Atlas Forum

About this Site => The Atlas => Topic started by: Voter #457 on January 16, 2011, 12:49:09 pm



Title: saorsa
Post by: Voter #457 on January 16, 2011, 12:49:09 pm
How many infractions is this guy at? Will we have to deal with him for much longer?


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 16, 2011, 12:59:39 pm
I just gave him his first 4 today.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 16, 2011, 01:00:44 pm
there is always the ignore function, btw


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Insula Dei on January 16, 2011, 02:05:33 pm
I just gave him his first 4 today.

Just 4???? Didn't  px75 get 10 or so for way less troll-like things?


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 16, 2011, 02:37:29 pm
Hopefully he will soon follow his fellow hacks Derek, Libertas, Jewish Conservative and Kyle Mercado.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 16, 2011, 02:51:39 pm
I just gave him his first 4 today.

Just 4???? Didn't  px75 get 10 or so for way less troll-like things?

1. Px got 5 that I know of recently
2. Well, it's kind of a mindless bureaucracy of a system, the infraction points thing, so it's not always perfect.  Also, some posts which may 'feel worse' are not necessarily punishable
3. It has to do with what's reported.  I don't tend to go scouring through every post someone makes
4. It's now 8.  In general, he needs to tone down his excessive hyperboles (leftists want Marxism at the point of the gun, leftists worship their false prophet Obama etcetc) which are damaging to discussion and the two posts I have infracted today at 4 a pop.  I'll probably PM him that same suggestion if he doesn't find this thread at some point like I suspect he will.

Remember that BRTD started a thread where the entire content was "Saorsa is a horrible person and an idiot." too..., which is not exactly helping the situation, in addition to this one.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on January 16, 2011, 04:54:41 pm
Remember that BRTD started a thread where the entire content was "Saorsa is a horrible person and an idiot." too..., which is not exactly helping the situation, in addition to this one.

Yeah... I had no clue who saorsa was.  And when you start off with a thread calling him an idiot, you're more likely to get infracted than he is... just sayin'.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Landslide Lyndon on January 16, 2011, 05:58:54 pm
I just gave him his first 4 today.

Just 4???? Didn't  px75 get 10 or so for way less troll-like things?

1. Px got 5 that I know of recently
2. Well, it's kind of a mindless bureaucracy of a system, the infraction points thing, so it's not always perfect.  Also, some posts which may 'feel worse' are not necessarily punishable
3. It has to do with what's reported.  I don't tend to go scouring through every post someone makes
4. It's now 8.  In general, he needs to tone down his excessive hyperboles (leftists want Marxism at the point of the gun, leftists worship their false prophet Obama etcetc) which are damaging to discussion and the two posts I have infracted today at 4 a pop.  I'll probably PM him that same suggestion if he doesn't find this thread at some point like I suspect he will.

Remember that BRTD started a thread where the entire content was "Saorsa is a horrible person and an idiot." too..., which is not exactly helping the situation, in addition to this one.

You forgot his clinical obsession with homosexuality (Kirk and Madsen anyone?).


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 16, 2011, 06:00:52 pm
Forgot?  I'm aware, I wasn't trying to sum up his entire posting history.  Obviously he's not going to hang around long if he begins every post with "Attention homos and homo lovers" or whatevsky he does, but that's part of toning it down a notch, I would argue.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Landslide Lyndon on January 16, 2011, 06:05:52 pm
TBH, he acts suspiciously like a sock. If I was a mod I'd do an IP check on him.

P.S. Actually I have 4 points.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 16, 2011, 06:08:14 pm
TBH, he acts suspiciously like a sock. If I was a mod I'd do an IP check on him.

Yeah we did that back when he had like 2 posts.

Quote
P.S. Actually I have 4 points.

Heh, well there you go.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Thomas D on January 16, 2011, 06:23:24 pm
If he breaks rules he should get infraction points, but I say let him be. He helps illustrate the absurdity of homophobia.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 17, 2011, 08:27:42 am
Can someone show me his most "characteristic" posts ? I've seen a couple of them but maybe not enough to really see what kind of hack/troll he is.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Voter #457 on January 17, 2011, 09:45:36 am
Can someone show me his most "characteristic" posts ? I've seen a couple of them but maybe not enough to really see what kind of hack/troll he is.

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=130641.0


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Thomas D on January 17, 2011, 09:55:20 am
Can someone show me his most "characteristic" posts ? I've seen a couple of them but maybe not enough to really see what kind of hack/troll he is.

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=130641.0

He pops up on page 3.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 17, 2011, 09:58:29 am
Can someone show me his most "characteristic" posts ? I've seen a couple of them but maybe not enough to really see what kind of hack/troll he is.

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=130641.0

I'm left wordless.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Mechaman on January 17, 2011, 10:37:41 am
If he breaks rules he should get infraction points, but I say let him be. He helps illustrate the absurdity of homophobia.

Yeah.
I would've loved to still have prophetman on this forum, just so he could illustrate the absurdity of racism.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 17, 2011, 11:21:16 am
If he breaks rules he should get infraction points, but I say let him be. He helps illustrate the absurdity of homophobia.

Yeah.
I would've loved to still have prophetman on this forum, just so he could illustrate the absurdity of racism.

I actually agree. While Libertas and Derek were dangerous because their nastiness lowered the quality of the political discourse, this guy is just too stupid to do harm. Like Johnnyboy or CJK, he's likely a sock whose goal is to make fun of homophobia. So let's just have a good laugh for some time, and ban him if/when he starts becoming annoying.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: minionofmidas - supplemental forum account on January 17, 2011, 03:40:30 pm
I put him on ignore the first day he was here.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 17, 2011, 04:39:21 pm
Quote
Hopefully he will soon follow his fellow hacks Derek, Libertas, Jewish Conservative and Kyle Mercado.

"Tolerance".

As any virtue, tolerance becomes a vice when practiced excessively.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 17, 2011, 05:03:04 pm
Quote
As any virtue, tolerance becomes a vice when practiced excessively.

"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard...."

Nice quote. Too bad it's irrelevant in this context.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 17, 2011, 06:31:05 pm
It should be added that over-reporting others in a very aggressive fashion is not advised.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on January 19, 2011, 10:00:55 am
I put him on ignore the first day he was here.

Typical Kirk and Madsen technique.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Good Grumps With A Gun on January 19, 2011, 12:19:11 pm
I put him on ignore the first day he was here.

I waited til today.  I feel dirty waiting that long. 


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Voter #457 on January 24, 2011, 06:31:04 pm
It's quite telling the guy has become one of our most hated posters at not even 100 posts yet.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Sewer on January 25, 2011, 12:06:29 am
The darkness hates the light...

I bet it's dark in that closet of yours.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: hawkeye59 on January 25, 2011, 08:08:59 am
The darkness hates the light...
Exactly. You hate us.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Mechaman on January 25, 2011, 11:21:16 am
The darkness hates the light...

I bet it's dark in that closet of yours.

Someday he'll come out of the closet.....no one who is that homophobic can be straight.

[edit]I guess he didn't like my posting here......ha ha.......

(http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/GALLERY/1477_23_07_09_2_33_54.jpg)

Typical rhetoric from a Kirk and Madsen commie.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: saorsa on January 25, 2011, 11:22:51 am
It is unlawful for a person to:

   1. Use in electronic mail or electronic communication any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to that person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.
   2. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing any person.
   3. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to abuse, annoy, threaten, terrify, harass, or embarrass.
   4. Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.

----------------

Take this as formal notice of the existence of criminal statutes preventing harassing and annoying conduct online that directed at others. Please also take note that I consider the comments that were directed specifically at me by a couple of posters to be harassing, embarrassing and annoying and I believe that such conduct can be shown to have been committed with criminal intent.

Please note that I will act accordingly if such conduct does not cease.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Voter #457 on January 25, 2011, 03:37:00 pm
He just called for the death penalty for pre-martial sex. lulz


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 25, 2011, 04:19:00 pm
It is unlawful for a person to:

   1. Use in electronic mail or electronic communication any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to that person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.
   2. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing any person.
   3. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to abuse, annoy, threaten, terrify, harass, or embarrass.
   4. Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.

----------------

Take this as formal notice of the existence of criminal statutes preventing harassing and annoying conduct online that directed at others. Please also take note that I consider the comments that were directed specifically at me by a couple of posters to be harassing, embarrassing and annoying and I believe that such conduct can be shown to have been committed with criminal intent.

Please note that I will act accordingly if such conduct does not cease.


Take this post as formal notice that further legal threats against forum members will not be tolerated.

Also, you're abusing the report system by over-reporting every sarcastic or minimally negative post towards yourself, a tactic that is not only completely ineffective but frowned upon.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Good Grumps With A Gun on January 25, 2011, 04:29:52 pm
It is unlawful for a person to:

   1. Use in electronic mail or electronic communication any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to that person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.
   2. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing any person.
   3. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to abuse, annoy, threaten, terrify, harass, or embarrass.
   4. Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.

----------------

Take this as formal notice of the existence of criminal statutes preventing harassing and annoying conduct online that directed at others. Please also take note that I consider the comments that were directed specifically at me by a couple of posters to be harassing, embarrassing and annoying and I believe that such conduct can be shown to have been committed with criminal intent.

Please note that I will act accordingly if such conduct does not cease.


Take this post as formal notice that further legal threats against forum members will not be tolerated.

Also, you're abusing the report system by over-reporting every sarcastic or minimally negative post towards yourself, a tactic that is not only completely ineffective but frowned upon.

Pace, Loon.......I think it's funny what he posted (god knows where it's from) highlights the word "annoying".......since he's violated that provision more than anyone on the board presently.  :)


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on January 25, 2011, 05:23:55 pm
It's a section of NC and/or LA state code, for what it's worth.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 25, 2011, 05:59:07 pm
It's a section of NC and/or LA state code, for what it's worth.

     Isn't any section irrelevant unless it's the law in MA?


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on January 25, 2011, 06:02:29 pm
It's a section of NC and/or LA state code, for what it's worth.

     Isn't any section irrelevant unless it's the law in MA?

Well, I think if a poster posted from LA or NC, they'd be subject to that law, but I really have no clue.  It's not like this is actually going to go to court.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 25, 2011, 06:04:11 pm
It's a section of NC and/or LA state code, for what it's worth.

     Isn't any section irrelevant unless it's the law in MA?

Well, I think if a poster posted from LA or NC, they'd be subject to that law, but I really have no clue.  It's not like this is actually going to go to court.

     Internet lawyering doesn't work so well if people realize that nothing will come of the legal threats. :P


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Voter #457 on January 25, 2011, 06:23:42 pm
I'd like Torie to weigh in here.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: DMCA2 on January 25, 2011, 06:41:28 pm
It is unlawful for a person to:

   1. Use in electronic mail or electronic communication any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to that person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.
   2. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing any person.
   3. Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to abuse, annoy, threaten, terrify, harass, or embarrass.
   4. Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.

----------------

Take this as formal notice of the existence of criminal statutes preventing harassing and annoying conduct online that directed at others. Please also take note that I consider the comments that were directed specifically at me by a couple of posters to be harassing, embarrassing and annoying and I believe that such conduct can be shown to have been committed with criminal intent.

Please note that I will act accordingly if such conduct does not cease.


Take this post as formal notice that further legal threats against forum members will not be tolerated.

Also, you're abusing the report system by over-reporting every sarcastic or minimally negative post towards yourself, a tactic that is not only completely ineffective but frowned upon.

It's not a threat.

I have a right to use the law to defend myself if necessary. You can't and won't take that away.

As for the reported posts, I only reported posts that directly and viciously attacked me. People reported posts of mine for "hyperbole" simply because they didn't like the message.

It's pretty obvious what this forum is. You people are far-left individuals who want to have a tiny echo chamber so that you can soak in the confirmation bias and pretend that the world agrees with you. You don't want anyone to voice an opposing view, you don't want any dissent, you just want to hear yourselves speak.

It's actually intellectual laziness. It makes you feel good to pretend that people like me don't exist. It makes you comfortable to pretend that I am just a "troll" or a "sock puppet". That way you don't have to confront the reality that there are more people out there like me than you realize. People who will stand up to your attempts to impose radical marxism and immorality on the rest of humanity. People who will defend ourselves, as entitled under natural law, should you seek to use force against us to impose your will.

That's what's really going on here. You want to pretend that I'm just playing with you, that way you can sleep comfortably in your ignorance, not knowing exactly what type of political hornets nest you are stirring up when you seek to promote communism and pedophilia (both of which have happened on this board.)

That's ok. I respect your right to have an echo chamber. You won't get any more problems from me on that front.

Over the next few weeks, I would suggest that the members here get intimately acquainted with the copyright laws as they exist in the United States. You might also want to register an agent for service under the provisions of the DMCA if you have not already done so.

Quote
Isn't any section irrelevant unless it's the law in MA?

NOPE.

"Any offense under this section committed by the use of electronic mail or electronic communication may be deemed to have been committed where the electronic mail or electronic communication was originally sent, originally received in this State, or first viewed by any person in this State."

Moreover, personal attacks against another, after being informed that such attacks should cease, are not protected under the First Amendment. There have been convictions under the Statute for far less offensive things than were posted about me here.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Voter #457 on January 25, 2011, 06:43:37 pm
If all this were true Kyle Mercado would be locked up for a very long time.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Thomas D on January 25, 2011, 06:52:22 pm
You would sent us to jail? But there's so much gay stuff going on there.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on January 25, 2011, 07:01:48 pm
Why the second account?


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Cruz Will Lose on January 25, 2011, 07:04:23 pm
Why the second account?

Maybe his original one was banned?  Dunno.  I am not sure why he's so fixated on this forum when there are countless others out there more to his liking. 


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Mechaman on January 25, 2011, 07:13:47 pm
Nothing about satirizing other posters?

AWESOME!


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: memphis on January 25, 2011, 07:33:00 pm
I'm so very very afraid ::)


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Mechaman on January 25, 2011, 08:02:58 pm
Take this as formal notice of the existence of criminal statutes preventing harassing and annoying conduct online that directed at others. Please also take note that I consider the comments that were directed specifically at me by a couple of posters to be harassing, embarrassing and annoying and I believe that such conduct can be shown to have been committed with criminal intent.

Please note that I will act accordingly if such conduct does not cease.


There goes Youtube!


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on January 25, 2011, 08:26:33 pm
Take this as formal notice of the existence of criminal statutes preventing harassing and annoying conduct online that directed at others. Please also take note that I consider the comments that were directed specifically at me by a couple of posters to be harassing, embarrassing and annoying and I believe that such conduct can be shown to have been committed with criminal intent.

Please note that I will act accordingly if such conduct does not cease.


There goes Youtube!
Oh snap!


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Kalwejt on January 25, 2011, 09:23:47 pm
saorsa, who the fyck are you?

Fernando Collor being bored in the senate and taking it out on teh gaysz, who ensured his defeat in October through a mass conspiracy.

Please go die in a fire, Fernando, you troll and a waste of sperm.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Nym90 on January 25, 2011, 09:30:29 pm
Why the second account?

Maybe his original one was banned?  Dunno.  I am not sure why he's so fixated on this forum when there are countless others out there more to his liking. 

The duplicate account has been banned. Saorsa has not; a warning has been issued and thus he's been given the opportunity to heed it.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 25, 2011, 09:47:42 pm
I have a right to use the law to defend myself if necessary. You can't and won't take that away.

...in court.  This isn't court.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Lunar on January 25, 2011, 10:17:16 pm
it should also go without saying that we have digital recordings of many of your offending posts on the moderation board, even if you deleted them all so you have just one post left (http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=6302) after my last post, for what it's worth.  I don't know if that's the aim, lol, but it should be said, this is all quite bizarre


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Kalwejt on January 25, 2011, 10:25:49 pm
I love this guy.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Mr. Morden on January 26, 2011, 04:47:42 am
"Bored teenager launches lawsuit after being offended on internet messageboard"

That'll make a fun episode of Judge Judy.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 26, 2011, 09:22:10 am
Please don't ban him ! He is so funny...


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Kalwejt on January 26, 2011, 06:51:38 pm
Ban of saorsa will be simply unacceptable until we all can see Sam showing this down his throat!


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: SvenssonRS on January 26, 2011, 10:58:12 pm
I can't believe I'm actually siding with the mods. 'Ey, Sam, Crowning Moment of Awesome. :D


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Kalwejt on January 27, 2011, 07:38:18 am
Guessing time!

saorsa's sockmaster is:

1. Willow Palin
2. One of Rick Santorum's bored kids
3. Michele Bachmann
4. Barney Frank, making fun of far right-wing idiots
5. Boren and bitter Fernando Collor de Mello
6. JSojourner

?


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on January 27, 2011, 09:53:01 pm
Guessing time!

saorsa's sockmaster is:

1. Willow Palin
2. One of Rick Santorum's bored kids
3. Michele Bachmann
4. Barney Frank, making fun of far right-wing idiots
5. Boren and bitter Fernando Collor de Mello
6. JSojourner

?

Maybe Joe Biden too.  ;)


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Kalwejt on January 27, 2011, 10:14:32 pm
Guessing time!

saorsa's sockmaster is:

1. Willow Palin
2. One of Rick Santorum's bored kids
3. Michele Bachmann
4. Barney Frank, making fun of far right-wing idiots
5. Boren and bitter Fernando Collor de Mello
6. JSojourner

?

Maybe Joe Biden too.  ;)

He must be really bored.


Title: Re: saorsa
Post by: Secret Cavern Survivor on January 28, 2011, 04:54:27 am
Guessing time!

saorsa's sockmaster is:

1. Willow Palin
2. One of Rick Santorum's bored kids
3. Michele Bachmann
4. Barney Frank, making fun of far right-wing idiots
5. Boren and bitter Fernando Collor de Mello
6. JSojourner

?

Maybe Joe Biden too.  ;)

He must be really bored.

Well, he's the VP, so it's understandable. He has nothing to do except waiting for the President's death. :P