mean I will stop paying attention. I may still PM people asking them to PM me back. However, I want to hold this office to the highest ethical standards, and thus, I hope you all can understand my rationale behind this. Thanks. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 09, 2011, 06:11:57 AM Well ironically, I do have something you might want to investigate.
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=137387.0 I didn't realize that Franzl had resigned prior to the election so this got delayed until you took office. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 09, 2011, 06:56:40 AM I'm a stickler for these sort of rules. 20 minutes and 1 second would be "too long" for me!
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 13, 2011, 03:27:54 AM The Senate By-Election will begin at 11:30pm, New York City time, Thursday Night, and will end 11:30pm, Sunday Night.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 14, 2011, 11:30:49 PM BALLOTING IS NOW OPEN
And yes - I realized about 10 minutes ago that my bedroom clock is actually an hour off, which explains why my alarm never went off (I use my cell when getting ready for work); so we'll be using Chicago time *facepalm* Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 15, 2011, 07:35:03 AM Unofficial Tracker (first round only)
AS OF: Kalwejt Meeker: 5 TexasGurl: 4 Jbrase: 3 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 17, 2011, 07:08:33 PM Please note that I may not be online at the moment the polls close. To clarify, they close in about 4 hours and 20 minutes. They close weather or not I've posted in the thread to indicate they are closed.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 18, 2011, 04:40:42 PM For those who don't know, I've become very ill.
I don't mean physically. I spoke to the President, as well as to Homley and Tmth, two people who I trust and who have experience of some sort with counting ballots. I've asked Tmth to help me out as my time is very limited ATM - my schedule has gone haywire - by examining Homley's tracker for errors. I've glanced over the results myself, but am having difficulty concentrating. If all three of us come up with the same result, I will certify it. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on July 18, 2011, 06:07:13 PM Hope you get better, Teddy! I suggest you take a break from Atlasia; I know how this game can be stressful.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 18, 2011, 07:06:12 PM Since I've been given a few weeks off work that'd drive me insane from boredum. Thanks for the concern tho. I am feeling better.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 18, 2011, 07:24:07 PM I don't really see anything wrong with Homely's count, but then again, there's a reason I've never lobbied for this position. :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 18, 2011, 07:42:01 PM Quote FIRST COUNT Jbrase - 29 (Dallasfan, Jbrase, ZuWo, shua, Yelnoc, Ghost_white, wormyguy, realisticidealist, tmth, tb75, John Dibble, PiT, Giovanni, Torie, afleitch, Angus, officepark, Cathcon, Taft, homelycooking, Junkie, RowanBrandon, Duke, NCYankee, A-Bob, Elyski, Winfield, Keystone Phil, JCL) TexasGurl - 22 (Gramps, Antonio, Jas, Thomas D, Polnut, benconstine, sbane, Hawkeye, fuzzy, TexasGurl, Snowstalker, Lewis Trondheim, Xahar, Badger, nclib, ilikeverin, Bacon King, Hashemite, Marokai, Hatman) Meeker - 12 (Kalwejt, Snowguy, Ebowed, Jackson, Eraserhead, JulioMadrid, opebo, Oakvale, Sewer, Meeker, MaxQue, Foucaulf, DrScholl, jfern) SECOND COUNT: homelycooking is eliminated. His four votes are transferred. Jbrase - 33 (Dallasfan, Jbrase, ZuWo, shua, Yelnoc, Ghost_white, wormyguy, realisticidealist, tmth, tb75, John Dibble, PiT, Giovanni, Torie, afleitch, Napoleon, MOPolitico, Cincinnatus, big bad fab, Angus, officepark, Cathcon, Taft, homelycooking, Junkie, RowanBrandon, Duke, NCYankee, A-Bob, Elyski, Winfield, Keystone Phil, JCL) TexasGurl - 22 (Gramps, Antonio, Jas, Thomas D, Polnut, benconstine, sbane, Hawkeye, fuzzy, TexasGurl, Snowstalker, Lewis Trondheim, Xahar, Badger, nclib, ilikeverin, Bacon King, MaxQue, Foucaulf, Hashemite, Marokai, Hatman) THIRD COUNT: Meeker is eliminated. His twelve votes are transferred. Jbrase - 36 (Dallasfan, Jbrase, ZuWo, shua, Yelnoc, Ghost_white, wormyguy, realisticidealist, tmth, tb75, John Dibble, PiT, Giovanni, Torie, afleitch, Napoleon, MOPolitico, Cincinnatus, big bad fab, Oakvale, Ebowed, Kalwejt, Angus, officepark, Cathcon, Taft, homelycooking, Junkie, RowanBrandon, Duke, NCYankee, A-Bob, Elyski, Winfield, Keystone Phil, JCL) TexasGurl - 27 (Gramps, Antonio, Jas, Thomas D, Polnut, benconstine, sbane, Hawkeye, fuzzy, TexasGurl, Snowstalker, Lewis Trondheim, JulioMadrid, opebo, Jackson, Snowguy, Xahar, Badger, nclib, ilikeverin, Bacon King, Sewer, MaxQue, Foucaulf, Hashemite, Marokai, Hatman) Exhausted - 4 (Eraserhead, Meeker, DrScholl, jfern) I consider this to be "Validated but not Certified" Unless tmth PMs me that he found an error I missed, I'll certify this before I go to bed. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 18, 2011, 09:53:50 PM FIRST COUNT
Jbrase - 29 (Dallasfan, Jbrase, ZuWo, shua, Yelnoc, Ghost_white, wormyguy, realisticidealist, tmth, tb75, John Dibble, PiT, Giovanni, Torie, afleitch, Angus, officepark, Cathcon, Taft, homelycooking, Junkie, RowanBrandon, Duke, NCYankee, A-Bob, Elyski, Winfield, Keystone Phil, JCL) TexasGurl - 22 (Gramps, Antonio, Jas, Thomas D, Polnut, benconstine, sbane, Hawkeye, fuzzy, TexasGurl, Snowstalker, Lewis Trondheim, Xahar, Badger, nclib, ilikeverin, Bacon King, Hashemite, Marokai, Hatman) Meeker - 12 (Kalwejt, Snowguy, Ebowed, Jackson, Eraserhead, JulioMadrid, opebo, Oakvale, Sewer, Meeker, MaxQue, Foucaulf, DrScholl, jfern) SECOND COUNT: homelycooking is eliminated. His four votes are transferred. Jbrase - 33 (Dallasfan, Jbrase, ZuWo, shua, Yelnoc, Ghost_white, wormyguy, realisticidealist, tmth, tb75, John Dibble, PiT, Giovanni, Torie, afleitch, Napoleon, MOPolitico, Cincinnatus, big bad fab, Angus, officepark, Cathcon, Taft, homelycooking, Junkie, RowanBrandon, Duke, NCYankee, A-Bob, Elyski, Winfield, Keystone Phil, JCL) TexasGurl - 22 (Gramps, Antonio, Jas, Thomas D, Polnut, benconstine, sbane, Hawkeye, fuzzy, TexasGurl, Snowstalker, Lewis Trondheim, Xahar, Badger, nclib, ilikeverin, Bacon King, MaxQue, Foucaulf, Hashemite, Marokai, Hatman) THIRD COUNT: Meeker is eliminated. His twelve votes are transferred. ☑Jbrase - 36 (Dallasfan, Jbrase, ZuWo, shua, Yelnoc, Ghost_white, wormyguy, realisticidealist, tmth, tb75, John Dibble, PiT, Giovanni, Torie, afleitch, Napoleon, MOPolitico, Cincinnatus, big bad fab, Oakvale, Ebowed, Kalwejt, Angus, officepark, Cathcon, Taft, homelycooking, Junkie, RowanBrandon, Duke, NCYankee, A-Bob, Elyski, Winfield, Keystone Phil, JCL) TexasGurl - 27 (Gramps, Antonio, Jas, Thomas D, Polnut, benconstine, sbane, Hawkeye, fuzzy, TexasGurl, Snowstalker, Lewis Trondheim, JulioMadrid, opebo, Jackson, Snowguy, Xahar, Badger, nclib, ilikeverin, Bacon King, Sewer, MaxQue, Foucaulf, Hashemite, Marokai, Hatman) Exhausted - 4 (Eraserhead, Meeker, DrScholl, jfern) () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 02:31:08 PM ()
Theodore James "Teddy" Tedofsky, SoFE, seen in background, behind wall, at a registration event in Atlasia's newest state. Teddy, SoFE, appeared at an event today in Atlasia's newest state, comprising many islands of voters that had previously been partially disenfranchised. Teddy made a point that this was part of a campaign to increase turnout in all Atlasian elections. "The last time I held this post I ran this sort of campaign" Teddy said "We went out private letters to all citizens who had not voted before the polls closed in an attempt to ensure they were aware of the election." "We plan to do the same this time" Teddy continued, adding "we also plan to send out letters to those who are perhaps not as active in political life prior to polls opening, in order to engage the public". Teddy announced that he would take his registration drive to other areas of the country where registration was low, and that until then, he would relax on the beaches of this new state, in order to 'get accustomed to the local culture and way of life'. Teddy is expected to return sometime in August. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on July 29, 2011, 07:51:32 AM We could use a voter drive in the south.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 07, 2011, 12:11:38 PM An election is forthcoming on the 18th. More soon!
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 11, 2011, 08:32:43 PM Election begins in a week plus hours.
Apologies for not being around. I've been having killer allergies. I'm supposed to take 2 anti-histimes but I need to take 4 or 5 just to make the endless sneezing stop - and that puts me to sleep - and upon waking up I begin a new fit of sneezing. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 16, 2011, 05:49:15 PM Elections are just around the corner, and begin Thursday night.
Wednesday night a sample ballot will be prepared that will show all the candidates who have registered in time Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 05:11:28 PM sample ballot under construction
ahduke99 (RPP) endorsements: (RPP) (CID) benconstine (CID) endorsements: (CID) homelycooking (CID) endorsements: (CID) jbrase (CID) endorsements: (CID) (RPP) shua (POP) endorsements: (POP) snowguy716 (JCP) endorsements: (JCP) Noted Write-ins (any campaign for write in that has had more than two people say they plan to vote) BRTD (note this will not go on the ballot and is simply for informational purposes) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 08:11:27 PM () () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The regular election begins at 23:59, August 18th, and ends at 23:59, August 21st. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. Keep posts to votes only. However, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to be fair in consideration of the above matter and will give voters the benefit of the doubt. Explanations of one's vote or simple expressions of approval for a candidate will not be construed as acts of campaigning, unless they obviously violate the above criteria. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127882.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. The Department of Federal Elections strongly recommends that you preference at least 5 candidates, as there are 5 seats to be filled. Every voter should be reminded, however, that any and all candidates can be preferenced, and that preferences even after 5th preference can still be relevant in the count. DO NOT VOTE IN THIS BOOTH UNTIL THE GENERAL ELECTION BEGINS (23:59 Eastern Time)! VOTES CAST BEFORE THEN ARE INVALID! In other words, 4 hours from the time of this post. Do not vote until then. Thank you. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. [ ] AHDuke99 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1151) Candidate: Regional Protection Party (RPP) Endorsement: Regional Protection Party (RPP), Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID) [ ] benconstine (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2270) Candidate: Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID) Endorsement: Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID) [ ] homelycooking (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3962) Candidate: Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID) Endorsement: Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID) [ ] JBrase (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3985) Candidate: Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID) Endorsement: Coalition of Independent Democrats (CID), Regional Protection Party (RPP) [ ] shua (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2516) Candidate: Populares (POP) Endorsement: Populares (POP) [ ] snowguy716 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=1904) Candidate: Jesus Christ Party (JCP) Endorsement: Jesus Christ Party (JCP) [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [ ] None of the above Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 18, 2011, 10:42:30 PM Just for clarification, why is Ben on the ballot but not BRTD? I checked the Constitution, and it says the deadline is 24 hours before the earliest possible start of the election. Was Thursday at 12:00am not the earliest possible start, making Wednesday at 12:00am the deadline? It would appear as if he is 13 hours late.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 10:48:34 PM Just for clarification, why is Ben on the ballot but not BRTD? I checked the Constitution, and it says the deadline is 24 hours before the earliest possible start of the election. Was Thursday at 12:00am not the earliest possible start, making Wednesday at 12:00am the deadline? It would appear as if he is 13 hours late. I always make every effort to be as inclusive as possible, even if it does "bend" the law, as I'd rather "go down in flames" for being too democratic than not democratic enough. As for why BRTD is not on the ballot https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=40247.2730 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=40247.2715 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=40247.2700 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=40247.2685 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=40247.2670 The fairest way to avoid any accusations of bias for or against any particular candidate is for me to either read every single post ever posted on the entire forum to look for this information, or, to actively read none of them. It may seem silly, but it holds this office beyond reproach. https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=139749.0 (title, write-in) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 18, 2011, 10:52:06 PM I strongly object. I will challenge this in court if necessary. Ben shouldn't be on the ballot.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 10:52:46 PM I strongly object. I will challenge this in court if necessary. Ben shouldn't be on the ballot. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 18, 2011, 10:56:46 PM I see three main options here:
1) Ben is kept on the ballot, BRTD added 2) Ben is removed from the ballot. 3) I will seriously consider having the results invalidated in court. I hope you don't decide to go with the last option, it sounds like a bunch of unnecessary drama. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 10:58:09 PM I am unable to find this clause you are referring to.
I also can not add BRTD who has clearly started that he is running a write-in you have 120 seconds to show me the clause if you want ben removed Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 10:59:45 PM I've found the article
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 18, 2011, 11:01:26 PM I meant to say the CESRA, not the Constitution.
https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/CESRA#Section_8:_Candidacy_Declarations The candidacy declaration deadline for regular elections to the Senate shall be twenty-four hours before the earliest possible commencement of the election and for special elections to the Senate shall be twenty-four hours before the commencement of the election. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 11:02:04 PM https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Consolidated_Electoral_System_Reform_Act#Section_8:_Candidacy_Declarations
Quote The candidacy declaration deadline for regular elections to the Senate shall be twenty-four hours before the earliest possible commencement of the election and for special elections to the Senate shall be twenty-four hours before the commencement of the election. It is my opinion that this is in fact clear and unambigious, and that allowing ben to remain on the ballot would open the department up to un-needed* legal challenge. *IE I wont go against my own interpretation of the law. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 11:03:56 PM Note that ben was removed due to this being brought to my attention.
While I am always willing to "bend" the law in favour of more democracy, I can not clearly "break" them. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 18, 2011, 11:05:25 PM Thank you for the consistency.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 11:06:13 PM It would not be an altasia election without some kind of legalistic drama :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 18, 2011, 11:13:47 PM to do:
Update calendar with clear deadline filing times Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 22, 2011, 05:55:45 AM Preliminary (un-validated) results have been posted in the ballot thread.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 02:52:09 AM Please note for future reference that if you quit the game between the time you are elected and the time the results are validated (and this window will be expanding as I plan to leave a few hours to find errors) that you will cause a host of problems. Rather, concede defeat, as this allows the election to be re-counted without you as a candidate.
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=139799.msg3001130#msg3001130 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 24, 2011, 03:08:24 AM According to what law?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 03:12:55 AM https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Consolidated_Electoral_System_Reform_Act#Section_12:_Concession_of_Victory
It's the next highest. I had thought I'd have to recount the entire thing. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 03:16:28 AM My understanding is that if he does not concede, then he'll be elected, and IIRC, we'll need to wait some weeks until he's declared inactive. Though, it does allow him to return - but then again the decision to concede is his to make.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 24, 2011, 03:23:24 AM Hmm, that's interesting. The wording doesn't quite seem right since it obviously wasn't written with the Proportional Representation Act in mind. How would you count it? Since it just says "greatest number of highest preferences" does that mean it would basically be Ben vs. Shua among everyone's votes?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 03:50:57 AM My understanding, by the use of the word next, means Ben.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 24, 2011, 03:55:48 AM My understanding, by the use of the word next, means Ben. Well that's the problem is, that's not how the STV elections work. I don't know who has more highest preferences, but that doesn't sound like the same thing as just re-counting the election without Homely in it. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 04:05:50 AM "the candidate with the next greatest number of highest preference votes"
"greatest" and "next greatest" in this case may not be equal. next implies that these 5 must have the greatest; the 5 greatest. The implication is that since this is how you win, then the next person to win, should win. next also limits me. I would need to pick Homely's of 10, and next greatest would be 9, which would exclude Ben. Unless next in this case did include 10. However All of this presumes that they are talking about the first ballot. I do not. I presume all of this refers to the final ballot. Otherwise this clause could well force me to elect JBrase to two Senate seats. On the final ballot, the only other name left is that of Ben. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 04:09:16 AM And FTR, I am not playing favs here. If I was Shua would win. This is how I interpret the law as written.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Јas on August 24, 2011, 04:39:47 AM The Proportional Representation Act specifies, in section 3, which sections of the CESRA are applicable to STV elections. Section 12, re: concessions, is not included there, and so might not reasonably be considered applicable or relevant to the present case.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 06:07:49 AM Meh. Seems pretty stupid but if that is the law, that's what I will enforce, and Homely will be pronounced elected.
I'm going to bed at some point and waking up at another point. (clearly). I'll be back in 16 hours for sure, and, for 8 hours between now and then. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Napoleon on August 24, 2011, 07:05:28 AM Yeah, if you do this stupid sh**t, I will sue.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 07:16:46 AM Yeah, if you do this stupid sh**t, I will sue. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 07:26:52 AM FTR my options are as follows:
1 - Just make Shua a Senator. I'd like to be able to do this, but, my ethics wont allow it. 2 - Go with my original thoughts, have homely declare, and certify/validate Ben as the winner of the 5th seat. While this was what I was going to do, Jas has pointed out that the law in fact does not allow for it. 3 - Declare homely as the winner of the 5th seat, and let the Senate deal with the problem. I'd rather not pass the buck, but the law actually seems to suggest that I do so, and I will not go against my own interpretation of the law. All options are "stupid" really. I'm a bit disappointed that someone would run for Senate then quit the game right after winning. That being said I've quit myself a few times and know the emotions that go into it and I will not "blame" homely for quitting. Regardless, I find myself somewhere between a sigh and a facepalm. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Cincinnatus on August 24, 2011, 07:51:13 AM You need homely to quit after validation and swearing in, which would clearly solve the problem. Can he not come on for the five minutes it would take to do so later? :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 08:23:37 AM That still triggers a by-election.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 08:28:53 AM I'm going to bed in about 2 minutes. I'll thus be awake at near 6pm local. Ideally, Homely will have read this thread and will have some kind of decision.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 08:32:26 AM ...Also note that, as was revealed with JBrase was elected, the law is very flawed whenever unexpected things happen like a senator resigns.
Keep in mind that: A - Homely does not BECOME a Senator until the end of the month. Can he resign from an office he does not hold? B - Ignoring the above, the date he resigns can impact how long for the by-election by up to 6 days. Ideally he will speak to me in person and I can thumb though all the laws and explain to him exactly what would happen based on his decision. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on August 24, 2011, 08:56:07 AM What am I supposed to do? Concede "defeat" in the election? Swear in and then resign?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Napoleon on August 24, 2011, 10:05:59 AM Yeah, if you do this stupid sh**t, I will sue. You are violating the Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Јas on August 24, 2011, 12:49:21 PM ...Also note that, as was revealed with JBrase was elected, the law is very flawed whenever unexpected things happen like a senator resigns. Keep in mind that: A - Homely does not BECOME a Senator until the end of the month. Can he resign from an office he does not hold? B - Ignoring the above, the date he resigns can impact how long for the by-election by up to 6 days. Ideally he will speak to me in person and I can thumb though all the laws and explain to him exactly what would happen based on his decision. A by-election can't take place until a vacancy occurs; and no vacancy can arise in homely's case until at least the start of the next Senate session. IMO, the new Senate can either expel homely early in the session; but the neatest solution would probably be a post-dated resignation by homely. It's quite common for resignations to be stated as taking effect as of a specified time/date of the resigner's choosing. I can't see why that couldn't also be applicable for the current instance, e.g. homely specifying that he's resigning his office as of 12.01 on the date of swearing-in. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 01:17:04 PM Yeah, if you do this stupid sh**t, I will sue. You are violating the Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act. I can see you are trying to threaten me to attempt to force me away from doing something, but you are going to have to explain what it is you do not want me to do. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 01:18:06 PM What am I supposed to do? Concede "defeat" in the election? Swear in and then resign? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 01:22:27 PM ...Also note that, as was revealed with JBrase was elected, the law is very flawed whenever unexpected things happen like a senator resigns. Keep in mind that: A - Homely does not BECOME a Senator until the end of the month. Can he resign from an office he does not hold? B - Ignoring the above, the date he resigns can impact how long for the by-election by up to 6 days. Ideally he will speak to me in person and I can thumb though all the laws and explain to him exactly what would happen based on his decision. A by-election can't take place until a vacancy occurs; and no vacancy can arise in homely's case until at least the start of the next Senate session. IMO, the new Senate can either expel homely early in the session; but the neatest solution would probably be a post-dated resignation by homely. It's quite common for resignations to be stated as taking effect as of a specified time/date of the resigner's choosing. I can't see why that couldn't also be applicable for the current instance, e.g. homely specifying that he's resigning his office as of 12.01 on the date of swearing-in. He would still need to swear in, which he can not do if he's not here. The one thing that is clear to me however, is that the "fix" to this "problem" no longer falls within the jurisdiction of this department. It's "not my problem" and while that normally wouldn't sit well with me, I just woke up and my allergies are bothering me, so I am very apt to say "fine" to that. There is nothing I can do regardless one way or another. Therefore... Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 01:23:19 PM https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=139799.msg3001499#msg3001499
() Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Јas on August 24, 2011, 01:29:07 PM ...Also note that, as was revealed with JBrase was elected, the law is very flawed whenever unexpected things happen like a senator resigns. Keep in mind that: A - Homely does not BECOME a Senator until the end of the month. Can he resign from an office he does not hold? B - Ignoring the above, the date he resigns can impact how long for the by-election by up to 6 days. Ideally he will speak to me in person and I can thumb though all the laws and explain to him exactly what would happen based on his decision. A by-election can't take place until a vacancy occurs; and no vacancy can arise in homely's case until at least the start of the next Senate session. IMO, the new Senate can either expel homely early in the session; but the neatest solution would probably be a post-dated resignation by homely. It's quite common for resignations to be stated as taking effect as of a specified time/date of the resigner's choosing. I can't see why that couldn't also be applicable for the current instance, e.g. homely specifying that he's resigning his office as of 12.01 on the date of swearing-in. He would still need to swear in, which he can not do if he's not here. The one thing that is clear to me however, is that the "fix" to this "problem" no longer falls within the jurisdiction of this department. It's "not my problem" and while that normally wouldn't sit well with me, I just woke up and my allergies are bothering me, so I am very apt to say "fine" to that. There is nothing I can do regardless one way or another. Therefore... I'm pretty sure Supreme Court jurisprudence would suggest that a swearing-in isn't necessary (though I have no intention of researching the case law). IIRC, the Court has held that persons elected become Senators whether or not they swear-in; though swearing-in is necessary to carry out official duties of their office. I can't imagine any problem arising from a resignation along the lines I outlined earlier. At any rate, even were it held that swearing-in were necessary, unless practice has changed, it was the case that pre-emptive swearings-in were allowed for previous Senates; so homely could swear-in now and follow-it up with a resignation effective after the time he is due to take office. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 01:30:38 PM Right now I'm stuffing my mouth full of allergy medicine and it's probably going to knock me back to sleep, so I'm in a bit of a bad mood, but in short, it's not my problem anymore. You guys are welcome to discuss it in here however.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on August 24, 2011, 05:44:53 PM Right now I'm stuffing my mouth full of allergy medicine and it's probably going to knock me back to sleep, so I'm in a bit of a bad mood, but in short, it's not my problem anymore. You guys are welcome to discuss it in here however. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 24, 2011, 06:05:36 PM Well either way I think this is something that needs to be fixed for future elections. I'm considering introducing an amendment to the PRA that will deal with this type of situation. Perhaps using the election results to perform another count excluding candidates that already won and/or dropped out for however many seats have been conceded.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Napoleon on August 24, 2011, 06:14:52 PM I definitely wouldn't support anything other than a by-election for this type of situation. Anything else would allow electoral sabotage to be committed with ease.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on August 24, 2011, 08:20:06 PM I would prefer a by-election be held as well. But as for now, I resign/concede/abdicate. I apologize to the voters who chose me in the recent elections, but I cannot serve as Senator.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 09:41:05 PM Well either way I think this is something that needs to be fixed for future elections. I'm considering introducing an amendment to the PRA that will deal with this type of situation. Perhaps using the election results to perform another count excluding candidates that already won and/or dropped out for however many seats have been conceded. I'd prefer giving the candidate the ability to concede any time between the results and their swearing in, with the SoFE recounting the entire election as if that candidate had never run in the first place. I'll of course enforce any law that is determined. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on August 24, 2011, 10:17:32 PM Well either way I think this is something that needs to be fixed for future elections. I'm considering introducing an amendment to the PRA that will deal with this type of situation. Perhaps using the election results to perform another count excluding candidates that already won and/or dropped out for however many seats have been conceded. I'd prefer giving the candidate the ability to concede any time between the results and their swearing in, with the SoFE recounting the entire election as if that candidate had never run in the first place. I'll of course enforce any law that is determined. ^ My problem with that is it may result in a candidate winning under original count but not the new one---thus why I think anyone who wins in the original count should win,period. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 24, 2011, 10:26:41 PM aye indeed. Perhaps word it in a way that all winning candidates and conceding candidates are left off the ballot when it "recount" takes place.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 16, 2011, 06:34:57 PM The Department would like to distancve itself from any comments the SoFE may (or has) made over the past (or future) few hours, on the grounds that the SoFE is, admittedly "drunk" and feels himself "unable to discharge the duties of office untul I wake up hungover tomrarroawh" (sic)
The DoSE would like to express it's non-support of the SoFE being this, as he put it "drunk" while there is a possible, as he put it "vacancy" in the Senate. The DoFE expects a full statement from the SoFE by Monday at 5pm on this issue (all times New York of course) and hops that this can be resolved without further confusion Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on September 16, 2011, 08:42:30 PM The Department would like to distancve itself from any comments the SoFE may (or has) made over the past (or future) few hours, on the grounds that the SoFE is, admittedly "drunk" and feels himself "unable to discharge the duties of office untul I wake up hungover tomrarroawh" (sic) The DoSE would like to express it's non-support of the SoFE being this, as he put it "drunk" while there is a possible, as he put it "vacancy" in the Senate. The DoFE expects a full statement from the SoFE by Monday at 5pm on this issue (all times New York of course) and hops that this can be resolved without further confusion Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 17, 2011, 02:59:33 AM The SoFE has a terrible headache.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 24, 2011, 05:24:52 PM For those wondering why I've missed messages in the past few days, I will share with you what only a few others know.
A few days ago, I sent my resignation letter to the President. I had grown sick and tired of some things that were happening, or rather, not happening. It is one thing when someone, who will remain nameless, makes baseless. libellous, and endless personal attacks against me, but it is another when not a single person says a single thing and just stands by, eating popcorn, watching it all "go down". It had gotten to the point that I felt I could no longer do my job with someone who had in the past threatened to find any reason to take me to court. Not because I had done anything wrong specifically, but rather that he wants to "stick it" to me, and this is a convenient way to do so. I felt this person was a threat to my entire department, and thus, the government. The President, in his wisdom, told me that there was quite some time before I'd be required to interact in any way with this person, and to take some time to think. In the interim, things have appeared to have improved, and additionally, the attacks stopped, and, others have finally seem to have stood up against this kind of toxic activity that drives away quality players. Therefore, I'd like to apologize for my inactivity during that period, and, say that I am rescinding my offer of resignation. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Bacon King on September 24, 2011, 06:25:52 PM Good to hear that you're staying on, Teddy :)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 30, 2011, 12:40:54 AM Voting booth to be opened shortly. Sorry, I am ill and was resting.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on September 30, 2011, 12:47:19 AM https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=141501.0
You have 72 hours from the post time to cast your ballots. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 03, 2011, 11:29:39 AM PRELIM
VOTED FOR KALWEJT #1 freepcrusher bgwah nclib px75 antwnzrr meekermariner gporter CultureKing ArchangelZero jfern DrScholl change08 Dessie Potter RFK redcommander Franken polnut Mark Warner 08 Bacon King mondale84 badger Jackson snowguy716 Obamaisdabest RodPresident JulioMadrid oakvale opebo Snowstalker Scott Eraserhead Jbrase JLD Nathan EarlAW Dallasfan65 Thomas D Hashemite belgiansocialist hawkeye59 Kalwejt Antonio V Fuzzybigfoot Dr. Cynic Napoleon Ebowed 46 VOTED FOR JUNKIE #1 Smid John Dibble Gustaf Reaganfan SamSpade AHDuke99 RowanBrandon North Carolina Yankee NHI angus elyski729 Junkie Mechaman officepark Torie Pingvin99 MaxQue Inks.LWC brandonh A-Bob dead0man ChairmanSanchez Simfan34 Psychic Octopus MilesC56 JohanusCalvinusLibertas Wonkish1 Winfield tmthforu94 benconstine Cathcon MOPolitico shua AndrewCT 20RP12 TJ in Cleve afleitch sbane Jas Franzl filliatre Marokai Blue ZuWo JBach717 44 Other... KALWEJT #4 BRTD KALWEJT... sorta realisticidealist JUNKIE #2 PiT (The Physicist) KALWEJT #2 Lief Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 03, 2011, 08:41:17 PM Not meeting activity requirement
elyski729 Kal - 49 Jun - 44 12 hours or so before I certify. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on October 03, 2011, 09:36:40 PM there were 95 votes made while the booth was open, so I think you must be missing someone.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 04, 2011, 01:40:02 AM I can double check but if you have any clue as to who I may have missed I'm open.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on October 04, 2011, 03:07:16 AM I can double check but if you have any clue as to who I may have missed I'm open. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 04, 2011, 06:15:12 AM You are right.
50 to 44. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 04, 2011, 06:16:05 AM This will delay final certification a bit as I may have made other errors. Still, I will certify within a few hours.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 04, 2011, 06:22:25 PM ()
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 06, 2011, 11:58:30 AM Fun game! How much do you know about federal election law! (this is to familiarize everyone with the law so they know it when they run)
Pre-Question-Clue: You might want to read Question 10 first! And yes, you can use the Wiki! Question 1 When is the next (Presidential) election. Clue: we just passed an amendment related to this. Question 2 What is the deadline to register to run for said race? And for the concurrent Senate races? Question 3 When is the next at-large Senate elections? Question 4 What happens in the event of a tie? Is it different based on the office being run for? If so how? Question 5 Explain the method used to elect the At-Large senators. Question 6 Who is the most recent (not current) SoFE Question 7 What happens if the Candidate resigns? What if it happens in between the registration deadline and the election? Between the opening of the booth and the closing of the booth? Between the closing of the booth and certification? Between certification and taking the seat? Question 8 Who can not run (IE what are the requirements to run) for Senator, and President Question 9 What happens to people who are banned from the forum, WRT their registration here in the game? Question 10 What sources did you use for this! be honest! What wiki pages, and what did you just know? There are 5 objectives I have for posting the quiz. The quiz ends on the 11th of October (late evening) at which time I reveal the answers and my reationale. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 12, 2011, 02:47:26 PM I consider the lack of anyone even trying to answer this not only a personal insult against myself but a personal insult against the department.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 13, 2011, 04:32:53 PM If people really think I'm that unimportant, I could always step aside...
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on October 13, 2011, 04:38:16 PM those are a lot of questions to try to answer
maybe if you made them multiple choice Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 13, 2011, 04:48:20 PM There is no try. Only do, and do not.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Cincinnatus on October 13, 2011, 04:49:39 PM those are a lot of questions to try to answer maybe if you made them multiple choice True or False. Less reading ;) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 13, 2011, 05:02:02 PM You don't have to research anything.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 13, 2011, 09:30:05 PM This is the "5 reasons" PM I sent to myself when I posted this originally.
Quote 1 - Get people to learn the rules/laws 2 - Find out who already knows about the laws (possible future SoFEs) 3 - Finding out who follows this thread (by who bothers to try to answer) 4 - Give people something to do beyond partisan bickering 5 - I dont wanna bother looking up the dates, so thanks for giving them to me!! I guess I'll have to look up the dates myself. Regardless, I am not quitting. That was an empty threat to get people to answer. However, I am still running for Governor, and if elected, I'll have to resign. I'll delay accepting the Governor's post until I am able to run the Federal Election. I don't know if I'll have time to "certify" it, but I will count everything and hand all the documents to the President, so that he can certify if I am unable to. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on October 18, 2011, 01:00:20 AM The JCP endorsed Shua and NCYankee for ME & SE Senate, so they have our permission to appear on the ballot as JCP if they and their party wish.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on October 18, 2011, 01:13:30 AM The JCP endorsed Shua and NCYankee for ME & SE Senate, so they have our permission to appear on the ballot as JCP if they and their party wish. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 18, 2011, 03:00:17 AM 10-4. They will be listed as such.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 18, 2011, 06:39:22 PM I'll gladly bear the JCP endorsement if it is not too late to accept such.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 18, 2011, 06:49:40 PM It's only too late when the ballot is up. Does your party have any endorsements?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 19, 2011, 06:51:44 PM No we do not, unfortunately. No one sought such from our party for some reason. Hard to endorse the invisible man for a second preference somewhere.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on October 20, 2011, 08:30:48 PM I think you accidentally put JCP for the Winfield/Jbrase ticket.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Cincinnatus on October 20, 2011, 08:40:02 PM I am hereby running for NE Senate in October. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Napoleon on October 20, 2011, 09:14:33 PM I am hereby running for NE Senate in October. It had to be no more than two months before the election though. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Cincinnatus on October 20, 2011, 09:17:25 PM I am hereby running for NE Senate in October. It had to be no more than two months before the election though. I don't care. Just giving the information so it's here. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Cincinnatus on October 20, 2011, 09:49:36 PM Can we stop posting in the elections thread, please? :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Bacon King on October 20, 2011, 10:41:46 PM Rowan should be on the ballot. The statute that placed the two month limitation on candidacy declarations (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Seventh_Amendment_to_the_Consolidated_Electoral_System_Reform_Act) was signed into law on July 23rd, almost an entire month after Rowan declared his candidacy. Legally, he was considered to be a valid candidate as soon as he declared in June, since it was before the two-month law was put into place. If Rowan isn't on the ballot, he could very easily sue and probably win.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 23, 2011, 08:48:42 PM Reminder: election ends at midnight. If I'm awake I'll post when it closes.
When I wake up I'll start a countin Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 04:18:04 PM Counting will begin (and end) in a few hours.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 05:53:11 PM Does not meet activity requirements:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=964 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=2235 Activity at Aug 24th, need to check exact dates. May not meet membership requirements (further investigation) https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=7220 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=7521 https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=7291 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 06:20:54 PM UP TO PAGE 3
PEOPLE OF NOTE (votes may, or may not, be in valid) Lucys Hannibal Seattle Nueve Dereich --------------- PRESIDENT WINFIELD (With seconds) Dallas (Snowguy) Jake (Duke) Office (Duke) SNOWGUY Snowguy Fritz Bacon Ebowed Dr. Cynic Scott Fuzzy Anonio Thomas Hawkeye Belgian Kal Julio GMantis Snowstalker Change Eraser DUKE Marokai Dead0man PiT Ping Zu Andrew Joh Fab Cathcon Verin Sanchez Tmth NOTA Teddy -------------------- SENATE -------------------- NE NAPOLEON Dallas Snowguy Scott Jake Andrew Snowstalker Eraser -------------------- SE YANKEE Bacon PiT Ping Kal Sanchez -------------------- ME MOPolitico Zu Joh Fab Office Tmth SHUA Cathcon -------------------- MW MAROKAI Marokai Fritz Dr. Cynic Jas Thomas Hawkeye Belgian Verin SEWER Julio GMantis -------------------- PA BGWAH Ebowed Antonio Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 10:05:21 PM PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT [2] AHDuke99/Cincinnatus (JBach717) RPP - Regional Protection Party [ ] snowguy716/Bacon King JCP - Jesus Christ Party [1] Winfield/JBrase IND - Independent [ ] Write-in:______________________________ -__________________ [3] None of the above NORTHEAST SENATE [X] () Please do not draw on your ballot. I am a very forgiving SoFE and will record for the person for whom I feel you had intention to vote for. Not all SoFE's will be the same. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 10:27:17 PM PEOPLE OF NOTE (votes may, or may not, be in valid)
Lucys Hannibal Seattle Nueve Dereich --------------- PRESIDENT WINFIELD (With seconds) Dallas (Snowguy) Jake (Duke) Office (Duke) JBrase (Snowguy) Morgan (Duke) Giovanni (Duke) Wormy (Snowguy) Mecha (Snowguy) Winfield (NOTA) Shua (Duke) Phk (Snowguy) Napoleon (Snowguy) SNOWGUY Snowguy Fritz Bacon Ebowed Dr. Cynic Scott Fuzzy Anonio Thomas Hawkeye Belgian Kal Julio GMantis Snowstalker Change Eraser John Opebo Rod Seattle** Frodo Tender Obama Gramps Holmes Freep px75 Jackson Neuve** Hatman Meeker Sewer Culture Smash Mondale RFK Red Oak BRTD Nathan Arch Lief DrScholl NCLib Bgwah DUKE Marokai Dead0man PiT Ping Zu Andrew Joh Fab Cathcon Verin Sanchez Tmth Yelnoc Dereich** A-Bob MOPolitico Realistic Ghost Torie Cyic Max Nik Gustaf Ben Naso Brandon Yankee Smid Angus Hannibal** Taft TJ Polnut Miles Junkie Aflei Rowan Shua Jas Bill Lucys** Franzl NHI Duke Sbane Phil NOTA Teddy Sam -------------------- SENATE -------------------- NE NAPOLEON Dallas Snowguy Scott Jake Andrew Snowstalker Eraser Obama Holmes Hatman Giovanni Smash Mondale RFK Polnut Red Winfield Oak Nathan Lief Bill Napoleon Phil ROWAN Cynic Nik Morgan Smid Rowan -------------------- SE YANKEE Bacon PiT Ping Kal Sanchez John Yelnoc Dereich JBrase Brandon Yankee Taft Miles Lucys** Duke NOTA Sam -------------------- ME MOPolitico Zu Joh Fab Office Tmth A-Bob MOPolitico Ben aso Hannibal** aflei Franzl SHUA Cathcon Ghost Frodo Gramps TJ Shua OPEBO Opebo (Shua) NCLib (Shua) -------------------- MW MAROKAI Marokai Fritz Dr. Cynic Jas Thomas Hawkeye Belgian Verin Gustaf Angus Mecha SEWER Julio GMantis Rod px75 Sewer BRTD -------------------- PA BGWAH Ebowed Antonio Realistic Seattle** Torie Tender Jackson Neuve** Meeker Culture Arch Phk DrScholl Sbane Bgwah MAX Max (Bgwah) JUNKIE Junkie (Bgwah) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 10:33:51 PM NE Senate
Napoleon - 23 Rowan - 5 SE Senate Yankee - 14-15 (pending research on validity of ballot) NOTA - 1 ME Senate MOPolitico - 9-10 Shua - 6 Opebo - 2 MW Senate Marokai - 11 Sewer - 6 PA Senate Bgwah - 13-15 Max - 1 Junkie - 1 Underlined = Winner. I will certify in apx 24 hours unless someone complains. Regardless of number of valid ballots, these are the winners. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 10:36:55 PM Snowguy 44-46
Duke - 43-46 Winfield - 12 NOTA - 2 Round 2 Snowguy - 50-52 Duke - 48-51 This race is TOO CLOSE TO CALL and hence I will need to check into the ballots before I pre-certify Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 11:24:56 PM Hannibal - Not meeting activity requirements
Seattle - Registered on time, All Appears in Order (AAIO) with Ballot. Dereich - AAIO Lucy's - AAIO Neu - AAIO I will need to have a discussion with the RG about ensuring people's usernames and not chosen names end up on the census. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 24, 2011, 11:28:18 PM NE Senate
Napoleon - 23 Rowan - 5 SE Senate Yankee - 15 NOTA - 1 ME Senate MOPolitico - 9 Shua - 6 Opebo - 2 MW Senate Marokai - 11 Sewer - 6 PA Senate Bgwah - 15 Max - 1 Junkie - 1 President Snowguy 46 Duke - 45 Winfield - 12 NOTA - 2 Round 2 Snowguy - 52 Duke - 50 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2011, 10:39:23 PM Certification in an hour
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Mopsus on October 25, 2011, 10:55:08 PM I would like to bring to the attention of the SoFE the fact that ghost_white, who voted in the Mideast Senate Race, is registered in the Northeast, and his vote in that race is therefore invalid.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2011, 10:57:50 PM Hum. I'd not even considered that. I will make the proper changes.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2011, 11:00:58 PM ---------------
NE Senate Napoleon - 23 Rowan - 5 --------------- SE Senate Yankee - 15 NOTA - 1 --------------- ME Senate Round 1 MOPolitico - 8 Shua - 6 Opebo - 2 Round 2 MOPolitico - 8 - Tiebreaker, lead on previous ballot. Shua - 8 --------------- MW Senate Marokai - 11 Sewer - 6 --------------- PA Senate Bgwah - 15 Max - 1 Junkie - 1 --------------- President Snowguy 46 Duke - 45 Winfield - 12 NOTA - 2 Round 2 Snowguy - 52 Duke - 50 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2011, 11:02:34 PM ---------------
NE Senate Napoleon - 23 Rowan - 5 --------------- SE Senate Yankee - 15 NOTA - 1 --------------- PA Senate Bgwah - 15 Max - 1 Junkie - 1 --------------- President Snowguy 46 Duke - 45 Winfield - 12 NOTA - 2 Round 2 Snowguy - 52 Duke - 50 () ME and MW raised had concerned raised, either here just now or via PM some time ago without deets. The remainder are certified. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on October 25, 2011, 11:04:02 PM I wish I had a tie with MOPolitico.
However, I did not, as I only won 7 in the final round. edit: I'm actually counting 12-7. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2011, 11:08:38 PM ME Senate Round 1 MOPolitico - 8 Shua - 6 Opebo - 2 Round 2 MOPolitico - 8 - Tiebreaker, lead on previous ballot. Shua - 8 --------------- MW Senate Marokai - 11 Sewer - 6 These races will have their certification delayed 24 hours to further examine results Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 25, 2011, 11:09:08 PM I wish I had a tie with MOPolitico. However, I did not, as I only won 7 in the final round. edit: I'm actually counting 12-7. Yea, something is wrong, hence I'm going to recount these two races Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 26, 2011, 12:46:13 AM --------------
-------------- Page 1 Marokai (Marokai) Marokai (Dead0man) Marokai (Fritz) Page 2 Marokai (Dr. Cynic) Marokai (Jas) Marokai (Thomas) Marokai (Hawkeye) Marokai (Belgian) Page 3 Sewer (Julio) Marokai (Verin) Sewer (GMantis) Page 4 Sewer (Rod) Page 5 Marokai (Gustaf) Sewer (px75) Page 6 Marokai (angus) Sewer (Sewer) Page 7 Marokai (Mecha) Sewer (BRTD) Page 8 -------------- Marokai - 12 Sewer - 6 -------------- -------------- Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 MOPolitico (ZuWo) MOPolitico (Johanus) MOPolitico (Fab) Shua (Cathcon) MOPolitco (Office) MOPolitico (Tmth) Page 4 MOPolitico (A-Bob) Opebo (Opebo) MOPolitico (MOPolitco) Shua (Frodo) Page 5 Shua (Gramps) MOPolitico (Ben) MOPolitico (Naso) Page 6 MOPolitico (Hannibal) Shua (TJ) Page 7 MOPolitico (afleit) Shua (Shua) Page 8 MOPolitico (Franzl) Opebo (NCLib) -------------- MOPolitico - 12 Shua - 5 Opebo - 2 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on October 26, 2011, 10:15:54 PM Since Snowguy was elected President, when will a by-election be held to fill the seat that he will vacate in the Senate? (Don't worry, I've no intention whatsoever of running.)
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 26, 2011, 10:16:37 PM He needs to resign first, and then the Senate needs to inform me of his vacancy.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on October 26, 2011, 10:22:20 PM He needs to resign first, and then the Senate needs to inform me of his vacancy. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2011, 02:03:07 AM He needs to resign first, and then the Senate needs to inform me of his vacancy. As much as I would enjoy holding elections at random dates when I feel like it for whatever office springs to my mind, I can hold general elections on schedule. Anything else must only be held when I am informed of a need for them. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2011, 02:05:21 AM Marokai - 12 - WINNER
Sewer - 6 MOPolitico - 12 - WINNER Shua - 5 Opebo - 2 () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on November 07, 2011, 11:02:06 PM Is there going to be a special election sometime?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 08, 2011, 06:11:54 AM If/when the Senate informs me of a vacancy, there indeed will be.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on November 12, 2011, 06:15:55 PM If/when the Senate informs me of a vacancy, there indeed will be. I suppose this is my job now that I'm PPT again? Well there is indeed a vacancy for Snowguy's old seat. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 13, 2011, 02:02:26 AM If/when the Senate informs me of a vacancy, there indeed will be. I suppose this is my job now that I'm PPT again? Well there is indeed a vacancy for Snowguy's old seat. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 16, 2011, 02:06:21 AM Join me in a celebration on December 4th as I celebrate the fact that, as of that date, I'll have been SoFE for 50%+1 of the time said office has existed!
edit Time in months. As SoFE Franzl - 7.5 Teddy - 8.5 As SoFA or SoFE, rounded up Hatman - 17 Franzl - 12 Gabu - 11 Teddy - 9 Lewis - 7 When Teddy will overtake: Gabu = end of Jan 2012 Franzl = end of Feb 2012 Hatman = end of Jul 2012 Single Term = New Years 2013 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 17, 2011, 01:46:02 PM Sample Ballot
() () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The special election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, November 17th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, November 20th. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. In short, the department will be taking a liberal interpreation of this, so Keep posts to votes only. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=143164.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. Note that voting begins at midnight and ends in exactly 72 hours. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. [ ] Cincinnatus (JBach717) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=7206) Regional Protection Party [ ] Nathan (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=6261) Jesus Christ Party [ ] Yelnoc (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4922) Silly Party of Atlasia [ ] Write In: _________________ Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on November 17, 2011, 01:46:08 PM Quote You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list, you can presume you are elegible. Those aren't really the same. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 17, 2011, 01:52:32 PM the original blah blah was written some time ago.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on November 17, 2011, 02:51:17 PM No spot for write-ins?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 17, 2011, 03:07:35 PM Oh right lol I knew I was forgetting something.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on November 17, 2011, 03:35:25 PM If a voter were to write in some campaign message as a vote preference, such as this:
Quote [1] Texasgurl [2] Jbrase [3] Write-in: Anyone who isn't Meeker or this: Quote [1] Write-in: Meeker [2] Xahar has maturity issues would you disqualify the vote? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 17, 2011, 03:39:28 PM I always interpret as liberally as I can, so the first ballot write-in would be invalid as it does not indicate an individual, but the second ballot would be fully valid. In general that line refers to posting, or discussion.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 18, 2011, 08:38:17 AM Just a reminder, I use the word "Clear Intent" when deciding if a vote is valid.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 19, 2011, 09:37:08 PM As per
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=144078.new#new Teddy is having medical difficulties and *may* be unable to close the booth. Unlikely but just be aware Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 02:10:43 AM The chances increase slightly. If I am not able to close the booth you all know when to stop voting, and if you don't hear from me within 24 hours of the end of voting, presume I will be unable to do it.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 05:42:31 AM I'm back and I'll be fine to count whatever is needed
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 06:17:51 PM PRE COUNTS
Balloting List Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid ZuWo - Valid Hermit (Pingvin99) - Census? Cincinnatus - Valid AndrewPA - Valid Marokai - Valid Junkie - Valid Winfield - Valid brandonh - Valid Franzl - Valid polnut - Valid Snowstalker - Valid AHDuke99 - Valid Yankee - Valid Simfan34 - Valid NHI - Activity? cinyc - Activity? Dereich - Activity? Reaganfan - Valid MaxQue - Valid homelycooking - Valid NiK - Valid dead0man - Valid filliatre - Valid MOPolitico - Valid Inks.LWC - Valid JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid tmthforu94 - Valid A-Bob - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid Fritz - Valid Kalwejt - Valid Antonio V - Valid Frodo - Valid Hawkeye59 - Valid Ebowed - Valid Tender Branson - Activity? Fuzzybigfoot - Valid Jackson - Valid RFK - Valid Bacon King - Valid Napoleon - Valid oakvale - Valid opebo - Valid NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Census? RodPresident - Activity? JulioMadrid - Activity? Nathan - Valid Meeker - Activity? BRTD - Valid Seattle - Activity? Smash255 - Activity? snowguy716 - Valid Eraserhead - Activity? Hashemite - Valid CultureKing - Activity? realisticidealist - Activity? - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) Lewis - Valid TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) angus - Valid ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) sbane - Activity? (2P: Cincinnatus) Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) ========== Other - Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 06:24:44 PM All those flagged for activity pass very easily with the exception of Cynic, who only passes with a good margin.
PRE COUNTS Balloting List Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid ZuWo - Valid Hermit (Pingvin99) - Census? Cincinnatus - Valid AndrewPA - Valid Marokai - Valid Junkie - Valid Winfield - Valid brandonh - Valid Franzl - Valid polnut - Valid Snowstalker - Valid AHDuke99 - Valid Yankee - Valid Simfan34 - Valid NHI - Census? cinyc - Valid Dereich - Valid Reaganfan - Valid MaxQue - Valid homelycooking - Valid NiK - Valid dead0man - Valid filliatre - Valid MOPolitico - Valid Inks.LWC - Valid JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid tmthforu94 - Valid A-Bob - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid Fritz - Valid Kalwejt - Valid Antonio V - Valid Frodo - Valid Hawkeye59 - Valid Ebowed - Valid Tender Branson - Valid Fuzzybigfoot - Valid Jackson - Valid RFK - Valid Bacon King - Valid Napoleon - Valid oakvale - Valid opebo - Valid NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Census? RodPresident - Valid JulioMadrid - Valid Nathan - Valid Meeker - Valid BRTD - Valid Seattle - Valid Smash255 - Valid snowguy716 - Valid Eraserhead - Valid Hashemite - Valid CultureKing - Valid realisticidealist - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) Lewis - Valid TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) angus - Valid ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) ========== Other - Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 06:27:45 PM Census:
pingvin should be listed as Pingvin99 NVGonzalez should be listed as antwnzrr NHI is properly listed The RG has been contacted. PRE COUNTS Balloting List Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid ZuWo - Valid Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid Cincinnatus - Valid AndrewPA - Valid Marokai - Valid Junkie - Valid Winfield - Valid brandonh - Valid Franzl - Valid polnut - Valid Snowstalker - Valid AHDuke99 - Valid Yankee - Valid Simfan34 - Valid NHI - Valid cinyc - Valid Dereich - Valid Reaganfan - Valid MaxQue - Valid homelycooking - Valid NiK - Valid dead0man - Valid filliatre - Valid MOPolitico - Valid Inks.LWC - Valid JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid tmthforu94 - Valid A-Bob - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid Fritz - Valid Kalwejt - Valid Antonio V - Valid Frodo - Valid Hawkeye59 - Valid Ebowed - Valid Tender Branson - Valid Fuzzybigfoot - Valid Jackson - Valid RFK - Valid Bacon King - Valid Napoleon - Valid oakvale - Valid opebo - Valid NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid RodPresident - Valid JulioMadrid - Valid Nathan - Valid Meeker - Valid BRTD - Valid Seattle - Valid Smash255 - Valid snowguy716 - Valid Eraserhead - Valid Hashemite - Valid CultureKing - Valid realisticidealist - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) Lewis - Valid TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) angus - Valid ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) ========== Other - Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 06:31:54 PM Current round 1
Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid ZuWo - Valid Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid clarence - Invalid (Time) Cincinnatus - Valid AndrewPA - Valid Marokai - Valid Junkie - Valid Winfield - Valid brandonh - Valid Franzl - Valid polnut - Valid Snowstalker - Valid AHDuke99 - Valid Yankee - Valid Simfan34 - Valid NHI - Valid cinyc - Valid Dereich - Valid Reaganfan - Valid MaxQue - Valid homelycooking - Valid NiK - Valid dead0man - Valid filliatre - Valid MOPolitico - Valid Inks.LWC - Valid JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid tmthforu94 - Valid A-Bob - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid Fritz - Valid Kalwejt - Valid Antonio V - Valid Frodo - Valid Hawkeye59 - Valid Ebowed - Valid Tender Branson - Valid Fuzzybigfoot - Valid Jackson - Valid RFK - Valid Bacon King - Valid Napoleon - Valid oakvale - Valid opebo - Valid NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid RodPresident - Valid JulioMadrid - Valid Nathan - Valid Meeker - Valid BRTD - Valid Seattle - Valid Smash255 - Valid snowguy716 - Valid Eraserhead - Valid Hashemite - Valid CultureKing - Valid realisticidealist - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) Lewis - Valid TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) angus - Valid ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Current round 2
angus - Valid Lewis - Valid Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on November 20, 2011, 07:11:33 PM Teddy, you seem to have missed Badger's vote in your count.
[3 ] Cincinnatus (JBach717) Regional Protection Party [ 1] Nathan Jesus Christ Party [ 2] Yelnoc Silly Party of Atlasia [4 ] Write In: _Other candidates not as good as these (i.e. most posters :))__ Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 07:15:52 PM I shall add it
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 08:44:19 PM Current round 1
Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid ZuWo - Valid Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid clarence - Invalid (Time) Cincinnatus - Valid AndrewPA - Valid Marokai - Valid Junkie - Valid Winfield - Valid brandonh - Valid Franzl - Valid polnut - Valid Snowstalker - Valid AHDuke99 - Valid Yankee - Valid Simfan34 - Valid NHI - Valid cinyc - Valid Dereich - Valid Reaganfan - Valid MaxQue - Valid homelycooking - Valid NiK - Valid dead0man - Valid filliatre - Valid MOPolitico - Valid Inks.LWC - Valid JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid tmthforu94 - Valid A-Bob - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid Fritz - Valid Kalwejt - Valid Antonio V - Valid Frodo - Valid Hawkeye59 - Valid Ebowed - Valid Tender Branson - Valid Fuzzybigfoot - Valid Jackson - Valid RFK - Valid Bacon King - Valid Napoleon - Valid oakvale - Valid opebo - Valid NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid RodPresident - Valid JulioMadrid - Valid Nathan - Valid Meeker - Valid BRTD - Valid Seattle - Valid Smash255 - Valid snowguy716 - Valid Eraserhead - Valid Hashemite - Valid CultureKing - Valid realisticidealist - Valid Obamaisdabest - Valid mondale84 - Valid belgiansocialist - Valid Badger - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid - Valid ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) Lewis - Valid TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) angus - Valid ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) Jbrase - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) - Valid (2P: ) ========== Rowan - Rowan - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) ========== Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Current round 2
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 11:04:46 PM Current round 1
Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid 1 ZuWo - Valid 2 Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid 3 clarence - Invalid (Time) 4 Cincinnatus - Valid 5 AndrewPA - Valid 6 Marokai - Valid 7 Junkie - Valid 8 Winfield - Valid 9 brandonh - Valid 10 Franzl - Valid 11 polnut - Valid 12 Snowstalker - Valid 13 AHDuke99 - Valid 14 Yankee - Valid 15 Simfan34 - Valid 16 NHI - Valid 17 cinyc - Valid 18 Dereich - Valid 19 Reaganfan - Valid 20 MaxQue - Valid 21 homelycooking - Valid 22 NiK - Valid 23 dead0man - Valid 24 filliatre - Valid 25 MOPolitico - Valid 26 Inks.LWC - Valid 27 JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid 28 tmthforu94 - Valid 29 A-Bob - Valid 30 Progressive Realist - Valid 31 - Valid 32 - Valid 33 - Valid 34 - Valid 35 - Valid 36 - Valid 37 ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid 1 Fritz - Valid 2 Kalwejt - Valid 3 Antonio V - Valid 4 Frodo - Valid 5 Hawkeye59 - Valid 6 Ebowed - Valid 7 Tender Branson - Valid 8 Fuzzybigfoot - Valid 9 Jackson - Valid 10 RFK - Valid 11 Bacon King - Valid 11 Napoleon - Valid 12 oakvale - Valid 13 opebo - Valid 14 NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid 15 RodPresident - Valid 16 JulioMadrid - Valid 17 Nathan - Valid 18 Meeker - Valid 19 BRTD - Valid 20 Seattle - Valid 21 Smash255 - Valid 22 snowguy716 - Valid 23 Eraserhead - Valid 24 Hashemite - Valid 25 CultureKing - Valid 26 realisticidealist - Valid 27 Obamaisdabest - Valid 28 mondale84 - Valid 29 belgiansocialist - Valid 30 Badger - Valid 31 nclib - Valid 32 Lief - Valid (First write-in is not accepting write-ins) 33 ArchangelZero - Valid 34 DrScholl - Valid 35 Ghost_white - Valid 36 EarlAW - Valid 37 boris78 - Valid 38 - Valid 39 - Valid 40 ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 1 Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) 2 Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) 3 Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 4 FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) 5 Lewis - Valid 6 TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 7 angus - Valid 8 ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 9 ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 10 Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 11 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 12 Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) 13 Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 14 Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) 15 sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 16 Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 17 benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 18 MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 19 Jbrase - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20 PiT - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 21 Wonkish1 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 22 - Valid (2P: ) 23 - Valid (2P: ) 24 - Valid (2P: ) 25 - Valid (2P: ) 26 - Valid (2P: ) 27 ========== Rowan - Rowan - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 1 ========== Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Current round 2
A side note from the SoFE It's very sad and pathetic that some of these most recent voters, I've had to check the Census to see if they are even Atlasians. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 11:29:32 PM Rather than just complain (as per my last line) about people pumping party supporters, I took it upon myself to do the positive thing, and I contacted people who were online to let them know about the election.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 11:33:56 PM Current round 1
Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid 1 ZuWo - Valid 2 Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid 3 clarence - Invalid (Time) 4 Cincinnatus - Valid 5 AndrewPA - Valid 6 Marokai - Valid 7 Junkie - Valid 8 Winfield - Valid 9 brandonh - Valid 10 Franzl - Valid 11 polnut - Valid 12 Snowstalker - Valid 13 AHDuke99 - Valid 14 Yankee - Valid 15 Simfan34 - Valid 16 NHI - Valid 17 cinyc - Valid 18 Dereich - Valid 19 Reaganfan - Valid 20 MaxQue - Valid 21 homelycooking - Valid 22 NiK - Valid 23 dead0man - Valid 24 filliatre - Valid 25 MOPolitico - Valid 26 Inks.LWC - Valid 27 JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid 28 tmthforu94 - Valid 29 A-Bob - Valid 30 Progressive Realist - Valid 31 Averroës Nix - Valid 32 - Valid 33 - Valid 34 - Valid 35 - Valid 36 - Valid 37 ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid 1 Fritz - Valid 2 Kalwejt - Valid 3 Antonio V - Valid 4 Frodo - Valid 5 Hawkeye59 - Valid 6 Ebowed - Valid 7 Tender Branson - Valid 8 Fuzzybigfoot - Valid 9 Jackson - Valid 10 RFK - Valid 11 Bacon King - Valid 11 Napoleon - Valid 12 oakvale - Valid 13 opebo - Valid 14 NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid 15 RodPresident - Valid 16 JulioMadrid - Valid 17 Nathan - Valid 18 Meeker - Valid 19 BRTD - Valid 20 Seattle - Valid 21 Smash255 - Valid 22 snowguy716 - Valid 23 Eraserhead - Valid 24 Hashemite - Valid 25 CultureKing - Valid 26 realisticidealist - Valid 27 Obamaisdabest - Valid 28 mondale84 - Valid 29 belgiansocialist - Valid 30 Badger - Valid 31 nclib - Valid 32 Lief - Valid (First write-in is not accepting write-ins) 33 ArchangelZero - Valid 34 DrScholl - Valid 35 Ghost_white - Valid 36 EarlAW - Valid 37 boris78 - Valid 38 Wormyguy - Valid 39 Alcon - Valid 40 - Valid 41 - Valid 42 ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 1 Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) 2 Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) 3 Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 4 FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) 5 Lewis - Valid 6 TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 7 angus - Valid 8 ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 9 ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 10 Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 11 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 12 Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) 13 Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 14 Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) 15 sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 16 Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 17 benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 18 MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 19 Jbrase - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20 PiT - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 21 Wonkish1 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 22 - Valid (2P: ) 23 - Valid (2P: ) 24 - Valid (2P: ) 25 - Valid (2P: ) 26 - Valid (2P: ) 27 ========== Rowan - Rowan - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 1 ========== Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Current round 2
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 11:44:32 PM updated above
Reminder, in the event of a tie, who leads on the previous ballot (IE Nathan) wins Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 11:52:35 PM Final round 1
Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid 1 ZuWo - Valid 2 Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid 3 clarence - Invalid (Time) 4 Cincinnatus - Valid 5 AndrewPA - Valid 6 Marokai - Valid 7 Junkie - Valid 8 Winfield - Valid 9 brandonh - Valid 10 Franzl - Valid 11 polnut - Valid 12 Snowstalker - Valid 13 AHDuke99 - Valid 14 Yankee - Valid 15 Simfan34 - Valid 16 NHI - Valid 17 cinyc - Valid 18 Dereich - Valid 19 Reaganfan - Valid 20 MaxQue - Valid 21 homelycooking - Valid 22 NiK - Valid 23 dead0man - Valid 24 filliatre - Valid 25 MOPolitico - Valid 26 Inks.LWC - Valid 27 JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid 28 tmthforu94 - Valid 29 A-Bob - Valid 30 Progressive Realist - Valid 31 Averroës Nix - Valid 32 Keystone Phil - Valid 33 - Valid 34 - Valid 35 - Valid 36 - Valid 37 ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid 1 Fritz - Valid 2 Kalwejt - Valid 3 Antonio V - Valid 4 Frodo - Valid 5 Hawkeye59 - Valid 6 Ebowed - Valid 7 Tender Branson - Valid 8 Fuzzybigfoot - Valid 9 Jackson - Valid 10 RFK - Valid 11 Bacon King - Valid 12 Napoleon - Valid 13 oakvale - Valid 14 opebo - Valid 15 NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid 16 RodPresident - Valid 17 JulioMadrid - Valid 18 Meeker - Valid 19 BRTD - Valid 20 Seattle - Valid 21 Smash255 - Valid 22 snowguy716 - Valid 23 Eraserhead - Valid 24 Hashemite - Valid 25 CultureKing - Valid 26 realisticidealist - Valid 27 Obamaisdabest - Valid 28 mondale84 - Valid 29 belgiansocialist - Valid 30 Badger - Valid 31 nclib - Valid 32 Lief - Valid (First write-in is not accepting write-ins) 33 ArchangelZero - Valid 34 DrScholl - Valid 35 Ghost_white - Valid 36 EarlAW - Valid 37 boris78 - Valid 38 Wormyguy - Valid 39 Alcon - Valid 40 bgwah - Valid 41 Nathan - Valid 42 ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 1 Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) 2 Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) 3 Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 4 FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) 5 Lewis - Valid 6 TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 7 angus - Valid 8 ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 9 ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 10 Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 11 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 12 Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) 13 Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 14 Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) 15 sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 16 Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 17 benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 18 MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 19 Jbrase - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20 PiT - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 21 Wonkish1 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 22 Sam Spade - Valid (2P: Nathan) 23 - Valid (2P: ) 24 - Valid (2P: ) 25 - Valid (2P: ) 26 - Valid (2P: ) 27 ========== Rowan - Rowan - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 1 ========== Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Final round 2
With the 2 candidate tied at 49 votes each, we have a possible problem Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 20, 2011, 11:56:38 PM It would appear the normal definition of a tie breaker does not apply here hum
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on November 20, 2011, 11:57:29 PM What about the normal definition of a barnburner? Heh.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:03:23 AM [size=30]RESULTS[/size]
Final round 1 Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid 1 ZuWo - Valid 2 Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid 3 clarence - Invalid (Time) 4 Cincinnatus - Valid 5 AndrewPA - Valid 6 Marokai - Valid 7 Junkie - Valid 8 Winfield - Valid 9 brandonh - Valid 10 Franzl - Valid 11 polnut - Valid 12 Snowstalker - Valid 13 AHDuke99 - Valid 14 Yankee - Valid 15 Simfan34 - Valid 16 NHI - Valid 17 cinyc - Valid 18 Dereich - Valid 19 Reaganfan - Valid 20 MaxQue - Valid 21 homelycooking - Valid 22 NiK - Valid 23 dead0man - Valid 24 filliatre - Valid 25 MOPolitico - Valid 26 Inks.LWC - Valid 27 JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid 28 tmthforu94 - Valid 29 A-Bob - Valid 30 Progressive Realist - Valid 31 Averroës Nix - Valid 32 Keystone Phil - Valid 33 - Valid 34 - Valid 35 - Valid 36 - Valid 37 ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid 1 Fritz - Valid 2 Kalwejt - Valid 3 Antonio V - Valid 4 Frodo - Valid 5 Hawkeye59 - Valid 6 Ebowed - Valid 7 Tender Branson - Valid 8 Fuzzybigfoot - Valid 9 Jackson - Valid 10 RFK - Valid 11 Bacon King - Valid 11 Napoleon - Valid 12 oakvale - Valid 13 opebo - Valid 14 NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid 15 RodPresident - Valid 16 JulioMadrid - Valid 17 Nathan - Valid 18 Meeker - Valid 19 BRTD - Valid 20 Seattle - Valid 21 Smash255 - Valid 22 snowguy716 - Valid 23 Eraserhead - Valid 24 Hashemite - Valid 25 CultureKing - Valid 26 realisticidealist - Valid 27 Obamaisdabest - Valid 28 mondale84 - Valid 29 belgiansocialist - Valid 30 Badger - Valid 31 nclib - Valid 32 Lief - Valid (First write-in is not accepting write-ins) 33 ArchangelZero - Valid 34 DrScholl - Valid 35 Ghost_white - Valid 36 EarlAW - Valid 37 boris78 - Valid 38 Wormyguy - Valid 39 Alcon - Valid 40 bgwah - Valid 41 - Valid 42 ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 1 Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) 2 Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) 3 Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 4 FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) 5 Lewis - Valid 6 TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 7 angus - Valid 8 ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 9 ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 10 Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 11 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 12 Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) 13 Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 14 Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) 15 sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 16 Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 17 benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 18 MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 19 Jbrase - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20 PiT - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 21 Wonkish1 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 22 Sam Spade - Valid (2P: Cin) 23 - Valid (2P: ) 24 - Valid (2P: ) 25 - Valid (2P: ) 26 - Valid (2P: ) 27 ========== Rowan - Rowan - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 1 ========== Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Final round 2
With the 2 candidate tied at 49 votes each, we have a possible problem Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:07:10 AM This being a by-election to a vacant at-large seat, this act
https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Proportional_Representation_Act#Section_2:_Rules_on_the_counting_of_votes_in_PR-STV_elections would normally apply However, this act makes it clear that this is for multiple slots, while only one is being elected. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Consolidated_Electoral_System_Reform_Act#Section_2:_Determination_of_the_Winner This act would otherwise apply. My interpretation is the latter is correct. Why? First - Section 2 of the PR act makes it clear that this only applies when more than one person is being elected. Section 3 also clearly states that the CES will need to be taken into account, placing it before the PR act. As always I will leave this as-is for 24 hours for appeals. In short, we are down to a run off election - which is how I interpret the acts - with the possibility of legal interpretation suggesting that at-large tie procedures be used, which would elect Nathan as the leader on the first ballot - which is what I thought before I checked to see if I was sure. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on November 21, 2011, 12:07:27 AM But, isn't clarence's vote invalid?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:10:10 AM ah, I did not even catch that. It is, and I will edit the list accordingly. Also, someone edited their ballot (people still have about 8 more mins to do so) so I will also edit that accordingly.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on November 21, 2011, 12:11:39 AM Teddy, I am extremely confident in the accuracy of my count.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:12:23 AM In 9 minutes I close the thread and check to see that everything is in order.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on November 21, 2011, 12:12:42 AM I'd appreciate a concordance or description of the differences between HEART's count and DoFE's.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Yelnoc on November 21, 2011, 12:12:52 AM Shall I conduct a third, tri-partisan count?
:) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:18:57 AM My first ballot numbers are off for you, Nathan, because I have #11 twice.
I am checking second ballot right now. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:19:41 AM Final round 1
Cincinnatus ========== Cincinnatus (JBach717) - Shua - Valid 1 ZuWo - Valid 2 Hermit (Pingvin99) - Valid 3 Keystone Phil - Valid 4 Cincinnatus - Valid 5 AndrewPA - Valid 6 Marokai - Valid 7 Junkie - Valid 8 Winfield - Valid 9 brandonh - Valid 10 Franzl - Valid 11 polnut - Valid 12 Snowstalker - Valid 13 AHDuke99 - Valid 14 Yankee - Valid 15 Simfan34 - Valid 16 NHI - Valid 17 cinyc - Valid 18 Dereich - Valid 19 Reaganfan - Valid 20 MaxQue - Valid 21 homelycooking - Valid 22 NiK - Valid 23 dead0man - Valid 24 filliatre - Valid 25 MOPolitico - Valid 26 Inks.LWC - Valid 27 JohanusCalvinusLibertas - Valid 28 tmthforu94 - Valid 29 A-Bob - Valid 30 Progressive Realist - Valid 31 Averroës Nix - Valid 32 ========== Nathan - Scott - Valid 1 Fritz - Valid 2 Kalwejt - Valid 3 Antonio V - Valid 4 Frodo - Valid 5 Hawkeye59 - Valid 6 Ebowed - Valid 7 Tender Branson - Valid 8 Fuzzybigfoot - Valid 9 Jackson - Valid 10 RFK - Valid 11 Napoleon - Valid 12 oakvale - Valid 13 opebo - Valid 14 NVGonzalez (antwnzrr) - Valid 15 RodPresident - Valid 16 JulioMadrid - Valid 17 Nathan - Valid 18 Meeker - Valid 19 BRTD - Valid 20 Seattle - Valid 21 Smash255 - Valid 22 snowguy716 - Valid 23 Eraserhead - Valid 24 Hashemite - Valid 25 CultureKing - Valid 26 realisticidealist - Valid 27 Obamaisdabest - Valid 28 mondale84 - Valid 29 belgiansocialist - Valid 30 Badger - Valid 31 nclib - Valid 32 Lief - Valid (First write-in is not accepting write-ins) 33 ArchangelZero - Valid 34 DrScholl - Valid 35 Ghost_white - Valid 36 EarlAW - Valid 37 boris78 - Valid 38 Wormyguy - Valid 39 Alcon - Valid 40 bgwah - Valid 41 Bacon King - Valid 42 ========== Yelnoc - Dallasfan65 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 1 Sewer - Valid (2P: Nathan) 2 Dr. Cynic - Valid (2P: Nathan) 3 Gustaf - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 4 FallenMorgan - Valid (2P: Nathan) 5 Lewis - Valid 6 TJ in Cleve - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 7 angus - Valid 8 ChairmanSanchez - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 9 ilikeverin - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 10 Mechaman - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 11 20RP12 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 12 Thomas D - Valid (2P: Nathan) 13 Cathcon - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 14 Torie - Valid(2P: Cincinnatus) 15 sbane - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 16 Conley - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 17 benconstine - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 18 MilesC56 - Valid (2P: Nathan) 19 Jbrase - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 20 PiT - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 21 Wonkish1 - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 22 Sam Spade - Valid (2P: Cin) 23 ========== Rowan - Rowan - Valid (2P: Cincinnatus) 1 ========== Invalid: Clarence, Teddy Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:20:40 AM HEART and DoFE agree on the above
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Simfan34 on November 21, 2011, 12:22:18 AM This is becoming quite interesting...
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:23:24 AM UNDERGOING COMPARISON TO HEART
Final round 2
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on November 21, 2011, 12:26:24 AM UNDERGOING COMPARISON TO HEART Final round 2
Your count has an error, Teddy. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:27:44 AM Removed additional jbrase on the grounds there's only one
Final round 2
edit as I'm posting as it tells me about my new post thanks Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:28:49 AM This brings us back to this:
This being a by-election to a vacant at-large seat, this act https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Proportional_Representation_Act#Section_2:_Rules_on_the_counting_of_votes_in_PR-STV_elections would normally apply However, this act makes it clear that this is for multiple slots, while only one is being elected. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Consolidated_Electoral_System_Reform_Act#Section_2:_Determination_of_the_Winner This act would otherwise apply. My interpretation is the latter is correct. Why? First - Section 2 of the PR act makes it clear that this only applies when more than one person is being elected. Section 3 also clearly states that the CES will need to be taken into account, placing it before the PR act. As always I will leave this as-is for 24 hours for appeals. In short, we are down to a run off election - which is how I interpret the acts - with the possibility of legal interpretation suggesting that at-large tie procedures be used, which would elect Nathan as the leader on the first ballot - which is what I thought before I checked to see if I was sure. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on November 21, 2011, 12:32:00 AM The first preference tie-breaker should be used. I suppose it's possible I'm biased (:P) but I'm fairly confident that is the correct solution.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on November 21, 2011, 12:33:11 AM This being a by-election to a vacant at-large seat, this act https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Proportional_Representation_Act#Section_2:_Rules_on_the_counting_of_votes_in_PR-STV_elections would normally apply However, this act makes it clear that this is for multiple slots, while only one is being elected. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Consolidated_Electoral_System_Reform_Act#Section_2:_Determination_of_the_Winner This act would otherwise apply. My interpretation is the latter is correct. Why? First - Section 2 of the PR act makes it clear that this only applies when more than one person is being elected. Section 3 also clearly states that the CES will need to be taken into account, placing it before the PR act. As always I will leave this as-is for 24 hours for appeals. In short, we are down to a run off election - which is how I interpret the acts - with the possibility of legal interpretation suggesting that at-large tie procedures be used, which would elect Nathan as the leader on the first ballot - which is what I thought before I checked to see if I was sure. Teddy, what in Section 2 of the PR act leads you to believe that it refers to an election for multiple seats? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:46:02 AM 2. The ‘quota’ (i.e. the number of votes required to be deemed elected) shall then be calculated as the whole number (disregarding any attached fraction) resulting from the following equation:
[Total Valid Poll/(Number of seats to be filled + 1)] + 1 This would mean every by-election we've ever done for any vacant at-large seat has been done incorrectly, because it's not used a quota. The quota in this case would be 50, and Nathan would be elected on the tiebreaker. I'm willing to recount the election with the quota (it wouldn't change anything) but it would mean accepting that all these by-elections have been done incorrectly. I'm willing to do that though if others are? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Sam Spade on November 21, 2011, 12:47:08 AM Quote Section 3: Vacancies 1. In the event of a vacancy arising for whatever reason in a seat filled by Proportional Representation, a by-election shall be held on a nationwide basis in accordance with the terms outlined within the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act (F.L. 14-2) and the Proportional Representation Act. This, in theory, because it is, well, poorly worded, means that both Acts could apply simultaneously, but since the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act does not mention Proportional Representation seats, a court would determine that, by omission, the Senate meant the Proportional Representation Act only applied in these situations. As such, Section 2 of that Act would apply, pretty clearly. I don't know where you're getting that the PR Act only applies to multiple slot elections. It's certainly not in the statutory language. Maybe I read this before I changed my vote. Maybe not. Who knows. Let me ask the more important question though - does it change the end result? Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:49:18 AM Yes
The end result is either Nathan is a Senator or Nathan and Bill have a run-off Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on November 21, 2011, 12:50:48 AM I think its pretty clear that Nathan wins the tie. I'm not understanding what part of the law makes this questionable.
As to the quota, that doesn't mean all those elections were done incorrectly. Quota just isn't relevant when we are electing one seat, and it makes no difference to the end result. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Sam Spade on November 21, 2011, 12:52:23 AM I think its pretty clear that Nathan wins the tie. I'm not understanding what part of the law makes this questionable. As to the quota, that doesn't mean all those elections were done incorrectly. Quota just isn't relevant when we are electing one seat, and it makes no difference to the end result. That's what I thought - I'm just pointing out a statutory issue. I will now go back into hiding, as my question has been answered. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:53:30 AM 1. Hereinafter Class B Senators shall be elected using the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote (hereinafter ‘PR-STV’).
2. For the purposes of these elections the whole of Atlasia shall be treated as a single electoral constituency. 1. After the close of polls, the ‘total valid poll’ shall be calculated, this being the total number of valid votes cast in the election. 2. The ‘quota’ (i.e. the number of votes required to be deemed elected) shall then be calculated as the whole number (disregarding any attached fraction) resulting from the following equation: [Total Valid Poll/(Number of seats to be filled + 1)] + 1 Quota is required. It does not change anything, whatsoever, but it's still required. If Nathan is to be made a Senator tonight, than we have to accept that all the class B by-elections should have had Quotas, which is actually where I'm leaning at this time. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 12:55:58 AM I am willing to do this, and to release a statement on behalf of the department apologizing for not using a quota in the past.
Again it is meaningless, but the law says I have to, regardless of weather there is a point to it or not. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on November 21, 2011, 12:58:33 AM Okay Teddy, they should have had quotas. Saying so now does not change the result of any past election. This is a relevant question ONLY in the current situation- a tie.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 01:00:41 AM Correct on all counts, as far as I understand.
Thus I'm resetting the 24 hour clock. Nathan is declared elected. I will certify this in 24 hours. If there are any objections to this within that period I will examine them accordingly. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Cincinnatus on November 21, 2011, 01:01:04 AM I have no intention to challenge the result. That is all.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on November 21, 2011, 02:04:21 AM Even if this goose is mostly cooked, I'm going to hold off on swearing in until Tuesday morning just to be safe.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 02:13:18 AM You can not swear in until I certify :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on November 21, 2011, 02:43:10 AM Okay, so I'll end up waiting until Tuesday morning anyway, I guess, if we've reset the 24-hour clock to question the result.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 03:03:03 AM The 24 hour clock is a courtesy I began leaving after we had an incident like this take place after I'd gone to bed. It's a way of everyone knowing the results for 24 hours, and thus, if I've made a mistake (and I always manage to make one) that someone can point it out and I can fix it. Then once the clock is out (1am tomorrow) I stamp my little stamp and inform the senate of the results, and you are free to swear in, out, or at whomever you wish.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2011, 03:05:16 AM If you'd like to see the stamp, go back a few pages :P
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on November 21, 2011, 03:33:18 AM I see; thank you for the explanation. じゃあ、また明日、إن شاء الله.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 22, 2011, 01:26:15 AM Senate By-Election, At Large
ROUND 1 Nathan - 42 Cincinnatus - 32 Yelnoc - 23 ROUND 2 Nathan - 48 Cincinnatus - 48 Tie broken by lead on previous ballot. Nathan has been elected to the Senate. () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 03, 2011, 11:30:52 PM Please note that I have resigned as SoFE effective immediately.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 05, 2011, 09:16:00 PM I, Homelycooking, will administer this week's elections.
So far, these candidates have declared their intentions to run and will be placed on the ballot: 20RP12, Silly Party of Atlasia, Pennsylvania JUNKIE, Regional Protection Party, Maine KALWEJT, Jesus Christ Party, Alabama NATHAN, Jesus Christ Party, Massachusetts SEWER, Silly Party of Atlasia, Iowa TEDDY, National Centrist Party, Washington TJ IN CLEVE, Regional Protection Party, Ohio Representatives of parties granting endorsements should contact me by Thursday so that the endorsements you give to the candidates will likewise be listed on the ballot. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Grumpier Than Thou on December 06, 2011, 06:23:57 AM :D <3
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 07, 2011, 09:01:23 AM SAMPLE BALLOT -
VOID FOR ALL NON-DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES () () This election is held in accordance with Article V of the Constitution and with the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. The regular election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, December 8th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, December 11. DO NOT EDIT OR DELETE THE POST CONTAINING YOUR BALLOT IN ANY WAY AFTER 20 MINUTES OF ITS BEING POSTED OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE INVALIDATED The act of campaigning within the election booth is strictly forbidden and will render void any votes made by those who campaign. The act of campaigning is considered to include, but is not limited to, strong attempts to compel others either to vote or not to vote for one or multiple candidates, or other related activities that could reasonably be construed as a direct attempt to influence how future voters cast their ballots. In other words, this is not a discussion thread. In short, the department will be taking a liberal interpreation of this, so Keep posts to votes only. Place the numbers 1, 2, etc. in the space provided beside the candidates who you wish to vote for to designate your order of preference for these candidates. If any other mark or attempt to order the candidates is made, the Department of Forum Affairs will make every effort to deduce voter intent from the content of the ballot, but the warning must be issued that failure to follow the above instructions may result in the invalidation of your ballot in the event of an inability to discern voter intent. You are an eligible voter in general if you were registered to vote on or before the proper date, and if you made 15 posts in any location within the Atlas Forum in the 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the regular election. In other words, if your name appears on the Census list (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=143164.0), you can presume you are elegible. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate or that you support one or many candidates that are not listed in addition to those that are, you may write in other candidates and include them in your list of preferences. Space is provided for one such write-in, but as many can be listed as you wish. In the event that you do not support any listed candidate, and do not wish to write in any candidate, you may place an X or a 1 beside "None of the above", and only beside "None of the above". In the event that an X or a 1 appears beside "None of the above" on a ballot, all other marks or numbers will be ignored. It is not permissible under current election law to vote for both "None of the above" and other candidates. Note that voting begins at midnight and ends in exactly 72 hours. Names of candidates follow in alphabetical order. AT-LARGE SENATE (5 seats) [ ] 20RP12 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=6514) of Pennsylvania SPA - Silly Party of Atlasia Endorsement: JCP, RPP [ ] Junkie (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4846) of Maine RPP - Regional Protection Party, Non-Partisan League caucus Endorsement: JCP, RPP [ ] Kalwejt (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3776) of Alabama JCP - Jesus Christ Party, Social Democratic caucus Endorsement: JCP [ ] Nathan (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=6261) of Massachusetts JCP - Jesus Christ Party Endorsement: JCP [ ] Sewer (SpaceCommunistMutant) (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3497) of Iowa SPA - Silly Party of Atlasia Endorsement: JCP [ ] TJ in Cleve (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=6991) of Ohio RPP - Regional Protection Party Endorsement: RPP [ ] Write-in:______________________________ [ ] None of the above SAMPLE BALLOT - VOID FOR ALL NON-DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 07, 2011, 09:52:18 PM Representatives of parties granting endorsements should contact me by Thursday so that the endorsements you give to the candidates will likewise be listed on the ballot. Oh great and magnificent Registrar General, possessor of highest approval ratings in all the land, The Regional Protection Party has endorsed 20RP12 and Teddy and thus they may choose to appear as such on the ballot. Sen. NC Yankee, RPP Chairman. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 07, 2011, 09:56:11 PM Representatives of parties granting endorsements should contact me by Thursday so that the endorsements you give to the candidates will likewise be listed on the ballot. Oh great and magnificent Registrar General, possessor of highest approval ratings in all the land, The Regional Protection Party has endorsed 20RP12 and Teddy and thus they may choose to appear as such on the ballot. Sen. NC Yankee, RPP Chairman. Thank you Mr. Chairman. Since Teddy is no longer a candidate, the ballot will be edited to reflect your party's endorsements of 20RP12, TJ in Cleve and Junkie. Your fitting reverence has also been noted. ;D Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 07, 2011, 10:43:51 PM OFFICIAL COUNT 1. Ebowed: NATHAN 2. Napoleon: NATHAN 3. ZuWo: TJ IN CLEVE 4. Teddy: SEWER 5. Clarence: TJ IN CLEVE 6. Jackson: KALWEJT 7. 20RP12: 20RP12 8. big bad fab: JUNKIE 9. Kalwejt: KALWEJT 10. tmthforu: TJ IN CLEVE 11. belgian: NATHAN 12. AndrewPA: JUNKIE 13. px75: KALWEJT 14. Antonio V: KALWEJT 15. angus: 20RP12 16. Hawkeye: KALWEJT 17. Change08: NATHAN 18. Shua: 20RP12 19. Lewis T.: Xahar to SEWER 20. RFK: KALWEJT 21. Scott: NATHAN 22. Polnut: JUNKIE 23. Oakvale: JUNKIE 24. Inks: TJ IN CLEVE 25. Simfan: JUNKIE 26. Benconstine: JUNKIE 27. Averroes Nix: NATHAN 28. Snowguy: KALWEJT 29. Sanchez: 20RP12 30. officepark: TJ IN CLEVE 31. Fritz: SEWER 32. Homely: JUNKIE Current tally (after write-ins): 20RP12: 4 JUNKIE: 7 KALWEJT: 7 NATHAN: 6 SEWER: 3 TJ IN CLEVE: 5 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: TJ in Oregon on December 08, 2011, 12:08:29 AM I thought the voting began at 11:59 PM tomorrow night (well, technicially tonight now)? Is the voting booth thread just posted so we can see the ballot or has it started?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on December 08, 2011, 12:26:04 AM Yeah I'm a tiny bit confused. The voting booth even says:
Quote The regular election begins at 23:59 EDT, Thursday, December 8th, and ends at 23:59 EDT, Sunday, December 11 This implies the elections arts in about 24 hours, not now. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Fritz on December 08, 2011, 01:06:28 AM lordie.......
Looks like the election started a day early. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 08, 2011, 01:08:27 AM This has happened before, and the result was the law allows the voting booth to be opened any time on Thursday, but, it must be closed 72 hours after it opens.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on December 08, 2011, 01:10:04 AM Yeah it's legal for it to start now. Homely will need to fix the specific times, though.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 08, 2011, 09:31:10 AM Sorry, I fucked up big time. We could delete the old one and start at the correct time. I suppose, though that since the voting booth is legal (opened on Thursday), we should continue to use the current one. Any advice?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on December 08, 2011, 09:37:06 AM When this happened to me we decided to continue, and I just made sure to PM voters to let them know. The RG also counted people as having cast a (though invalid) ballot, if they voted late.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 08, 2011, 09:42:45 AM I apologize for my error in opening the voting booth early. The election will proceed as scheduled until 0:00 Sunday, and all registered voters will be notified of these voting hours.
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 08, 2011, 05:42:15 PM OFFICIAL COUNT 1. Ebowed: NATHAN 2. Napoleon: NATHAN 3. ZuWo: TJ IN CLEVE 4. Teddy: SEWER 5. Clarence: TJ IN CLEVE 6. Jackson: KALWEJT 7. 20RP12: 20RP12 8. big bad fab: JUNKIE 9. Kalwejt: KALWEJT 10. tmthforu: TJ IN CLEVE 11. belgian: NATHAN 12. AndrewPA: JUNKIE 13. px75: KALWEJT 14. Antonio V: KALWEJT 15. angus: 20RP12 16. Hawkeye: KALWEJT 17. Change08: NATHAN 18. Shua: 20RP12 19. Lewis T.: Xahar to SEWER 20. RFK: KALWEJT 21. Scott: NATHAN 22. Polnut: JUNKIE 23. Oakvale: JUNKIE 24. Inks: TJ IN CLEVE 25. Simfan: JUNKIE 26. Benconstine: JUNKIE 27. Averroes Nix: NATHAN 28. Snowguy: KALWEJT 29. Sanchez: 20RP12 30. officepark: TJ IN CLEVE 31. Fritz: SEWER 32. Homely: JUNKIE 33. JulioMadrid: KALWEJT 34. MOPolitico: JUNKIE 35. Frodo: NATHAN 36. A-Bob: TJ IN CLEVE 37. ilikeverin: 20RP12 38. Marokai: JUNKIE 39. Dallasfan: KALWEJT 40. Bacon King: NATHAN 41. Badger: KALWEJT 42. Thomas D: KALWEJT 43. Winfield: 20RP12 44. Mondale: NATHAN 45. MilesC56: TJ IN CLEVE 46. Pingvin: JUNKIE 47. Holmes: NATHAN 48. Taft4Prez: JUNKIE 49. Brandon H: TJ IN CLEVE 50. Jbrase: JUNKIE 51. Fuzzy: KALWEJT 52. wormyguy: SEWER 53. real. id.: TJ IN CLEVE 54. Meeker: NATHAN 55. Tender B.: KALWEJT 56. Smid: TJ IN CLEVE 57. MaxQue: JUNKIE 58. Hashemite: KALWEJT 59. Cathcon: TJ IN CLEVE 60. Franzl: JUNKIE 61. Torie: TJ IN CLEVE 62. BRTD: NATHAN 63. Snowstalker: NATHAN 64. PiT: 20RP12 65. Dereich: TJ IN CLEVE 66. sbane: JUNKIE 67. RowanBrandon: TJ IN CLEVE 68. MQuinn: TJ IN CLEVE 69. NCYankee: TJ IN CLEVE 70. opebo: NATHAN 71. Junkie: JUNKIE 72. Cincinnatus: JUNKIE 73. JCL: TJ IN CLEVE 74. Duke: JUNKIE 75. Smash255: NATHAN 76. Dr. Cynic: SEWER 77. bgwah: KALWEJT 78. TJ in Cleve: TJ IN CLEVE 79. RodPresident: KALWEJT 80. Nathan: NATHAN 81. Lief: SEWER 82. Sam Spade: JUNKIE Current tally (after write-ins): 20RP12: 7 JUNKIE: 19 KALWEJT: 16 NATHAN: 16 SEWER: 6 TJ IN CLEVE: 18 TOTAL VOTE: 82 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Grumpier Than Thou on December 08, 2011, 06:11:33 PM -gulp-
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 11, 2011, 12:10:37 AM UNOFFICIAL RESULTS
FIRST COUNT QUOTA: 14 JUNKIE (RPP): 19 ELECTED (bbf, polnut, Oakvale, Simfan, Ben, Homely, MOPolitico, Pingvin, Taft, Jbrase, Franzl, Sbane, Junkie, Cincinnatus, Duke, Sam Spade, AndrewCT, Marokai, MaxQue) TJ IN CLEVE (RPP): 18 ELECTED (ZuWo, Clarence, tmthforu, Inks, Officepark, A-Bob, TJ in Cleve, Miles, Brandon H, realisticidealist, Cathcon, Torie, Dereich, NCYankee, Smid, Rowan, JCL, MQuinn) KALWEJT (JCP): 16 ELECTED (Jackson, Kalwejt, px75. Antonio V, Snowguy, JulioMadrid, Badger, Fuzzy, Hash, bgwah, RodPresident, Tender Branson, Thomas D, Hawkeye, RFK, Dallasfan) NATHAN (JCP): 16 ELECTED Meeker, Holmes, Mondale, Averroes Nix, change08, Ebowed, Belgiansocialist, BRTD, Snowstalker, Smash, Opebo, Frodo, Bacon King, Ebowed, Nathan, Scott) 20RP12 (SPA): 7 (20RP12, PiT, angus, Shua, Sanchez, Winfield, ilikeverin) SEWER (SPA): 6 (Lief, Lewis T, Teddy, Fritz, wormyguy, Dr. Cynic) SECOND COUNT: Transfer of TJ in Cleve, Nathan, Junkie and Kalwejt surpluses 20RP12 (SPA) 15.06 ELECTED + 3.95 from Junkie (bbf, polnut, Oakvale, Simfan, Ben, Homely, MOPolitico, Pingvin, Taft, Jbrase, Franzl, Sbane, Junkie, Cincinnatus, Duke) + 3.11 from TJ in Cleve (ZuWo, Clarence, tmthforu, Inks, Officepark, A-Bob, TJ in Cleve, Miles, Brandon H, realisticidealist, Cathcon, Torie, Dereich, NCYankee) + 0.50 from Kalwejt (Thomas D, Hawkeye, RFK, Dallasfan) + 0.50 from Nathan (Bacon King, Nathan, Scott, Napoleon) SEWER (SPA) 9.81 + 1.05 from Junkie (Sam Spade, AndrewCT, Marokai, MaxQue) + 0.00 from TJ in Cleve + 1.38 from Kalwejt (Jackson, Kalwejt, px75. Antonio V, Snowguy, JulioMadrid, Badger, Fuzzy, Hash, bgwah, RodPresident) + 1.38 from Nathan (Meeker, Holmes, Mondale, Averroes Nix, change08, Ebowed, Belgiansocialist, BRTD, Snowstalker, Smash, Opebo) EXHAUSTED 1.15 + 0.89 from TJ in Cleve (Smid, Rowan, JCL, MQuinn) + 0.13 from Kalwejt (Tender Branson) + 0.13 from Nathan (Frodo) KALWEJT, JUNKIE, 20RP12, TJ IN CLEVE and NATHAN are elected to the Senate. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on December 11, 2011, 12:13:41 AM OFFICIAL RESULTS
FIRST COUNT: Quota: 14 JUNKIE (RPP): 19 ELECTED (bbf, polnut, Oakvale, Simfan, Ben, Homely, MOPolitico, Pingvin, Taft, Jbrase, Franzl, Sbane, Junkie, Cincinnatus, Duke, Sam Spade, AndrewCT, Marokai, MaxQue) TJ IN CLEVE (RPP): 18 ELECTED (ZuWo, Clarence, tmthforu, Inks, Officepark, A-Bob, TJ in Cleve, Miles, Brandon H, realisticidealist, Cathcon, Torie, Dereich, NCYankee, Smid, Rowan, JCL, MQuinn) KALWEJT (JCP): 16 ELECTED (Jackson, Kalwejt, px75. Antonio V, Snowguy, JulioMadrid, Badger, Fuzzy, Hash, bgwah, RodPresident, Tender Branson, Thomas D, Hawkeye, RFK, Dallasfan) NATHAN (JCP): 16 ELECTED Meeker, Holmes, Mondale, Averroes Nix, change08, Ebowed, Belgiansocialist, BRTD, Snowstalker, Smash, Opebo, Frodo, Bacon King, Ebowed, Nathan, Scott) 20RP12 (SPA): 7 (20RP12, PiT, angus, Shua, Sanchez, Winfield, ilikeverin) SEWER (SPA): 6 (Lief, Lewis T, Teddy, Fritz, wormyguy, Dr. Cynic) SECOND COUNT: Transfer of TJ in Cleve, Nathan, Junkie and Kalwejt surpluses Junkie: 14 ELECTED TJ in Cleve: 14 ELECTED Kalwejt: 14 ELECTED Nathan: 14 ELECTED 20RP12 (SPA): 15.06 ELECTED + 3.95 from Junkie (bbf, polnut, Oakvale, Simfan, Ben, Homely, MOPolitico, Pingvin, Taft, Jbrase, Franzl, Sbane, Junkie, Cincinnatus, Duke) + 3.11 from TJ in Cleve (ZuWo, Clarence, tmthforu, Inks, Officepark, A-Bob, TJ in Cleve, Miles, Brandon H, realisticidealist, Cathcon, Torie, Dereich, NCYankee) + 0.50 from Kalwejt (Thomas D, Hawkeye, RFK, Dallasfan) + 0.50 from Nathan (Bacon King, Napoleon, Nathan, Scott) SEWER (SPA): 9.81 + 1.05 from Junkie (Sam Spade, AndrewCT, Marokai, MaxQue) + 1.38 from Kalwejt (Jackson, Kalwejt, px75. Antonio V, Snowguy, JulioMadrid, Badger, Fuzzy, Hash, bgwah, RodPresident) + 1.38 from Nathan (Meeker, Holmes, Mondale, Averroes Nix, change08, Ebowed, Belgiansocialist, BRTD, Snowstalker, Smash, Opebo) EXHAUSTED: 1.15 + 0.89 from TJ in Cleve (Smid, Rowan, JCL, MQuinn) + 0.13 from Kalwejt (Tender Branson) + 0.13 from Nathan (Frodo) All ballots have been certified as valid. KALWEJT, JUNKIE, 20RP12, TJ IN CLEVE and NATHAN are elected to the Senate. I, Homelycooking, administrator of the December 2011 Senate Election, declare the above results to be a complete and accurate summary of the votes cast. () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on January 30, 2012, 12:00:43 AM OFFICIAL RESULTS
POLNUT (JCP): 35 ELECTED (Junkie, Ebowed, Odysseus, Polnut, Homely, Hawkeye, Ben, AndrewPA, 20RP12, Antonio V, Sewer, Bgwah, Teddy, Marokai, Scott, Peeperkorn, Fuzzy, Napoleon, Jackson, Fritz, Franzl, Cincinnatus, Duke, Hatman, Yelnoc, Sbane, MOPolitico, Dr Cynic, Badger, Oakvale, Frodo, Nathan, Jbrase, Realistic, Hashemite) CLARENCE (RPP): 13 (TJ in Cleve, ZuWo, Miles, Clarence, Winfield, NCYankee, Pingvin, Simfan, Taft, Thomas D, Brandon H, MQuinn, Inks) JERSEYRULES (RPP): 4 (Jerseyrules, PiT, Wormyguy, Cathcon) FRODO (Write-in): 1 (Tmthforu) XAHAR (Write-in): 1 (Lewis T.) All ballots have been certified as valid. POLNUT is elected to the Senate. I, Homelycooking, administrator of the January 2012 Special Senate Election, declare the above results to be a complete and accurate summary of the votes cast. () Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on February 01, 2012, 01:43:33 AM To the interim SOFE: what is the deadline for a Presidential candidate declaring for office?
Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on February 01, 2012, 08:21:55 AM To the interim SOFE: what is the deadline for a Presidential candidate declaring for office? 0:00 AM, Friday, February 10 Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: tpfkaw on February 01, 2012, 07:52:47 PM To the interim SOFE: what is the deadline for a Presidential candidate declaring for office? 0:00 AM, Thursday, February 9 It is my understanding that the deadline is tonight at midnight, going by Section 8, Clause 3 of the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. Quote The candidacy declaration deadline for full tickets of a Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidate to declare shall be seven days before the earliest possible commencement of the election. However, should the Vice-Presidential candidate withdraw his candidacy, then the Presidential candidate may nominate a new Vice-Presidential candidate up to seventy-two hours before the commencement of the election. Of course this might've been repealed or changed since then, but I don't recall that happening. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on February 01, 2012, 07:59:26 PM To the interim SOFE: what is the deadline for a Presidential candidate declaring for office? 0:00 AM, Thursday, February 9 It is my understanding that the deadline is tonight at midnight, going by Section 8, Clause 3 of the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act. Quote The candidacy declaration deadline for full tickets of a Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidate to declare shall be seven days before the earliest possible commencement of the election. However, should the Vice-Presidential candidate withdraw his candidacy, then the Presidential candidate may nominate a new Vice-Presidential candidate up to seventy-two hours before the commencement of the election. Of course this might've been repealed or changed since then, but I don't recall that happening. But the election is required to occur on the second-to-last Friday of the month (February 17). Quote Presidential elections shall be held in the months of February, June and October. Elections shall be held from midnight Eastern Standard Time on the second to last Friday of a given month and shall conclude exactly 72 hours later. [2] One week before the "earliest possible commencement" of the election is Friday, February 10 (not the 9th as I said before: that was an error.) Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: tpfkaw on February 01, 2012, 08:01:51 PM The new constitution says this about when Presidential elections start:
Quote Presidential elections shall be held in the months of February, June and October. Elections shall begin between 0000 Eastern Standard Time on the second Thursday of the election month and 0001 Eastern Standard Time on the first Friday thereafter, and shall conclude exactly 72 hours after beginning. That'd mean the earliest possible commencement is 00:00 on Thursday, February 9th, unless an amendment changed that. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on February 01, 2012, 08:06:07 PM Sorry, I guess you're right. I don't know how I ended up in the Second Constitution while looking for the correct law.
So the deadline is midnight tonight, then. Damn it! Why am I always wrong? :P Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: bgwah on February 02, 2012, 12:10:56 AM The new constitution says this about when Presidential elections start: Quote Presidential elections shall be held in the months of February, June and October. Elections shall begin between 0000 Eastern Standard Time on the second Thursday of the election month and 0001 Eastern Standard Time on the first Friday thereafter, and shall conclude exactly 72 hours after beginning. That'd mean the earliest possible commencement is 00:00 on Thursday, February 9th, unless an amendment changed that. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_Third_Constitution It's Feb 16th. Title: Re: Department of Federal Elections Post by: homelycooking on February 02, 2012, 08:38:15 AM The new constitution says this about when Presidential elections start: Quote Presidential elections shall be held in the months of February, June and October. Elections shall begin between 0000 Eastern Standard Time on the second Thursday of the election month and 0001 Eastern Standard Time on the first Friday thereafter, and shall conclude exactly 72 hours after beginning. That'd mean the earliest possible commencement is 00:00 on Thursday, February 9th, unless an amendment changed that. https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_Third_Constitution It's Feb 16th. So the deadline is Thursday, February 9. If you're wondering why there are so many empty liquor bottles piling up around the Census Bureau, well... |