Talk Elections

Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion => International Elections => Topic started by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 06:31:11 PM



Title: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 06:31:11 PM
This is the way things are normally done, so post results here. I can't lock the other thread, of course; just don't post there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 06:32:05 PM
As I said, some birds told me LIB 4 NDP 2 CON 1 in NL.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:33:01 PM
Australian on Twitter is tweeting emails from Canadians. If it's accurate, NL results:

Liberals: four seats
NDP: two seats
Conservatives: one seat


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 06:33:58 PM
I am assuming the NDP is leading in St. John's South-Mount Pearl and Tories in Avalon.  Don't know this but based on polling and past election results that would be my guess.  I am I correct?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:34:40 PM
Liberal incumbents apparently held Bonavista-Gander-Grand Falls-Windsor and Humber-St. Barbe-Baie Verte.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: redcommander on May 02, 2011, 06:36:17 PM
Has anyone found another internet stream? The Global News one went off until 10 P.M. Eastern.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 06:36:28 PM
Wayne Easter (Malpeque) leading Conservative opponent.

This was the only potential seat change in PEI. Don't think it's happening.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:36:59 PM
I am assuming the NDP is leading in St. John's South-Mount Pearl and Tories in Avalon.  Don't know this but based on polling and past election results that would be my guess.  I am I correct?

NDP leading in Mount Pearl and St. John's East. Conservatives leading in Avalon, yes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 06:37:28 PM
So NDP on Teddy' schedule. Libs actually doing better.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 06:37:56 PM
Let me know when they call any seat changes differently than last time around.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 06:38:01 PM
Libs holding Random - Burin - St. George's according to that? Interesting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:39:15 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/BernardKeane
http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda

These tweeters are posting the bulk of the illicit info I've found.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 06:40:41 PM
These are all super-safe Liberal seats being discussed anyway.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 06:41:37 PM
Not sure why people are so angry at Elections Canada on Twitter. The law is stupid but they didn't write it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:42:18 PM
A new cumulative total: 5 Liberal, 3 NDP, 1 Conservative.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 06:43:04 PM


I doubt it, it's probably coming from NS or NB.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 06:44:20 PM
Looks like Peter MacKay may be in trouble. Excellent.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 06:44:43 PM
NDP lead over MacKay, dixit Twitter!!!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 06:45:18 PM

How many polls in so far?  I know in past election he has started out trailing yet won.  Still a bit early now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Thomas D on May 02, 2011, 06:45:28 PM
A new cumulative total: 5 Liberal, 3 NDP, 1 Conservative.


Well that's good enough for me to call it.

New Liberal Majority for Canada. Congrats Iggy. :D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 06:45:56 PM
Election chat!

http://mibbit.com/

Channel: #atlasforum


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:46:15 PM
Don't get too excited yet, it looks like it's only a single precinct in from Central Nova (MacKay's riding)... latest results I've seen are 72 NDP votes to 11 Conservative votes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 06:46:45 PM
whysofar Amanda
If 2X=6, then Lib=X+2, NDP=X-1, Con=X-2. Solve for X! #elxn41 #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:47:40 PM
Liberal 8, NDP 3, Conservative 3


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 06:47:51 PM
I can confirm that it's just one precinct in Central Nova, but still,...;)

Also, Mibbit!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 06:48:30 PM
Ridings to watch:

St. John's South - Mount Pearl, where the Liberals are defending against repeat NDP candidate Ryan Cleary, apparently only deciding to run again because of Layton. His gamble seems to have paid off.

Dartmouth - Cole Harbour, where the race between Liberal Mike Savage and "former NDP provincial leader" Robert Chisholm have baffled predictors.

Central Nova, where Defence Minister Peter McKay's 2008 victory against Elizabeth May could mean nothing if defeated by NDP challenger David Parker, teacher.

Madawaska - Restigouche, where Liberal J.C. D'Amours could end up in third place, lending to a Conservative-NDP fight in this Acadian Francophone constituency.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:49:03 PM

New results: LIB 10, Con 5, NDP 3.


NDP still leading in Central Nova.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 06:51:37 PM
Some of this stuff can't be true. He's reporting Karlo Vukobratovic as winning St. John's South... who isn't even a candidate there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 06:52:01 PM
Atlantic Canada: LIB 10 NDP 5 CON 3


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 06:55:51 PM
I imagine the results that are start to pick up in Atlantic Canada, any updates here.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 06:58:10 PM
NDP winning St. Johns South-Mt. Pearl

Shuldn't be a surprise, really.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 06:58:10 PM
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/argosy---41st-general-election

Live stream from Nova Scotia university discussion


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 06:59:12 PM
Atlantic: Lib 10 NDP 8 Cons 7

Peter Mackay still trailing. Even if he wins there could be a bad night for the CPC.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 06:59:22 PM
Some of this stuff can't be true. He's reporting Karlo Vukobratovic as winning St. John's South... who isn't even a candidate there.

Lol yeah, saw that. He also didn't realize at first that there were Atlantic provinces besides Newfoundland and Labrador.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 06:59:32 PM
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/argosy---41st-general-election

Live stream from Nova Scotia university discussion

25k fine!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 06:59:50 PM
I imagine the results that are start to pick up in Atlantic Canada, any updates here.

Whoever's feeding Bernard Keane the results at least knows how to make them look plausible. Liberal 10, Conservative 5 and NDP 3 is the best guess.

It's all a crapshoot if there aren't good Nova Scotia/New Brunswick results. If NDP defeats McKay, however, that shows enough of a swing for 9-10 seats at the end.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:00:44 PM
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/argosy---41st-general-election

Live stream from Nova Scotia university discussion

25k fine!

I'll pay in Zimbabwe Dollars.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:01:17 PM

I'm seeing both 10, 8, 7 and 10, 9, 5. Not sure which is true (if either, lol).

MacKay still trailing in Nova.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Man From G.O.P. on May 02, 2011, 07:01:49 PM
Can Americans get any coverage minus the live stream on cbc or cspan beggining at 930et?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:02:53 PM
Can Americans get any coverage minus the live stream on cbc or cspan beggining at 930et?

Beginning at 10pm Eastern. CBC streaming plus I think CSPAN.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 07:03:32 PM
BernardKeane Bernard Keane
Cons up 9% in votes in NS. Greens severely down. New total Cons 12 Lib 10 NDP 9 #elxn41 #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:04:26 PM
Peter McKay leading again in Central Nova. New totals Lib 11 Con 9 NDP 8


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 07:04:54 PM
Quote
New total Cons 12 Lib 10 NDP


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:05:41 PM
What seats are the NDP picking up now?  If MacKay is ahead I presume it is Dartmouth-Cole Harbour, Halifax West, and South Shore-St. Margaret's.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:06:50 PM
From CBC: Atlantic Canada results (not final). Lib 10, NDP 8, CON 7

NDP's Chisholm leading Liberal Savage in Dartmouth


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 07:07:34 PM
Far more nerve-racking than our election nights....lol.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 07:08:12 PM
NDP is supposedly leading in Dartmouth-Cole Harbour, per Twitter twatter.  Avalon may be the only Newfoundland riding not called.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:08:38 PM
What seats are the NDP picking up now?  If MacKay is ahead I presume it is Dartmouth-Cole Harbour, Halifax West, and South Shore-St. Margaret's.

Found tweets specifically saying NDP is ahead in Dartmouth and South Shore.

edit- halifax west, too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 02, 2011, 07:09:48 PM
Thanks for updates everyone. :) Hope NDP comes up ahead in Central Nova! But seems less and less likely.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:11:33 PM
ndp +4 seats in atlantic, lib -5, cons +1

edit: Red 12 Blue 13 Orange 7


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 02, 2011, 07:11:50 PM
Interesting comparing this to my projections


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:12:01 PM
NFLD - Liberal: 4 (Foote, Simms, Byrne, Russell) - NDP: 2 (Harris, Cleary)

Conservatives pulling ahead of the NDP in Central Nova and South Shore.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:12:28 PM
Con 12, Liberal 12, NDP 8


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 07:13:10 PM
Twitterverse claims Mackay won Central Nova (CON hold).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 07:13:32 PM
Confirmed: Peter Mackay wins Central Nova. Total Con 13, Lib 12, NDP

:(


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:13:38 PM
Conservatives winning in South Shore - St. Margaret's? (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65206592857047040)

Guy has 13 CON, 12 LIB, 7 NDP


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:14:40 PM
Twitterverse claims Mackay won Central Nova (CON hold).

No real surprise here.  He got 46% last time around and the Tories have the best voter retention so even though I suspect much of the Liberal and Green support went to the Tories, that still wouldn't be enough.  What new seats are the Tories picking up?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:16:02 PM
Conservatives winning in South Shore - St. Margaret's? (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65206592857047040)

Guy has 13 CON, 12 LIB, 7 NDP

Possible.  This is a very rural riding and it really depends on location.  Gerald Keddy also tends to win big in the small communities while Gordon Earle I think won most of the large communities last time around.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:17:04 PM
9.8% swing to the NDP in NB.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:18:00 PM

cons +2 seat in atlantic, but down in % popular of vote #elxn41 #tweettheresults
47 seconds ago


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 07:18:35 PM
Conservatives winning in South Shore - St. Margaret's? (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65206592857047040)

Guy has 13 CON, 12 LIB, 7 NDP

I think that guy is possibly a hack....


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 02, 2011, 07:19:37 PM

cons +2 seat in atlantic, but down in % popular of vote #elxn41 #tweettheresults
47 seconds ago

Sad.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 07:19:53 PM
South Shore swung heavily to the NDP in the provincial election, but they're swinging away now. They're upset about the prov govt's cancellation of the Yarmouth Ferry among other things.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:20:13 PM
Conservatives winning in South Shore - St. Margaret's? (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65206592857047040)

Guy has 13 CON, 12 LIB, 7 NDP

I think that guy is possibly a hack....

Do you mean, the Canadian emailing him is a hack? :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 07:21:00 PM
From the Usenet rumor mill (http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/browse_thread/thread/474a5cb418323e18#):
Cops seek suspect after alleged theft of ballot box in Nova Scotia

megan leslie elected in hfx


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:21:26 PM

Andrews (Lib) up by ~ 250. Avalon. #elxn41
1 minute ago


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:21:49 PM
South Shore swung heavily to the NDP in the provincial election, but they're swinging away now. They're upset about the prov govt's cancellation of the Yarmouth Ferry among other things.

Considering the Daxter government's economic shock therapy, I should have known Nova Soctia wouldn't lean so heavily NDP this time.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:22:14 PM
Conservatives winning in South Shore - St. Margaret's? (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65206592857047040)

Guy has 13 CON, 12 LIB, 7 NDP

He just tweeted that he's received further confirmation of this result.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: redcommander on May 02, 2011, 07:22:59 PM
Is there any chance of a Tory majority still?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:23:50 PM
Is there any chance of a Tory majority still?

Depends on how many seats they pick up in Ontario and if they can keep their losses to a minimum in Quebec and British Columbia.  Also if they come within a few seats, they can probably bribe a few opposition members to cross the floor


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 07:24:33 PM
These results are looking good for the Tories...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 07:24:35 PM
"OurVoteCanada projects NDP minority government"....


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:24:41 PM
Update: 12 con 12 lib 7 ndp in atlantic. #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:24:43 PM
Some outfit called "OurVote Canada" is projecting an NDP minority government based on results that are out so far...

edit- beaten to it!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:25:31 PM
These results are looking good for the Tories...

Not really.  When you consider the Liberal collapse, it would make sense they would pick up ridings they came in second even if their vote didn't increase.  Could be vote splitting, which would be good news for them in Ontario, not so much BC.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:26:24 PM
In Halifax West, NDP candidate Gregor Ash leading LIB Geoff Regan "by 600"


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 02, 2011, 07:26:47 PM
Who is OurVoteCanada?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 07:26:51 PM
South Shore swung heavily to the NDP in the provincial election, but they're swinging away now. They're upset about the prov govt's cancellation of the Yarmouth Ferry among other things.

Considering the Daxter government's economic shock therapy, I should have known Nova Soctia wouldn't lean so heavily NDP this time.

Yeah, Dexter's not as popular as he used to be. That's why I predicted no NDP gains there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:28:04 PM
If Atlantic Canada was its own country, we would have a minority government.  Otherwise either Tory or Liberal, but a Liberal+NDP coalition would work.  Off course Atlantic Canada is the least Tory friendly area of English Canada, so maybe a good sign.  We shall see.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 02, 2011, 07:28:33 PM
reminder of my projection:
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:28:40 PM
http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/topics


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 07:30:14 PM
From Usenet, again:

Confirmed: Peter Mackay wins Central Nova.

Total Con 13, Lib 12, NDP 7

From CBC:

Atlantic Canada results (not final). Lib 10, NDP 8, CON 7

NFLD
- Liberal: 4 (Foote, Simms, Byrne, Russell)
- NDP: 2 (Harris, Cleary)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:30:26 PM
Atlantic Vote Change: Liberal & Greens down ~ 4 pts each. Cons & NDP up ~4 pts. #elxn41 #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:31:40 PM
LIB Scott Andrews's lead in Avalon is widening?

Dartmouth-Cole Harbour has been called for the NDP (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65211318394826753)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 07:33:06 PM
woohoo!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:33:10 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda

This guy has just reposted all the elected candidates so far; still 13 C, 12 L, 7 N. Look if you're interested in specific seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 07:33:20 PM
:D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 07:33:44 PM
LIB Scott Andrews's lead in Avalon is widening?

Dartmouth-Cole Harbour has been called for the NDP (http://twitter.com/#!/navdhanda/status/65211318394826753)

:)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:34:20 PM
Atlantic Vote Change: Liberal & Greens down ~ 4 pts each. Cons & NDP up ~4 pts. #elxn41 #tweettheresults

How much did the Conservatives go up in Newfoundland & Labrador?  Or was this throughout Atlantic Canada?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:35:31 PM
Also, net change so far.

+2 Con, +3 NDP, -5 Lib


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:35:37 PM
Nova Scotia popular vote so far: Con 37 NDP 31.1 Lib 27.1


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:37:03 PM
Nova Scotia popular vote so far: Con 37 NDP 31.1 Lib 27.1

I am guessing the provincial NDP's unpopularity is hurting them here.  Also rural results tend to come in faster than urban so those numbers may tighten up.  Certainly if this swing occurred nationally, we would have a Tory majority.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 07:37:12 PM
Can someone give a list of the known seat flips?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:37:33 PM
Tracking seat changes so far. Certain projections are bolded:

St. John's South – Mount Pearl: LIB -> NDP
Dartmouth – Cole Harbour: LIB -> NDP
Halifax West: LIB -> NDP

Think the two CON gains are in New Brunswick, but unconfirmed.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:37:58 PM
Voter turn out up 34% compared to 2008; normally bad news for incumbent #elxn41


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:38:57 PM
Voter turn out up 34% compared to 2008; normally bad news for incumbent #elxn41

Not always as maybe people are tired of minority governments.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 07:39:22 PM
Voter turn out up 34% compared to 2008; normally bad news for incumbent #elxn41

What's it at now?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:41:00 PM
Avalon apparently reelects the Liberals. Bad news for CPC IF true.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:41:06 PM
In Kings - Hantis, PC-turned-Liberal Scott Brison is leading "by 300 votes"

Quoting from the Pundit's Guide:

Quote
If MacKay's former Progressive Conservative colleague Scott Brison loses his seat ... it will have been the result of his support being eaten away from both the right and the left. The Conservatives are running former provincial justice minister David Morse ... and is said to be running the strongest Conservative campaign here since Brison himself. But the NDP switched out its earlier candidate for PSAC staff rep Mark Rogers, who is apparently also running very strongly and with the orange wave helping him along.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 07:42:26 PM
Halifax West before South Shore? Wow.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 07:42:53 PM
When black-out is lifted we will learn that the Liberals in fact sweeped Atlantic Canada :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:43:18 PM
Vote share in AC: Con 36 - NDP 30 - L 30 - G 3 #elxn41 #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:44:02 PM
Halifax West before South Shore? Wow.

If the NDP and Tories are rising but the Liberals sinking that would make sense as the Blue Liberals would go Tory and Progressive Liberals go NDP.  Also the NDP has a better GOTV in Halifax than Rural Nova Scotia.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:44:10 PM
First shocker? (http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/browse_thread/thread/470b829fc9435bbc)

Quote
NPD is winning in Laurier-Ste Marie, Duceppe was beaten !!!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 07:44:48 PM
First shocker? (http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/browse_thread/thread/470b829fc9435bbc)

Quote
NPD is winning in Laurier-Ste Marie, Duceppe was beaten !!!

Joke post. Polls not closed.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:45:42 PM
First shocker? (http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/browse_thread/thread/470b829fc9435bbc)

Quote
NPD is winning in Laurier-Ste Marie, Duceppe was beaten !!!

Could happen.  Of the four leaders, he is the most likely to lose his own seat, but Ignatieff could also lose his own.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 07:46:20 PM
The polls aren't closed in Quebec; disregard Twitter frauds.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:46:55 PM
First shocker? (http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/browse_thread/thread/470b829fc9435bbc)

Quote
NPD is winning in Laurier-Ste Marie, Duceppe was beaten !!!

Joke post. Polls not closed.

But that must mean Duceppe was beaten so badly we can predict it now!

It's spreading along the twitterverse, so might as well get it done with.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:47:06 PM
Since they picked up nothing in Newfoundland & Labrador.  What are the other two seats elsewhere in Atlantic Canada they are ahead in?  It would have to be in PEI or New Brunswick.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:47:14 PM
Polls close in Ontario/Quebec in 15 minutes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 07:47:27 PM
Most likely New Brunswick.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 07:48:26 PM
Polls close in Ontario/Quebec in 15 minutes.

Close at 9:30


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:48:59 PM
Since they picked up nothing in Newfoundland & Labrador.  What are the other two seats elsewhere in Atlantic Canada they are ahead in?  It would have to be in PEI or New Brunswick.

Madawaska-Restigouche in NB is one.


TWITTER Y U LIE


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 07:49:09 PM
"Supposedly Duceppe loses to NPD in Laurier-Ste Marie."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:50:12 PM

Could be PEI.  It would probably be Madawaska-Restigouche, Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, or Malpeque.  It would be all three if the Tories are trailing in South Shore-St. Margaret's which I believe they are not.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 07:50:51 PM
"Supposedly Duceppe loses to NPD in Laurier-Ste Marie."

See?

"Andrews [LIB] confirmed in Avalon, thus finishing off Newfoundland." (http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/browse_thread/thread/864c98e039fa8eee#)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 07:51:05 PM
CON 14 LIB 12 NDP 7

"Supposedly Duceppe loses to NPD in Laurier-Ste Marie."

Already confirmed as fraud on the last page.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 07:51:16 PM
The polls aren't closed in Quebec; disregard Twitter frauds.

They could be closed on the Isles du Madeleine - but I've heard no early results from there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 07:52:31 PM
The polls aren't closed in Quebec; disregard Twitter frauds.

They could be closed on the Isles du Madeleine - but I've heard no early results from there.

That would be NDP or Bloc Quebecois.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Thomas D on May 02, 2011, 07:52:57 PM
I don't get it. I can get any pay-per-view for free on the internet but finding Canadian election results is like trying to find a needle in a haystack. ???


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 07:56:48 PM
Is there anywhere that has a map of the results?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 07:57:16 PM

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadavotes2011/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 07:58:36 PM
Yeah... that one wasn't working so I was looking for another, but I got it up now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:00:08 PM
How about just list the seats that have flipped.  That would make it easy.  I know the NDP picked up St. John's South-Mount Pearl and Dartmouth-Cole Harbour and are leading in Halifax West.  The Tories are leading in Madawaska-Restigouche and one other riding they didn't win last time around.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 02, 2011, 08:00:52 PM
http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/ everyone must listen it's just that awesome.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 08:01:01 PM
New Seat Total: Con 13, Lib 12, NDP 7, BQ 1 (Quebec has one riding in AST) #elxn41 #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:01:08 PM
Ridings to watch in Quebec:

All of them.


Ridings to watch in Ontario:

Kenora, where if the orange wave strikes can end the Conservative pursuit for a majority.

Simcoe-Grey for the duel between local MP Helena Guergis, cast out of Harper's caucus, and the Tories' own candidate.

The Brampton trio (West, Springdale, Bramalea-Gore-Malton) to witness Harper's success at gaining the ethnic vote (Indians in particular)

Trinity-Spadina, Parkdale-High Park and Beaches-East York, where the NDP or the Liberals can gain it all in Toronto's left coast.

Essex, Brant, and Kitchener-Centre, where the strength of the NDP candidates may let them beat the odds.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:03:43 PM
Ridings to watch in Quebec:

All of them.


Ridings to watch in Ontario:

Kenora, where if the orange wave strikes can end the Conservative pursuit for a majority.

Simcoe-Grey for the duel between local MP Helena Guergis, cast out of Harper's caucus, and the Tories' own candidate.

The Brampton trio (West, Springdale, Bramalea-Gore-Malton) to witness Harper's success at gaining the ethnic vote (Indians in particular)

Trinity-Spadina, Parkdale-High Park and Beaches-East York, where the NDP or the Liberals can gain it all in Toronto's left coast.

Oshawa, Essex and Brant, where the strength of the NDP candidates may let them beat the odds.

Oshawa is a good possibility.  Essex a long shot but possible.  Not Brant as they have the formal Liberal candidate and I suspect the Tories will hold the 43% they got last time around.  Essex and Oshawa only if hte Liberal vote collapses which seems more likely in Oshawa than Essex


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 08:04:53 PM
Scott Brison re-elected. May be true, who knows.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:05:34 PM
So the last ridings close 4:30 CET?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on May 02, 2011, 08:07:02 PM
How much tactical voting do you guys think there will be in the GTA?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:07:20 PM

Nfld is an unique case since their time zone is half an hour ahead.

Pacific ridings close at 7 = 4:00 CET.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:07:35 PM

Hard for me to do the math.  10 Eastern, which is 3 London Time and 4 Central European Time, I think.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:08:56 PM
Scott Brison re-elected. May be true, who knows.

Where are you getting these results from?  Are you on location?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Man From G.O.P. on May 02, 2011, 08:09:42 PM
Scott Brison re-elected. May be true, who knows.

Where are you getting these results from?  Are you on location?


Inks stop posting for a while, no, we can't see any real results. Yes, it's stupid. Wait


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:10:18 PM
LOL, apparently the CBC just accidentally broadcast Atlantic results in Toronto for several minutes.

edit- it was CBC Newsworld, and not just Toronto but all of Canada, for six minutes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 02, 2011, 08:10:43 PM

Hard for me to do the math.  10 Eastern, which is 3 London Time and 4 Central European Time, I think.

Better question... rather than specific time zones, in how many minutes/hours will we start to see confirmed results?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 08:10:49 PM
On that same newsgroup another poster is claiming Break The Ban is a fraud.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:11:37 PM

Hard for me to do the math.  10 Eastern, which is 3 London Time and 4 Central European Time, I think.

Better question... rather than specific time zones, in how many minutes/hours will we start to see confirmed results?

49 minutes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 02, 2011, 08:13:27 PM

Hard for me to do the math.  10 Eastern, which is 3 London Time and 4 Central European Time, I think.

Better question... rather than specific time zones, in how many minutes/hours will we start to see confirmed results?

49 minutes.

Cheers mate!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:14:02 PM
LOL, apparently the CBC just accidentally broadcast Atlantic results in Toronto for several minutes.

edit- it was CBC Newsworld, and not just Toronto but all of Canada, for six minutes.

Several tweeters who saw this confirmed that the seat count was indeed 13 Conservative, 12 Liberal, 7 NDP, and 1 Bloc.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:14:29 PM
Can you confirm which ridings have been called and which flipped


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:16:12 PM
Can you confirm which ridings have been called and which flipped

St. John's South – Mount Pearl: LIB -> NDP
Dartmouth – Cole Harbour: LIB -> NDP
Halifax West: LIB -> NDP

Conservative gains are Madawaska-Restigouche and one of the PEI seats (don't know which one).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
Can you confirm which ridings have been called and which flipped

Quote
St. John's South – Mount Pearl: LIB -> NDP
Dartmouth – Cole Harbour: LIB -> NDP
Halifax West: LIB -> NDP

Conservative gains are Madawaska-Restigouche and one of the PEI seats (don't know which one).

It would probably be Malpeque.  Did the Liberals hold Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:17:23 PM
"Jfd888" on Twitter said that "Exit polls show NDP gains in the Toronto suburbs failed to materialize. Big CON Margins."

Saw it on CBC. The account is now terminated.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:18:16 PM
"Jfd888" on Twitter said that "Exit polls show NDP gains in the Toronto suburbs failed to materialize. Big CON Margins."

Saw it on CBC. The account is now terminated.

Uh... were big CON margins in the Toronto suburbs ever in doubt?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 08:18:59 PM
PEI stands at Liberal 3, Conservative 1 and New Brunswick Liberal 1, Conservative 9 #tweettheresults


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 08:19:36 PM
"Jfd888" on Twitter said that "Exit polls show NDP gains in the Toronto suburbs failed to materialize. Big CON Margins."

Saw it on CBC. The account is now terminated.

Do we even have exit polls?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:20:47 PM
"Jfd888" on Twitter said that "Exit polls show NDP gains in the Toronto suburbs failed to materialize. Big CON Margins."

Saw it on CBC. The account is now terminated.

Do we even have exit polls?
I don't think so.  We did during the Quebec referendum, the last time around.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 08:21:21 PM
"Jfd888" on Twitter said that "Exit polls show NDP gains in the Toronto suburbs failed to materialize. Big CON Margins."

Saw it on CBC. The account is now terminated.

Very suspicious claim - pretty sure exit polls are illegal in Canada.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 08:21:30 PM
Bloc apparently is trailing in their Atlantic zone riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: homelycooking on May 02, 2011, 08:21:44 PM
PEI stands at Liberal 3, Conservative 1 and New Brunswick Liberal 1, Conservative 9 #tweettheresults

So Liberals held Malpeque? Or did they gain Egmont and lose Malpeque? And did Yvon Godin seriously lose? This looks dubious.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:21:59 PM
Can you confirm which ridings have been called and which flipped

Quote
St. John's South – Mount Pearl: LIB -> NDP
Dartmouth – Cole Harbour: LIB -> NDP
Halifax West: LIB -> NDP

Conservative gains are Madawaska-Restigouche and one of the PEI seats (don't know which one).

It would probably be Malpeque.  Did the Liberals hold Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe

Nevermind about the PEI. Saw "3 LIB 1 CON" and forgot the Conservatives already had a seat there. So no change on PEI.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:22:20 PM
total results so far:

Newfoundland: Liberal 5, NDP 2
Nova Scotia: Liberal 3, Conservatives 3, NDP 4 (unconfirmed, working from numbers they put up on the screen very briefly)
PEI: Liberal 3, Conservative 1
NB: Liberal 1, Conservative 9, NDP 0


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:23:55 PM
PEI stands at Liberal 3, Conservative 1 and New Brunswick Liberal 1, Conservative 9 #tweettheresults

So Liberals held Malpeque? Or did they gain Egmont and lose Malpeque? And did Yvon Godin seriously lose? This looks dubious.

Status quo on PEI.  Tories held Egmont.  Liberals won the other 3 ridings.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 08:24:27 PM
Didn't the NDP have a seat in NB?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 08:25:07 PM
Godin is losing? WHAT?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:25:38 PM
Yeah, I have a hard time believing that. NDP won Acadie in NB with nearly 60% last time.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 02, 2011, 08:25:51 PM
Didn't the NDP have a seat in NB?

Acadie—Bathurst.  Would be a shock if NDP were losing there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:26:24 PM
Godin WTF??


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:27:34 PM
There is no way he will lose.  Probably a typo.  I am guessing Beausejour, Dominic Leblanc was the only Liberal in New Brunswick?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:28:38 PM
CBC coverage should begin momentarily: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 02, 2011, 08:29:09 PM
Since the results will be available.  I will sign off now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 08:29:26 PM
They can't put anything online until 10:00 EST because of BC


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:30:05 PM
Will it? I thought it was 30 more minutes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:30:43 PM
Results won't be shown, but talking heads will talk.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:31:23 PM
CBC is showing results.  14 Con, 11 Lib, 8 NDP


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:31:47 PM
He's from Ontario. He can see the results on local tv since the polls are closed there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:32:11 PM
Er, okay, now apparently the website isn't streaming until 10pm. Liars.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 02, 2011, 08:32:40 PM
Er, okay, now apparently the website isn't streaming until 10pm. Liars.

Ah no rite >:(


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on May 02, 2011, 08:32:44 PM
Er, okay, now apparently the website isn't streaming until 10pm. Liars.

It briefly showed 9:30 for me as well. So you're not imagining things. :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:33:40 PM
Vote percentage update: CON 37.5% NDP 29.9% LIB 29.3% GRN 2.9%
via Twitter


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:34:24 PM
Er, okay, now apparently the website isn't streaming until 10pm. Liars.

Ah no rite >:(

You might be able to get CBC on TV... I'm not sure if you've got it in cable at MSU that carries CBC, but we do in Mt. Pleasant.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:35:19 PM
Inks, can you confirm Godin is indeed safe?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: homelycooking on May 02, 2011, 08:35:28 PM

What are the eight seats? The two St Johns ridings, Dartmouth, the two Halifax ridings, Sackville, Acadie-Bathurst, presuming the world hasn't been turned upside down. What's the eighth riding?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:35:51 PM
NDP is leading in Gaspésie--Îles-de-la-Madeleine.

By 455 votes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 02, 2011, 08:36:02 PM
Er, okay, now apparently the website isn't streaming until 10pm. Liars.

Ah no rite >:(

You might be able to get CBC on TV... I'm not sure if you've got it in cable at MSU that carries CBC, but we do in Mt. Pleasant.

Eh, I don't have a TV set up in my room.  Lemme check if there's one in the common room that's open.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:36:38 PM

What are the eight seats? The two St Johns ridings, Dartmouth, the two Halifax ridings, Sackville, Acadie-Bathurst, presuming the world hasn't been turned upside down. What's the eighth riding?

The Atlantic Quebec one?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 08:36:52 PM
NDP is leading in Gaspésie--Îles-de-la-Madeleine.

Somewhere Duceppe is crying.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:37:29 PM
Blue +3
Orange +3
Red -6


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:38:09 PM
NDP is leading in Gaspésie--Îles-de-la-Madeleine.

Somewhere Duceppe is crying.

It's very close, though, a 455 vote lead.  And I think the part of the riding on the Gaspe peninsula closed at 9:30 - but I'm not certain about that.

65/235 is in, assuming my non-existent French is correct.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:38:56 PM
On the West Coast, getting CBC's results.

CON 18, LIB 12, NDP 9


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:39:30 PM
Confirmed seats:
Valcourt (CON)
Gordon (Con)
Williamson (Con)
Weston (Con)
Allen (Con)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:40:00 PM
The NDP polled 7% there in 2008,...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:40:09 PM
NDP is leading in Gaspésie--Îles-de-la-Madeleine.

Somewhere Duceppe is crying.

lol, if the BQ is losing that seat...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:41:50 PM
CBC now listing the total at 21 CON, 17 LIB, 10 NDP


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: redcommander on May 02, 2011, 08:42:57 PM
CBC now listing the total at 21 CON, 17 LIB, 10 NDP

Where are you finding the listing? Whenever I go to their website, the results map is on zero still.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:43:30 PM
CBC now listing the total at 21 CON, 17 LIB, 10 NDP

Where are you finding the listing? Whenever I go to their website, the results map is on zero still.

He's watching it on cable TV.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:43:44 PM
NEW BRUNSWICK POPULAR VOTE: 43.9 CON, 30.5 NDP, 21.8 LIB.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:43:57 PM
CBC now listing the total at 21 CON, 17 LIB, 10 NDP

Where are you finding the listing? Whenever I go to their website, the results map is on zero still.

This is CBC TV.  The joys of living in a border state! ;D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:44:05 PM
Does this mean there is no NDP wave (in Ontario ;)) or are these just seats that weren't going to change hands any time soon?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:44:52 PM
Does this mean there is no NDP wave (in Ontario ;)) or are these just seats that weren't going to change hands any time soon?

Way too early to tell.  Polls just closed in Ontario 14 minutes ago.  Some polls haven't even started counting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:45:32 PM
And CBC has just cut off. Local news channels list the end of polling in 15 minutes.

Godspeed, you Easterners!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:46:11 PM
Twitter tells me:

Tories: 26
Liberals: 20
NDP: 16
Bloc: 2


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:47:01 PM
CBC reporting the Liberals took a big hit in Atlantic, but they've stopped broadcasting results from there and are reporting results from Quebec as they come in.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:47:17 PM
Twitter tells me that CTV says the Conservatives will win the election.  

Whether that means majority or minority - I don't know, nor does CTV, apparently.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:47:30 PM
CON 37
NDP 21
LIB 20
BQ 3


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:49:13 PM
CON 49
NDP 25
LIB 24
BQ 3


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:49:59 PM
The Quebec wave may be larger than we have all predicted. Have you seen any LIB -> CON gains yet?

I don't trust CTV, by the way - thinks it's a Conservative shill.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:50:25 PM
CTV calls the official opposition for the NDP


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:50:40 PM
CTV supposedly says NDP poised to be official opposition, per Twitter.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 08:50:56 PM
CTV calls the official opposition for the NDP

:D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Dan the Roman on May 02, 2011, 08:51:14 PM
So last minute swing to the Tories?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:51:23 PM
Nine more minutes!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:51:52 PM
This is CBC, not CTV.

CON 70
NDP 29
LIB 26
BQ 4


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:52:18 PM
If the NDP and the Liberals form a coalition, does that mean that the title 'official Opposition' goes to the Conservatives, or does it paradoxically remain with the NDP?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:52:48 PM
Via Twitter:

CTV projecting 130-157 seats for Cons, 69-97 NDP, 47-69 Lib #tweettheresults #elxn41


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:52:59 PM
Conservatives on track for a majority ? :(


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 08:53:06 PM
Projecting first and second place I can understand, but I wish at least that we had networks that vaguely understood the parliamentary system.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 08:53:19 PM
These Tories seat counts are getting scary. Especially because the Prairies are still out...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:54:09 PM

Judging from the Atlantic results I saw, current popular vote %s are similar to the last Nanos poll:

37.1 CON, 31.6 NDP, 20.5 LIB, 5.7 BQ, 3.8 GRN


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:54:23 PM
If the NDP and the Liberals form a coalition, does that mean that the title 'official Opposition' goes to the Conservatives, or does it paradoxically remain with the NDP?

I'd assume that would go to the Conservatives.

If the NDP makes enough gains from BQ, I could see it happening, but if BQ maintains enough seats, I don't think they'd go along with a coaltion, and we'll see a minority government with the Conservatives again.

Of course, there's the 3rd option of the NDP and the Libs cancelling each other out too much and the Conservatives gaining a majority.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:55:03 PM
These Tories seat counts are getting scary. Especially because the Prairies are still out...

Not necessarily.  The Prairies closed at the same time as most of Ontario and Quebec.  Only BC and Yukon are still open (and perhaps part of a riding in Alberta).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:55:20 PM
Canada owes the world another minority (preferrably followed by an NDP minority). What should we do for fun if the Tories win this election outright?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:55:46 PM
Also, 5 more minutes!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:55:59 PM
BQ just dropped to 2... I'm not sure what CBC is counting.  I assumed these were seats that were called, not as they go.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:56:31 PM
BQ back up to 3...now 4.  Perhaps it was a typo?  Does anybody know how CBC does this?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Stranger in a strange land on May 02, 2011, 08:56:52 PM
Conservatives on track for a majority ? :(

Hopefully at least it looks like the Bloc will be wiped out


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:57:10 PM
Via Twitter:

CTV is declaring a Conservative win 44-23-21-3

Vote percentages, I assume?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:57:36 PM
BQ just dropped to 2... I'm not sure what CBC is counting.  I assumed these were seats that were called, not as they go.

Perhaps they have a computer that counts all ridings where a party leads as "going" to that party?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 08:57:51 PM
Con 95 Lib 31 NDP 44 BQ 4

Conservative numbers getting scary high :(


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 08:57:51 PM
Via Twitter:

CTV is declaring a Conservative win 44-23-21-3

Vote percentages, I assume?

That'd be nasty.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 08:58:02 PM
BQ back up to 3...now 4.  Perhaps it was a typo?  Does anybody know how CBC does this?

Reported leads in ridings - even if only one poll is reporting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 08:58:16 PM
Conservatives on track for a majority ? :(

Hopefully at least it looks like the Bloc will be wiped out

If the Bloc is wiped out and they don't get a majority, that'll most likely mean a coalition for the Libs and NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 08:58:36 PM
Via Twitter:

CTV is declaring a Conservative win 44-23-21-3

Vote percentages, I assume?

Conservative majority, ~170 seats.

That would mean the most accurate pollster was COMPAS?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:00:04 PM
CBC go!!!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:00:11 PM
CBC is saying Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine looks like it could go to the NDP and they have a lot of polls reporting from the riding so far.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:00:35 PM
CBC website is up!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Capitan Zapp Brannigan on May 02, 2011, 09:01:57 PM
The NDP surge looks like it gave Ontario to the Conservatives..

Ugh.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 09:02:18 PM
This is looking like a Conservative Majority. Gross.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:03:15 PM

No feed though?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:03:21 PM

Elections Canada's website, Elections.ca is up, too... and very sloooooow.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 09:03:43 PM
Uh, it looks like most ridings have one or two precincts (or whatever wacky name the Canadians call them) in so far. Might want to let some more votes get counted before you panic.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:03:55 PM
This may be a stupid question and I may be really dumb... does the CBC website show what party the incumbent is in each riding?  I don't see it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Capitan Zapp Brannigan on May 02, 2011, 09:04:00 PM
No way Iggie survives this to stay on as leader.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 09:04:11 PM
BQ wipeout


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:04:38 PM
CBC TV went back up.

Currently CON 38.9, NDP 29.8, LIB 27.8, GRN and others insignificant.

No way Iggie survives this to stay on as leader.

He may not even try. Etobicoke-Lakeshore has a Conservative leading.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:05:08 PM
Gaspésie--Îles-de-la-Madeleine is 34.4%-31.3% NDP over Bloc, with 125/235 reporting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:05:42 PM
Conservatives are +22 so far.  If this holds up, they'll have a majority by far.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 09:05:58 PM
This may be a stupid question and I may be really dumb... does the CBC website show what party the incumbent is in each riding?  I don't see it.

They don't show it. Rather annoying.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:06:45 PM
No way Iggie survives this to stay on as leader.

At this point, he could lose his seat.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 02, 2011, 09:06:58 PM
Labrador???

Early days yet, but Ignatieff leads by one vote.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:07:24 PM
No way Iggie survives this to stay on as leader.

That was always a given


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:07:29 PM
CBC QUEBEC POPULAR VOTE RESULTS:

NDP 38.0, BQ 24.1, CON 20.3, LIB ~13?

MANITOBA:

CON 51.3, NDP 29 LIB 15.2


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 09:08:10 PM
NDP at 46 seats in Quebec


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:08:17 PM
This may be a stupid question and I may be really dumb... does the CBC website show what party the incumbent is in each riding?  I don't see it.

They don't show it. Rather annoying.

Well then, for anybody who might need assistance (I'll admit that's me too), this is a site that might be easy to use: http://predictor.hillandknowlton.ca/predictor/

or Wikipedia.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 09:08:48 PM
LOL the lady who went on Vacation and cant speak French is winning.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:09:21 PM
CBC says Joe Volpe's in trouble.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 09:09:49 PM
The extra Atlantic CON seat is Labrador!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:10:16 PM
Ignatieff is now trailing, although there are only 10/279 polls in.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:10:42 PM
CBC saying Conservative majority is likely...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:11:12 PM
So far, all cabinet ministers with declared victories in their ridings have been elected.  Although there are some who are trailing.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Capitan Zapp Brannigan on May 02, 2011, 09:11:35 PM
Dion vs Iggie, worse leader?

Tough.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 09:11:35 PM
CTV DECLARES NDP OFFICIAL OPPOSITION


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:12:05 PM
BQ is dead.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on May 02, 2011, 09:12:21 PM
CTV DECLARES NDP OFFICIAL OPPOSITION

CBC now says the same thing.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Man From G.O.P. on May 02, 2011, 09:12:55 PM
This is insanity.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:13:09 PM
CBC is claiming NDP will be the Official Opposition behind the Conservatives.  I guess that means basically that they're assuming a Conservative majority with no chance of a coalition.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 09:14:01 PM
NDP ahead in 2 Scarborough seats


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:15:32 PM
NDP supporters cheering... until a Tory majority is called in an hour or two. :(

Duceppe is losing his seat BADLY


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 02, 2011, 09:16:21 PM
Trudeau in third place in Papineau.

Early days in a highly polarised seat... won't comment again on that seat until eventually called.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:16:48 PM
It won't be two hours till the Conservative Majority is called :(


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:17:33 PM
NDP supporters cheering... until a Tory majority is called in an hour or two. :(

Duceppe is losing his seat BADLY

With that said, now that NDP is official opposition they can blame the Liberals.

Still think the Liberals will be torn apart after the election.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 09:17:45 PM
Tory majority imminent. :(


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:18:43 PM
The swing to the Conservatives in Labrador is pretty crazy.  That's one that can't even really be blamed on the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:19:43 PM
CBC results for actual elected seats:
CON 66
NDP 17
LIB 12


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:19:56 PM
CTV - Harper won his riding, Calgary Southeast.  Duh.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:20:26 PM
Just 35ish Liberal MPs? 'Natural Party of Government',..


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:20:51 PM
Look at CBC's GTA map!

The Liberals have been devoured. There are ~7 Rob Ford ridings going to the Conservatives. The Coast is going to the NDP. The sheer abnormality of this would be why a Tory majority is too early.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:21:27 PM
Interesting polls coming in in Saskatoon—Wanuskewin now have the NDP leading by about a point.  I'm not sure if it'll keep up, but a decent swing from 2008.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:22:54 PM
The 2 ridings where BQ leads in Southern Quebec are seeing NDP numbers awfully close to the BQ numbers.  BQ may not even end the night with 4 MPs.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:23:33 PM
Big swing towards the Tories in Ontario. Two Ottawa ridings have switched. Guergis is decimated. GTA is in ruins. However, in the midst of all this, Kingston and the Islands has a narrow Liberal lead.

Ignatieff and Duceppe are falling too much behind.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: redcommander on May 02, 2011, 09:24:34 PM
It seems like it's 1993 in reverse for the Grits and the BQ.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:24:57 PM
NDP over 100!!!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:25:21 PM
BQ completely wiped in Montreal at the moment.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 09:25:44 PM
Bloc is leading in only 3 ridings, despite having 23.4% of the vote in Quebec... Gotta love FPTP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:26:08 PM
NDP has now even taken over the lead in Richmond-Arthabaska.  Apparently I should've been more generous in how many seats BQ would lose.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:26:25 PM
Tories 3 seats from a majority...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:27:00 PM
Saskatchewan results are hidious.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 09:27:18 PM
One seat away.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Kevin on May 02, 2011, 09:28:19 PM
Holy F**K,

What has just happened in Canada over the past couple of weeks in order to lead the historically dominant Liberal Party to this state.  mean many areas of Greater Toronto that were super strong Liberal seats in the last election appear to be falling to the Tories and the NDP has established a clean sweep in Quebec!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:28:28 PM
Someone will project a Tory majority in the next few minutes. I would wait until BC results are out, though.

That said, the Ontario sweep may be too hard to gain back. I hope the GTA is an anomaly.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:28:42 PM
Bloc is leading in only 3 ridings, despite having 23.4% of the vote in Quebec... Gotta love FPTP.

Is there a movement to push for AV voting in Canada like the UK is trying (although it'll fail there)?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Kevinstat on May 02, 2011, 09:28:48 PM
The Tories will hit 155 any second now.  They're at 154 now.  Now down to 152.  This is interesting, even though they'll probably end up with one sixty something seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:29:51 PM
Bob Rae win Toronto Centre - LIB hold.  Your next Liberal leader - perhaps.

Iggy is trailing in Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 39-35.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 09:30:36 PM
Looks like all our predictions are wrong.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:31:30 PM
The Liberals have collapsed in British Columbia...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:31:30 PM
The NDP is now leading in Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River with 50/150 polls reporting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:31:43 PM
Edmonton is very sad as well.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 09:31:50 PM
Iggy's down to a 41-34 deficit. Duceppe is down by 14, but there's not many votes in yet.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:32:20 PM
Conservatives were briefly at 155 on the CTV tally.  Down to 154, now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:32:55 PM
Looks like all our predictions are wrong.

I debated giving the Conservatives a stronger lead, thinking the NDP might cancel out some liberal votes.  But I never thought BQ would take such a huge hit.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:33:25 PM
Cannon defeated in Pontiac (CON loss).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:34:08 PM
The Liberals have collapsed in British Columbia...

Most ridings in BC only have one poll released. The Ontario gains are dependent on a very low number of polls - 20 out of 200.

The Liberals have collapsed, but it's across the nation.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Thomas D on May 02, 2011, 09:35:04 PM
I had the NDP at 106. Screwed everything else up though.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:36:01 PM
The NDP should win most of the BC seats not yet reporting, no? Harper's majority might be thight.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:36:42 PM
Ajax-Pickering is a CON pickup.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Thomas D on May 02, 2011, 09:36:54 PM
Bloc lady on CBC.

Spin lady, spin!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 09:37:34 PM
She says they're not going anywhere... Haha


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:38:20 PM
CON at 158 on CTV ticker.  NDP 106.  LIB 30.  BLOC 3.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:38:32 PM
I do feel sorry for Gilles Duceppe.  I've always liked him personally.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:39:00 PM
Worst case scenario for BQ now is... 2 seats. Wow.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Capitan Zapp Brannigan on May 02, 2011, 09:39:37 PM
So are these numbers with all the votes in for the riding or is it not official yet?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:39:49 PM
Dang... Elizabeth May is pissed as hell.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:40:07 PM
Tories above 160 now... so gross.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Thomas D on May 02, 2011, 09:41:00 PM
Early night I guess.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:41:07 PM
Ahuntsic seems like it's going to the NDP any moment.
All Independents are gone.
Elizabeth May looks determined, but she's going to get slaughtered.
Although the Tories are at 160+ now, this is predicate on the NDP not gaining in BC. If that surge happens you're going to see the Conservatives beneath 155.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:41:26 PM
So are these numbers with all the votes in for the riding or is it not official yet?

Leading and elected.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:42:34 PM
Ken Dryden defeated - CON Pickup from LIB.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:42:55 PM
So what makes Kenora so different from all the rural NDP provinces surrounding it?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 02, 2011, 09:43:02 PM
GLOBAL  TV - Tory Majority


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:45:09 PM
Among the Conservative gains:

NDP -> CON in Sault Ste. Marie;
LIB -> CON in Winnipeg South Centre;
LIB -> CON Yukon!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 02, 2011, 09:45:43 PM
()
I was closer than anyone

ME

I WAS!!!

words can not express how happy I am right now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 09:45:51 PM
So now the Liberal Party is gone and Stephen Harper has a majority all because of a self-inflicted wound. Way to go Michael Ignatieff. You are the biggest loser in Canadian political history.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 02, 2011, 09:46:11 PM
CTV - Tory Majority


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:46:15 PM
CTV- Conservative Majority


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:46:35 PM

Yeah, this one ended up being more boring than the British election.  I figured if anything, there might be more Liberal and NDP votes that could lead to a potential coalition if they eroded the Bloc.  This one was about as boring as the 2008 elections for the U.S.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:47:06 PM
So now the Liberal Party is gone and Stephen Harper has a majority all because of a self-inflicted wound. Way to go Michael Ignatieff. You are the biggest loser in Canadian political history.

At least with his seat lost he'll have no excuse not to move back to the United States ASAP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:47:38 PM
()
I was closer than anyone

ME

I WAS!!!

words can not express how happy I am right now.

What was yours?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:48:47 PM
()
I was closer than anyone

ME

I WAS!!!

words can not express how happy I am right now.

Twenty seats lower for the Tories than actual results, like most.

At this point, we have no one to blame but Ontario. I'm this close to thinking that the rain in the GTA today led to a Conservative majority.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 09:50:25 PM
Elizabeth May at 50% with one poll in


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:50:40 PM
May leading.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:50:48 PM
In other news, Elizabeth May is leading with the first poll reporting now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 09:51:13 PM
CBC calls for majority.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:51:19 PM
Kill me, kill me

EDIT: Regarding the Tory majority, of course.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 02, 2011, 09:51:19 PM
CBC - Majoirity Tory


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Thomas D on May 02, 2011, 09:52:09 PM
Time to repeal gay marriage.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:52:09 PM
CBC now projecting Conservative majority!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Insula Dei on May 02, 2011, 09:52:24 PM
GAME OVER


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 09:55:00 PM
The Liberal collapse is so pitiful.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:55:08 PM
Vote percentages:
Con.  40.0%
N.D.P. 30.9%
Lib. 20.1%
B.Q. 4.9%
Other 4.1%
   


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Mikado on May 02, 2011, 09:55:23 PM
So, after Bloq Quebecois, whither Quebecan nationalism?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 09:55:56 PM
So, after Bloq Quebecois, whither Quebecan nationalism?

It could see a resurgence in 2015 (or later).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 09:56:41 PM
Three of the four ridings the Bloc is winning are within 1-2% now. They could end up with only one seat.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 09:56:46 PM
So, after Bloq Quebecois, whither Quebecan nationalism?

A majority would be made without anything from Quebec. I'm seeing a more SDP scenario in Quebec's future, starting with a PQ victory.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 02, 2011, 09:56:46 PM

No, there is enough moderates in the party.

Earl, you should be happy, Ruth Ellen Brosseau won.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:57:04 PM
The Liberal collapse is so pitiful.

The Bloc collapse is even more spectacular.  (I wouldn't use the word pitiful to describe the fall of the separatists).

In other news, the Ottawa waitress who went to Vegas won her riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 09:58:04 PM
I feel sorry for Canada.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 02, 2011, 09:58:18 PM
This next election is for October 2015.
At the same time provinical elections are slated for Manitoba, Ontario, Sask, PEI, Newfoundland, and Yukon (I believe)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 09:58:42 PM

As a leftist, the demise of the Liberals and Bloc should be good news.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Capitan Zapp Brannigan on May 02, 2011, 09:59:40 PM
Welcome to Harperland.

The only good thing that can come from this is a united left come 2015.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:00:10 PM
Sault Ste. Marie is still a dogfight.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 10:00:20 PM
Disgusting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 10:00:25 PM
So why did the Liberals not get wiped out in the Maritimes?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 10:00:35 PM

As a leftist, the demise of the Liberals and Bloc should be good news.

In the long-run, hopefully. In the short-term, as a leftist, I'm worried about what unrestricted Tory government will do to the Canadian social safety net.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:00:59 PM

As a leftist, the demise of the Liberals and Bloc should be good news.

As a voter from BC - where the NDP has only won government 3 times out of 22 elections - I am less cheery.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:01:51 PM
So, after Bloq Quebecois, whither Quebecan nationalism?

The Bloc has always been ancillary to the Quebec separatist movement. The PQ took power for the first time in Quebec well before the Bloc was a glimmer in anyone's eye. The Quebec nationalists will go back to focusing on provincial politics as they did the in the 1970s and 80s.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 10:02:21 PM
So does anyone expect the Liberals to fold into the NDP?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:02:32 PM
Bob Rae is now speaking.  He's leading, but it looks like he'll be one of the few Liberal MPs left in Ontario.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Frodo on May 02, 2011, 10:02:38 PM
That vote of no confidence that brought down the government apparently backfired big-time.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 10:02:44 PM
Liberals below 20% now, while the NDP are inching up and the Tories are about to fall below 40%.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 10:02:48 PM
Two of the three Bloc seats have leads of 0.4% and 0.65%. It's possible that by the end of tonight the BQ could be tied with the Greens for number of seats held!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:03:00 PM
So why did the Liberals not get wiped out in the Maritimes?

TRA-dition!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:03:28 PM
Vancouver Centre is the last riding to report.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:03:35 PM
So why did the Liberals not get wiped out in the Maritimes?

The Atlantic provinces always seem to trail trends.  They were among last to have a semi-functioning Progressive Conservative party, too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:03:35 PM
Both Jean-Pierre Blackburn and Lawrence Cannon lost their seats, so Harper's lost 2 cabinet members so far, with 3 more in trouble potentially.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 10:04:32 PM
Bloc leading only in two seats. Oh mon dieu!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:05:16 PM
Assuming all things hold equal in Ontario, the seat counts for that province are:

CON: 73 (+21)
NDP: 22 (+5)
LIB: 11 (-26)

Ahuntsic has went from Bloc to the NDP. The Bloc is shut out in Montreal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bacon King on May 02, 2011, 10:06:01 PM
Bloc leading only in two seats. Oh mon dieu!

And in one of those seats they're only 0.81% above the NDP with 150 out of 230 precincts left to report.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:06:24 PM
Bloc leading only in two seats. Oh mon dieu!

I just saw them lose their third.  I never expected such a hit for them.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on May 02, 2011, 10:06:59 PM
The CBC's spin of the election is really annoying...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:07:22 PM
Looks like they could lose Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord as well, leaving them with one reasonably safe one.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ag on May 02, 2011, 10:09:06 PM
This, actually, seems like an emergence of a two-party system :)) Bloc annihilated, Grits screwed, so, what's left is Con vs Lab :)))


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:11:17 PM
The only consolation for "progressives" today is that the Tories' Atlantic and Ontario caucus certainly outnumbers those from the West. The centre of political gravity has shifted once again to the East.
Then again, this is the province that gave Mike Harris to the world...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:16:03 PM
Latest: Michael Ignatieff now speaking, congratulating Jack Layton and Stephen Harper.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:16:25 PM
The only consolation for "progressives" today is that the Tories' Atlantic and Ontario caucus certainly outnumbers those from the West. The centre of political gravity has shifted once again to the East.
Then again, this is the province that gave Mike Harris to the world...

And it's also the province that took Mike Harris away. A Conservative majority now is unlikely to be a Conservative government in 2015.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:16:34 PM
Iggy is on now.  Conceding and taking responsibility.  Will he be on the next plane to Boston?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 10:17:08 PM
Elizabeth May is up 49-34. Greens looking to be about as relevant as the Bloc in the next Parliament.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 10:17:09 PM
NDP is at 32% in Saskatchewan with 0 seats. Liberals are at 9% with 1 seat. FPTP is gross.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:17:33 PM
BQ is now leading again in Richmond-Arthabaska and Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Frodo on May 02, 2011, 10:17:39 PM
The only consolation for "progressives" today is that the Tories' Atlantic and Ontario caucus certainly outnumbers those from the West. The centre of political gravity has shifted once again to the East.
Then again, this is the province that gave Mike Harris to the world...

And it's also the province that took Mike Harris away. A Conservative majority now is unlikely to be a Conservative government in 2015.

And why would that be?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:18:14 PM
Gilles Duceppe has been defeated, per the Globe and Mail.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:18:26 PM
Elizabeth May is up 49-34. Greens looking to be about as relevant as the Bloc in the next Parliament.

Hey, it'd be a gain of 1.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:19:16 PM
Ignatieff says that his party is "a descendent of a great Quebecois, Wilfrid Laurier"

It is so poignant, because there are no traces of Laurier left to be found. Almost no Quebec seats, no anti-war perspective, no Canadian autonomy...

Just realized-Liberals are still leading in Winnipeg North!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 10:21:26 PM
Guelph and Kingston stay red. That's a bit surprising.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 10:21:37 PM
Liberals may drop below 19%. Jeez.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:21:40 PM
Iggy just told the crowd to express their gratitude for his wife. Uh...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:22:09 PM
CBC is confirming Jean-Francois Fortin will be elected, giving the BQ their first solid win of the night.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:23:03 PM
Ignatieff is saying the party will continue "long after we're gone".


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:23:43 PM
Oh my God he's staying on as leader. What a nutcase.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 02, 2011, 10:24:02 PM
Conservative might picks two seats in Winnipeg.
Winnipeg South Centre and Elmwood


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 10:24:09 PM
Just realized-Liberals are still leading in Winnipeg North!

Hilarious, isn't it?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:25:15 PM
He's making a good case now for the need of a centre party.  He needed to be doing this better months ago, though.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 10:25:34 PM
Oh my God he's staying on as leader. What a nutcase.

Reading between the lines I think he's accepting that he will quit. After all he lost his seat!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 10:26:22 PM
I've been staring at the results on screen so stunned I forgot to say anything here.

I'd seen the polls indicating something like this, but I didn't believe them - I'd figured for the Tories staying at where they were, with the NDP getting no more than 50 (indeed, all three opposition parties splitting the rest fairly evenly). To be blunt, I was very wrong.

I had felt that the Liberals needed a pricking of their egos given their high-and-mighty attitude, and that the last two defeats had not given them that, but this is overdoing it a bit; I never thought I'd feel sorry for them, but I do now.

I'm a conservative (no capital), but I've been disappointed by the Tory government. This is probably the best result from my point of view, as there will be no constant electioneering whenever a contentious bill comes up, but it also means that an NDP government may not be far off. I'm unequivocally and unreservedly stunned tonight, but also a little uneasy. We finally appear to have headed off in the direction the British took ninety years ago, but hopefully we will not go through the kinds of Labour governments they have had.

As I have been so wrong about so many things in this election, I think I had better shut up for the rest of this discussion.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on May 02, 2011, 10:26:40 PM
Okay Ignatieff. We get it. Shut up now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Dan the Roman on May 02, 2011, 10:26:52 PM
He's making a good case now for the need of a centre party.  He needed to be doing this better months ago, though.

If he spoke like this weeks ago this night would have gone very differently.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 10:27:07 PM
How in the world would he stay on as party leader despite not having a seat? Would he make speeches from his front porch or something?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:27:20 PM
The only consolation for "progressives" today is that the Tories' Atlantic and Ontario caucus certainly outnumbers those from the West. The centre of political gravity has shifted once again to the East.
Then again, this is the province that gave Mike Harris to the world...

And it's also the province that took Mike Harris away. A Conservative majority now is unlikely to be a Conservative government in 2015.

And why would that be?

Looking at the results (and knowing from the pre-election polling that Liberal voters prefer the NDP more than 5-1 over the Conservatives), the Conservatives would lose a fair number of seats once the Liberals are out of the picture, and their majority is not very big as-is. Plus, it's hard to see the Conservatives in a majority government being able to resist doing things that will make them deeply unpopular in places like the GTA.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:28:13 PM
Oh my God he's staying on as leader. What a nutcase.

Reading between the lines I think he's accepting that he will quit. After all he lost his seat!

If the party wants him gone, I think he'll leave.  And they should--clearly he wasn't doing things right.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 10:28:41 PM
So it looks to me, assuming the polls were correct, right-wing Liberals jumped ship at the last minute and voted Tory. Left-wing Liberals did not.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:28:46 PM
How in the world would he stay on as party leader despite not having a seat? Would he make speeches from his front porch or something?

Typically they would make a junior member resign in a safe seat and have the leader win it in a by-election. Though given what just happened I'm not so sure if anyone will be willing to do that.

Also not so sure there are any safe Liberal seats now...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:29:06 PM
Going back to BC's ridings:

My riding has, as I predicted, gone massively for the Conservative incumbent. It is interesting that the NDP might claim second place in a city that has never gone to the left.

Vancouver Quadra will be kept by Joyce Murray (LIB). Vancouver South will finally turn blue. Surrey North is finally becoming more and more orange, and NDP is in the lead. Elizabeth May still leads, but with only 10 boxes polled.

Nanaimo-Alberni and Surrey North both seem to be NDP pickups.

In my eyes, the future of the NDP hangs on a knife edge. When I calm down more I'll write an essay about it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 10:31:14 PM
I'm not so sure the Liberals would prefer the NDP to the Tories - in Nova Scotia, anyway, their votes have been sliding more to the Conservatives as all Tory MPs have increased their majorities and Peter Stoffer has had his cut by a rising Tory vote.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:33:15 PM
At this point with 140/215 polls reporting, it looks like Bloc Québécois is safe in Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 10:34:18 PM
Also not so sure there are any safe Liberal seats now...

Sure there are, there are a whole two of them in Newfoundland that voted majority-Liberal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:34:26 PM
CBC has declared Gilles Duceppe has lost.  If there was any BQ MP I would've wanted to win, it'd have been him... he always seemed like a nice guy to me.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:38:15 PM
So, will Bob Rae be a potential replacement for Ignatieff is he does resign/gets kicked out?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon on May 02, 2011, 10:38:28 PM
Is this some sort of trend within the Anglosphere to put exactly one Green member in a legislative body?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:38:59 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on May 02, 2011, 10:39:41 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

Very.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:40:16 PM
Duceppe is about to speak.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:40:23 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

At this point, it'd be smart for them.  But if the Liberals want to be the "party of the centre" then that's a different story.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on May 02, 2011, 10:40:29 PM
So....can Iggy hold on to his seat?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:41:21 PM
Duceppe is about to speak right now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:41:33 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

When your riding is surrounded by NDP elects, it's hard not to.

Montmorency-Charlevoix, by the way, has swung to the NDP. Bloc is rising in Richmond-Arthabaska.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon on May 02, 2011, 10:41:42 PM
Breaking News: Liberal Party will change its name to "Bloc Newfoundland".

j/k :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 10:42:28 PM

He's down by 5.6% with 193/279 in, and he's been trailing all night. I'm going to say no.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 02, 2011, 10:42:48 PM
Lamourex (Libertal) keeps WInnipeg North
9241 votes to 9124. (All polls reported)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:43:25 PM

It's already been projected - No.  But Stephane Dion and Justin Trudeau won.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 10:44:28 PM
The natural governing party of Canada has fallen below 19% of the popular vote.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:45:06 PM
Dang...CBC makes it seem like Stephen Harper hates Quebec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:46:41 PM
Dang...CBC makes it seem like Stephen Harper hates Quebec.

CBC hates Stephen Harper, so.... 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on May 02, 2011, 10:46:58 PM
Are the Liberals going to tear themselves apart? It looks like it from the pretty different tones of Bob Rae's interview and Ignatieff's speech.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:47:02 PM
Breaking News: Liberal Party will change its name to "Bloc Newfoundland".

j/k :)

The real problem with the Liberals is that they have no solid base. GTA is gone. Another Vancouver riding is gnawed away. New Brunswick has repudiated ex-Premier Graham's party.

All we have now is a party of individuals. Trudeau, Fry, Rae, McCallum, McGuinty... these powerful personalities will tear the party apart. And they have no affiliation to the party, but instead the party is affiliated to them. They can walk away if convenient.

The feudal nature of the Liberals is still evident. If that's not fixed by the year's end, the Liberals are gone.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:48:33 PM
You can tell how much harder the BQ was hit by how somber Duceppe sounds in his speech compared to Ignatieff.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 02, 2011, 10:49:28 PM
Feeling slightly better, logged on. Harper majority is not great, but NDP managing second is. Some remarkable results in Quebec and Toronto. Shame about the Prairies; a paradoxical side-effect of NDP success their at a provincial level.

I suppose the obvious question is 'what now', isn't it?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:50:16 PM
"The liberals and conservatives who closed the door on Quebec a long time ago were also rejected by Quebecers"


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:50:36 PM
The parade of egos left in the Liberal Party is sort of amusing.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 10:50:56 PM
Richmond-Arthabaska looks to be a Bloc hold. 34-33 lead with 230/251 in. So... they'll be getting at least 2 seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:51:13 PM
Duceppe has just resigned.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 10:51:56 PM
May is projected the winner in Saanich-Gulf Islands (Green).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 10:52:17 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:54:05 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on May 02, 2011, 10:54:53 PM
Look at those swings in the affluent Toronto suburbs...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 10:55:34 PM
Chantal Hébert says: "This is the worst result for the sovereigntists... there is no money, no official status for the party... Mr. Harper is unpopular, but over [Duceppe's leadership] sovereignity has never gone up."

The Bloc has outlived its purpose, even that of getting Quebec pork. Sovereignism as a federal movement is over.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 10:56:01 PM
Bloc has slipped into the lead in Bas-Richelieu with only a few polls left. Sloooooow counting in Quebec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 10:58:30 PM
Liberals may have gone the way of Fianna Fail - two of the most powerful parties in history getting record-low results within nine weeks.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 10:59:27 PM
Heh, good for May.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 11:02:28 PM
Oh, Justin Trudeau is speaking. Hah.

Also Peter Mansbridge is my favorite journalist and he is a national treasure and you Canadians should never let him go.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:03:39 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.

Well, that's still a huge step down for him.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 11:05:09 PM
Leading a party that might actually be able to take power on the provincial level is certainly a step above leading a joke grouping of 2 or 3 people.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:06:20 PM
Surely one can complain about "infantile leftism" dominating this election...

Liberals may have gone the way of Fianna Fail - two of the most powerful parties in history getting record-low results within nine weeks.

As bad as this seems, it's not THAT bad. Fianna Foil in a FPTP system would have seats numbering in the single digits. The Liberals still have their personalities, and they have not gone past a point of no return. Their stabilization or their demise will just be quicker than most.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:06:49 PM
Leading a party that might actually be able to take power on the provincial level is certainly a step above leading a joke grouping of 2 or 3 people.

Well, I mean step down from where he was before tonight.  After tonight, at least until at least 2015, the BQ is essentially dead.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:07:14 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.

Well, that's still a huge step down for him.

No, it's not. The PQ has always been more important than the BQ, and he would have the opportunity to form a government as PQ leader. Even before this defeat, I think being PQ leader was a bigger position than being BQ leader (but in 2007 Duceppe didn't want a slugfest with Marois that would have exposed the schisms between the social-democratic and conservative wings of the PQ). I think this defeat has tainted him too much, though.

(Curious what the NDP breakthrough will do for the QS's polling, if anything.)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 02, 2011, 11:08:56 PM
Why is the Green doing so well in the Yukon?

Edit: Bloc takes Richmond-Arthabaska. Looks like they'll win Bas-Richelieu-etc. as well. Ahuntsic is the only other seat that they have a good shot at winning.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:09:00 PM
Elizabeth May now speaking.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:11:10 PM
"Today we proved that Canadians want change in politics."  Not really... you didn't.  The NDP did.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:12:17 PM
While they won their first seat in an election, they acutally lost 3% of the vote nationwide.  I'm sorry, but I don't see what the big deal is here.  Sure, you won a seat, but come on, it's only one seat.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:12:48 PM
"Today we proved that Canadians want change in politics."  Not really... you didn't.  The NDP did.

Seems like she wrote her speech without consideration of a Conservative majority.
(If the Tories won, surely she would have lost?)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 11:13:21 PM
Surely one can complain about "infantile leftism" dominating this election...

Liberals may have gone the way of Fianna Fail - two of the most powerful parties in history getting record-low results within nine weeks.

As bad as this seems, it's not THAT bad. Fianna Foil in a FPTP system would have seats numbering in the single digits. The Liberals still have their personalities, and they have not gone past a point of no return. Their stabilization or their demise will just be quicker than most.

I was referring more to their share of the vote - below 20% for the first time. Liberals are more likely to recover but both are in trouble.

I'm not sure how you drew 'infantile leftism' from what I said, especially considering that I am not in any way a left-winger. Infantile, maybe . . .


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:14:31 PM
"Today we proved that Canadians want change in politics."  Not really... you didn't.  The NDP did.

Seems like she wrote her speech without consideration of a Conservative majority.
(If the Tories won, surely she would have lost?)

You really think it was written?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 11:16:00 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.

Well, that's still a huge step down for him.

No, it's not. The PQ has always been more important than the BQ, and he would have the opportunity to form a government as PQ leader. Even before this defeat, I think being PQ leader was a bigger position than being BQ leader (but in 2007 Duceppe didn't want a slugfest with Marois that would have exposed the schisms between the social-democratic and conservative wings of the PQ). I think this defeat has tainted him too much, though.

(Curious what the NDP breakthrough will do for the QS's polling, if anything.)


One wonders whether anyone has thought of starting a serious provincial NDP. Surely Mulcair could beat the dismal pair of Charest and Marois...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:18:04 PM
While they won their first seat in an election, they acutally lost 3% of the vote nationwide.  I'm sorry, but I don't see what the big deal is here.  Sure, you won a seat, but come on, it's only one seat.

The seat is symbolically important for the Greens. They've struggled to be recognized as a real party without a seat (the debates controversy in 2008, for example); May winning in Saanich will change that.

I doubt the Greens will gain more seats in 2015, except maybe Vancouver Centre if they're really lucky, and they might end up merged into the NDP before then, but it's still a significant moment for the Greens, just overshadowed by other significant moments.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:18:26 PM
The Conservatives are now 2 MPs away from having a solid win declared by the CBC.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:18:38 PM
Surely one can complain about "infantile leftism" dominating this election...

Liberals may have gone the way of Fianna Fail - two of the most powerful parties in history getting record-low results within nine weeks.

As bad as this seems, it's not THAT bad. Fianna Foil in a FPTP system would have seats numbering in the single digits. The Liberals still have their personalities, and they have not gone past a point of no return. Their stabilization or their demise will just be quicker than most.

I was referring more to their share of the vote - below 20% for the first time. Liberals are more likely to recover but both are in trouble.

I'm not sure how you drew 'infantile leftism' from what I said, especially considering that I am not in any way a left-winger. Infantile, maybe . . .

Crap, sorry; that was not directed at you at all! I was making that reference with respect to May's victory and the NDP winning on a hope and a prayer.

Fianna Fail's percentage '11 is lower than Liberal '11, but Fianna Fail's drop was due to the collapse of an entire political order. I firmly believe the death of the Liberal party will not be decided by the electorate, but by themselves.

 
You think she's good enough an orator to make it up as she went?

May-bashing is the only way to express my anger, I suppose.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 11:19:17 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

He would have a bit more credibility if he were a member of the NDP, wouldn't he?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:19:24 PM
CBC has now announced Ignatieff has lost.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:20:25 PM
The BQ is now up to 2 MPs with Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia and Richmond-Arthabaska being officially declared by the CBC.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 11:22:20 PM
I've often wished that we would announce our results in Canada the same way Britain does it - it would have been especially delicious tonight to see the first Quebec & Toronto results be read out. The color would have drained from Bloc & Liberal supporters' faces in about half a second.

As for the suggestion about re-starting a provincial NDP in Quebec, I think that would be a good idea (and a lot of people may now think so too): Quebeckers seem to embrace leftism more than separatism, but unfortunately they must vote for both at once in the form of the PQ. Providing just the socialism might be just the thing that they would go for. It's at least worth a shot - I live in Nova Scotia and imagining what might happen to the Maritimes if Quebec were to go horrifies me.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:23:08 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.

Well, that's still a huge step down for him.

No, it's not. The PQ has always been more important than the BQ, and he would have the opportunity to form a government as PQ leader. Even before this defeat, I think being PQ leader was a bigger position than being BQ leader (but in 2007 Duceppe didn't want a slugfest with Marois that would have exposed the schisms between the social-democratic and conservative wings of the PQ). I think this defeat has tainted him too much, though.

(Curious what the NDP breakthrough will do for the QS's polling, if anything.)


One wonders whether anyone has thought of starting a serious provincial NDP. Surely Mulcair could beat the dismal pair of Charest and Marois...

There already is a provincial NDP. The QS. (Well, sort of. The QS is actually descended from the old provincial NDP. The Quebec NDP disaffiliated with the federal NDP in the early 1990s because they wanted to be sovereigntist, then later merged with some other small lefty outfits to form the UFP, which then merged with Option Citoyenne in 2007 to create QS.)

Quebec provincial politics is too starkly split along separatist-unionist lines that I can't see the NDP wanting to wade into the mire. Maybe. No way Mulcair would lead it, though; he's now the heir apparent to Jack Layton and hence a contender for Prime Minister.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:23:55 PM
Jack Layton will be speaking soon.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 11:24:31 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.

Well, that's still a huge step down for him.

No, it's not. The PQ has always been more important than the BQ, and he would have the opportunity to form a government as PQ leader. Even before this defeat, I think being PQ leader was a bigger position than being BQ leader (but in 2007 Duceppe didn't want a slugfest with Marois that would have exposed the schisms between the social-democratic and conservative wings of the PQ). I think this defeat has tainted him too much, though.

(Curious what the NDP breakthrough will do for the QS's polling, if anything.)

One wonders whether anyone has thought of starting a serious provincial NDP. Surely Mulcair could beat the dismal pair of Charest and Marois...

There would be the old question of whether that party would be federalist or sovereigntist. Leave Quebec City to the Parti Québécois. The NDP can have Ottawa.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 02, 2011, 11:24:46 PM
Ah, I see that the NDP gained (the successor to) David Lewis's old seat. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 11:26:30 PM


Crap, sorry; that was not directed at you at all! I was making that reference with respect to May's victory and the NDP winning on a hope and a prayer.

[/quote]

Of course you're right - I should have realized what you meant.

I agree, unbiased though I'm not: since the election of Bush, I've found the Canadian left to be off-puttingly strident and self-righteous. At the start of the 2004 campaign (before I was old enough to vote), I supported Martin & his Liberals; by the end of it, I was solidly Tory. The constant nattering about hidden agendas and the evil Americans soured me on them, and their even louder talk about such things since then has made the break complete.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 11:26:40 PM
Tories officially have 155 seats elected now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 11:27:14 PM
Ah, I see that the NDP gained (the successor to) David Lewis's old seat. :)

Finally back in the fold after all these years. Wonderful.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:27:49 PM
CBC now has the Tories at 155 solid victories!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:29:22 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Frodo on May 02, 2011, 11:29:35 PM

And set to win 10 to 15 more.  


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 11:29:47 PM
He also said, "others will follow until Quebec becomes a country. ... Quebec needs to become a free country."

Planning for the PQ leadership still, I see. Should have taken it in 2007 when he could.

Well, that's still a huge step down for him.

No, it's not. The PQ has always been more important than the BQ, and he would have the opportunity to form a government as PQ leader. Even before this defeat, I think being PQ leader was a bigger position than being BQ leader (but in 2007 Duceppe didn't want a slugfest with Marois that would have exposed the schisms between the social-democratic and conservative wings of the PQ). I think this defeat has tainted him too much, though.

(Curious what the NDP breakthrough will do for the QS's polling, if anything.)


One wonders whether anyone has thought of starting a serious provincial NDP. Surely Mulcair could beat the dismal pair of Charest and Marois...

There already is a provincial NDP. The QS. (Well, sort of. The QS is actually descended from the old provincial NDP. The Quebec NDP disaffiliated with the federal NDP in the early 1990s because they wanted to be sovereigntist, then later merged with some other small lefty outfits to form the UFP, which then merged with Option Citoyenne in 2007 to create QS.)

Quebec provincial politics is too starkly split along separatist-unionist lines that I can't see the NDP wanting to wade into the mire. Maybe. No way Mulcair would lead it, though; he's now the heir apparent to Jack Layton and hence a contender for Prime Minister.

It's not obvious that this structure should be seen as more fixed than the Bloc was, given how the ADQ did and the unpopularity of the two leaders. But I realize it's not likely - just speculating here. And I agree that Mulcair will in fact stay federal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:30:34 PM
As Layton makes his speech, Nipissing-Timiskaming switches, LIB -> CON.

Also, Layton says "Tonight Canadians voted for better healthcare", but quickly corrects himself: "Public healthcare!"


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 11:30:59 PM
Canadians pronounce Ottawa weird. Aaw-tow-waah


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:31:19 PM
Layton: "Tonight Canadians voted to improve healthcare--public healthcare. ... and to lift every senior out of poverty."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 11:31:38 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.


They live in Trinity-Spadina. And Ignatieff lives in Toronto Centre, and Rae lives in Parkdale-High Park. You don't even have to pretend to have an address in the riding in Toronto, no-one cares about this.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 11:31:51 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.

Canada doesn't require one to live in a seat to run for it. I'm not sure if they're even required to live in the province.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:32:22 PM
Layton: "You voted to end the same old debates and political games."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:33:05 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.

Canada doesn't require one to live in a seat to run for it. I'm not sure if they're even required to live in the province.

Ahh, I didn't realize that.  I'd still think it'd be hard to get elected if you don't live there.  Surely that must get brought up in the campaigns?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:33:50 PM
Some guy on Twitter made me laugh: "Happy Jack's speech reminds me of the first time I made it to third base. #elxn41 #cdnpoli"


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:35:18 PM
Layton congratulated Harper for his victory, is booed.

He responds: "It's a significant victory."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 02, 2011, 11:35:58 PM
Scarborough-Rouge River everyone. Scarborough-Rouge River.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 11:36:04 PM
NDP audience cheer Ignatieff, Duceppe and May (the loudest) and boo Harper.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 02, 2011, 11:37:17 PM
http://threehundredeight.blogspot.com/

^^^ was off by more than 20 seats for every party


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 02, 2011, 11:38:17 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.

Canada doesn't require one to live in a seat to run for it. I'm not sure if they're even required to live in the province.

Stockwell Day notably represented a British Columbia riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:38:29 PM
I don't think anybody did well with their predictions.  I almost went heavy with the Conservative gains, but figured I'd just get mocked as a hack... should've done it! lol


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 11:38:36 PM
Scarborough-Rouge River everyone. Scarborough-Rouge River.

Not very Rouge.  More like Orange.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:40:01 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.

Canada doesn't require one to live in a seat to run for it. I'm not sure if they're even required to live in the province.

Ahh, I didn't realize that.  I'd still think it'd be hard to get elected if you don't live there.  Surely that must get brought up in the campaigns?

I does in more provincial areas, but not usually in the cities, at least assuming that you live somewhere in the city. (All of the Toronto MPs who play musical chairs still live Toronto; someone could get elected for a seat anywhere in Montreal provided they live somewhere in Montreal, etc.)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:40:36 PM
"You can count on us to assure that Parliament is addressing the needs of new Canadians."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 02, 2011, 11:40:44 PM
So, isn't it a bit odd that Layton and Chow are both MPs?  Clearly they can't have the same "home address" if they're both MPs.

Canada doesn't require one to live in a seat to run for it. I'm not sure if they're even required to live in the province.

Ahh, I didn't realize that.  I'd still think it'd be hard to get elected if you don't live there.  Surely that must get brought up in the campaigns?


No, not a chance. If Layton decided to run in the Yukon it would be a different story, but within Toronto no-one cares about this.

The political culture about this issue is different in Canada - often parties will try to find a safe seat for "star" candidates even if they live elsewhere, and there's a tradition of the leader of a party running in a safe seat when they lose even if it's nowhere near their home. In addition to Day as Xahar mentioned, Tommy Douglas ran in a by-election in Burnaby BC immediately after losing in Regina.

When Jean Chrétien came back to lead the Liberals after some time in the private sector and his seat was taken, the Liberal member for Beauséjour NB resigned to let Chrétien in, and they elected him even though it was revealed that he had advised during the 1980 referendum that: "if Quebec separates, it will become an armpit, like New Brunswick". :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:42:41 PM
I don't think anybody did well with their predictions.  I almost went heavy with the Conservative gains, but figured I'd just get mocked as a hack... should've done it! lol

Us left wingers are so out of touch with reality*!

Every election is a learning experience, though. Rooting for the NDP this time was certainly less misguided than supporting Obama and Clegg.

*I predicted 100 NDP seats, though. Do I get partial points?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:44:35 PM
Layton's got good appeal to the young Canadians.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:44:48 PM
Lawrence Joseph closed very strongly in the late polls in Desnethe, I notice. Not quite enough, but at the next election...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 02, 2011, 11:46:24 PM
Wow. I said it before, and I'll say it again. I now hate Saskatchewan. It seems it was harder for the NDP to gain Tory seats than Liberal and BQ seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:46:57 PM
Mourani now in the lead in Ahuntsic again. Anyone have any theories as to why she was able to hold on to her vote when every other Bloquiste in Montreal saw their supporters abandon them in droves? Mourani always struck me as a weak candidate when she was campaigning against the Liberals in the past.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 11:47:25 PM
Jack Layton makes a gaffe as he incorrectly identifies Canada as the greatest country in the world.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 02, 2011, 11:48:22 PM
What's the margin for re-counts?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 11:48:33 PM
Mourani now in the lead in Ahuntsic again. Anyone have any theories as to why she was able to hold on to her vote when every other Bloquiste in Montreal saw their supporters abandon them in droves? Mourani always struck me as a weak candidate when she was campaigning against the Liberals in the past.

That seat is just weird. Still BQ getting 4 seats instead of 3 is kind of disappointing though doesn't mean much longterm.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on May 02, 2011, 11:48:48 PM
Awww, quoting Tommy Douglas. ;D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 11:49:00 PM
Jack Layton makes a gaffe as he incorrectly identifies Canada as the greatest country in the world.

Despite this tragic night, that statement is still correct.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:49:13 PM
Plot twist! (http://enr.elections.ca/National_e.aspx)

Voter turnout still decreased this election. This time, it would be more immigrants not voting than general inactivity, though I think Albertans cared little either. At least my skepticism over high advanced voter turnout was justified.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:49:33 PM

Where are you thinking there could be a recount?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 02, 2011, 11:49:56 PM
What is the reason for the  cane, anyway?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 02, 2011, 11:51:26 PM

Elections Canada says "less than one one-thousandth of the total votes cast in the electoral district". (http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=vot&dir=faq&document=faqelec&lang=e#a7)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 11:52:59 PM
I should note that carpetbagging in most non-US countries isn't all that controversial at all, also see George Galloway or Enoch Powell after being kicked out of the UK Tories running in Northern Ireland just because the UUP was the only other real conservative party...

Of course if the US had a parliamentary system it might be the same here.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 02, 2011, 11:53:24 PM
Wow. I said it before, and I'll say it again. I now hate Saskatchewan.

I think you'd be better off hating the boundaries :P

Three heartbreakers instead of one. Is that better or worse? But a majority government (as distasteful as that is given its composition) does mean that the boundaries will change before the next election. And given the disparity between votes and seats there this time, the case for a radical redesign in Saskatchewan is pretty overwhelming.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 02, 2011, 11:54:27 PM
Why is Abbotsford so hideously right wing? I can see it being right wing but like that, wow.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 02, 2011, 11:55:57 PM
Wow. I said it before, and I'll say it again. I now hate Saskatchewan. It seems it was harder for the NDP to gain Tory seats than Liberal and BQ seats.

That tends to happen when a party gets more of the vote than in 2008 - versus two parties that ran significantly behind their 2008 tallies.  Conservatives had a better chance picking up Liberal seats than NDP seats, too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 02, 2011, 11:56:15 PM
Why is Abbotsford so hideously right wing? I can see it being right wing but like that, wow.

Mennonites, I think. Maybe there is some Dutch Reform spillover from Lynden, Washington, too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 02, 2011, 11:56:24 PM
Plot twist! (http://enr.elections.ca/National_e.aspx)

Voter turnout still decreased this election. This time, it would be more immigrants not voting than general inactivity, though I think Albertans cared little either. At least my skepticism over high advanced voter turnout was justified.

Not quite - turnout is calculated from counted votes versus the number of eligible voters, even if not all the votes have been counted yet. It's currently at 57% but with a few thousand polling stations still to come I expect it will pass 60%. A rise, but a small one - certainly not the big increase a lot were predicting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 02, 2011, 11:58:15 PM
Why is Abbotsford so hideously right wing? I can see it being right wing but like that, wow.

My grade 10 bio teacher said that the school board in Abbotsford cut out the sections about sex from their textbooks.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 03, 2011, 12:00:24 AM
Langley/Abbotsford is basically the Canadian Colorado Springs - Focus on the Family Canada is based in Langley, and Abbotsford has the highest % answering just "Christian" on the census, basically a proxy for Evangelicals.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 12:03:39 AM
Plot twist! (http://enr.elections.ca/National_e.aspx)

Voter turnout still decreased this election. This time, it would be more immigrants not voting than general inactivity, though I think Albertans cared little either. At least my skepticism over high advanced voter turnout was justified.

Not quite - turnout is calculated from counted votes versus the number of eligible voters, even if not all the votes have been counted yet. It's currently at 57% but with a few thousand polling stations still to come I expect it will pass 60%. A rise, but a small one - certainly not the big increase a lot were predicting.

Thanks; CBC is predicting 61% turnout now.


Also realized Conservatives have a seat in every province right now. Couldn't cringe a little when Mansbridge said they were "The true national party".

Since the NDP put a lot of female candidates in Quebec to fulfill a gender quota, their landslide in Quebec means they have greatly changed the balance of the sexes in parliament; ~38% of their caucus, in fact.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 12:03:40 AM
Harper up soon.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:06:03 AM
From Elecitons.ca With 
Polls reporting: 68,516/71,513 Voter turnout: 13,952,058 of 23,971,740 registered electors (58.2%)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:06:31 AM
Stephen Harper about to speak.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ottermax on May 03, 2011, 12:14:20 AM
anybody see Canada turning into France where the left remains split and is dominated by a leftist/socialist party that cannot seem to win nationally, but cannot move toward the center, while the center-right governs for an eternity?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 12:16:39 AM
How'd you like to win by 14 votes?

Nipissing-Timiskaming
Jay Aspin (CON) 36.6%   
15,507
Anthony Rota (LIB) 36.6%   
15,493
Rona Eckert (NDP)  20.8%   
8,807
Scott Edward Daley (GRN) 6%   
2,550



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 03, 2011, 12:17:17 AM
That waitress won by a large margin, too!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Tender Branson on May 03, 2011, 12:17:46 AM
Can someone please give me a short summary of the results so far ?

(I´m not really interested in reading 30+ pages ... :P)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:20:15 AM
Harper: "Candians chose hope, unity of purpose, and a strong unity of Canada."


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:21:36 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Strange_Death_of_Liberal_England


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:22:17 AM
Can someone please give me a short summary of the results so far ?

(I´m not really interested in reading 30+ pages ... :P)

The Bloc was slaughtered down to 3 or 4 MPs.  The Tories will have a majority, and the NDP will get just over 100 MPs.  The Liberals took a hit, and while Ignatieff hasn't mentioned it, others in the Liberal Party seem to be open to a merger with the NDP.  Ignatieff stressed the importance of remaining a centre party during his speech.  Elizabeth May won her election, making her the first Green MP to be elected.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:24:17 AM
Harper should be praising Layton.  It's because of Layton and the NDP that the Tories won tonight.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:25:24 AM
Harper should be praising Layton.  It's because of Layton and the NDP that the Tories won tonight.

How so?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:27:50 AM
Harper should be praising Layton.  It's because of Layton and the NDP that the Tories won tonight.

How so?

There were a lot of ridings where the NDP and the Liberals split the vote allowing the Conservatives to win.  I guess you could blame Ignatieff, but either way, without both an NDP and a Liberal party, the Conservatives wouldn't have reached a majority.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:28:23 AM
The Parkdale-High Park rematch wasn't even close. Neither was Davenport.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 12:28:41 AM
To conclude the night, remarks against Harper:

-Now that Harper has a four-year mandate, he will be the longest serving PM under the Conservative label since John A. McDonald.
-Always irritated when Conservative spin refers to Harper as "Prime Minister Stephen Harper" or "Rt. Honorable Stephen Harper". If they were as reformist as they claim, they would botch the honorific system altogether.
-"Strong Stable National Conservative Majority Government" should be the Party's slogan in 2015.
-Harper thanked Conservative supporters "for their prayers".
-Surely he must stand up for "all regions", considering he will either lose the stranglehold on Alberta and Ontario if he prefers one too much.
-"Comprehensive measures to make our streets safer"? How comprehensive?
-Harper paid lip service to all politicians except for Ignatieff.
-For all his compliments of Canada, he never mentioned that the nation could be a "leader".


anybody see Canada turning into France where the left remains split and is dominated by a leftist/socialist party that cannot seem to win nationally, but cannot move toward the center, while the center-right governs for an eternity?

Of course. I'm terrified.

EDIT: Well, not "move toward the center" as instead "shoot itself in the foot".


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:30:03 AM
RE: the NDP not moving to the centre... um... that's exactly what they've done under Layton so far. Despite his background. It's worked as well.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:35:19 AM
Bloc Québécois has secured 4 MPs.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 03, 2011, 12:37:34 AM
City of Toronto (counting Pickering-Scarborough East as .5): NDP 8, Con 7.5, Lib 7. Wow.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 03, 2011, 12:38:29 AM
anybody see Canada turning into France where the left remains split and is dominated by a leftist/socialist party that cannot seem to win nationally, but cannot move toward the center, while the center-right governs for an eternity?

More like the UK.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:40:49 AM
City of Toronto (counting Pickering-Scarborough East as .5): NDP 8, Con 7.5, Lib 7. Wow.

^^^

Almost as eye-catching as Quebec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on May 03, 2011, 12:41:49 AM
Are elections for the Toronto City Council partisan and if so what is the current composition?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:44:20 AM
Amusing: Westmount-Ville-Marie may yet hold for the Liberals. This was the NDP's second best seat in Montreal last time, but this isn't maybe so surprising, given that they mostly surged with pure laine voters and Westmount itself is very... you know. Not that.

Are elections for the Toronto City Council partisan and if so what is the current composition?

Nonpartisan, but everyone knows the general leaning of the candidates.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
Newton-North Delta has all 213 polls reporting, but CBC has not called it.

The NDP leads 15,413 to the Libs at 14,510, and the Conservatives at 14,434.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 12:48:28 AM
Well, the CBC has now just called Newton-North Delta for Jinny Sims of the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 12:51:20 AM
The last of the "leading" CBC ridings;

Etobicoke Centre: With 1 poll left, LIB Borys Wrzesnewskyj leads CON Ted Opitz by 9 votes out of 51174 voters. Will head for a recount.
Esquimault-Juan de Fuca: With 4 polls left, NDP Randall Harrison leads CON Troy DeSouza by 573 votes out of 62279 voters.
Yukon: With 1 poll left, CON Ryan Leef leads LIB Larry Bagnell - who was whipped on a no vote to abolish the gun registry - by 168 votes out of 15877 voters.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 12:58:00 AM
The LIB lead in Etobicoke Centre is down to 9 votes with 1 poll left.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:58:31 AM
Quebec seats with over 50% for the NDP as of... whenever I type each one out.

Gatineau - 61.9
Hull-Aylmer - 59.2
Outremont - 56.4
Riviere-du-Nord - 55.1
Trois-Rivieres - 53.6
Montcalm - 52.9
Saint-Hyacinthe-Bagot - 52.2
Chateauguay-Saint-Constant - 52.0
Longueuil-Pierre-Boucher - 51.9
Repentigny - 51.9
Drummond - 51.7
Abitibi-Temiscamingue - 51.3
Shefford - 51.1
Rosemont-La-Petite-Patrie - 50.8

Don't think I've missed any. Near-misses include Manicouagan (remember that one?), some in Quebec City, the North Shore burbs and the East Island.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 03, 2011, 01:00:02 AM
I know this is the sort of thing no-one will believe you about after the fact, but I was actually thinking a few days ago that the Tamils in Scarborough-Rouge River could be a bit of a wild card, since this whole boat people/human smuggling issue was basically about them, putting them at the centre of certain issues and greatly increasing their interest in Canadian politics when before they had been just another marginalized taken-for-granted group in the inner Toronto suburbs.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:01:43 AM
Scarborough Centre has been called for the Conservatives.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 03, 2011, 01:02:45 AM
Etob Centre went back to the Conservatives.

Only Yukon and Esqu-Jean left


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:03:37 AM
Etobicoke Centre has also been called for the Conservative candidate, with 21,661 to the Liberal, Borys Wrzesnewskyj,  with 21,635.  Yikes - that was a close race!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:04:02 AM
CBC has now just called Vancouver Centre for the Liberals.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 01:04:56 AM
Etoibicoke Centre will go under a recount, since the Conservatives' candidate only has a 21-vote lead.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 03, 2011, 01:05:08 AM
Looking at the Yukon results
There is a led of 168 between the Conservatives and the Liberals.

A total of 15,877 votes in 100 polls. An average of 158 votes per poll.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 03, 2011, 01:05:22 AM
Westmount—Ville-Marie will hold, it appears. Hilarious.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 01:05:29 AM
Etob Centre went back to the Conservatives.

By 26 votes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:06:48 AM
Etoibicoke Centre will go under a recount, since the Conservatives' candidate only has a 21-vote lead.

I figured they'd have a recount there. ;)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 03, 2011, 01:07:36 AM
Two final observations:

1) Already the complaining (mostly from NDP supporters, but some others too) about the lack of PR. However, for the first time the NDP is on the benefitting end of our current system, giving them 103 MPs for 30-31% of the vote. Something I like to remind them of as well is the famous 1960 medicare election: the CCF won a 21-seat majority with 41% of the vote, similar to the Tory vote tonight. If we had had PR then, with the ambivalent Liberals and the anti-medicare Socreds holding the majority, would medicare as the NDP want it have come about?

2) The seemingly inexorable movement of affluent urban constituencies away from the Tories, starting during the Diefenbaker years. Britain experienced this in a big way in 1997 (though the cities had been drifting very slowly towards Labour in the years before that). However, there's been a big reversal tonight as the Tories have oh-so-carefully targeted issues that are big on city & suburban families' minds (much as Blair did). They got some nice fat swings last time (York Centre, for instance), but some even better ones today. Call it Labour's 1997 in reverse as decades-long Liberal seats like Eglinton & York Centre go blue.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 01:08:08 AM
Looking at the Yukon results
There is a led of 168 between the Conservatives and the Liberals.

A total of 15,877 votes in 100 polls. An average of 158 votes per poll.


Where that missing poll in Yukon is from really matters.  Small village could equal low turnout but a landslide for one or another candidate.  Whitehorse could mean higher turnout and who knows what politically.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:08:24 AM
Yukon now has all 101 polls reporting:

Leef (CON) 5,422
Bagnell (Lib) 5,290
Streicker (GRN) 3,037
Barr (NDP) 2,308


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 01:08:32 AM
CBC Vancouver is interviewing Libby Davies, NDP MP for Vancouver East.

For some reason she keeps refering to Layton as "our leader". She also blabbers about proportional representation, as if the Tories will ever blink on that!

NDP candidate Randall Garrison will win Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca at this point.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 01:09:07 AM
Westmount—Ville-Marie will hold, it appears. Hilarious.

Anglo-snobs for Iggy!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 01:10:33 AM
Etoibicoke Centre will go under a recount, since the Conservatives' candidate only has a 21-vote lead.

I figured they'd have a recount there. ;)

Nipissing-Timiskaming is even closer and also heading to a recount: CON+14 votes over LIB.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on May 03, 2011, 01:10:38 AM
Bramalea-Gore-Malton

Gosal (CON) 34.4% (-3)
Singh (NDP) 33.5% (+21)
Mahli (LIB) 28.4% (-17)

A 500 vote margin between Singh and Gosal. I was expecting it to be close because of Singh's star candidate prowess but woah.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:10:54 AM
1 poll left to come in from Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca.  The NDP leads by just under 400.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 03, 2011, 01:11:09 AM
Elections Results: Save as a text file. Open using Excel

http://enr.elections.ca/DownloadResults.aspx


re: Yukon:
Largest poll in the 2008 election had 287 voters.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 01:11:23 AM
The Liberals star recruit in Hamilton Mountain (a former MPP for the area) polled a miserable 16.2%.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:13:52 AM
Harper lost 4 cabinet members tonight.  All from Quebec.  The NDP surge there ended up hurting the Conservatives, and that's the one dark spot in an otherwise great night for the Conservatives.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 01:14:22 AM
The Globe and Mail has called every riding:
CONSERVATIVE 167
NDP 102
LIBERAL 34
BLOC QUEBECOIS 4
GREEN 1


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:15:43 AM
So they're assuming Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca will go to the NDP, since they have the lead now, I guess.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 01:16:54 AM
Elections Results: Save as a text file. Open using Excel

http://enr.elections.ca/DownloadResults.aspx


re: Yukon:
Largest poll in the 2008 election had 287 voters.


Thanks!  Too bad I didn't have that link 3 hours ago - I could have made some maps!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:18:46 AM
Elections Results: Save as a text file. Open using Excel

http://enr.elections.ca/DownloadResults.aspx


re: Yukon:
Largest poll in the 2008 election had 287 voters.


Thanks!  Too bad I didn't have that link 3 hours ago - I could have made some maps!

Make some now!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on May 03, 2011, 01:18:56 AM
Other dramatic swings of interest:

Vaughan
Fantino (CON) 56% (+7)
Ferri (LIB) 30% (-17)
Pratt (NDP) 12% (+10)

Thornhill
Kent (CON) 61% (+12)
Mock (LIB) 24% (-15)
Stelchik (NDP) 12% (+5)

Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Trottier (CON) 40% (+5)
Ignatieff (LIB) 35% (-9)
Erickson (NDP) 20% (+8)

Davenport
Cash (NDP) 54% (+23)
Silva (LIB) 28% (-18)
Rodrigues (CON) (+4)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 03, 2011, 01:23:29 AM
Harper lost 4 cabinet members tonight.  All from Quebec.  The NDP surge there ended up hurting the Conservatives, and that's the one dark spot in an otherwise great night for the Conservatives.

Gary Lunn, Minister for Sports also lost in Saanich-Gulf Islands.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:23:29 AM
Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca has been called.

NDP 26,198
CON 25,792


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:24:37 AM
Final results are CON 167, NDP 102, LIB 34, BQ 4, GRN 1.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 01:25:57 AM
Some members of the media did lose, but not in the way I expected. PostMedia and Sun Media won for supporting the Conservatives; the Globe did, to an extent. the Star backed out fast enough. For those who lost, they lost badly:

Projectors. Once again, even the most generous projection underestimated the Conservatives by ~15 seats. The actual NDP seat count of 102 was 7 above the mean 95 seats projected, which is decent. Nobody saw the GTA dissection, however, nor did anyone predict the scope of the BQ's defeat. In light of any accurate result, most of them will either be fired or ignored. Which leads me to...

Strategic voting groups. As the NDP carved into the Liberal vote halfway through, it became impossible to rally all non-Conservative voters under a "progressive" banner. This is exemplified by Project Democracy, that strategic voting site which not only exaggerated Liberal support but could not prevent a Harper majority. Toronto bohemia has finally failed.

Pollsters. Since there was a greater diversity of results, it is difficult to blame pollsters as a whole for being incorrect. And it's not as if they were horrible; they can blame a 2% swing from the Liberals to the Conservatives on an election-day scramble. It is clear regional breakdowns need a lot of work, though, and perhaps there will now be a move from national polling to provincial polling, as different firms have to downsize.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:28:39 AM
Polling is a lot harder in Canada too.  The "All politics is local" phrase is increased in huge magnitude in Canada.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 03, 2011, 01:29:35 AM
Closest Ridings

Nipissing--Timiskaming (Consv - Liberal)   14
Etobicoke Centre (Consv - Liberal)   26
Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup (Conserv - NDP)   110
Winnipeg North (Liberal - NDP) 117
Yukon   (Consv - Liberal) 132
Labrador   (Consv - Liberal) 231


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 01:32:54 AM
Harper lost 4 cabinet members tonight.  All from Quebec.  The NDP surge there ended up hurting the Conservatives, and that's the one dark spot in an otherwise great night for the Conservatives.

Gary Lunn, Minister for Sports also lost in Saanich-Gulf Islands.

Forgot about him, and CBC didn't list him  as a Cabinet Minister.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 01:33:21 AM
I checked, and this was actually the best NDP result in Saskatchewan since 1988. Despite winning no seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 01:36:28 AM
Closest Ridings

Nipissing--Timiskaming (Consv - Liberal)   14
Etobicoke Centre (Consv - Liberal)   26
Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup (Conserv - NDP)   110
Winnipeg North (Liberal - NDP) 117
Yukon   (Consv - Liberal) 132
Labrador   (Consv - Liberal) 231


The first two will go for an automatic recount. The NDP might demand a recount in Winnipeg North, given how sure a victory it was for most observers. Maybe the NDP will challenge all of its lost seats, but the Liberals certainly won't. In Yukon, Bagnell knew that voting for the gun registry would spell his doom. The less one thinks of Labrador, the better.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 03, 2011, 01:38:31 AM
I checked, and this was actually the best NDP result in Saskatchewan since 1988. Despite winning no seats.

I do not understand why the boundary commission would draw those seats like  that.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 01:44:49 AM
I checked, and this was actually the best NDP result in Saskatchewan since 1988. Despite winning no seats.

I do not understand why the boundary commission would draw those seats like  that.

I don't know the original reason, but the boundaries were kept last time round because Dick Proctor didn't like the look of the proposed Moose Jaw seat and promptly shot himself (and his party) in the head. The argument for change wasn't so overwhelming at the time because NDP candidates had managed (over divided non-socialist votes) to win in 1997 and 2000.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 03, 2011, 01:45:38 AM
I checked, and this was actually the best NDP result in Saskatchewan since 1988. Despite winning no seats.

I do not understand why the boundary commission would draw those seats like  that.
They almost did not.
http://www.elections.ca/scripts/fedrep/sask/sask_map_e.htm
|The Liberals were in power in both 2004 and 1994 and thus, the way the map is now is the way they'd win the maximum number of seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 03, 2011, 01:47:22 AM
Blow-Outs: (All Conservative over NDP)

Calgary--Nose Hill   33225
Vegreville--Wainwright   33594
Macleod   34674
Calgary Southwest   36179
Wild Rose   36397
Crowfoot   39309
Calgary Southeast   41713

Ridings with Lowest Popular vote for the Winner

Liberal   25.6%   Haute-Gaspésie--La Mitis--Matane--Matapédia
BLOC   30.3%   Ahuntsic
Liberal   30.9%   Vancouver Centre
NDP   32.5%   Richmond--Arthabaska
NDP   33.4%   Newton--North Delta
NDP   33.8%   Gaspésie--Îles-de-la-Madeleine
Conservative   33.8%   Yukon
Liberal   34.1%   Lac-Saint-Louis
NDP   34.2%   Pierrefonds--Dollard

Biggest % of Popular Vote:

NDP   71.2%   St. John's East
Conservative   71.6%   Medicine Hat
Conservative   72.1%   Fort McMurray--Athabasca
Conservative   74.0%   Souris--Moose Mountain
Conservative   74.6%   Wild Rose
Conservative   75.1%   Calgary Southwest
Conservative   75.7%   Peace River
Conservative   75.9%   Red Deer
Conservative   76.0%   Portage--Lisgar
Conservative   76.3%   Calgary Southeast
Conservative   77.1%   Yellowhead
Conservative   77.5%   Macleod
Conservative   77.8%   Westlock--St. Paul
Conservative   79.7%   Vegreville--Wainwright
Conservative   81.5%   Wetaskiwin
Conservative   83.9%   Crowfoot


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ottermax on May 03, 2011, 01:59:38 AM
So in summary:
Tories: The Tories accomplished something tonight. How on earth did they get to this majority? Was it only because of the NDP surge splitting the vote or was it because of something else? How will they govern? Harper has never seemed to be one of the shining leaders of Canada, but he may now have a dynasty that could continue for a total of 9 years of power. Will he be considered one of the great leaders of Canada, and how will he do that?

Liberals: Fail. The liberals have been limited dramatically to a few seats in the West, a spattering of seats in urban Ontario and Montreal, and Atlantic Canada, (in fact Atlantic Canada is now the largest caucus!). How did this happen? What will the Liberals do now? Merger, disband, continue? Who will lead the liberals now? What message will they cling to? Who will they reach out to?

NDP: Wow, but with so many caveats. To have this party that has traditionally represented left-wing English Canada, to now be largely represented by Francophones is a huge shift. What will this do to this party? Where will the NDP go from here? What will the NDP do as opposition? In the next four years will the NDP continue to lead as opposition and possibly aim for the top post at the next election?

BQ: Another fail. Where does the bloc go from here? Does separatism still matter? Who will lead this party? Will members resign or join another party? What now? How on earth did they collapse so much?

Greens: Wow. She finally won a seat. Is she irrelevant? How can May make the most out of this in the next four years? Will the Greens win more seats in the future? How can the Greens turn this around for their benefit?

Quebec: What happened? Is separatism dead or is it still an issue? How will Quebecers react to this new NDP in control?

What an amazing night! I'm not particularly thrilled by the ultimate result, but it sure has been fascinating.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 03, 2011, 02:02:07 AM
On the greens winning a seat:

Back in 1989 Reform won a single seat. The office manager for that MP was one Stephen Harper.

A seat is what you make of it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 03, 2011, 02:03:03 AM
Separatism is still an issue, but it will be fought on the provincial scene from now, I think.

The BQ experiment failed, finally.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 02:15:54 AM
Winner, with color shading for percentage of vote to Winning candidate:
Nationwide:
()

Toronto/Golden Horseshoe:
()

Ottawa:
()

Montreal:
()

Quebec City:
()

Vancouver/Lower Mainland:
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 03, 2011, 02:19:10 AM
There's some wacky border stuff going on with the Montreal map.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 02:28:00 AM
There's some wacky border stuff going on with the Montreal map.

Yes there is.  The river/ocean shapefile I downloaded doesn't exactly match the Elections Canada shapefile when you zoom in very close.  I could see the same type of wackiness when CTV was putting results up in Montreal and Quebec City.  I haven't tried to clean things up.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 02:34:06 AM
This is a pseudo-swing measure - 2011 Vote Percentage MINUS 2008 Vote Percentage.   Red=hot' Deepest red = +20 points or more from 2008.  Blue=cold; Deepest blue = -20 points or more from 2008.  The scale is in 5-point intervals:

First, the Conservatives:
()

T.O. inset:
()

Next, the NDP:
()

T.O. inset:
()

Finally, the Liberals:
()

T.O. inset:
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 02:47:19 AM
And national maps for the percentage of the vote won by party.  These are in the party's colors, with 10 steps that increase in intensity every 10 points, per the atlas color scales for those parties:

Conservatives:
()

NDP:
()

Liberals (Yikes!):
()

Bloc (Quebec only, naturally - light blue kind of stinks as a color to use for comparisons, but there really wasn't a ton of variation, anyway):
()

I'll do similar regional maps tomorrow by request.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 03, 2011, 02:48:14 AM
You probably noticed I haven't posted in the canadian elections thread since a while... Not that I didn't care, to the contrary : I was afraid of being too disappointed by the results. This sudden NDP surge just seemed to be too beautiful to be true.

In the end, I feel it's a great day for Canada. Of course, we're headed to 4 more years of Harper, with the potentiality to do a lot of harm. But fortunately the majority is narrow enough for this not to be a total catastrophe. The most important thing is that the realignment of Canadian politics seems to be inevitable now. The bloc is already gone, and Quebec should remain a NDP stronghold. Whether they merge with the NDP, fade away or remain a minor parliamentary party, the liberals shouldn't recover the place they had previously (I can be wrong of course, but it seems difficult). Thus Canada will finally have a true left/right system. That was beyond anything I could imagine, especially considering how the election started. That's a great day in the long run.

It seems like Canada experienced the exact reverse of 1993 (maybe this has already been said though) : with the NDP as reform, liberals as PCs and conservatives as liberals. If this lasts, the entire political system will have radically shifted in a bit more than two decades. Now, with such results, will Layton still step down ? I've heard that he would, but that was before the massive surge. It would make little sense to get rid of such a successful leader, especially since he could very well become PM by 2015.

Of course I have a thought for my friend Hashemite, for which today is certainly a very bad day. As much as this wipeout seems somewhat deserved to the liberals (I've not followed the campaign myslef, but everybody in the forum seems to think they've run an awful campaign), it's certainly sad for all their supporters who didn't necessarily identify with the leadership. I can only feel sad to see the party of Pearson and Trudeau reduced to that.

Anyways, it's quite stunning to see how a dull and predictable election suddenly turned into a massive realignment. As I've said, Canada has extremely passionating politics, and has showed once again that nothing should be taken for granted there. Thank you Canada, please keep on thrilling us ! :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 03, 2011, 02:55:02 AM
Starting tomorrow, every New Democrat will have to ask a question: what should the NDP oppose?

Do they begin with opposing the crime legislation brought forward by the Conservatives, and barring that the extra money spent on prisons? Do they protest the cancellation of the vote subsidy, arguing that it hurts the opposition more than the government? Do they oppose the copyright laws or a weakening of government control over telecommunications? Or do they go right after the social issues, taking a strong stance against regression over abortion and gay marriage?

For everything they oppose, they will lose voters. For a party elected on an era of good feeling, having to alienate some to please others might be a difficult choice. But four years is enough for a post-Layton leadership to start thinking ideas, a grand blueprint for federal government; to snatch away Harper's "national government" before it can be entrenched. If four years is too short a time, the NDP would never be able enough for government anyway.

Being in opposition is hard. Harper has hammered his policy goals so much that infrequent voters have been bit by curiosity. From tomorrow, the NDP will have to convince that these fantastical policies have real effects. The next hundred days are very important, but in a completely different way.


I have to thank this forum for their interest and analysis; certainly better than the most of the Canadian media. Please stick around for four more years!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 03, 2011, 02:55:35 AM
It's dawned on me that there won't be a Canadian or British election until 2015 :(

Australia better do something exciting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: frihetsivrare on May 03, 2011, 03:10:19 AM
I can only feel sad to see the party of Pearson and Trudeau reduced to that.

Anyways, it's quite stunning to see how a dull and predictable election suddenly turned into a massive realignment. As I've said, Canada has extremely passionating politics, and has showed once again that nothing should be taken for granted there. Thank you Canada, please keep on thrilling us ! :)

Actually when Lester Pearson was opposition leader the Liberal Party was in nearly as bad a place as now.  In 1958 the Progressive Conservatives under John Diefenbaker won 208/265 seats, which is 78.5%.  But at least Pearson still won his riding and the Liberals retained official opposition status.

To add, I agree with your attitude about Canadian elections.  The coverage is especially great on the CBC; it's nowhere near as scripted and polished as American coverage.  Over the last few elections the numbers have been much more interesting, with more than two parties competing for seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 03, 2011, 03:12:31 AM
While the NDP hasn't really been a western party since the rise of Reform, this election pounded that point home. For fun, here's a table of CCF/NDP seat totals by province:

YearTerr.B.C.Alta.Sask.Man.Ont.Que.EastTotal
19353227
194015118
19454185128
19493531113
195371131123
19577105325
19584138
19621026119
196392617
196593921
1968763622
1972111531131
197412228116
197918456226
198011277532
19848541330
198811911021043
199312519
19971354821
20002241413
2004547319
2006110312329
20081914171437
20111121222586102


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 03, 2011, 03:33:07 AM
The Conservatives actually outpolled the Liberals on PEI 41.2% to 41.0%. Seats still went 3-1 Liberal though. Yay FPTP!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 03, 2011, 03:44:51 AM
Interesting to see the new factions emerging in the NDP and Conservative Party. Both Layton and Harper will have though jobs inside and outside their caucuses and one misstep for either will see their parties embroiled into a Liberal-style civil war.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 03, 2011, 03:52:08 AM
Primary vote of winning party:

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on May 03, 2011, 04:50:25 AM
It's dawned on me that there won't be a Canadian or British election until 2015 :(

Australia better do something exciting.

I'm sure we'll have our fill of election coverage for 2012, at least.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Franzl on May 03, 2011, 04:54:46 AM
It's dawned on me that there won't be a Canadian or British election until 2015 :(

Australia better do something exciting.

I'm sure we'll have our fill of election coverage for 2012, at least.

Yeah but the way we do "election coverage" in America....as in two-year long campaigns makes me want to vomit long before the actual election...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on May 03, 2011, 05:11:13 AM
While the NDP hasn't really been a western party since the rise of Reform, this election pounded that point home. For fun, here's a table of CCF/NDP seat totals by province:

YearTerr.B.C.Alta.Sask.Man.Ont.Que.EastTotal
19353227
194015118
19454185128
19493531113
195371131123
19577105325
19584138
19621026119
196392617
196593921
1968763622
1972111531131
197412228116
197918456226
198011277532
19848541330
198811911021043
199312519
19971354821
20002241413
2004547319
2006110312329
20081914171437
20111121222586102

     I find it intriguing how the NDP now holds 58 seats in Quebec after not holding any prior to 2008. The dramatic swing in Quebec has to be the most momentous aspect of this election on a geographical level.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 03, 2011, 05:19:32 AM
Actually when Lester Pearson was opposition leader the Liberal Party was in nearly as bad a place as now.  In 1958 the Progressive Conservatives under John Diefenbaker won 208/265 seats, which is 78.5%.  But at least Pearson still won his riding and the Liberals retained official opposition status.

The number of seats doesn't really matter as much as the rank. It's very easy to come from second to first, but far more difficult to come from third to second (in FPP countries at least).

The tab is quite stunning indeed. Of course seeing Quebec switching from BQ to NDP is a very good thing because that means Québec will finally play a true role on federal politics. But now the risk is to see the NDP becoming the party of the Québec and only of the Québec. It is very important for it to consolidate its inroads in Ontario or BQ, because they can't win more in Québec and they can't hope to win nationally with only Québec.

If we look at the results of previous elections outside Québec, we can see it even more clearly.

2004200620082011
Con99114133161
NDP19293644
Lib114906327
Others111

That's quite surprising, actually. NDP gained a mere 8 seats, only one more than in 2008 and less than in 2006, when it gained 10. Almost all seats lost by the liberals have come to the conservatives. In some way, it's understandable : with NDP and liberals close in term of votes, there has probably been a huge voting split favoring the conservative. If the NDP confirms its second party status and the liberals further shrink, which seems likely, we will probably see strong NDP gains outside Québec. Otherwise, there's a risk to see the NDP become trapped in Québec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on May 03, 2011, 05:26:55 AM
It's interesting how, if you look at everything outside of Quebec, the number of seats is just a continuation on the same level of the previous trends. When you throw Quebec into the mix, then everything turns completely sideways.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 03, 2011, 07:19:41 AM
Bramalea-Gore-Malton was surprisingly close. And look who was second :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on May 03, 2011, 10:18:51 AM
Why are Labrador and the PEI ridings underpopulated compared to the rest of the country?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on May 03, 2011, 10:23:53 AM
Why are Labrador and the PEI ridings underpopulated compared to the rest of the country?

If I'm not mistaken it has to do with an old rule that no province can have a fewer number of seats than it had during the first parliament. Or something like that. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on May 03, 2011, 10:41:40 AM
Somewhat shocked by the results in Ottawa-Orleans:

Galipeau (Purgs) 44.5% (-0.4)
Bertschi (Lib) 38.5% (-0.3)
Cenatus (NDP) 14.1% (+4.2)
Maillet (Grn) 2.9% (-3.4%)

A testament of our strong campaign and our excellent candidate, a terrible useless MP (who I saw yesterday. He looks like an angry old man who can't even be bothered to be polite to poll workers). But taken out by the NDP surge for a useless 20some Haitian student.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 03, 2011, 11:43:53 AM
Why are Labrador and the PEI ridings underpopulated compared to the rest of the country?

If I'm not mistaken it has to do with an old rule that no province can have a fewer number of seats than it had during the first parliament. Or something like that. 

It has something to do with the number of Senators, too. Only Ontario, BC and Alberta ridings are not undersized.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 03, 2011, 11:44:48 AM
Why are Labrador and the PEI ridings underpopulated compared to the rest of the country?

If I'm not mistaken it has to do with an old rule that no province can have a fewer number of seats than it had during the first parliament. Or something like that. 

1972 Parliament.

Also, there is a clause that prohibits any province from having more Senators than MPs, and in 1972, NL and NS each only had 1 more MP, so even if that 1972 rule were to go, the Atlantic would still have at least 30 MPs.

As for Labrador, it was decided to make it it's own seat rather than combine it with something on the Island of Newfoundland. This is partly because it is "northern". Most "northern" ridings are empty. Check Kenora for example.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: You kip if you want to... on May 03, 2011, 11:45:36 AM
What an awful result, atleast NDP's in opposition. I hope Britain and Canada has the chance to throw out Tory governments in 2015.

It's scary how much Canada needs PR.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 11:58:59 AM
Lolquébec. I think I'll have to go with orange Québec avatar from now on.

And shame on the incompetent Hessian radio. No news item whatsoever about the election that I caught. >:( I literally came to the computer right now not knowing the results - had the NDP breakthrough really happened? Or had the Tories won their majority?
Well, both it turns out. Guess that was the second to last federal election that the Liberal Party of Canada will ever fight, or at least be deemed a newsworthy contender in. Maybe third to last.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 12:34:47 PM
Ah, I see that you're a fan of the Member for Berthier-Maskinongé.

---

Just looking through the Toronto results (doing the usual percentage winners map - slightly dodgy at this stage as a couple of seats might change hands, but whatever) and... er... York Centre. Knew that Dryden lost (knew that he was going to lose) but the margin? Wow. That was once one of the safest of the safe Liberal seats.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Dancing with Myself on May 03, 2011, 12:53:10 PM
I only watched about 30 min's worth of CBC online coverage but I enjoyed it. I learned quite a bit too. I just wish another US channel besides C-Span 2 would show stuff like this


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:04:19 PM
Breaking News: Liberal Party will change its name to "Bloc Newfoundland".

j/k :)
I love the maths of the new Liberal caucus:

12 from the Atlantic Provinces (I love the term "Maritimes", but apparently Maritimes equals Atlantic Provinces minus Newfie. :( )
11 from Ontario, of which 7 from Toronto
11 from the remainder, of which 7 from Montréal.

And yeah, I thought the Liberals would probably be comparatively stable in Anglo Montréal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 03, 2011, 01:05:42 PM
()

Minor errors certain.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:09:19 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

He would have a bit more credibility if he were a member of the NDP, wouldn't he?
He was a member of the NDP. ???


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:12:55 PM
Canadians pronounce Ottawa weird. Aaw-tow-waah
How else would you pronounce it?

I mean, I pronounced it Ottavah as a kid, as most Germans would, but for the past 17 years I've not dreamt of any other way than the one you describe. It is an anglicization of Outaoua, after all.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:27:25 PM
Elections Results: Save as a text file. Open using Excel

http://enr.elections.ca/DownloadResults.aspx


re: Yukon:
Largest poll in the 2008 election had 287 voters.

Thanks, looking good!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:39:01 PM
Why are Labrador and the PEI ridings underpopulated compared to the rest of the country?
Because Canada's laws on the issue are utterly ridiculous. Actually, everywhere but Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia is overrepresented, just to very varying extent. Everywhere but these three is at its fixed minimum of seats. These three are proportional to a theoretical fixed size of parliament, which is quite a bit smaller than its actual size. Of course, if anywhere else were to grow so much that its fixed minimum were an underrepresentation compared to that theoretical size, then that place would get extra seats, but... it's. effing. silly.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 03, 2011, 01:52:03 PM
Canadians pronounce Ottawa weird. Aaw-tow-waah
How else would you pronounce it?

I mean, I pronounced it Ottavah as a kid, as most Germans would, but for the past 17 years I've not dreamt of any other way than the one you describe. It is an anglicization of Outaoua, after all.

Probably the second vowel, which is for me an unstressed schwa (like the first vowel in "about") unless you really, really force it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:54:43 PM
It takes color from the w, hence why it's not quite a schwa sound. Much as the o does in names like Howard etc.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Stranger in a strange land on May 03, 2011, 01:57:16 PM

The Quebec portion of that map is beautiful :) though the rest of it gives Harper free reign for four years. :( Oh well, at least the Bloc has been wiped out, and the NDP is now the official opposition, meaning that they'll probably form a government someday.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 01:59:18 PM
The Bloc was official opposition once too, you know.

The Progressives also beat the Tories into third place in 1921. But didn't form the official opposition as they offered supply to the Liberal minority government.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: joevsimp on May 03, 2011, 02:06:53 PM
The Quebec portion of that map is beautiful :) though the rest of it gives Harper free reign for four years. :( Oh well, at least the Bloc has been wiped out, and the NDP is now the official opposition, meaning that they'll probably form a government someday.

I dunno, Southern Ontario looks a very dark shade of blue, they'd need practically a clean sweep in Toronto, although Saskatchewan looks vaguely promising


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 02:09:33 PM
The Quebec portion of that map is beautiful :) though the rest of it gives Harper free reign for four years. :( Oh well, at least the Bloc has been wiped out, and the NDP is now the official opposition, meaning that they'll probably form a government someday.

I dunno, Southern Ontario looks a very dark shade of blue, they'd need practically a clean sweep in Toronto, although Saskatchewan looks vaguely promising
That's because it's a vote lead map. Across much of Saskatchewan, the Liberals have no discernible presence. Much of southern Ontario is three party country. (Although the Tory dominance in the rural/outer suburban parts is too strong to be broken by an end to votesplitting alone.)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 02:13:37 PM

It's sort of funny really. Last time the Dippers increased their vote share by ... like ... 50% and added a smattering of seats. Now their vote just went up a notch or two and they gained ten seats.


Glory NOW, Dippers all! (Why did I forget that trademark post in 2008? Strange... or maybe the forum software just didn't find it? Anyways, the third one is from the Outremont by-election.)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 03, 2011, 02:15:53 PM
Some margin maps.  Colors are for the winning party, 10 shades in 5-point increments from 0.01 points to 45 points.  The darkest shade is a 45 to 100 point margin.  Unfortunately, the darkest orange shade blends with red and teal looks like blue.  Those seats were almost always won by the NDP by 40+ points over their closest rival.  The maps don't show which party came in second.

Nationwide:
()

Maritime Provinces (reddish orange is strong NDP):
()

Quebec City:
()

Montreal (yes, overlaid the river shapefile makes the borders screwy):
()

Ottawa (deep reddish orange is strong NDP):
()

Southern Ontario:
()

Winnipeg:
()

Edmonton:
()

Calgary (uber-blue):
()

Vancouver/Victoria/Lower Mainland (deep reddish orange is strong NDP):
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 03, 2011, 02:20:38 PM
The Quebec portion of that map is beautiful :) though the rest of it gives Harper free reign for four years. :( Oh well, at least the Bloc has been wiped out, and the NDP is now the official opposition, meaning that they'll probably form a government someday.

I dunno, Southern Ontario looks a very dark shade of blue, they'd need practically a clean sweep in Toronto, although Saskatchewan looks vaguely promising

If they were astute the NDP will be banking on a dozen losses in Quebec and will have to win dozens elsewhere. The inner suburbs of larger cities and should be where they concentrate their machine building to prevent the Liberals from taking them and to cement themselves as the national leftist party.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 03, 2011, 02:23:03 PM
It takes color from the w, hence why it's not quite a schwa sound. Much as the o does in names like Howard etc.

Nah, the vowel in the first syllable of "Howard" isn't a schwa; it's the same as the one in "house" or "doubt", the diphthong [aw].


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 02:26:10 PM
It takes color from the w, hence why it's not quite a schwa sound. Much as the o does in names like Howard etc.

Nah, the vowel in the first syllable of "Howard" isn't a schwa
Yeah; I wasn't saying that. I was trying my hands at analogy: The middle syllable in Ottawa is to a schwa as the o in Howard - maybe I should have said Howell / Powell -  is to a decent o. Of course, that's also non-English in source (Cymraeg). Unlike Howard, actually.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: joevsimp on May 03, 2011, 02:56:07 PM
The Quebec portion of that map is beautiful :) though the rest of it gives Harper free reign for four years. :( Oh well, at least the Bloc has been wiped out, and the NDP is now the official opposition, meaning that they'll probably form a government someday.

I dunno, Southern Ontario looks a very dark shade of blue, they'd need practically a clean sweep in Toronto, although Saskatchewan looks vaguely promising

If they were astute the NDP will be banking on a dozen losses in Quebec and will have to win dozens elsewhere. The inner suburbs of larger cities and should be where they concentrate their machine building to prevent the Liberals from taking them and to cement themselves as the national leftist party.

that sounds like what I'd do


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 03, 2011, 03:17:19 PM
The Quebec portion of that map is beautiful :) though the rest of it gives Harper free reign for four years. :( Oh well, at least the Bloc has been wiped out, and the NDP is now the official opposition, meaning that they'll probably form a government someday.

I dunno, Southern Ontario looks a very dark shade of blue, they'd need practically a clean sweep in Toronto, although Saskatchewan looks vaguely promising

If they were astute the NDP will be banking on a dozen losses in Quebec and will have to win dozens elsewhere. The inner suburbs of larger cities and should be where they concentrate their machine building to prevent the Liberals from taking them and to cement themselves as the national leftist party.

that sounds like what I'd do

In particular I'm thinking the outer 416 and inner 905. London, Winnipeg, and Edmonton are also places they should look to. They should make a few good noises about the conditions of northern and rural communities (especially since they face no consequences for a long time) which will give them strong second place showings and underscore their claim to be the national leftist party. Critically they will have to cultivate an Obama-style fundraising base starting from the stereotypical "champaign socialists" of which there are quite many.

They'll have to start now, because a few upsets at by-elections will boost their morale and make Harper apprehensive (especially since his party will be complacent and could suffer Liberal-style infighting).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 03, 2011, 03:23:44 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

He would have a bit more credibility if he were a member of the NDP, wouldn't he?
He was a member of the NDP. ???

Exactly my point.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: homelycooking on May 03, 2011, 03:33:13 PM
Interesting results in Saskatchewan. Take Saskatoon - Rosetown - Biggar, where Greens and Grits won 2% each. With the current boundaries, has the NDP hit a ceiling at about 45%? There aren't any more Liberal or Green voters to take votes from, and the rest are presumably suburban and rural Tories not exactly receptive to the NDP. Are there similar "ceilings" in other ridings in the Prairies?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 03:36:27 PM
I only watched about 30 min's worth of CBC online coverage but I enjoyed it. I learned quite a bit too. I just wish another US channel besides C-Span 2 would show stuff like this

Being able to watch CBC on TV was nice.  I was able to get the first half hour live before they launched results on their website.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on May 03, 2011, 03:45:04 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

He would have a bit more credibility if he were a member of the NDP, wouldn't he?
He was a member of the NDP. ???

Exactly my point.

Well, him being a member of the NDP in the past may allow him to bridge that gap if a merger is introduced.  Now that Ignatieff has resigned, if Rae does become the next leader, I could see it happening.  If Justin Trudeau is chosen as the next leader, I don't know that he'd be pushing for a merger.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 03, 2011, 03:50:29 PM
Bob Rae is sounding open to an NDP-Liberal merger.

He would have a bit more credibility if he were a member of the NDP, wouldn't he?
He was a member of the NDP. ???

Exactly my point.

Well, him being a member of the NDP in the past may allow him to bridge that gap if a merger is introduced.  Now that Ignatieff has resigned, if Rae does become the next leader, I could see it happening.  If Justin Trudeau is chosen as the next leader, I don't know that he'd be pushing for a merger.

Bob Rae? Are you kidding? I really don't think the NDP will look well on a "traitor" who decides to return when his new party fails so dismally. And besides, it will be best if Bob Rae is kept as far from the front as possible given the bad memories of his government. And if the Liberals elect Trudeau as next leader (cannot happen because he is still too young) then they're even more bankrupt than I thought possible. Canadians don't like political families.

Finally, if anything the NDP will be lunging for the political expertise of dissatisfied Liberals (contributing further to the Liberal downfall), especially in the outer 416 and inner 905. That is where they need to do well in the next election.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 03, 2011, 04:00:59 PM
Re-thinking about that, it seems pretty clear that NDP somewhat underperformed outside Quebec. Most of projections were giving NDP 90-110 seats, and they ended up with 102 : pretty correct. However, NDP was expected to carry between 45-50 seats in Quebec, and in the end they carried 58. That means the NDP lost around 10 seats it was expected to win outside of Québec.

I don't think this is really a consequence of NDP polling less well (I might be wrong of course), but rather a higher vote splitting and a stronger conservative performance. Still, the NDP needs to win outside of Québec if it wants a future as a national party. BC, the prairies and big cities should be their top targets.

So, this is the seat brekdown without Québec :
2004200620082011
Con99114133161
NDP19293644
Lib114906327
Others111

What does the PV percentage look like ?

20082011
Con43.347.7
NDP20.326.4
Lib27.120.5
Others9.35.4

The figures used are from wikipedia so it might be slightly imprecise, but overall it's clear enough : NDP still fairly above liberals, but by a tighter margin (by 5.9 instead of 11.7). Add to this a commanding tory lead, and it is explainable why NDP didn't surge there. However the NDP results aren't disappointing at all, just 4 points below the national results. I don't know what the polls exactly showed, but that seems more or less in line with what was announced. So there should be some field with NDP gain if they impose therselves as the second strongest party.

Very interesting to compare the swings with or without Quebec though. Quebec doubled the NDP surge from 6.1 to 12.4. At the same time, liberal collapse is almost unchanged (6.6 to 7.4). Finally, Tories' surge is halved from 4.4 to 2.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 03, 2011, 04:05:45 PM
Interesting results in Saskatchewan. Take Saskatoon - Rosetown - Biggar, where Greens and Grits won 2% each. With the current boundaries, has the NDP hit a ceiling at about 45%? There aren't any more Liberal or Green voters to take votes from, and the rest are presumably suburban and rural Tories not exactly receptive to the NDP. Are there similar "ceilings" in other ridings in the Prairies?

See Edmonton East. Ray Martin should run in Edmonton Centre next time.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 03, 2011, 04:08:47 PM
If I might be allowed the first native speaker intervention into this incredibly confused discussion, the issue is the third (i.e. last) syllable, which internationals pronounce as a schwa "a" like in "Maria" but which Anglophone Canadians pronounce as "-aw". As I am from Ontario, "Ottawa" rhymes in my idiolect with "saw", "macaw", etc.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 03, 2011, 04:10:06 PM
More like a "real" a than an aw, I'd have said. But that distinction often gets blurred in Americans too, so...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 03, 2011, 04:11:59 PM
Yes, if you're a posh southern Englander (or a continental English teacher trying to emulate such), it's less like "law" than, well, "far" :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 03, 2011, 04:14:16 PM
Also, ilikeverin, in Canadian English "Howard" does not start with the same vowel as "house" or "doubt" (except the verb "house" with the voiced consonant). Canadian English raising before voiceless consonants is one of the its most distinctive features, hence all the "aboot" jokes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 03, 2011, 04:45:41 PM
Wow, what a crazy night. At lot of upsets! And squeakers. So much close NDP races, especially in the GTA and Saskatchewan. :( The NDP did pretty well in Toronto, and especially the Conservatives too. Or perhaps, the Liberals seriously underperformed. Of course, I hate the results, but a potential realignment election is always fun.

I'm sad Timmins-James Bay swung away from the NDP. :( But honestly, where did the Conservatives' strength (for lack of a better term) come from in the riding? I honestly have seen no Conservative lawn signs anywhere here in Timmins. Many NDP signs, and a few Liberal ones. Strange. Also, lol at York West. Now the most Liberal riding in Toronto? That's where I live during school... I hate the MP there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 03, 2011, 04:49:47 PM
Also, ilikeverin, in Canadian English "Howard" does not start with the same vowel as "house" or "doubt" (except the verb "house" with the voiced consonant). Canadian English raising before voiceless consonants is one of the its most distinctive features, hence all the "aboot" jokes.

Well, o/c.  I myself have Canadian raising before voiceless consonants for /aj/ :) But there's nothing schwa-like in the first syllable of "Howard", unless you're from way in the olden days when apparently /aw/ was always [əw].

More like a "real" a than an aw, I'd have said. But that distinction often gets blurred in Americans too, so...

Ah, yes.  Don't try to tell a Canadian or Californian that "cot" and "caught" can be pronounced differently, or else they'll get quite confused about why anyone would ever say such a thing ;D  (For that matter, don't try to tell me.  Stupid Michiganders and their stupid lack of a merger! >:()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: redcommander on May 03, 2011, 07:29:51 PM
It seems that last night's election confirms that once again Alberta is the best Canadian province. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 03, 2011, 08:27:39 PM
It seems that last night's election confirms that once again Alberta is the best Canadian province. :)

hurrr.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 03, 2011, 08:36:27 PM
Also, ilikeverin, in Canadian English "Howard" does not start with the same vowel as "house" or "doubt" (except the verb "house" with the voiced consonant). Canadian English raising before voiceless consonants is one of the its most distinctive features, hence all the "aboot" jokes.

Well, o/c.  I myself have Canadian raising before voiceless consonants for /aj/ :) But there's nothing schwa-like in the first syllable of "Howard", unless you're from way in the olden days when apparently /aw/ was always [əw].

More like a "real" a than an aw, I'd have said. But that distinction often gets blurred in Americans too, so...

Ah, yes.  Don't try to tell a Canadian or Californian that "cot" and "caught" can be pronounced differently, or else they'll get quite confused about why anyone would ever say such a thing ;D  (For that matter, don't try to tell me.  Stupid Michiganders and their stupid lack of a merger! >:()

I really don't have any idea how they could possibly be pronounced differently.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 03, 2011, 08:48:42 PM
Also, ilikeverin, in Canadian English "Howard" does not start with the same vowel as "house" or "doubt" (except the verb "house" with the voiced consonant). Canadian English raising before voiceless consonants is one of the its most distinctive features, hence all the "aboot" jokes.

Well, o/c.  I myself have Canadian raising before voiceless consonants for /aj/ :) But there's nothing schwa-like in the first syllable of "Howard", unless you're from way in the olden days when apparently /aw/ was always [əw].

More like a "real" a than an aw, I'd have said. But that distinction often gets blurred in Americans too, so...

Ah, yes.  Don't try to tell a Canadian or Californian that "cot" and "caught" can be pronounced differently, or else they'll get quite confused about why anyone would ever say such a thing ;D  (For that matter, don't try to tell me.  Stupid Michiganders and their stupid lack of a merger! >:()

I really don't have any idea how they could possibly be pronounced differently.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on May 03, 2011, 09:43:38 PM
cot /kɒt/
caught /kɔt/

The two are very similar vowels, and in those dialects where there is no longer a distinct difference in vowel length between the two words, I suspect the merger is inevitable.  But the way I pronounce them, they are quite distinct words.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 03, 2011, 10:19:21 PM
How do you pronounce ɒ and ɔ


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 03, 2011, 10:21:02 PM
Is it like the different way british people pronounce "Knotty" and "Naughty"


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ilikeverin on May 03, 2011, 10:56:51 PM
Is it like the different way british people pronounce "Knotty" and "Naughty"

Correct!  If by "British" you also mean "most everyone outside of Canada and anywhere in blue on this map (http://www4.uwm.edu/FLL/linguistics/dialect/staticmaps/q_28.html)".

Also, ilikeverin, in Canadian English "Howard" does not start with the same vowel as "house" or "doubt" (except the verb "house" with the voiced consonant). Canadian English raising before voiceless consonants is one of the its most distinctive features, hence all the "aboot" jokes.

Well, o/c.  I myself have Canadian raising before voiceless consonants for /aj/ :) But there's nothing schwa-like in the first syllable of "Howard", unless you're from way in the olden days when apparently /aw/ was always [əw].

More like a "real" a than an aw, I'd have said. But that distinction often gets blurred in Americans too, so...

Ah, yes.  Don't try to tell a Canadian or Californian that "cot" and "caught" can be pronounced differently, or else they'll get quite confused about why anyone would ever say such a thing ;D  (For that matter, don't try to tell me.  Stupid Michiganders and their stupid lack of a merger! >:()

I really don't have any idea how they could possibly be pronounced differently.

ME NEITHER.  But Michiganders keep insisting they can be!  And sometimes when I try to make fun of them for their vowel shift I [a] when I should [ɒ] and it sounds funny :(


The first one's actually /ɑ/, the unrounded version.  Michiganders usually have [a] for /ɑ/ and [ɒ] for /ɔ/.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 04, 2011, 12:09:06 AM
Back to the results...

Recount scheduled for Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup. NDP leads the Conservatives by five votes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 04, 2011, 12:53:24 AM
Back to the results...

Recount scheduled for Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup. NDP leads the Conservatives by five votes.

CBC and other sources say CON incumbent Bernard Généreux is leading by 110 votes. This does not qualify for an automatic recount, but the NDP has paid for a requested one.

Where did you get "NDP leading by 5 votes" from?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 04, 2011, 12:57:22 AM
Back to the results...

Recount scheduled for Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup. NDP leads the Conservatives by five votes.

CBC and other sources say CON incumbent Bernard Généreux is leading by 110 votes. This does not qualify for an automatic recount, but the NDP has paid for a requested one.

Where did you get "NDP leading by 5 votes" from?

http://enr.elections.ca/JudicialRecount_e.aspx


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 04, 2011, 03:50:07 AM
Back to the results...

Recount scheduled for Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup. NDP leads the Conservatives by five votes.

CBC and other sources say CON incumbent Bernard Généreux is leading by 110 votes. This does not qualify for an automatic recount, but the NDP has paid for a requested one.

Where did you get "NDP leading by 5 votes" from?
You should follow my blog, I reported this hours ago.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 04, 2011, 07:49:49 AM
Why did the Tories do so well in New Brunswick? They won 8/10 seats. The last three elections they won 6, 3 and 2 seats respectively. I heard 2008 was due to Dion's Green Tax Shift, but why did it get even worse for them, especially since the Liberal vote held up quite well in the rest of Atlantic Canada?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: CARLHAYDEN on May 04, 2011, 07:51:36 AM
National Journal has a nice map of the results in the Ridings:

http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/03/infographic-how-canada-voted/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 04, 2011, 07:55:06 AM
Ominous trends for Liberal Irwin Cotler in Mount Royal (Pierre Trudeau's old seat, once considered the most Liberal in Canada):

1999 by-election: 92%
2000: 81%
2004: 76%
2006: 65%
2008: 56%
2011: 41%

Cotler beat the Conservative in 2011 by just under 6 points. If the Liberals continue to degenerate, is Mount Royal a reasonably likely Conservative pick-up in 2015?


Also, anyone else have some interesting riding trivia?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 04, 2011, 09:47:26 AM
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 04, 2011, 09:52:50 AM
Is it like the different way british people pronounce "Knotty" and "Naughty"

I pronounce those differently, too. Weird Canadians.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 11:21:21 AM
Currently working on party vote maps by riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 12:23:59 PM
Good Lord: the Liberals polled just 14.8% in Lester Pearson's old fief.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 04, 2011, 01:52:25 PM
Liberals did godawful across Northern Ontario. Not only did some Liberals swing to the NDP to stop the Conservatives, many did the same to the Conservatives to stop the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 04, 2011, 01:56:51 PM
Liberals did godawful across Northern Ontario. Not only did some Liberals swing to the NDP to stop the Conservatives, many did the same to the Conservatives to stop the NDP.

Perhaps more to the Tories than the NDP (most left-wing Liberals had probably bolted in the region already) - their Kenora majority is up & they even grabbed Sault Ste. Marie.

The same thing appeared to be the case in NS - Regan held on in Halifax West as his lost votes mostly went to the third-place Tory candidate; as well, the four rural Tory MPs all increased their majorities while the NDP's Peter Stoffer saw a swing against him in Sackville.

Perhaps in Winnipeg too - I had not expected to see someone lik Jim Maloway out of a job, especially in a seat like Elmwood.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 02:15:40 PM
Perhaps in Winnipeg too - I had not expected to see someone lik Jim Maloway out of a job, especially in a seat like Elmwood.

He didn't win by much in 2008 and the provincial government has become unpopular since then - remember that in 1988 the NDP lost a lot of ground (and seats) in Manitoba, despite their national surge and for related reasons. Obviously a top NDP target next time round, no matter what happens when the boundaries are redrawn.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 04, 2011, 04:20:36 PM
I've taken a look at the Liberal Caucus, and I find very few of them that are at danger of defection. The only three that seem logical are Bob Rae to the NDP, and Joyce Murray and Stephane Dion to the Greens.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 04, 2011, 04:22:43 PM
The NDP would never take Bob Rae back.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 04:29:43 PM
Map time! As always use the magic of 'right click' to get a bigger version... comments will appear later, but perhaps you could add your own (like milk in tea).

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 04:30:12 PM
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 04, 2011, 04:30:41 PM

That's the GTA, not Toronto. Toronto is actually only just the NDP and Liberal ridings near Lake Ontario. Etobicoke, North York and Scarborough are in Toronto, technically, but are pretty different. The rest outside (Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering, Vaughan, there's a sh**tload) is the GTA.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 04:31:07 PM
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 04:32:04 PM
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 04:32:48 PM
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 04, 2011, 04:35:33 PM

Hmm. Maybe it's time for northern Ontario secession discussions again. :P We can be called "Better Ontario", or "The Non-Sheep Ontario".

Thanks for the maps! :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 04, 2011, 05:01:00 PM

That's the GTA, not Toronto. Toronto is actually only just the NDP and Liberal ridings near Lake Ontario. Etobicoke, North York and Scarborough are in Toronto, technically, but are pretty different. The rest outside (Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering, Vaughan, there's a sh**tload) is the GTA.

That's kind of like saying Brooklyn and the Bronx aren't New York City.  As a legal and practical matter, Toronto is much more than just the NDP and Liberal ridings near Lake Ontario.  The Etobicoke, Scarborough and the Don Valley ridings that were won the by Tories are in Toronto - since amalgamation in 1998 or, arguably, 1954 when the metropolitan government of Toronto was first created.  The Tory areas in Mississauga or Vaughn are not.

If I'm reading the map correctly, Toronto basically includes the area east of and including the ridings along the 427 to the blue riding where the 401 almost meets the lake, and south of the line just south of where the 427 ends.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 04, 2011, 05:05:36 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Greater_toronto_area_map.svg

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 04, 2011, 05:24:06 PM

That's the GTA, not Toronto. Toronto is actually only just the NDP and Liberal ridings near Lake Ontario. Etobicoke, North York and Scarborough are in Toronto, technically, but are pretty different. The rest outside (Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering, Vaughan, there's a sh**tload) is the GTA.

That's kind of like saying Brooklyn and the Bronx aren't New York City.  As a legal and practical matter, Toronto is much more than just the NDP and Liberal ridings near Lake Ontario.  The Etobicoke, Scarborough and the Don Valley ridings that were won the by Tories are in Toronto - since amalgamation in 1998 or, arguably, 1954 when the metropolitan government of Toronto was first created.  The Tory areas in Mississauga or Vaughn are not.

I was referring to the amalgamation when I used the term "technically" - the "former" Toronto is what I referenced to when I talked about the ridings near Lake Ontario. Downtown Toronto is very different from Etobicoke, which is different from Scarborough, which is different from North York, etc. They're all different culturally and politically, and the latter are more like suburbs, as you can see from the results. And even the 2010 mayoral race, Ford won everything outside of downtown, so I can't say I'm really surprised by the Conservatives' showing. But yeah, a lot of people, when referring to Toronto, still just mean downtown.

But yeah, I hate when people are referring to the GTA, and call it Toronto. Big difference.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 04, 2011, 05:31:03 PM

That's the GTA, not Toronto. Toronto is actually only just the NDP and Liberal ridings near Lake Ontario. Etobicoke, North York and Scarborough are in Toronto, technically, but are pretty different. The rest outside (Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering, Vaughan, there's a sh**tload) is the GTA.

I just stole it from Wikipedia; didn't make it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 04, 2011, 05:36:23 PM
And a close-up of the city of Toronto (click for a closeup)

() (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Toronto_map.png)

I was referring to the amalgamation when I used the term "technically" - the "former" Toronto is what I referenced to when I talked about the ridings near Lake Ontario. Downtown Toronto is very different from Etobicoke, which is different from Scarborough, which is different from North York, etc. They're all different culturally and politically, and the latter are more like suburbs, as you can see from the results. And even the 2010 mayoral race, Ford won everything outside of downtown, so I can't say I'm really surprised by the Conservatives' showing. But yeah, a lot of people, when referring to Toronto, still just mean downtown.

But yeah, I hate when people are referring to the GTA, and call it Toronto. Big difference.

I understand what you're saying - in the New York City area, when people say they are going into "the city", they usually mean Manhattan, not Staten Island or Queens.  And Staten Island and The Bronx are very different from Manhattan and each other, culturally and politically.  But that doesn't mean that they are not part of New York City and if a Republican wins NY-13, there's no Republican representing New York City.

The map Meeker posted is centered on the city of Toronto, but cropped so that it includes other parts of the GTA.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 04, 2011, 05:47:27 PM

The steep Tory rise in Nova Scotia surprised (and rather pleased) me - they'd not seen much of an increase in the last few elections as many red Tories (the norm around here) had not followed the merged parties, and provincially they've been devastated by Rodney MacDonald's bumbling. The CBC had been saying that Peter MacKay might be at risk, but I rarely trust CBC predictions of this kind (I don't remember them giving a great deal of chance to the NB Tories last fall either). The Atlantic Tories may be truly back in business at last.

Incidentally, thank you no end for these maps - given the size of this country it's rather difficult to make a good electoral map, and most that I've come across online have not been very good or editable. These are fabulous.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 04, 2011, 05:48:22 PM
WRT the when is Toronto not Toronto debate... the New York comparison doesn't quite work as the boundary of that city has been settled for a long time; the amalgamation was very recent and fairly controversial. So Scarborough (for example) is both part of Toronto (both legally and for most practical purposes) but isn't in certain other respects. In Britain people tend to identify where they live based on the pre-1974 local government areas (without being aware that that's what they do), and the situation the parts of Canada where there was a mania for forced amalgamations in the 1990s is probably similar.

Though I think there's some Tory representation within the old city anyway; it's not as though those boundaries respected - even the boundary of the current city is breached at one point.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 04, 2011, 06:07:13 PM
WRT the when is Toronto not Toronto debate... the New York comparison doesn't quite work as the boundary of that city has been settled for a long time; the amalgamation was very recent and fairly controversial. So Scarborough (for example) is both part of Toronto (both legally and for most practical purposes) but isn't in certain other respects. In Britain people tend to identify where they live based on the pre-1974 local government areas (without being aware that that's what they do), and the situation the parts of Canada where there was a mania for forced amalgamations in the 1990s is probably similar.

Though I think there's some Tory representation within the old city anyway; it's not as though those boundaries respected - even the boundary of the current city is breached at one point.

Granted, 1898 (when NYC was amalgamated) isn't 1998 due to the passage of time, but the city borders are what the city borders are, regardless of when amalgamated.  NYC borough identity and pride still does exist, especially in Brooklyn and Staten Island.  And the boroughs are different from each other.

I suspect the boundary of the current city was breached for population balance reasons, necessitating a Pickering-Scarborough East riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on May 04, 2011, 06:11:34 PM
But yeah, I hate when people are referring to the GTA, and call it Toronto. Big difference.

Quite guilty of that. My reasoning has always been that the "GTA" encompassed what is now amalgamated Toronto, quite like how the "Lower Mainland" refers to Vancouver and all the suburbs under control of the GVRD (http://www.metrovancouver.org/) which would be called Vancouver after amalgamation.

But, going back to the Liberal collapse - more people should be talking about Mississauga-Brampton! Peel region has gone entirely Tory, and by a far wider swing than Toronto. The Tory takeover of Brampton, at the very least, could be evidence that their targeting minorities strategy has worked, if only among the Indians. Or that they were right about immigrants only voting Liberal out of nostalgia.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on May 04, 2011, 06:18:43 PM
Hmm. Maybe it's time for northern Ontario secession discussions again. :P We can be called "Better Ontario", or "The Non-Sheep Ontario".

Just go with the name of another Great Lake, Superior (or its Ojibwe name, Gichigami).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 04, 2011, 09:20:09 PM
http://yfrog.com/hs34gyp
()
Not shopped. http://enr.elections.ca/ElectoralDistricts_e.aspx


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 05, 2011, 02:18:45 AM
These  results in LaSalle-Emard are considered validated!
So did Marx-Leninist won a seat? (Its the NDP-Marx had there votes traded)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 05, 2011, 02:20:26 AM
These  results in LaSalle-Emard are considered validated!
So did Marx-Leninist won a seat? (Its the NDP-Marx had there votes traded)


I suppose than, if there is a legal problem, they will ask to the NDP candidate to ask a recount.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 05, 2011, 02:20:50 AM
These  results in LaSalle-Emard are considered validated!
So did Marx-Leninist won a seat? (Its the NDP-Marx had there votes traded)

I dunno. I've been begging for answers but no one will say a word.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 05, 2011, 02:55:43 AM
I think the result needs to be formally declared and the website isn't the formal declaration and therefore doesn't actually have any legal status. The successful candidate doesn't become the member until the declaration by Elections Canada and the figures on the website are for information purposes only.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 05, 2011, 03:32:51 AM
Two things could have happened.
1 - The person at the website putting in the data made a mistake.
If this is true, then no biggie, all will be fixed by morning.
2 - The returning officer, on his validated return, made a mistake.
If this is true, then since these results are valid, someone will need to challenge it, or, this person becomes elected.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 05, 2011, 03:45:09 AM
Two things could have happened.
1 - The person at the website putting in the data made a mistake.
If this is true, then no biggie, all will be fixed by morning.
2 - The returning officer, on his validated return, made a mistake.
If this is true, then since these results are valid, someone will need to challenge it, or, this person becomes elected.

Yes, quite right. I'd presupposed option 1 and suspected that's the case. If option 2 is the case, it may well need to be challenged, because that would probably be a legal document.

I think option 1 is more likely, though, because if the error had been made prior to the figures being entered into the computer, they would have probably been flagged by the person entering them, and the media probably would have picked up on it by now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 05, 2011, 06:01:38 AM
Quebec votes and seats:

NDP - 42.9% - 58 seats
BQ - 23.4% - 4 seats
Con - 16.5% - 6 seats
Liberal - 14.2% - 7 seats

lol FPTP, 2nd-4th vote/seat rankings are inverted.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 05, 2011, 06:16:31 AM
Two things could have happened.
1 - The person at the website putting in the data made a mistake.
If this is true, then no biggie, all will be fixed by morning.
2 - The returning officer, on his validated return, made a mistake.
If this is true, then since these results are valid, someone will need to challenge it, or, this person becomes elected.

Yes, quite right. I'd presupposed option 1 and suspected that's the case. If option 2 is the case, it may well need to be challenged, because that would probably be a legal document.

I think option 1 is more likely, though, because if the error had been made prior to the figures being entered into the computer, they would have probably been flagged by the person entering them, and the media probably would have picked up on it by now.

Elections Canada can not "flag" anything, nor report anything of the sort to the media unless asked. The media has not asked, probably because they think it's a website error.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 05, 2011, 09:49:02 AM
They just flipped the MLPC and NDP numbers; not a big deal. The data has already been corrected on their website.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: rob in cal on May 05, 2011, 10:01:11 AM
Has anyone seen a handy list of all the ridings that switched parties, with results from 2008 vs 2011?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 05, 2011, 10:12:43 AM
Some random facts... apologies for any errors...

1. Michael Ignatieff is the first Leader of the Opposition to lose his seat since Robert Manion in 1940. He is also the first Leader of the Liberal Party to lose his seat since Mackenzie King in 1945. Let that sink in for a moment.

2. Gilles Duceppe is the first Quebec-based party leader to lose his seat since Fabian Roy (Social Credit) in 1980.

3. Looking at the ridings held by Prime Ministers since 1945, the Tories hold the successor seats to both of Mackenzie King (Prince Albert and Glengarry; the latter being in Glengarry-Prescott-Russell now), of John Diefenbaker (Prince Albert) and Joe Clark (Yellowhead). The NDP now hold the successor seats to those held by Paul Martin (LaSalle—Émard), Jean Chrétien (Saint Maurice, now split between Saint Maurice-Champlain and Berthier-Maskinongé), Brian Mulroney (first Manicouagan then Charlevoix; so the current Manicouagan and Montmorency-Charlevoix-Haute-Côte-Nord ridings) and Lester Pearson (Algoma East; now Algoma-Manitoulin-Kapuskasing) and Louis St. Laurent (Québec-Est; split between multiple Quebec City ridings, all of which are now NDP held). The Liberals continue to hold the seats of Pierre Trudeau (Mount Royal) and John Turner (Vancouver Quadra) and the seat that they took from Kim Campbell in 1993 (Vancouver Centre).

4. The NDP now hold the successor seats to four of the six ridings held by previous NDP leaders, up from three before the election. These are both of Tommy Douglas's ridings (Burnaby-Coquitlam - population growth means that multiple ridings cover that area now, but all are NDP - and Nanaimo-Cowichan-The Islands which is now just Nanaimo-Cowichan. Parts might be in other seats of course), David Lewis (York South, now mostly in York South-Weston - parts are also in Davenport - NDP - and Eglinton-Lawrence - Con. Yeah Toronto redrawing was pretty radical in the late 1970s) and Alexa McDonough (Halifax). Oshawa and Yukon are both held by the Conservatives; the former would be vulnerable to an NDP gain if the Harper government becomes unpopular and the NDP retains its current viability, but the NDP came fourth in the Yukon.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 05, 2011, 10:19:55 AM
Some random facts... apologies for any errors...

1. Michael Ignatieff is the first Leader of the Opposition to lose his seat since Robert Manion in 1940. He is also the first Leader of the Liberal Party to lose his seat since Mackenzie King in 1945. Let that sink in for a moment.
Okay, I'm letting the fact that Mackenzie King lost his seat in 1945 sink in. Didn't know that.



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on May 05, 2011, 10:32:32 AM
...but the NDP came fourth in the Yukon.

After possessing this seat from 1987-2000 (by NDP's then-leader for the most part).  Funny how trends shift around almost at random in Canada.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 05, 2011, 10:40:23 AM
So potential dippers preferred the Green, for whatever reason. And these northern ridings are all very personal-vote affected. The Tory will either aquire a personal vote or lose to a more united left campaign the next time around. Which might well be NDP. First scenario is more likely though.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 05, 2011, 12:22:24 PM
The NDP actually came out of no where to almost win heavily Sikh Bramalea-Gore-Malton and they picked up heavily South Asian ridings in suburban Vancouver like Newton-North Delta and Surrey North. Scarborough-Rouge River also went NDP in a shock upset (NDP vote went from 13% to 40%!!) and that seat is 89% (no typo) foreign-born and heavily Tamil (as is the new NDP MP). So for all the talk about Tory inroads in the immigrant communities - there was also an under-reported NDP story happening.


But yeah, I hate when people are referring to the GTA, and call it Toronto. Big difference.


But, going back to the Liberal collapse - more people should be talking about Mississauga-Brampton! Peel region has gone entirely Tory, and by a far wider swing than Toronto. The Tory takeover of Brampton, at the very least, could be evidence that their targeting minorities strategy has worked, if only among the Indians. Or that they were right about immigrants only voting Liberal out of nostalgia.



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 05, 2011, 02:13:28 PM
The NDP actually came out of no where to almost win heavily Sikh Bramalea-Gore-Malton and they picked up heavily South Asian ridings in suburban Vancouver like Newton-North Delta and Surrey North. Scarborough-Rouge River also went NDP in a shock upset (NDP vote went from 13% to 40%!!) and that seat is 89% (no typo) foreign-born and heavily Tamil (as is the new NDP MP). So for all the talk about Tory inroads in the immigrant communities - there was also an under-reported NDP story happening.


But yeah, I hate when people are referring to the GTA, and call it Toronto. Big difference.


But, going back to the Liberal collapse - more people should be talking about Mississauga-Brampton! Peel region has gone entirely Tory, and by a far wider swing than Toronto. The Tory takeover of Brampton, at the very least, could be evidence that their targeting minorities strategy has worked, if only among the Indians. Or that they were right about immigrants only voting Liberal out of nostalgia.


I suppose it was remarked on less because it was less unusual - a conservative party rarely does well among immigrant communities in this country compared to a party of the left.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 05, 2011, 05:18:32 PM
Yeah, but seeing as the Conservatives won their majority, the media only cares about their inroads.

As for Bramalea-Gore-Malton, less than a 1% loss! How sad. Have you seen any debate videos? Singh was the only one not reading any papers, was very articulate and on point, and was the only one (Green candidate not counting) who didn't speak with a heavy accent -- although that's probably not a con in that riding. He seemed like a great candidate, I hope he runs again, but with the election probably in four years, it seems too premature to start discussing future candidates.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DistingFlyer on May 05, 2011, 05:59:17 PM
Has anyone seen a handy list of all the ridings that switched parties, with results from 2008 vs 2011?

Comparing with the last election (not counting by-elections, party switches & the like) these are the seats to change hands:

Atlantic (6)

Ind to Cons (1)
Cumberland – Colchester – Musquodoboit Valley (NS)

Lib to Cons (3)
Labrador (NL)
Madawaska – Restigouche (NB)   
Moncton – Riverview – Dieppe (NB)   

Lib to NDP (2)
Dartmouth – Cole Harbour (NS)   
St. John’s South – Mount Pearl (NL)   


Quebec (58)

BQ to NDP (45)
Abitibi – Baie-James – Nunavik – Eeyou   
Abitibi – Témiscamingue   
Alfred-Pellan   
Argenteuil – Papineau – Mirabel   
Beauharnois – Salaberry   
Berthier – Maskinongé   
Brome – Missisquoi   
Chambly – Borduas   
Châteauguay – Saint-Constant   
Chicoutimi – Le Fjord   
Compton – Stanstead   
Drummond   
Gaspésie – Îles-de-la-Madeleine   
Gatineau   
Hochelaga   
Jeanne-Le Ber   
Joliette   
Longueuil – Pierre-Boucher   
La Point-de-l’Île   
Laurentides – Labelle   
Laurier – Sainte-Marie   
Laval   
Louis-Hébert   
Manicouagan   
Marc-Aurèle-Fortin   
Montcalm   
Montmagny – L’Islet – Kamouraska – Rivière-du-Loup (RECOUNTING)   
Montmorency – Charlevoix – Haute-Côte-Nord   
Québec   
Repentigny   
Rimouski-Neigette – Témiscouata – Les Basques   
Rivière-des-Mille-Îles   
Rivière-du-Nord   
Rosemont – La Petite-Patrie   
Saint-Bruno – Saint-Hubert   
Saint-Hyacinthe – Bagot   
Saint-Jean   
Saint-Lambert   
Saint-Maurice – Champlain   
Shefford   
Sherbrooke   
Terrebonne – Blainville   
Trois-Rivières   
Vaudreuil – Soulanges   
Verchères – Les Patriotes   

Cons to NDP (5)
Beauport – Limoilou   
Charlesbourg – Haute-Saint-Charles   
Jonquière – Alma   
Louis-Saint-Laurent   
Pontiac   

Ind to NDP (1)
Portneuf – Jacques-Cartier

Lib to NDP (7)
Brossard – La Prairie   
Honoré-Mercier   
Hull – Aylmer   
LaSalle – Émard   
Laval – Les-Îles   
Notre-Dame-de-Grâce – Lachine   
Pierrefonds – Dollard   


Ontario (28)

Lib to Cons (21)
Ajax – Pickering   
Bramalea – Gore – Malton   
Brampton West   
Brampton – Springdale   
Don Valley East   
Don Valley West   
Eglinton – Lawrence   
Etobicoke Centre (RECOUNTING)
Etobicoke – Lakeshore   
London North Centre   
Mississauga East – Cooksville   
Mississauga South   
Mississauga – Brampton South   
Mississauga – Streetsville   
Nipissing – Timiskaming (RECOUNTING)
Pickering – Scarborough East   
Richmond Hill   
Scarborough Centre   
Vaughan   
Willowdale   
York Centre   

Lib to NDP (6)
Beaches – East York   
Davenport   
Parkdale – High Park   
Scarborough Southwest   
Scarborough – Rouge River   
York South – Weston   

NDP to Cons (1)
Sault Ste. Marie


West & North (9)

Cons to GP (1)
Saanich – Gulf Islands (BC)

Cons to NDP (1)
Surrey North (BC)   

Lib to Cons (3)
Vancouver South (BC)   
Winnipeg South Centre (MB)   
Yukon (YK)   

Lib to NDP (2)
Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca (BC)   
Newton – North Delta (BC)   

NDP to Cons (1)
Elmwood – Transcona (MB)

NDP to Lib (1)
Winnipeg North (MB)

A total of 101 seats changed hands - quite a few, but not as many as the 120 in 1984 or the 203 in 1993.

Cons   143   +30     –7   166
Lib        77     +1   –44     34
BQ        49      –45       4
NDP        37   +69     –3   103
Ind          2        –2
GP           +1          1
TOTAL   308         308


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 05, 2011, 11:28:26 PM
Never thought I'd see the day where the NDP's worst riding was 9%, and almost every riding had at least 10%.

And, what was the NDP's worst riding? Crowfoot, where they still finished 2nd!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 06, 2011, 01:32:45 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSmMOkIGAks


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 06, 2011, 05:13:37 PM
What worries me is the NDP losses outside of Quebec... with nearly 60% of the caucus now coming from there, and many of the newbies being totally new to politics, I hope they remember that the party stands for labour and farmers' rights. Many of the (serious) candidates outside of the province were serious FFs in that regard, whereas a lot of the winners in Quebec don't seem to be... maybe I'm worrying for nothing.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 07, 2011, 03:47:41 AM
What worries me is the NDP losses outside of Quebec... with nearly 60% of the caucus now coming from there, and many of the newbies being totally new to politics, I hope they remember that the party stands for labour and farmers' rights. Many of the (serious) candidates outside of the province were serious FFs in that regard, whereas a lot of the winners in Quebec don't seem to be... maybe I'm worrying for nothing.

That's my concern as well. But I'd hope the leadership realizes these dangers and will try to do things intelligently.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 07, 2011, 04:06:31 PM
Here are a couple of maps. Of course that's nothing compared with other maps that have been posted, but if you don't mind. ;)


Percentages by province (Atlas scale) :

()

()

()


And here is "trend", ie the difference between change in the province and overall change. The 0% shade is for a trend lower than -5, 20% is between -5 and 0, 40% is between 0 and 5, etc...

()

()

()


NDP is quite horrible, if I must say...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: redcommander on May 07, 2011, 04:14:26 PM
Do you think Layton will put Brosseau in his shadow cabinet?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 07, 2011, 04:14:27 PM
Here's what the election would look like in a 3-way tie (each party has 29.72%) :

()


And the same map excluding Québec (each party has 31.53%) :

()



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Man From G.O.P. on May 07, 2011, 06:00:33 PM
Slightly off topic, when is the next Question Period?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 07, 2011, 06:54:52 PM
Slightly off topic, when is the next Question Period?

I heard Parliament might return on May 30th.
First there needs to an election of Speaker, and then a throne speech. Maybe June 1st will be the first question period. (Question period normally starts at 2:15 pm est Mon-Thur)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 08, 2011, 06:27:38 AM
Results of the election with PR :

FPPNatNBPr
Con167128164128
NDP102997998
Lib34614960
BQ4201618
Gr1004

Nat : National PR, Ste Lagüe method with a 5% threshold.
NB : National PR, Ste Lagüe method with a 5% threshold for 246 seats. 62 seats (20%) given to the winning party.
Pr : PR by province, Ste Lagüe method with a 5% threshold.

Interestingly, no notable distortion between provincial and national PR despite the unfairness of the repartition of seats between provinces. The greens manage to break the threshold in Alberta (1 seat) and BC (3 seats).

I'd like to experiment some math about what it would look like with AV, but I'm too lazy to look at 308 different ridings. I guess the liberals would benefit the most from it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 06:48:15 AM
Results of the election with PR :

FPPNatNBPr
Con167128164128
NDP102997998
Lib34614960
BQ4201618
Gr1004

Nat : National PR, Ste Lagüe method with a 5% threshold.
NB : National PR, Ste Lagüe method with a 5% threshold for 246 seats. 62 seats (20%) given to the winning party.
Pr : PR by province, Ste Lagüe method with a 5% threshold.

Interestingly, no notable distortion between provincial and national PR despite the unfairness of the repartition of seats between provinces. The greens manage to break the threshold in Alberta (1 seat) and BC (3 seats).

I'd like to experiment some math about what it would look like with AV, but I'm too lazy to look at 308 different ridings. I guess the liberals would benefit the most from it.

I know someone who is doing all 308 for AV. I'll contact him for results and let you know.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on May 08, 2011, 06:53:30 AM
How would you estimate the results by AV?  Guesswork?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 08, 2011, 07:04:18 AM
How would you estimate the results by AV?  Guesswork?

I think you have to estimate how the voters of each parties would split their preferences, and do as if those percentage were the same everywhere. For example, for NDP voters we could say 50% liberal, 20% conservative, 30% no preference. Of course some poll of 2011's voters would be very useful in this situation, but I doubt we can find something.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 07:18:30 AM
Ekos does polls asking who people's second preference is.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on May 08, 2011, 07:22:05 AM
Hmm, that still smells a little too much like arbitrary guessing to me.  Besides, I'd imagine that the breakdowns of voter preference could vary by province and locality, sometimes quite dramatically.

But I guess it's all an exercise in harmless speculation anyway. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 08, 2011, 07:43:14 AM
Quite so.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 08, 2011, 07:45:59 AM
Well, that's the best we can come with the data we have. Of course there will be a lot of mistakes, but at least we'd have the general picture.

Also, here's something interesting. Similarity rates between a province and the country overall. Similarity rate is calculated as the sum of the lowest results (between the provincial one and the national one) for each party.

- NB : 92.06%
- NS : 89.94%
- ON : 88.81%
- BC : 88.42%
- MB : 86.13%
- SK : 81.67%
- NFL : 79.07%
- PEI : 76.39%
- AB : 70.49%
- QC : 70.37%

New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are mini-Canadas. Quebec and Alberta virtually tied for most "eccentric" provinces. Other western provinces surprisingly high.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on May 08, 2011, 07:52:31 AM
Try to find EKOS' last poll, which had a breakdown of 2nd prefs in it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 08, 2011, 08:12:58 AM
EKOS' 2nd last poll had 2nd preferences

Cons: NDP 22.9%, Libs 17.7%, Greens 9%, BQ .7%, Others 2.1%. Would not vote: 47.2%
NDP: Libs 37%, Greens 20.5%, Tories 15.3%, BQ 8.9%, Others 1.8%, Would not vote 16.6%
Liberals: NDP 53.9%, Tories 13.2%, Greens 13%, BQ 2.9%, Others .8%, Would not vote 16.3%
BQ: NDP 48.7%, Liberal 11.5%, Greens 9.8%, Tories 6.7%, Others 1.9%, Would not vote 21.4%
Others: Greens 16.4%, Tories 14.5%, BQ 13.6%, NDP 11%, Liberals 8.3%, Would not vote 36.2%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 08, 2011, 08:21:12 AM
The "would not vote" would likely be lower under a system where IRV is the norm, but those numbers still seem like the best thing to use.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 08, 2011, 09:45:42 AM
EKOS' 2nd last poll had 2nd preferences

Cons: NDP 22.9%, Libs 17.7%, Greens 9%, BQ .7%, Others 2.1%. Would not vote: 47.2%
NDP: Libs 37%, Greens 20.5%, Tories 15.3%, BQ 8.9%, Others 1.8%, Would not vote 16.6%
Liberals: NDP 53.9%, Tories 13.2%, Greens 13%, BQ 2.9%, Others .8%, Would not vote 16.3%
BQ: NDP 48.7%, Liberal 11.5%, Greens 9.8%, Tories 6.7%, Others 1.9%, Would not vote 21.4%
Others: Greens 16.4%, Tories 14.5%, BQ 13.6%, NDP 11%, Liberals 8.3%, Would not vote 36.2%

That's interesting. Now if someone is ready to do the math, it'd be really great. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 08, 2011, 09:59:58 AM
The line for Greens is missing. Also, they must have caught a Quebec-heavy others sample. ;D

One set I found for Green seconds was NDP 40.3, Lib 17.4, Con 11.0, Bloc 2.6, other 1.3, none 27.4. However, that set has slightly different figures for everybody else as well. (to be found here (http://ipolitics.ca/2011/04/29/ndp-still-closing-on-conservatives-liberal-declines-continue/#), click on the middle image in the first row of three and then it's a few pages down)

Couple of other points: Do we assume that votes can transfer only once? Or that they will transfer further according to the preferences of the people they transferred to?

I'd be prepared to do this, though. Those minor details don't affect all that many constituencies.

However, someone else already has:

Quote
Conservatives 148 (down 19)
NDP 122 (up 10)
Liberals 48 (up 12)
BQ 1 (down 3)
Greens 1 (no change)

The Conservatives lost five seats to the NDP and 14 to the Liberals (mostly in Ontario where the NDP surge caused a horrible spoiler effect, leading to Liberals being defeated by Conservatives. Michael Ignatieff would still have lost his seat in my scenario, however.). The Liberals lose two seats to the NDP, but gain 14 from the Conservatives, for a net gain of 12. The Bloc loses three seats to the NDP.

More interesting to many, is that the NDP and Liberals together would command a majority of 170 seats.
Though the way he describes it, I think he made a silly mistake. http://thoughtundermined.com/?p=2011


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Vorlon on May 08, 2011, 11:20:03 AM
There are really three stories about this election the media, and most folks, seem to have missed actually.

The first story is how truly dominant the Tories have become in non-Quebec Canada.

Rest of  Canada (Canada - Quebec)

Tories:           5,204,751 votes
Dippers:         2,879,991   votes
Grits:              2,244,758 votes

In Non-Quebec Canada, the Tory vote actually exceeded the combined Grit + Dipper vote. (!)

The second story the media has missed is how fairly evenly the Grit vote in Ontario split between the Tories and the Dippers.

The Dippers increased their Ontario vote by about 485,000 votes, the increase in Tory vote was not that far behind at about an increase of 435,000. - A bit more of the Grit vote went to the Dippers, but is was far less one sided that many would suppose.

Back in the 90's when the "Unite the Right" folks were trying to get the PC and Reform parties to merge they always assumed that the "Unite the Right" vote would equal the PC + Reform vote, they were wrong, just as the Unite the left folks now thing the "Unite the Left" vote will equal the Dippers + Grits.

A final story that has been missed is how the Tories could, at least in theory, pursue a F%$K Quebec strategy if they wanted to.

The Tories won 161 seats outside of Quebec - an outright majority.  When the new census comes in, there will likely be ~~about~~ 30 new seats added, all of them in Tory friendly Ontario, BC, and Alberta.

If the Tories were to "reallocate" the current $ 11 Billion annual subsidy from the rest of Canada to Quebec, combined with an increase in the proportion of non-Quebec seats in Parliament, this could be a viable strategy.

The NDP, with half+ of it's caucus being from Quebec could be marginalized as, effectively, the "new bloq" and the more the NDP complained about Quebec no longer being subsidized, the stronger the Tories would become in English Canada...

Note:

the formula proposed by the Tories in 2010 would have allocated the following additional seats

Ontario + 18
Alberta +5
BC + 7

All other provinces would remain the same

http://www.democraticreform.gc.ca/index.asp?lang=eng&page=news-comm&doc=news-comm/20100401




         


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 08, 2011, 12:17:44 PM
A final story that has been missed is how the Tories could, at least in theory, pursue a F%$K Quebec strategy if they wanted to.

Well, there is a problem in that story.

Bloc collapse doesn't mean the death of the Quebec nationalism.
Moreover, the forces will stop being split on fighting on two levels at the same time.
That could allow them to focus on the provincial scene.

And if Harper decided to screw Quebec, a referendum could pass, I think.
Recent polls give a 42-58 result, but, in case of that strategy, that could move.

Harper is very smart. He doesn't want to be remembered as the Prime Minister which was in power when Quebec left.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 08, 2011, 01:06:29 PM
Its true outside Quebec, the Tories were quite strong.  I should also note in the English speaking parts of New Brunswick they averaged over 50% so sort of following the national party.  Likewise in Ontario minus the 416 area code, they got 47%, while 45% for just Southern Ontario.  Another interesting tidbit is since 2004, the results in New Brunswick have almost always been very close to what they were in Ontario which I never really understood as the two provinces are so different.  New Brunswick is Canada's only bilingual province, it is also very rural with only some smaller cities, while Ontario is very urban, has a large immigrant community which New Brunswick lacks, and has Canada's largest city.

On a final note, I look forward to seeing the poll by poll breakdown.  We should do some maps like we did last time around for both municipalities, counties, and polls.  Southern Ontario, Western Canada, and New Brunswick will probably be pretty depressing for those on the left and also expect Rural Nova Scotia to be a lot bluer than last time around, although I wonder if the unpopularity of the provincial governments hurt the Tories last time around while the NDP this time around.  Quebec off course will have way more orange than last time around while less red and blue and way less tourquoise. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on May 08, 2011, 01:31:25 PM
random factoid: the Tory vote dropped (in most cases marginally or very marginally) in all Ottawa ridings.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Vorlon on May 08, 2011, 01:40:55 PM

Washington: Rejecting Dino Rossi since 2004


A classic signature if ever there was one....


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 08, 2011, 02:41:07 PM
()

This is an edit of Al's maps (which were based on Smid's blank map) using Earl's triangular system of shading which represents the margin of the winner over each party. Parties other than the three major parties are ignored. Note that the NDP is in green; the map doesn't work otherwise.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 08, 2011, 03:06:11 PM
Vorlon, the problem in you theory is that you think to assume the Tories will always remain at this level in Anglo Canada. What you seem to consider a realignment could very well be a temporary surge that could go away as soon at it has come. What if Tories won outside Quebec, but by a more reasonable margin (say 38% instead of 48%) ? They could possibly win a narrow majority in Anglo Canada, but still get trounced in Québec and thus be a minority overall. If the NDP retains its domination on Québec and makes even only small inroads outside, it could very well come to power.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but let's not be too categorical.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 08, 2011, 03:19:40 PM
Very nice, Xahar. :D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 08, 2011, 07:04:24 PM

Exceptional work!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 08, 2011, 10:26:48 PM
Ominous trends for Liberal Irwin Cotler in Mount Royal (Pierre Trudeau's old seat, once considered the most Liberal in Canada):

1999 by-election: 92%
2000: 81%
2004: 76%
2006: 65%
2008: 56%
2011: 41%

Cotler beat the Conservative in 2011 by just under 6 points. If the Liberals continue to degenerate, is Mount Royal a reasonably likely Conservative pick-up in 2015?


Also, anyone else have some interesting riding trivia?

Tough to tell, al lot also depends on whether the Liberals rebound or disappear.  This is a pretty wealthy riding so I suspect in an NDP-Tory battle, the Tories would win, but in a Liberal-Tory battle the Liberals would win.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 08, 2011, 10:29:07 PM
However, someone else already has:

Quote
Conservatives 148 (down 19)
NDP 122 (up 10)
Liberals 48 (up 12)
BQ 1 (down 3)
Greens 1 (no change)

The Conservatives lost five seats to the NDP and 14 to the Liberals (mostly in Ontario where the NDP surge caused a horrible spoiler effect, leading to Liberals being defeated by Conservatives. Michael Ignatieff would still have lost his seat in my scenario, however.). The Liberals lose two seats to the NDP, but gain 14 from the Conservatives, for a net gain of 12. The Bloc loses three seats to the NDP.

More interesting to many, is that the NDP and Liberals together would command a majority of 170 seats.
Though the way he describes it, I think he made a silly mistake. http://thoughtundermined.com/?p=2011

All very interesting... I've been playing with a spreadsheet for different reasons, which is designed to distribute preferences under AV, or OPV as it is called in Queensland and NSW (although it works just as well for compulsory preferential, by setting an expiry rate at 0%). Do any of those polls have preference flows by Province?

From the blog Max linked to:

Quote
In a previous post, I wrote that my initial impression was that even under AV, the Conservatives would still have emerged with a majority. I hadn’t had a chance to examine riding by riding results, but given how AV has worked in Australia, in most instances, the candidate that emerges in first place after the first count, but short of a majority of votes cast, retains the seat even after preferences are factored in.

The rule of thumb I use (after hearing someone else mention it and it sounding reasonably accurate to me) is that the Coalition will win the seat if it receives greater than 45% primary vote and Labor receives less than 40% primary vote. If Labor receives >40% and the Coalition receives >45%, it's close and you need to look at it on a seat-by-seat basis. If Labor receives >40% and Coalition <45%, it's probably going to be Labor-held but look at it on seat-by-seat basis. If Labor outpolls Coalition, the seat will almost certainly be Labor-held.

I might shorten all this down...

1. If Labor outpolls Coalition, Labor-held (except in rare, but obvious circumstances, such as where the Greens could conceivably win the seat, or where there's a very popular independent).

2. If Coalition outpolls Labor, and receives >45% and Labor receives <40%, Coalition held.

3. If Coalition outpolls Labor and receives <45% and Labor receives >40%, very marginal, look at on a seat-by-seat basis, with the closer the Coalition is to 45% and the closer Labor is to 40% more likely to be a very marginal Coalition-held seat, the further the Coalition is from 45% and the closer Labor is to 45%, more likely to be very marginal Labor-held seat. If Labor and Coalition are very close to equal, Labor-held.

To extrapolate for Canadian results, you can probably say...

1. If Conservatives finish first with >45% of the vote, Conservative-held.

2. If Conservatives finish second, party that finishes first wins the seat.

3. If Conservatives finish third, party receiving Conservative preferences wins if that party finishes first or if the other party finishes first with a margin <5%. I figure the Conservatives would probably preference Liberals ahead of NDP on their official HTV card, but for strategic purposes, they may possibly preference the NDP.

I think generally it can be assumed that somewhere near 80% of Conservative, Liberal, NDP, Bloc or Greens voters would follow their party's HTV card (a report by the VEC suggests lower, but that report looks at voters that perfectly follow their party's card, and does not consider how the preferences flow to the final two candidates in the distribution and whether voters have followed their party's endorsement between those two candidates, therefore I think it's better to use the AEC's tables of preference flows in each electorate showing the percentage of votes going from a primary vote to a particular excluded candidate to each of the winning candidates, in such cases, 70-80% of Greens preference the Labor candidate ahead of a Coalition candidate, with more seats at the 80% end rather than the 70% end... Family First is closer to a 60/40 split to the Coalition, but with fewer booth workers handing out for the party, fewer of their voters will receive a HTV card).

In Queensland and NSW, where preferencing is optional and voters can "just vote 1" if they desire, the expiry rate is close to 50%, so the "would not vote" option in those polls does not seem far wrong to me - I'd expect a country more used to multiple parties would be more likely to preference than a country with two dominant parties... the interesting thing, however, is that the Greens expiry rate is still at that 50% rate, even though Greens voters must surely know that their first preference is less likely to be counted to the final count.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 08, 2011, 10:31:15 PM
...but the NDP came fourth in the Yukon.

After possessing this seat from 1987-2000 (by NDP's then-leader for the most part).  Funny how trends shift around almost at random in Canada.
North of the 60th parallel, people tend to vote more for candidates rather than party.  In Southern Canada it is a different story, but in Northern Canada, any party can win if they have a strong candidate.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 08, 2011, 10:37:43 PM
The NDP actually came out of no where to almost win heavily Sikh Bramalea-Gore-Malton and they picked up heavily South Asian ridings in suburban Vancouver like Newton-North Delta and Surrey North. Scarborough-Rouge River also went NDP in a shock upset (NDP vote went from 13% to 40%!!) and that seat is 89% (no typo) foreign-born and heavily Tamil (as is the new NDP MP). So for all the talk about Tory inroads in the immigrant communities - there was also an under-reported NDP story happening.


But yeah, I hate when people are referring to the GTA, and call it Toronto. Big difference.


But, going back to the Liberal collapse - more people should be talking about Mississauga-BramptonPeel region has gone entirely Tory, and by a far wider swing than Toronto. The Tory takeover of Brampton, at the very least, could be evidence that their targeting minorities strategy has worked, if only among the Indians. Or that they were right about immigrants only voting Liberal out of nostalgia.


The Tories tend to do best amongst those from the Far East (Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos and Vietnamese) while the South Asians split more along religious lines with the Hindus leaning to the right and Sikhs and Muslims more to the left.  Those from the Middle East, Africa, Latin American and the Caribbean tend to lean more left so no surprise they would switch to the NDP in the face of the collapse of the Liberals.  Amongst those from Europe, it seems the Tories did well amongst the Italians and Polish, while the Portuguese went more the NDP and the Greeks split fairly evenly.  Those from Northern Europe such as the Dutch and Germans were already going largely Tory while the British were polarized between the NDP and Tories much like in Britain.  Otherwise those who voted Labour in Britain probably went NDP while those who went Conservative ibefore immigrating probably stayed Conservative.  In the case of Bramalea-Gore-Malton it is more Sikh than anything.  In BC, at the provincial level, Surrey goes staunchly NDP in the areas where South Asians are largest so not a real surprise here.  Also an Ipsos poll showed the Tories did well amongst Hindus in the 2006 election, but placed third amongst Sikhs and Muslims


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 10:44:13 PM
Both the NDP and Tories were western based white man protestant parties until very recently.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 08, 2011, 11:48:35 PM
Both the NDP and Tories were western based white man protestant parties until very recently.

Rosemary Brown is neither white nor male.  Howard McCurdy isn't white either.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 11:51:28 PM
Lincoln Alexander was not white either, but the overwhelming majority of his caucus mates were.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Torie on May 09, 2011, 12:41:26 AM
Why did the NDP do so well in Quebec, while the Bloc collapsed, and why did the Liberals just collapse period?  Just asking.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on May 09, 2011, 12:49:10 AM
Why did the NDP do so well in Quebec, while the Bloc collapsed, and why did the Liberals just collapse period?  Just asking.

Please see: Thread, Entirety of.

:)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 09, 2011, 12:58:41 AM
Why did the NDP do so well in Quebec, while the Bloc collapsed, and why did the Liberals just collapse period?  Just asking.

In the case of the Bloc Quebecois, many in Quebec realized they were useless as sovereignty will be achieved through electing a PQ government provincially and a referendum.  This was not the first close call to being obliterated.  In 2003, it appeared the Liberals under Paul Martin would obliterate the Bloc, but they were revived thanks to the sponsorship scandal.  In 2008, it looked like the Tories would do the same, but their comments on the arts cuts as well as the perception they were too right wing for Quebec saved the Bloc.  This time around there wasn't much to attack the NDP with.  Prior to this election the only thing standing in their way was the fact the NDP favoured a highly centralized government, but they abandoned this in the Sherbrooke declaration.

As for the Liberals, once the NDP pulled ahead in Quebec, many on the left who were more concerned with defeating Harper than voting for any particular party switched to the NDP.  Likewise many Blue Liberals, particularly in Ontario were spooked by the thought of an NDP lead coalition so they bolted to the Tories.  The Liberals actually ran a decent campaign, but being in the centre and having a leader who was less popular than either Layton or Harper made them vulnerable.  Likewise Ignatieff didn't perform that well in the debates.  Had he done well in the debates, I suspect the party would have done much better than they did.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 09, 2011, 03:03:36 AM
random factoid: the Tory vote dropped (in most cases marginally or very marginally) in all Ottawa ridings.
Yeah, I noticed that too.

Which of course made Orleans the only reasonable liberal target seat in Canada.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 09, 2011, 03:20:29 AM
I couldn't sleep after 5am and redid the math, using Earl's figures except for the Green transfers.

First, some factoids: Because the NDP comes out on top of all the redistributions (except of the "other" vote), all actually NDP-won seats are safer under AV. So are all seats the Liberals held versus the Conservatives. There are some seats where the NDP beat the Liberals on Tory transfers.
Because the NDP receives a larger share of Liberal transfers than vice versa, the Tories are better placed to keep their under 50% seats vs the Liberals than the NDP. This is somewhat unfortunate as there's more of these.
You should really have at least separate Québec and RoC figures for this exercise. I had to treat the Bloc 2nd prefs as no 2nd pref in RoC, which contributes to the point just above. In Québec, the Bloc comes out looking even more transfer-toxic than it actually would be. Thankfully, because virtually everywhere has the NDP in first or second, it doesn't majorly screw things up except in Haute-Gaspésie. Which comes out as a Liberal pickup due to just 9% of the Dippers going to the BQ. Roflmao. Probably best to just ignore that result.
And Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar is the closest seat in the country, a Tory hold by 27 votes. :(

Anyway, here's the full list (ignoring Haute-Gaspésie)

Tories 145, NDP 117, Liberals 44, BQ 1, Greens 1

Seats changing hands:
Conservative to Liberal: 14
Labrador, Moncton - Riverview - Dieppe, Don Valley E, Don Valley W, Etobicoke C, Kitchener - Waterloo, London NC, Mississauga E - Cooksville, Nipissing - Timiskaning, Pickering - Scarborough E, Scarborough C, Willowdale, Winnipeg SC, Yukon
Conservative to NDP: 7 not counting Montmagny (flipping on recount anyways, but Con in the set of figures I used - that document posted by some Canadian conservative whose name I forget; thanks again!)
South Shore - Saint Margaret's, Lotbinière - Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, Bramalea - Gore - Malton, Sault Sainte Marie, Elmwood - Transcona, Palliser, Vancouver Island N
Liberal to NDP: 4
Papineau, Westmount - Ville-Marie, Winnipeg N, Vancouver C
BQ to NDP: 3
Ahuntsic, Bas-Richelieu, Richmond - Arthabaska


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 09, 2011, 03:49:21 AM
I wonder how much British NO voters had a vague idea of those results... ::)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 09, 2011, 08:36:23 AM
Sorry, Green transfers: NDP 33%, Liberals 17%, Tories 16.2%, BQ 5.9%, Other 2.7%, Would not vote 25%.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 09, 2011, 09:06:43 AM
Much more Conservative and Quebecois subsample, that.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: The Vorlon on May 09, 2011, 05:40:45 PM
Vorlon, the problem in you theory is that you think to assume the Tories will always remain at this level in Anglo Canada. What you seem to consider a realignment could very well be a temporary surge that could go away as soon at it has come. What if Tories won outside Quebec, but by a more reasonable margin (say 38% instead of 48%) ? They could possibly win a narrow majority in Anglo Canada, but still get trounced in Québec and thus be a minority overall. If the NDP retains its domination on Québec and makes even only small inroads outside, it could very well come to power.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but let's not be too categorical.

In politics, all things are fleeting...My theory is 100% absolutely correct, until it is wrong.... :)

That being said, i do think an Ontario/Western Canada political axis has a chance to survive because it is a logical alliance based upon shared interest and positions within Canada.

Western Canada is the economic engine that drives the nation, and is likely to be so for the foreseeable future, Ontario, while perhaps not the leader, at least is not an economic anchor - with enlightened leadership they have a good shot at a return to growth and prosperity.

A set of low tax, pro-growth policies are generally in alignment with the interest of both Ontario and Western Canada, while the opposite economic philosophy of high taxes and a greater role for the state are not.

To the degree that Canada as a nation embarks upon large national projects and programs, these programs will be disproportionately paid for by The West and Ontario, and the additional taxation levied on the West and Ontario will accrue to the benefit of (mostly) Quebec. - This is just an economic reality.

I would argue that the West and Ontario are natural allies or at least not natural enemies in the way the The West and Quebec are.



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 09, 2011, 06:08:33 PM
In politics, all things are fleeting...My theory is 100% absolutely correct, until it is wrong.... :)

That being said, i do think an Ontario/Western Canada political axis has a chance to survive because it is a logical alliance based upon shared interest and positions within Canada.

Western Canada is the economic engine that drives the nation, and is likely to be so for the foreseeable future, Ontario, while perhaps not the leader, at least is not an economic anchor - with enlightened leadership they have a good shot at a return to growth and prosperity.

A set of low tax, pro-growth policies are generally in alignment with the interest of both Ontario and Western Canada, while the opposite economic philosophy of high taxes and a greater role for the state are not.

To the degree that Canada as a nation embarks upon large national projects and programs, these programs will be disproportionately paid for by The West and Ontario, and the additional taxation levied on the West and Ontario will accrue to the benefit of (mostly) Quebec. - This is just an economic reality.

I would argue that the West and Ontario are natural allies or at least not natural enemies in the way the The West and Quebec are.

That may be so at the national level (though there are bound to be disagreements here), but is it true at the party level?

The Conservative Party won its majority simply by making inroads in the 905 and outer 416 areas. Many of those voters are rather lukewarm and voted just based on economic concerns (and on this the Liberals should not have ceded ground so easily). The Reform/Alliance heartland in the west is also enthusiastic about social issues. Sooner or later there will be disagreements within the caucus if Harper decides to abandon hot button social issues to strengthen support in Ontario or if he needs to pander to that same Reform/Alliance base to extract money. If the decision makers are too dominated by easterners then I won't be surprised if the Alberta Wildrose Alliance enters federal politics. Then everything the right has done in the past 20 years disappears.

Harper has iron control over his caucus for now, but there is no clear successor once the time for him to go comes (or if he is forced out once the caucus views him as a liability like Mulroney or Thatcher). In the absence of a clear line of succession his departure could cause the type of nasty infighting which left the Liberals in disarray for so long.

I'm not predicting doom and gloom, but one should remember that pride comes before the fall. Certainly the NDP faces a greater risk of falling apart given how important Quebec is now to this formerly anglophone-only party.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 07:31:51 PM
Quebec's federal revenue and federal spending share is about even. Quebec does not benefit as much as you say. The 6 "smaller" provinces do to massive degrees.

I have links to prove this but have to go to work. If there is a challenge I will produce these links later tonight.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 09, 2011, 07:48:41 PM
Quebec may be new territory for the NDP, but they haven't had too much trouble maintaining francophone support once they've obtained it. After all, northern Ontario is a very francophone region, relative to the rest of the country, and the NDP is the most popular party there. Granted, Quebec francophones are different from northern Ontario francophones, but not as much as, say, western ones.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 09, 2011, 08:43:32 PM
In politics, all things are fleeting...My theory is 100% absolutely correct, until it is wrong.... :)

That being said, i do think an Ontario/Western Canada political axis has a chance to survive because it is a logical alliance based upon shared interest and positions within Canada.

Western Canada is the economic engine that drives the nation, and is likely to be so for the foreseeable future, Ontario, while perhaps not the leader, at least is not an economic anchor - with enlightened leadership they have a good shot at a return to growth and prosperity.

A set of low tax, pro-growth policies are generally in alignment with the interest of both Ontario and Western Canada, while the opposite economic philosophy of high taxes and a greater role for the state are not.

To the degree that Canada as a nation embarks upon large national projects and programs, these programs will be disproportionately paid for by The West and Ontario, and the additional taxation levied on the West and Ontario will accrue to the benefit of (mostly) Quebec. - This is just an economic reality.

I would argue that the West and Ontario are natural allies or at least not natural enemies in the way the The West and Quebec are.

That may be so at the national level (though there are bound to be disagreements here), but is it true at the party level?

The Conservative Party won its majority simply by making inroads in the 905 and outer 416 areas. Many of those voters are rather lukewarm and voted just based on economic concerns (and on this the Liberals should not have ceded ground so easily). The Reform/Alliance heartland in the west is also enthusiastic about social issues. Sooner or later there will be disagreements within the caucus if Harper decides to abandon hot button social issues to strengthen support in Ontario or if he needs to pander to that same Reform/Alliance base to extract money. If the decision makers are too dominated by easterners then I won't be surprised if the Alberta Wildrose Alliance enters federal politics. Then everything the right has done in the past 20 years disappears.

Harper has iron control over his caucus for now, but there is no clear successor once the time for him to go comes (or if he is forced out once the caucus views him as a liability like Mulroney or Thatcher). In the absence of a clear line of succession his departure could cause the type of nasty infighting which left the Liberals in disarray for so long.

I'm not predicting doom and gloom, but one should remember that pride comes before the fall. Certainly the NDP faces a greater risk of falling apart given how important Quebec is now to this formerly anglophone-only party.
  I would argue that British Columbia and Ontario are somewhat natural alliances.  Both are quite urban, have large immigrant populations and don't tend to be to too heavily tilt to either the right or left.  It is true Alberta is a different story but not all the West is like Alberta.  Yes, BC has staunchly conservative areas like the Fraser Valley and Interior, but so does Ontario, particularly Central Ontario and Rural Eastern Ontario.  Likewise the 905 belt is similiar to the Lower Mainland suburbs although the NDP is much weaker.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 09, 2011, 08:47:01 PM
Quebec may be new territory for the NDP, but they haven't had too much trouble maintaining francophone support once they've obtained it. After all, northern Ontario is a very francophone region, relative to the rest of the country, and the NDP is the most popular party there. Granted, Quebec francophones are different from northern Ontario francophones, but not as much as, say, western ones.

Partially true, although the Tories did well in Eastern Ontario.  Madawaska-Restigouche, Glengarry-Prescott-Russell, West Nova, Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, Ottawa-Orleans, Stormont-Dundas-South Glengarry, Nipissing-Timiskaming, and Saint Boniface all have equally large Francophone communities yet went Tory unlike Quebec.  Also most Francophones outside Quebec get much of their information from the English media rather than French media.  In addition Ottawa-Vanier and Beausejour are some of the safest Liberal ridings in the country yet this has not transferred over into Quebec, so while you have a point, one cannot assume the strong NDP support in Northern Ontario will necessarily carry over into Quebec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 08:48:49 PM
BC has a tradition of voting against the federal government of the day.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 10, 2011, 06:35:36 AM
Partially true, although the Tories did well in Eastern Ontario.  Madawaska-Restigouche, Glengarry-Prescott-Russell, West Nova, Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, Ottawa-Orleans, Stormont-Dundas-South Glengarry, Nipissing-Timiskaming, and Saint Boniface all have equally large Francophone communities yet went Tory unlike Quebec.

Only Madawaska-Restigouche and Glengarry-Prescott-Russell are really at all comparable, fwiw. Though I don't think the issue is that speaking French = being a lefty. Northern Ontario is rather working class as is, of course, most of Francophone Quebec (the class element to linguistic conflict in the province is one reason why it has been so nasty). Obviously it's not safe to assume that the NDP's new voters will always stick with it, but the opposite isn't a safe assumption either.

Quote
In addition Ottawa-Vanier and Beausejour are some of the safest Liberal ridings in the country yet this has not transferred over into Quebec

If Beausejour is one of the safest Liberal ridings in all Canada, then they really are fycked.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 10, 2011, 07:27:20 AM
Well, yes, so they are. But you know that.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 11, 2011, 07:21:02 PM
Anybody know when they will have the poll by poll breakdown.  It will be interesting to see this and also start making the maps like we did for the 2008 election.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on May 11, 2011, 08:43:20 PM
Anybody know when they will have the poll by poll breakdown.  It will be interesting to see this and also start making the maps like we did for the 2008 election.

Checking the news releases on elections.ca

http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=med&document=releases2008&dir=pre&lang=e
http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=med&document=releases2006&dir=pre&lang=e


the poll results were released under 2 months after the election. (Last 2 elections)

Jan 23/06 --- Mar 13/06 (51 days)
Oct 14/08 --- Dec 4/08  (49 days)

So expect them sometime around June 20

The polling maps are found at ftp://ftp.geogratis.gc.ca/electoral/
however, the 2011 shapefiles are not out yet.






 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 11, 2011, 09:22:16 PM
Probably need to start a new thread when they come out.  I'll try to do the results by municipality and county.  I suspect Western Canada, Southern Ontario, and New Brunswick will be quite blue even more so than last time around.  Quebec will have a lot more orange and it will be interesting to see in the close races if the Bloc Quebecois still won several polls or if they were annihiliated throughout the province as it seems their support was fairly evenly distributed.  Asides from Newfoundland & Labrador and PEI, I don't think there will be much red.  It will be also interesting to see Toronto and compare it to the mayor's race last Fall.  It seems the Tories did well in the same areas Rob Ford did, while the NDP won in the areas that mostly went for George Smithermann.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: the506 on May 11, 2011, 09:30:36 PM
As I said in the other thread, as soon as the poll-by-poll results come out (and we get the shapefiles) I'm going to work on something like this...

http://www.the506.com/elxnmaps/NB2010/

Planning on doing separate party-specific maps and even something showing swing per poll from 2008 if it all pans out.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Torie on May 11, 2011, 10:44:02 PM
Why did the NDP do so well in Quebec, while the Bloc collapsed, and why did the Liberals just collapse period?  Just asking.

In the case of the Bloc Quebecois, many in Quebec realized they were useless as sovereignty will be achieved through electing a PQ government provincially and a referendum.  This was not the first close call to being obliterated.  In 2003, it appeared the Liberals under Paul Martin would obliterate the Bloc, but they were revived thanks to the sponsorship scandal.  In 2008, it looked like the Tories would do the same, but their comments on the arts cuts as well as the perception they were too right wing for Quebec saved the Bloc.  This time around there wasn't much to attack the NDP with.  Prior to this election the only thing standing in their way was the fact the NDP favoured a highly centralized government, but they abandoned this in the Sherbrooke declaration.

As for the Liberals, once the NDP pulled ahead in Quebec, many on the left who were more concerned with defeating Harper than voting for any particular party switched to the NDP.  Likewise many Blue Liberals, particularly in Ontario were spooked by the thought of an NDP lead coalition so they bolted to the Tories.  The Liberals actually ran a decent campaign, but being in the centre and having a leader who was less popular than either Layton or Harper made them vulnerable.  Likewise Ignatieff didn't perform that well in the debates.  Had he done well in the debates, I suspect the party would have done much better than they did.

Thanks for what appears on its face at least (since I know nothing about the ins and outs of Canadian political doings), appears to be a most cogent analysis. I appreciate your taking the time to enlighten me. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 12, 2011, 09:57:37 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oXW9wlieZO8

The new MP for Davenport and the re-elected MP for Timmins--James Bay, in a punk band together in 1983.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 12, 2011, 04:22:49 PM
Haha, I have Charlie Angus on my friends list on Facebook, and he's always posting videos like that. Having Cash also in Parliament should be fun. :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 12, 2011, 04:32:53 PM
haha. Awesome. When are the Barenaked Ladies going to run for Parliament? It's proven the NDP can win in Scarborough!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 12, 2011, 05:03:38 PM
Ruth Ellen Brosseau in her riding.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guCdS1ABm9M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91sxKz7jLkA

Her French is a bit awkward, but she can speak it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 12, 2011, 05:14:26 PM
I saw the first clip yesterday. She has been quite the celebrity in this country, to the point that I'd say she's a house hold name.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on May 12, 2011, 05:20:41 PM
It also doesn't hurt that she's pretty hot.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 12, 2011, 07:35:34 PM
It also doesn't hurt that she's pretty hot.

Helena Guergis was pretty hot, yet she lost, so although it might help it doesn't guarantee a win.  Mind you Simcoe-Grey is a pretty staunchly conservative riding to begin with.  In fact it includes much of Simcoe Centre which was the only riding to vote for the Reform Party in 1993, so as long as the right is united they are pretty much assured to win this riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on May 12, 2011, 07:39:25 PM
Oh I wasn't referring to Brosseau's electoral strength; just that her looks will help add to her 'celebrity' status.  Not everything is always about elections.  :)

I wonder if I came close to bumping into her while she was here during the campaign.  Probably not, but you never know.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 12, 2011, 09:34:05 PM
She has a better accent than Harper: http://tvanouvelles.ca/video/940199381001/ruth-ellen-brosseau-en-entrevue-a-tva-nouvelles/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 13, 2011, 10:18:19 PM
According to Radio-Canada, the NDP won the recount in Montmagny--L'Islet--Kamouraska--Rivière-du-Loup by 9 votes.

It was won by 105 votes by the Conservatives on election day (but 110 NDP votes were wrongfully added to the Greens). After that correction, NDP lead by 5, leading to a recount.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 13, 2011, 10:48:13 PM
How did Nipissing-Timiskaming and Etobicoke Centre go?  Considering how poorly the Tories did in Quebec, I suspect if Bernard Genereux won he would get a cabinet post.  With a 9 vote difference, I wonder if they can ask for another recount or what happens next.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 13, 2011, 11:08:15 PM
North Bay is much more Conservative than the rest of northern Ontario. Plus the complete Liberal collapse outside (and even inside) of urban centers. Still, Nipissing-Timiskaming was fairly close. As for Etobicoke Centre, eh... Rob Ford won it handily. Plus Liberal collapse. And maybe the Conservatives' constant attacks against Ignatieff might have played a part as well. He never really seemed to win convincingly.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 14, 2011, 06:00:54 AM
I dun make this
http://maps.google.ca/maps/ms?hl=en&geocode=&ie=UTF8&vps=1&jsv=338b&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=214668381355121949879.0004a339e65b69873c792


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 14, 2011, 01:23:04 PM
Also, a elector asked a recount in Winnipeg-North.

Lamoureux, a Liberal, won it by only 45 votes over the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 14, 2011, 09:38:20 PM
Also, a elector asked a recount in Winnipeg-North.

Lamoureux, a Liberal, won it by only 45 votes over the NDP.

I doubt it will change, but if the NDP wins the recount there, that means the Liberals were shut out of two provinces and only won one seat in another two.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 14, 2011, 09:42:30 PM
The recount confirmed the NDP win by 9 votes over the Conservative incumbent in the rural Quebec riding of Montmagny-L'Islet-Riveire du loup-Kamouraska - so Tories now have 166 seats and the NDP 103


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 14, 2011, 09:58:06 PM
The recount confirmed the NDP win by 9 votes over the Conservative incumbent in the rural Quebec riding of Montmagny-L'Islet-Riveire du loup-Kamouraska - so Tories now have 166 seats and the NDP 103

I wonder who they will bring into cabinet now with only 5 seats in Quebec.  I have a feeling we will see Maxime Bernier return to cabinet after the drubbing they got in Quebec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 15, 2011, 04:27:16 PM
Some "exit polling" data:

http://www.vancouversun.com/life/religion%20split%20federal%20vote%20poll/4748583/story.html

Kind of strange, if you ask me. How could the NDP be above average with both visible minorities and non visible minorities?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 15, 2011, 04:32:55 PM
I think that's visible minorities compared to non-visible minorities among immigrants. Even a "non-visible minority" is still not the majority!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 15, 2011, 08:34:05 PM
I think that's visible minorities compared to non-visible minorities among immigrants. Even a "non-visible minority" is still not the majority!

I suspect the Conservatives probably won mostly amongst those who were immigrants from Europe and the Far East, while the NDP more amongst South Asians, Middle Easterners, Africa, Caribbean, and Latin America.  Also the Catholic number is interesting as most polls showed the Tories well ahead amongst them, mind you that might be in English Canada only where I am pretty sure they got well over 30% and beat the NDP by a sizeable margin.  Also immigrants would include those born in Germany, Netherlands, and UK and I suspect the Tories did well amongst those.  It also looks like they gained significantly amongst the Polish and Italian community, while the Greek community is difficult to tell, but the Portuguese community appears to have swung towards the NDP, although the Tories probably won much of those in the suburbs however.  As for the NDP and Tories being closer amongst those born in Canada, lets remember the highest percentage of this group is in Quebec where the NDP handidly beat the Tories and Atlantic Canada where the results pretty much matched the national numbers.  Generally visible minorities in most countries tend to favour parties on the left as opposed to the right.  In fact I would argue the Tories perform much better amongst visible minorities than their right wing counterparts in many other countries do.  No surprise the Tories got clobbered amongst Muslim voters or how well they did amongst Jewish voters although as recently as 2006 the numbers were the exact reverse amongst Jewish voters.  Probably explains why Thornhill swung so heavily in favour of them and why they picked up traditional Liberal strongholds like York Centre and Eglinton-Lawrence while came awfully close to winning Mount Royal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 15, 2011, 10:54:53 PM
It's quite fun to read some of the Wikipedia articles on regional results. Some fun ones:

Montérégie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election_results_in_Mont%C3%A9r%C3%A9gie)

Every single seat changed party hands in three elections in the last thirty years.

Went 8-0 Liberal in 1979 and 1980, then went 8-0 and 9-0 PC in 1984 and 1988 respectively. It then went 8 Bloc/1 Liberal in 1993 and hovered around that amount through 2008. Then in 2011, it went 9-0 NDP.

Brampton, Mississauga and Oakville (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election_results_in_Brampton,_Mississauga_and_Oakville)

Went 9-0 Liberal in 2006, then 7-2 Liberal in 2008, then 9-0 Conservative in 2011.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 15, 2011, 11:01:07 PM
It's quite fun to read some of the Wikipedia articles on regional results. Some fun ones:

Montérégie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election_results_in_Mont%C3%A9r%C3%A9gie)

Every single seat changed party hands in three elections in the last thirty years.

Went 8-0 Liberal in 1979 and 1980, then went 8-0 and 9-0 PC in 1984 and 1988 respectively. It then went 8 Bloc/1 Liberal in 1993 and hovered around that amount through 2008. Then in 2011, it went 9-0 NDP.

Brampton, Mississauga and Oakville (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election_results_in_Brampton,_Mississauga_and_Oakville)

Went 9-0 Liberal in 2006, then 7-2 Liberal in 2008, then 9-0 Conservative in 2011.
Both are suburbs so somewhat swing.  Brampton, Mississauga, Oakville are often known for backing the winner both provincially and federally.  In 1999, the PCs won all those ridings provincially, while in 2003 they all swung over to the Liberals.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 15, 2011, 11:08:10 PM
There's no federal bellwether like Sarnia though, which has elected the winning party since the 1960s.  Not the same provincially however, as it was one of the few seats the Tories gained in the last provincial election.

I think if the NDP ever formed government, it would have to win seats like Sarnia. Not a wild thought, as the party has finished a strong second in the last two races.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 15, 2011, 11:51:49 PM
There's no federal bellwether like Sarnia though, which has elected the winning party since the 1960s.  Not the same provincially however, as it was one of the few seats the Tories gained in the last provincial election.

I think if the NDP ever formed government, it would have to win seats like Sarnia. Not a wild thought, as the party has finished a strong second in the last two races.
  True it is a bellwether and I agree the NDP could conceivably win it, although it will be tough as the rural areas are pretty solidly Tory and even Sarnia like many of the industrial towns in Southern Ontario have swung to the right.  Since the party is more like the Reform than the PCs, it has a strong populist appeal thus the reason it does well in the industrial centres of Southern Ontario.  Also many of the blue collar workers are white males over 50 who tend to vote Conservative.   Also the Tories got over 50% in the last two elections and the previous Liberal incumbent Roger Gallaway was one of the more right wing Liberals thus they have a strong base to begin with.  It won't be until people get really tired of the Tories they will have any chance at chipping away at the Tories.  I would argue an NDP win would come through a Quebec-West axis much as Mulroney won in the 80s, not an Ontario-Quebec axies like the Liberals use to have.  BC, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba are far more likely to go NDP than Ontario would.  Besides any NDP gains in the 519 area code would be offset by the 905 becoming a Tory stronghold and the 613 remaining a Tory stronghold.  The Tories are most ulnerable in the 905 and this could go Liberal but not NDP.  The 519 outside a few urban areas is pretty solidly Tory.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 16, 2011, 06:57:44 AM
Western Ontario is not nearly as anti-NDP as you think.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 16, 2011, 07:16:46 AM
I disagree than an NDP win would come from the west. I think it'll come from Ontario. They can only really gain  10-15 seats in western Canada. The rest have to come from somewhere. And, Ontario has gone NDP before, it just has to exorcise Bob Rae and do it again.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 16, 2011, 07:19:17 AM
()

Rae's win.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 16, 2011, 07:57:08 PM
I don't think it is so much that Southwestern Ontario is hostile to the NDP as more where would they get the additional votes from.  Unlike the BC Interior and Island where you have a lot crossover Tory-NDP voters there are relatively few in Ontario.  Many Lib-Tory switchers and NDP-Liberal switchers, but not too many NDP-Tory switchers.  In the 519 area code the Tories got above 50% in every riding save the two Kitchener ridings, Guelph, the three London ridings, the two Windsor ridings, Brant, and Essex.  In the case of Brant and Essex they came pretty close to 50% so the Liberals would have to crater and have over 90% transfer to the NDP to win this.  Although these have gone NDP in the past due to their strong manufacturing base, they also include a large rural section and the Tories dominate Rural Ontario pretty strongly.  In Guelph, it could NDP as the riding is centre-left but that assumes the Liberal vote swings en masse to the NDP.  If it doesn't swing much, it stays Liberal, if it partially swings you get a split vote and the Tories come up the middle.  In the Kitchener ridings, the Tories are vulnerable, but these are not exactly your NDP type ridings so if they do lose those seats it will be to the Liberals, not NDP.  London North Centre could go NDP but London West has a lot of business types living in the riding so although I could see the NDP getting as high as 30% here, Iwould be quite shocked if they actually won it.  The Liberals could as they are able to appeal to wealthy voters whereas the NDP cannot.  The remaining three ridings are already NDP held.  My point is the Tory vote is pretty solid and if it switches it would be to the Liberals, not the NDP or they would simply stay home.  And likewise I don't think the Liberals will completely disappear nor do I think all of them would go over to the NDP.  Maybe 2/3 would, but some would go over to the Tories and since the Tories have a much stronger base here, it would help them win seats.  Now I realize a lot can change in four years and if the NDP and Liberals merged, then they could win a whole whack of seats in Southwestern Ontario provided people were tired of the Tories.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 16, 2011, 08:05:40 PM
I still think the NDP win would come through the West and Quebec.  They won't win in Alberta, but BC, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba are different cases.  Yes Ontario, voted for Bob Rae, but that was a one time case and I don't think you can assume they would automatically go back to the NDP.  Usually a party has to have a strong base in area to do well in election after election.  The NDP could gain seats in Ontario, but I don't see this as being their stronghold.  The 905 and suburban 416 will either go Liberal or Tory, but certainly not NDP.  Northern Ontario is largley NDP to begin with, while Central Ontario and most of Eastern Ontario is solidly Tory and with no manufacturing base or major universities in most ridings, not much potential there.  Likewise the Liberals have managed to stay in the lows 20s in Eastern Ontario so I am not so sure they will disappear quickly in that region even if they cannot translate this into seats.  In BC, the NDP won the majority of seats in both the 1974 and 1988 election and has won provincially on multiple occassions.  Likewise they usually get around 40% provincially meaning if they could get all those who vote NDP provincially to vote NDP federally, they could do quite well.  Maybe not win the majority of seats in the province, but at least win more than they have now.  In Saskatchewan, it is really the riding boundaries that kill them.  If they got rid of the mixed urban-rural ridings I think the NDP would win seats in Saskatchewan.  Rural Saskatchewan is solidly Tory, but Saskatoon and Regina are much more competitive, so although not strongholds, they are winneable.  Both Gary Doer and Roy Romanow got close to 50% in their respective provinces, so if the federal NDP could adopt similiar policies, I don't see why they could get similiar results.  The problem is the federal NDP is very different than their provincial counterparts in those provinces thus why they don't do as well.  By contrast in Ontario other than Bob Rae's one time win, there is no history of the NDP doing well and not much they can draw from.  While some would say the same about the Quebec, the Bloc Quebecois and Parti Quebecois have very similiar platforms to the NDP so at least there was the ideological similiarity, by contrast, Ontario has no similiar comparison.  Unless the Liberals and NDP merge, looking at the results and characteristics of the population, I think the best chance of the NDP winning in 2015 is if they can reduce the Tories to a minority, defeat them on the throne speech and then rely on the Liberals to prop them up.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 16, 2011, 09:10:24 PM
That is lots of words...

It comes down to math. Once you take into account the unexpected GTA Harper bump, my math was correct. My math says the NDP can win "rural" areas of SW Ontario, like they did in Rae's era


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 16, 2011, 10:08:09 PM
I think you will see the NDP win in Brampton, first. Yes, you heard me. Indians vote NDP in BC, so why not in Ontario? The NDP nearly picked up Bramalea-Gore-Malton. Perhaps after redistribution, a more heavily Indian riding will result in an NDP pickup?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 16, 2011, 10:58:33 PM
I think you will see the NDP win in Brampton, first. Yes, you heard me. Indians vote NDP in BC, so why not in Ontario? The NDP nearly picked up Bramalea-Gore-Malton. Perhaps after redistribution, a more heavily Indian riding will result in an NDP pickup?

I think you are right on Bramalea-Gore-Malton.  Less sure about the other two Brampton ridings.  I think a lot depends on religion too.  I believe the Tories do well amongst the Hindus who are big in Ontario but not in BC, whereas amongst the Sikhs and Muslims they are far more likely to go NDP than Tory.  Mississauga is also an interesting case as it has a large Muslim population which could help the NDP.  Also, I think the Tories hardline on refugees could help the NDP amongst the Tamil population.  Mind you after re-distribution the boundaries will be much different and I wouldn't be surprised if one of the new ridings is a safe Tory, one is favourable to the Liberals and at least one if not more are favourable to the NDP.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown, but I am sure through gerrymandering in Mississauga/Brampton you could create a safe riding for each party.  As for the NDP bump in Rural Ontario, I am still skeptical since although Harper got a GTA bump that came almost entirely from the Liberals.  When one considers the Tories got over 50% in most rural Ontario ridings, you need Tory-NDP crossovers which I don't see.  If you look at the gains of the NDP and Tories in Ontario in the past four elections, almost all of it has come at the expense of the Liberals.  Due to the ideological differences between the two parties it is much tougher to swing votes between them then it is for each to pick off support or lose support to the Liberals who sit in between the two on the spectrum.  In BC, you have a lot more protest votes, especially in the Interior and Island thus why you have NDP-Tory swing votes, although in the case of the Lower Mainland they are pretty much non-existent.  All the swing voters I met in the Lower Mainland were either NDP-Liberal on the centre-left and Tory-Liberal on the centre-right.  In the case of Quebec, people care less about right vs. left and more about who will offer Quebec the best deal.  Besides it looks like the NDP gains came primarily from the Bloc Quebecois, to a lesser extent from the Liberals and even smaller number from the Tories.  The Bloc Quebecois was already a social democratic party so philosophically other than the national question, they had a lot in common with the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 16, 2011, 11:26:32 PM
I should also add the NDP strength amongst the South Asian vote is more at the provincial level, at the federal level they largely go Liberal still, although you are right if between the Tories and the NDP, the NDP probably would win hands down.  Lets remember the BC Liberals provincially are closer ideogically to the Tories than federal Liberals are.  In addition the South Asian community is overwhelmingly Sikh in BC, whereas in Ontario it is a real mix, although I think Bramalea-Gore-Malton and Brampton is general is primarily Sikh while the Muslim community is more in Mississauga and the Hindu more in Scarborough. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 16, 2011, 11:31:27 PM
Scarborough is another area that is trending NDP big time.

I know NDP-Tory swing voters are a rarity in Ontario, but if the NDP replaces the Liberals as the opposition (in the long run, I mean), then you will definitely see more. Where else will a disgruntled Tory run. The Liberals? Not if they are some fringe party. Boom, the NDP gets some votes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 17, 2011, 12:01:51 AM
Scarborough is another area that is trending NDP big time.

I know NDP-Tory swing voters are a rarity in Ontario, but if the NDP replaces the Liberals as the opposition (in the long run, I mean), then you will definitely see more. Where else will a disgruntled Tory run. The Liberals? Not if they are some fringe party. Boom, the NDP gets some votes.

I agree you may be right, although I think it will become more like BC elections where the number of swing votes will be at the margins.  If you look at the NDP vote in BC vs. the Social Credit/BC Liberals you do get occassional fluctuations but the variations are quite a bit less than what you see federally.  You also have about 20 really close ridings, mostly in the Lougheed Corridor that are often decided by a few hundred votes so I suspect elections would be fought in those types of ridings.  Where they would be is anyone's guess, although I think Scarborough, London are possibilities.  Also with the re-distribution you could get a long more swing ridings too as the suburbs and rural areas seem pretty strong Tory, but a large part of Ontario's population lives in urban areas and that is where the growth is.  I should also note you see a much smaller swing vote in the US and Europe where you have more polarized electorates and often elections are won and lost at the margins.  Also much of Ontario's growth comes from immigration so I suspect how future immigrants vote could have a big impact on whether the NDP makes big gains in Ontario or not.  I suspect that is why the Tories are all for maintaining or raising business and economic class, while cutting family class and refugees as they figure the former two are most likely to vote for them while not the latter two.  Also as the older voters die off, will the younger voters stay on the left or gradually move to the right as they get older and likewise what about voter turnout as most who don't vote in their first two elections never vote.  I guess I was thinking of the next election, not a few down the road.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 17, 2011, 01:34:29 AM
The Liberals won Scarborough (and Etobicoke) in terms of popular vote, both my very small margins.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 17, 2011, 04:22:24 PM
The Liberal candidate won (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/recount-confirms-liberal-victory-in-winnipeg-north/article2024876/) after the Winnipeg North recount.  His victory fell from 45 votes over the NDP on election night to 44 votes in the recount.

That leaves two recounts open, both in Ontario - Nipissing–Timiskaming and Etobicoke Centre.  The Conservative candidate narrowly edged a Liberal in the preliminary results from both ridings.  We might get final Nipissing–Timiskaming results today.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 17, 2011, 04:27:56 PM
The Conservative held on in Nipissing-Timiskaming, per local media (http://www.nugget.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3127898).   His margin increased from 14 votes over the Liberal incumbent on election night to 18 votes after the recount.

That leaves Etobicoke Centre's recount as the only one outstanding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 17, 2011, 07:39:28 PM
The Conservative held on in Nipissing-Timiskaming, per local media (http://www.nugget.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3127898).   His margin increased from 14 votes over the Liberal incumbent on election night to 18 votes after the recount.

That leaves Etobicoke Centre's recount as the only one outstanding.

I wonder if the Etobicoke Centre is expected today as well as I heard Harper plans to announce his cabinet tomorrow.  Usually one waits until all recounts are completed before doing this or perhaps maybe Harper has already decided Opitz is not cabinet material.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 17, 2011, 07:41:58 PM
The Liberals won Scarborough (and Etobicoke) in terms of popular vote, both my very small margins.

The Liberals actually won the 416 area code as well.  The NDP and Tories only got more seats since their vote was more concentrated.  The Tory vote is largely limited to the suburban 416, otherwise the same areas that voted for Rob Ford, while the NDP was mostly in the downtown core.  Scarborough was a real three way split and a slight increase for any party in votes would have meant a complete sweep.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown whether it is random or how they are distributed as the NDP has never been strong here prior to this election and the Tories were last strong here in 1988 when the riding demographics were vastly different than today thus no real comparison.  Scarborough has long been a Liberal stronghold and I am actually quite surprised how that collapsed so quickly.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 17, 2011, 08:46:05 PM
I wonder if the Etobicoke Centre is expected today as well as I heard Harper plans to announce his cabinet tomorrow.  Usually one waits until all recounts are completed before doing this or perhaps maybe Harper has already decided Opitz is not cabinet material.

Doubtful.  The Etobicoke Centre recount won't even start until tomorrow (http://www.insidetoronto.com/news/local/article/1006015--etobicoke-centre-recount-set-to-start-may-18).  There is no schedule for when it will end.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 17, 2011, 08:56:25 PM
The Liberals won Scarborough (and Etobicoke) in terms of popular vote, both my very small margins.

The Liberals actually won the 416 area code as well.  The NDP and Tories only got more seats since their vote was more concentrated.  The Tory vote is largely limited to the suburban 416, otherwise the same areas that voted for Rob Ford, while the NDP was mostly in the downtown core.  Scarborough was a real three way split and a slight increase for any party in votes would have meant a complete sweep.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown whether it is random or how they are distributed as the NDP has never been strong here prior to this election and the Tories were last strong here in 1988 when the riding demographics were vastly different than today thus no real comparison.  Scarborough has long been a Liberal stronghold and I am actually quite surprised how that collapsed so quickly.

Tories swept North York, the NDP swept the old city


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 17, 2011, 09:00:09 PM
I wonder if the Etobicoke Centre is expected today as well as I heard Harper plans to announce his cabinet tomorrow.  Usually one waits until all recounts are completed before doing this or perhaps maybe Harper has already decided Opitz is not cabinet material.

Doubtful.  The Etobicoke Centre recount won't even start until tomorrow (http://www.insidetoronto.com/news/local/article/1006015--etobicoke-centre-recount-set-to-start-may-18).  There is no schedule for when it will end.

I guess that means Ted Opitz won't being going into cabinet.  I wonder who will go into cabinet of the MPs elected in the 416 as I am sure at least one will.  Also I heard all defeated MPs have to have their offices cleared by Thursday, so that could be a problem if this one isn't known.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 17, 2011, 09:02:30 PM
The Liberals won Scarborough (and Etobicoke) in terms of popular vote, both my very small margins.

The Liberals actually won the 416 area code as well.  The NDP and Tories only got more seats since their vote was more concentrated.  The Tory vote is largely limited to the suburban 416, otherwise the same areas that voted for Rob Ford, while the NDP was mostly in the downtown core.  Scarborough was a real three way split and a slight increase for any party in votes would have meant a complete sweep.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown whether it is random or how they are distributed as the NDP has never been strong here prior to this election and the Tories were last strong here in 1988 when the riding demographics were vastly different than today thus no real comparison.  Scarborough has long been a Liberal stronghold and I am actually quite surprised how that collapsed so quickly.

Tories swept North York, the NDP swept the old city

Generally true, although I believe York West is mostly in North York which went Liberal and the Tories came in third.  Likewise I believe part of Don Valley West extends into the old city, but for the most part that is correct.  And the Liberals did win Toronto Centre and St. Paul's, otherwise the wealthy enclaves in old city. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 17, 2011, 09:14:12 PM
http://maps.google.ca/maps/ms?hl=en&geocode=&ie=UTF8&vps=2&jsv=340c&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=214668381355121949879.0004a339e65b69873c792


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 17, 2011, 09:44:03 PM
If Toronto is combined with York and East York
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 17, 2011, 10:31:30 PM

The Liberals actually won the 416 area code as well.  The NDP and Tories only got more seats since their vote was more concentrated.  The Tory vote is largely limited to the suburban 416, otherwise the same areas that voted for Rob Ford, while the NDP was mostly in the downtown core.  Scarborough was a real three way split and a slight increase for any party in votes would have meant a complete sweep.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown whether it is random or how they are distributed as the NDP has never been strong here prior to this election and the Tories were last strong here in 1988 when the riding demographics were vastly different than today thus no real comparison.  Scarborough has long been a Liberal stronghold and I am actually quite surprised how that collapsed so quickly.

There is actually more NDP history in Scarborough than you might think. The federal NDP actually won what is now Scarborough Southwest in the mid-60s and again in 1972 and they came very close in that riding in 1974, 1979 and 1980 (back in those days what is now Scarborough Rouge River was mostly farmers fields and a zoo!). The Ontario NDP regularly won seats in Scarborough from the early 60s up until the defeat of the Rae government in 1995 - Stephen Lewis was the MPP for Scarborough West for almost 20 years! Of course in those days Scarborough was very "white working class" and had a lot of immigrants from Scotland who brought their Labour Party voting habits with them. Now Scarborough is heavily immigrant. It seems that the NDP made a major breakthrough this time with the Tamil community which is huge in Scarborough - possibly because Layton was the only leader to speak up for the Tamils who were being massacred by the Sri Lankan army at the end of the civil war. BTW: Tamils are south Asian and they are also all Hindu - that is one one major Hindu group that is trending NDP in addition to the NDP strength with Sikhs and Muslims - it should be noted that two Indo-Canadians were elected as NDP MPs from heavily south asian risings in Surrey in suburban Vancouver this election.   


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 17, 2011, 10:45:55 PM
*sigh*

There are six pages of job postings on the NDP website, and not a single one that a non bilingual person can apply to.

I will never get to work on the Hill!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 17, 2011, 11:38:57 PM
True, Scarborough Southwest has gone NDP, but I am not so sure how well they have done elsewhere.  I know the PCs under Mulroney won seats in Scarborough albeit it was more suburban and whiter than today.  Also Mike Harris won Scarborough Southwest, Scarborough East, and Scarborough Centre, while Rob Ford won all Scarborough wards, so I think it was more of a Liberal stronghold federally than anything else.  As for the NDP gaining amongst Tamils, I agree.  I mentioned earlier the Tories doing well amongst Hindus, this is in reference to an Ipsos Exit poll of 36,000 Canadians whereby amongst Hindus in the 2006 election it was 44% Liberals, 29% Tories, while for Sikhs it was 40% NDP, 37% Liberals, and 17% Conservatives.  There are lots of Hindus from India which is where I think the Tories get a lot of their support from this community.  I suspect their stance on the Tamil refugees probably didn't go over too well with that community.  Since the Tories have gone up since 2006 and the Liberals have cratered, I wouldn't be surprised if the Tories won the Hindu vote.  I think amongst immigrants, they won those from Europe and the Far East while the NDP amongst those from elsewhere although one should be careful about generalizing as I don't think any ethnic group votes as a block.  In fact asides from those from Northern Europe (who the Tories probably got over 50% amongst, they got 48% in English Canada) I don't think any party got above 50% amongst any immigrant group.  Quite a contrast from 2000 when 71% of visible minorities voted Liberal.  In fact the loss of immigrants and Catholics is one of the reasons the Liberals have fallen so far so fast.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 18, 2011, 08:15:15 AM
There is a lot of discussion of how the parties fared among different religious groups based on that Ipsos exit poll. One thing i wish we knew from the exit poll is their actual sample sizes among Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists etc... because each of these religions is less than 1% of the entire Canadian population - so i wonder how statistically significant the exit poll is when trying to project vote intention in these micro-communities.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 18, 2011, 08:48:48 AM
The answer is that they aren't, but that people like data so much they are prepared to suspend disbelief...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on May 18, 2011, 10:29:19 AM
John Baird as Foreign Minister. What a joke.



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 18, 2011, 11:49:08 AM
John Baird will make a very good "minister of having as many affairs as possible in foreign countries where he can be anonymous".


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 18, 2011, 12:23:16 PM
For those who don't know, John Baird is known for being the debater in Parliament WHO ALWAYS SEEMS TO BE SPEAKING IN ALLCAPS. I find it amusing now he will be representing us in those subtle situations.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Franzl on May 18, 2011, 01:57:39 PM
*sigh*

There are six pages of job postings on the NDP website, and not a single one that a non bilingual person can apply to.

I will never get to work on the Hill!

Why don't you learn French?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 18, 2011, 04:34:01 PM
*sigh*

There are six pages of job postings on the NDP website, and not a single one that a non bilingual person can apply to.

I will never get to work on the Hill!

Why don't you learn French?

Lack of patience, mostly. But even a basic level of French wouldn't be good for those kinds of offices. I would have to be full on bilingual :/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 18, 2011, 10:53:29 PM
The emphasis on regional balance is somewhat worrying. I get the feeling that if the Conservatives won a single seat with a total moron in Montreal, said moron would nonetheless be a shoo-in for Cabinet.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 18, 2011, 10:54:43 PM
I don't see how that's worrying; there are a lot of total morons in cabinet.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 18, 2011, 11:37:20 PM
The emphasis on regional balance is somewhat worrying. I get the feeling that if the Conservatives won a single seat with a total moron in Montreal, said moron would nonetheless be a shoo-in for Cabinet.

Usually most parties figure out which seats are most likely to fall to them in areas they are shut out and thus run stronger candidates.  In the case of Toronto, Don Valley West, Eglinton-Lawrence, and York Centre were the most likely for the Tories whereas ridings like Don Valley East, Scarborough Centre, or Willowdale weren't so thats why they had stronger candidates in the former in the event they did win only a seat in Toronto.  It is true in Newfoundland & Labrador, their one seat was a surprise, but also they did have a strong candidate and it is unlikely they would have picked up Labrador with an average candidate.  The same for the Liberals as I believe in the past two elections, they've fielded strong candidates in Edmonton Centre as if they were to form government and win only one seat in Alberta, that would likely be it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 18, 2011, 11:47:19 PM
I don't see how that's worrying; there are a lot of total morons in cabinet.

I was considering writing something like "actually intellectually challenged as opposed to just disliked on partisan grounds", but that would be long and you'd still probably think there were some.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 18, 2011, 11:49:51 PM
I don't see how that's worrying; there are a lot of total morons in cabinet.

I was considering writing something like "actually intellectually challenged as opposed to just disliked on partisan grounds", but that would be long and you'd still probably think there were some.
Indeed I do.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 19, 2011, 02:15:47 AM
If Toronto is combined with York and East York
()

Old Toronto (Incl York and East York)
NDP - 165,703 - 43.6%
Lib - 117,069 - 30.8%
CPC - 77,060 - 20.3%
Grn - 17,483 - 4.6%
Oth - 3,010 - 0.9%

North York
CPC - 112,946 - 40.1%
Lib - 108,453 - 38.5%
NDP - 52,934 - 18.8%
Grn - 6,380 - 2.3%
Oth - 824 - 0.3%

Scarborough
Lib - 77,800 - 34.2%
CPC - 76,840 - 33.8%
NDP - 66,250 - 29.1%
Grn - 5,986 - 2.6%
Oth - 617 - 0.3%

Etobicoke
Lib - 54,346 - 39.0%
CPC - 54,019 - 38.8%
NDP - 26,335 - 18.9%
Grn - 3,605 - 2.6%
Oth - 924 - 0.7%

TOTAL CITY OF TORONTO
Lib - 357,668 - 34.8%
CPC - 320,865 - 31.2%
NDP - 311,222 - 30.3%
Grn - 33,454 - 3.3%
OTh - 5,375 - 0.5%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 19, 2011, 06:18:42 AM
Thank you!

Also, I'm kinda disappointed Leitch wasn't chosen for a cabinet role. Of all the idiots there is in the caucus, at least she's an actual doctor.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 19, 2011, 06:43:37 AM
The NDP's previous high in SRR was 14.6%. I'm going to be nice and round that to 15%.

The NDP took 40.5% this election. If they had taken 15% (and if the Liberals had, as you may expect, picked up the remainder) then Scarborough would look like this:

Scarborough
Lib - 89,678 - 39.4%
CPC - 76,840 - 33.8%
NDP - 54,372 - 23.9%
Grn - 5,986 - 2.6%
Oth - 617 - 0.3%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on May 19, 2011, 07:57:43 AM
I don't see how that's worrying; there are a lot of total morons in cabinet.

I was considering writing something like "actually intellectually challenged as opposed to just disliked on partisan grounds", but that would be long and you'd still probably think there were some.
Indeed I do.

ex: Maxime Bernier


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 19, 2011, 08:21:01 AM
With Bramlea-Malton split in half...

Mississauga
C - 127,187 - 43.5%
L - 103,490 - 35.4%
N - 52,582 - 18.0%
G - 8,154 - 2.8%
O - 856 - 0.3%

Brampton
C - 62,991 - 44.0%
L - 44,560 - 31.1%
N - 30,873 - 21.6%
G - 4,023 - 2.8%
O - 732 - 0.5%

URBAN PEEL REGION (IE the two above combined)
C - 190,178 - 43.7%
L - 148,050 - 34.0%
N - 83,455 - 19.2%
G - 12,177 - 2.8%
O - 1,599 - 0.4%

Durham Region (not including brock)
C - 129,407 - 51.0%
N - 58,851 - 23.2%
L - 53,587 - 21.1%
G - 10,406 - 4.1%
O - 1,276 - 0.5%

York Region
C - 209,664 - 52.0%
L - 113,990 - 28.3%
N - 63,577 -15.8%
G - 12,970 - 3.2%
O - 2,806 - 0.7%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 19, 2011, 08:39:45 AM
Could you post the seat count in each region, too? It looks like the Conservatives had a very efficient vote allocation.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 19, 2011, 09:11:15 AM
Teddy your boundary between North York and "Toronto" isn't right, even allowing that the latter includes York and East York.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 19, 2011, 07:49:36 PM
Could you post the seat count in each region, too? It looks like the Conservatives had a very efficient vote allocation.

Here it is by province.  Actually the Tories got above 50% in 107 out of the 166 seats they won so there were many areas where they won by big margins.  If you take Quebec out of the picture they got 48% in English Canada.  Off course much of that has to do with the fact they are the sole party on the right whereas the left is far more divided.

NL  Lib 4 NDP 2 CON 1 Lib 38%, NDP 33%, CON 28%
NS  CON 4 LIB 4 NDP 3  CON 37% NDP 30% LIB 29%
PEI LIB 3 CON 1  CON 41% LIB 41% NDP 15% (despite winning only one seat the Conservatives actually got 173 votes more than the Liberals in PEI)
NB CON 8 NDP 1 LIB 1 CON 44% NDP 30% LIB 23%
QC NDP 59 LIB 7 CON 5 BQ 4 NDP 43% BQ 23% CON 17% LIB 14%
ON CON 73 NDP 22 LIB 11 CON 44% NDP 26% LIB 25% (Note, Etobicoke Centre which the Conservatives won by 25 votes over the Liberals is still in the process of a recount)
MB CON 11 NDP 2 LIB 1 CON 54% NDP 26% LIB 16%
SK CON 13 LIB 1 CON 56% NDP 32% LIB 9%
AB CON 27 NDP 1 CON 67% NDP 17% LIB 9%
BC CON 21 NDP 12 LIB 2 GRN 1 CON 46% NDP 33% LIB 13% GRN 7%
NORTH CON 2 (YK and NU), NDP 1 (NT)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 19, 2011, 07:56:14 PM
Actually the Conservatives were the only party to get above 50% in the majority of ridings they won.  I believe the NDP got above 50% in around 40% of the ridings they won, while the Liberals in only 2 seats (both in Newfoundland & Labrador) and the BQ and Greens in none.  Even if you go by region, the Conservatives got over 50% (this excludes rounding up, otherwise 49.9% is not counted), 7 seats in Atlantic Canada (2 in NS, 4 in NB, and 1 in PEI), 1 seat in Quebec (Maxime Bernier's riding) 40 seats in Ontario, 9 seats in Manitoba, 10 seats in Saskatchewan, 25 seats in Alberta, and 15 seats in British Columbia.  While it is true vote splitting helped the Conservatives in some ridings, they also party won a majority as they didn't have a lot of wasted votes in Quebec where they did quite poorly.  If you only took the ridings they got over 45%, they would have won 134 seats, while 161 seats at over 40%.  At over 30%, they were only 30 ridings in all of English Canada where they got under 30%, but in Quebec it was 65 ridings.  At under 20%, it was only 7 in English Canada, while 55 in Quebec so if there was any divided it was between Quebec and ROC.  Quebec cleary voted for a left wing government while English Canada favoured the right (I consider the Liberals a centrist party so the Conservatives got more than the NDP + Greens by a long shot in English Canada)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 19, 2011, 10:26:01 PM
Could you post the seat count in each region, too? It looks like the Conservatives had a very efficient vote allocation.

Here it is by province.  Actually the Tories got above 50% in 107 out of the 166 seats they won so there were many areas where they won by big margins.  If you take Quebec out of the picture they got 48% in English Canada.  Off course much of that has to do with the fact they are the sole party on the right whereas the left is far more divided.

NL  Lib 4 NDP 2 CON 1 Lib 38%, NDP 33%, CON 28%
NS  CON 4 LIB 4 NDP 3  CON 37% NDP 30% LIB 29%
PEI LIB 3 CON 1  CON 41% LIB 41% NDP 15% (despite winning only one seat the Conservatives actually got 173 votes more than the Liberals in PEI)
NB CON 8 NDP 1 LIB 1 CON 44% NDP 30% LIB 23%
QC NDP 59 LIB 7 CON 5 BQ 4 NDP 43% BQ 23% CON 17% LIB 14%
ON CON 73 NDP 22 LIB 11 CON 44% NDP 26% LIB 25% (Note, Etobicoke Centre which the Conservatives won by 25 votes over the Liberals is still in the process of a recount)
MB CON 11 NDP 2 LIB 1 CON 54% NDP 26% LIB 16%
SK CON 13 LIB 1 CON 56% NDP 32% LIB 9%
AB CON 27 NDP 1 CON 67% NDP 17% LIB 9%
BC CON 21 NDP 12 LIB 2 GRN 1 CON 46% NDP 33% LIB 13% GRN 7%
NORTH CON 2 (YK and NU), NDP 1 (NT)

I was talking about those GTA regions, where the Tories did very well without particularly large vote margins. Obviously in Alberta they had a lot of surplus votes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 19, 2011, 10:33:24 PM
Teddy your boundary between North York and "Toronto" isn't right, even allowing that the latter includes York and East York.
Where exactly am I wrong?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 20, 2011, 07:01:23 AM
I was talking about those GTA regions, where the Tories did very well without particularly large vote margins. Obviously in Alberta they had a lot of surplus votes.

Here is what I got by the GTA region.  Actually in the outer suburbs they generally won by pretty big margins, i.e. Jim Flaherty's riding.  In the 905 belt, there were some close ones, but the NDP was generally weak save Bramalea-Gore-Malton and thus the Tories still averaged close to 45% in their pick ups and the Liberals in the high 30s.  Anyways here is the GTA breakdown by region.

Toronto

Liberal 35% 6 seats
Conservative 31% 8.5 seats (Pickering-Scarborough East straddles the boundary of Toronto)
NDP 31% 8 seats

Durham Regional Municipality

Conservative 50% 4.5 seats, i.e. clean sweep
Liberal 23%
NDP 23%

York Regional Municipality

Conservative 52% 6.5 seats (York-Simcoe half in York region and half Simcoe)
Liberal 27% 1 seat (John McCallum was the lone Liberal from the 905 belt)
NDP 17%

Peel Regional Municipality

Conservative 44% 8 seats clean sweep
Liberal 34%
NDP 19%

Halton Regional Municipality

Conservative 54% 3.5 seats, clean sweep (Wellington-Halton Hills split between Halton)
Liberal 26%
NDP 16%

905 belt (excluding Hamilton-Niagara region)

Conservative 49%
Liberal 28%
NDP 19%

GTA

Conservative 41%
Liberal 31%
NDP 24%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 20, 2011, 07:03:57 AM
It is true in 416, the Tories definitely got some lucky breaks while the Liberals really got some bad breaks there.  In the 905 belt, the Tory wins were pretty large in many cases.  The Peel region is where their vote was very efficient, but in Durham, York, and Halton they got over 50% and won by over 20 points so I wouldn't describe their vote as being efficient here.  The Liberals definitely got screwed over in the GTA big time.  Since their vote wasn't concentrated in any one area, they got a lot of votes which didn't translate into seats.  The NDP was mostly concentrated in the urban core and with a three way split in Scarborough while the Tories were mostly in the suburbs, while they fared poorly in the downtown area.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 20, 2011, 09:53:39 AM
In 416 the NDP grabbed all its low hanging fruit - even the two seats in Scarborough that most would have regarded as "high-hanging fruit" - but i can already see what seats in Toronto the NDP will almost certainly target next time due to good demographics (ie: low incomes and lots of visible minorities) and good showings in this election despite relatively weak local campaigns. In all likelihood in 2015 the NDP will be like vultures pecking even more chunks from the Liberals carcass - they will heavily target Toronto Centre (I expect rae will have retired by then), the two Scarbouogh seats they did not win and also Etobicoke North and York West and maybe even Don Valley East - all ridings that have drastically evolved demographically and which were once seen to be middle class suburbia and are now very downscale areas that are mostly populated by Somalis and South Asians and Afro-Canadians etc...

Of course there will be a redistribution between now and 2015 - and who knows what the new boundaries will look like. Right now both Trinity-Spadina and Toronto Centre are very overpopulated. I wouldn't be surprised if Rosedale gets removed from TC - turning TC into a rding tailor made for the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 20, 2011, 05:00:09 PM
Rae seems to be a good fit for Toronto Centre, but I definitely agree that the NDP can win it if he's out. Seems like the NDP is becoming the party of the old city, definitely so if the Liberals continue to be shut out. But as for Etobicoke North and York West, I see them voting Tory before the NDP. That part of the city has more in common with the 905 than the rest of the city.

Of course, 2015 is quite a while away too.

edit: I was looking through some old articles, and ::). The largest newspaper in Timmins-James Bay, and my city's own, is such a Conservative shill. link. (http://www.timminspress.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3108149) They seem to be under the impression that the only issue affecting people in Northern Ontario is the long-gun registry, and not things such as a declining forestry industry, losing 700 local jobs due to the closing of Xstrata Copper, threats to our vast lakes and forests, and a negligent federal and provincial government. It's no wonder why every other party other than the NDP gets shut out here, they think we're single issue voters who care more about guns than livelihood. Idiots.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on May 20, 2011, 06:17:19 PM
Teddy your boundary between North York and "Toronto" isn't right, even allowing that the latter includes York and East York.
Where exactly am I wrong?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Toronto_locator.png

It doesn't correspond so neatly to current riding boundaries; significant parts of Eglinton-Lawrence and Don Valley West are south of the line.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 20, 2011, 07:41:06 PM
25% of DVW is East York maybe.
25%-33% of Egl-Law is Toronto.

Both are majority North York.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 20, 2011, 10:48:22 PM

edit: I was looking through some old articles, and ::). The largest newspaper in Timmins-James Bay, and my city's own, is such a Conservative shill. link. (http://www.timminspress.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3108149) They seem to be under the impression that the only issue affecting people in Northern Ontario is the long-gun registry, and not things such as a declining forestry industry, losing 700 local jobs due to the closing of Xstrata Copper, threats to our vast lakes and forests, and a negligent federal and provincial government. It's no wonder why every other party other than the NDP gets shut out here, they think we're single issue voters who care more about guns than livelihood. Idiots.

lulz. Angus did suffer a bit, and Tony Martin a lot (did he flip flop too?), but that article was seeming to think a barber shop poll would be accurate? Where was this barber shop? Timmins? Good chance Timmins didn't even go NDP, or at least not where this barber show is. (Timmins is the most anti-NDP part of the district)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 20, 2011, 11:02:58 PM
Donations map:

http://www.cyberpresse.ca/actualites/elections-federales/carte-des-contributions-aux-partis-politiques/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 20, 2011, 11:30:36 PM
Seems like the NDP is becoming the party of the old city, definitely so if the Liberals continue to be shut out. But as for Etobicoke North and York West, I see them voting Tory before the NDP. That part of the city has more in common with the 905 than the rest of the city.


If you've ever actually been to Etobicoke North or York West - you would see that they are actually two of the poorest ridings in all of Ontario. Etobicoke North is largely run-down high rises built in the 60s that are mostly inhabited by Somalis and Sikhs and York West is the Jane-Finch corridor which is overwhelmingly Black housing projects. They are a teeny bit like the similarly poor and very visible minority 905 riding of Bramalea-Gore-Malton that almost went NDP and they are a lot like the Scarborough seats that went NDP.

When people talk about "905-land" as in the areas that went heavily Tory in this election - they don't mean run-down apartment complexes inhabited by recent immigrants and visible minorities and people with low incomes. They mean places like Thornhill and Oakville and much of Mississauga and Markham and Richmond Hill where you have a lot of big detached single family homes and people with upper middle class incomes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 21, 2011, 12:11:51 AM
Seems like the NDP is becoming the party of the old city, definitely so if the Liberals continue to be shut out. But as for Etobicoke North and York West, I see them voting Tory before the NDP. That part of the city has more in common with the 905 than the rest of the city.


If you've ever actually been to Etobicoke North or York West - you would see that they are actually two of the poorest ridings in all of Ontario. Etobicoke North is largely run-down high rises built in the 60s that are mostly inhabited by Somalis and Sikhs and York West is the Jane-Finch corridor which is overwhelmingly Black housing projects. They are a teeny bit like the similarly poor and very visible minority 905 riding of Bramalea-Gore-Malton that almost went NDP and they are a lot like the Scarborough seats that went NDP.

When people talk about "905-land" as in the areas that went heavily Tory in this election - they don't mean run-down apartment complexes inhabited by recent immigrants and visible minorities and people with low incomes. They mean places like Thornhill and Oakville and much of Mississauga and Markham and Richmond Hill where you have a lot of big detached single family homes and people with upper middle class incomes.

I live in York West. I take the 106 bus every day that goes up and down Sentinel. My visual observations would indeed place this portion of the riding as one of the "black"ist areas of the city.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 21, 2011, 08:56:46 AM
Most of the area covered by Etobicoke North was NDP at a provincial level for ages. Of course the immigrants that lived there then have been replaced with ones who are... perhaps somewhat less automatically conductive to voting for a social democratic party. Still. The NDP have just shown that they can win the votes of non-Anglo immigrant communities in Toronto, so that particularly frustrating genie is out of its bottle...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 12:26:31 AM
Assuming the Liberal vote collapses which I think is a big "if" at this point as with over half of the NDP caucus being from Quebec, many being young and inexperienced, and the fact Quebec can swing en masse towards a party and then take it away next election, I think it is a bit premature to predict the demise of the Liberals yet. 

In Toronto, Scarborough Centre is the only Tory held riding I think the NDP has a good shot at.  Don Valley East is possible, but you would need a much stronger swing.  It is somewhat of a mixed riding and includes demographics that are favourable to the NDP, but also those for the Tories.

As for the Liberal ridings, I agree Toronto Centre looks good for a pickup and in fact if it weren't for Rosedale it might already be NDP.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown here.  Although since more live outside Rosedale then inside I could see Rosedale going heavily Tory while the NDP winning the rest of the riding.  Markham-Unionville is a 905 riding so if the Liberals lose this, it would be to the Tories.  Besides if BC politics is any indication the Chinese community tends to lean more right than left unlike the South Asian community.  Scarborough-Guildwood, we will need to await the poll by poll breakdowns since although the NDP did well here, the lakefront areas are more wealthy so if those are already going Tory, then a good sign for the NDP, but if the Liberal strength is still in this region, then not so much.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 12:32:21 AM
Continuing the last post, Scarborough-Agincourt seems also more favourable to the NDP than Tories, but for whatever reason, Jim Karygiannis is very popular in his riding despite the fact he is a complete sleazebag.  A lot will depend on whether he runs again or not.  If he runs again, I think the Liberals will hold out, but if not then it is anybody's guess.

In terms of Etobicoke North, that is a tough one.  Has a large immigrant community and is fairly working class in contrast with the other two Etobicoke ridings where the NDP has almost no chance at winning.  By the same token, it went solidly for Rob Ford in the last municipal election, it went PC provincially in both 1995 and 1999 and the Tories federally have consistently been in second place, so could go either way if you ask me.

York West definitely favours the NDP over the Tories by a wide margin.  This includes York university and the Jane and Finch area.  Also the Tories usually only get in the teens or low 20s at best.  Yes, I know it borders Tory ridings like York Centre and Vaughan and Thornhill which the Tories won by a landslide, but the demographics of those ridings is quite different so I don't think you can assume the Tory strength will spillover here.  Those are all middle class ridings and mostly white and the 30% visible minority population they have is mostly middle class.  By contrast, York West is 70% visible minority and one of the poorest ridings in Canada, never mind it has the university which probably helps the NDP too.  Also the Tories have made strong inroads amongst the Jewish community and to a lesser extent the Italian community, but both have a large middle class community.  This riding lacks this.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 12:38:15 AM
Finally there is St. Paul's which is probably the toughest to predict.  One of the wealthiest ridings in Canada so should favour the Tories, but has the highest percentage of those with university degrees which is bad news for the Tories so tough to call.  Sort of like Vancouver-Quadra and Vancouver Centre out West which stayed Liberal despite being obliterated in the West and considering the Liberals only got 13% and I doubt they will fall below that in Ontario, I would guess this will stay Liberal as long as the party continues to exist.  Also similiar to Montgomery County in Maryland and Manhattan and San Francisco which all vote heavily Democrat but I doubt they would go for a social democratic party.  They are otherwise liberal, not socialist areas. 

I look forward to seeing the poll by poll breakdown.  For those on the blue team New Brunswick, Southern Ontario, the Prairies, and parts of BC should be very blue and I also suspect they won most of the counties and municipalities in Mainland Rural Nova Scotia and even in the Appalaches-Chaudieres region of Quebec.

For the orange team, I suspect you will see lots of it in Quebec and much the way they won most ridings, probably most RCMs and municipalities also went NDP.  Also lots in Northern Ontario and some in Vancouver Island, while elsewhere their support is largely confined to the urban core meaning a fair number of seats, but not too many municipalities let alone counties.

For the Red team, Newfoundland & Labrador and PEI will be your only bright spots.  In fact looking at the Liberal vote by municipality, poll, or region will probably be pretty depressing for our Liberal friends in most parts of the country.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 23, 2011, 01:57:08 AM
I heard the NDP won more polls than the Liberals in Toronto Centre, as the Tories won Rosedale and the NDP won the rest of the riding, so the Liberals won the riding by finishing 2nd in both areas.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 23, 2011, 11:22:04 AM

In terms of Etobicoke North, that is a tough one.  Has a large immigrant community and is fairly working class in contrast with the other two Etobicoke ridings where the NDP has almost no chance at winning.  By the same token, it went solidly for Rob Ford in the last municipal election, it went PC provincially in both 1995 and 1999 and the Tories federally have consistently been in second place, so could go either way if you ask me.


Its true that the Tories won Etob. North in '95 and '99 - but in each case they won it with just about the low vote share of any riding they won in the province on an almost perfect three-way split. On top of that - that area has changed a lot demographically since the 90s and is now much poorer and more "visible minority" than it was then. I think I read that Etobicoke North is the most Muslim riding in Canada now! Its true that Rob Ford is from that area (well actually he's from the richer more central part of Etobicoke - but he was elected there) - but if he zillions of robo-called etc...were not enough to even come close to electing a Tory in this election when Ford's popularity is still in a honeymoon phase - then I'm sceptical what impact he'll have in 2015 when he may not even be mayor anymore and will in any case have accumulated a lot of the negative baggage that comes from being in power.

I wouldn't be so quick to write off Etob.-Lakeshore for the NDP. That area actually went NDP federally in 1972 and came close to going NDP throughout the 70s and 80s. Provincially it was represented by Ruth Grier of the NDP for many years. The area closer to the lake is very working class. I think the Liberal vote was very inflated from having Ignatieff as the candidate - four years from now the NDP could be the main opposition to the Tories and the Liberal vote could collapse. in that context anything could happen.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 23, 2011, 04:01:45 PM
Recount over, 'toby C has been held by the CPC.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on May 23, 2011, 05:58:27 PM
Recount over, 'toby C has been held by the CPC.

...with no change in the margin whatsoever - Conservative win by 26 votes.  The Conservative and Liberal candidates each picked up 17 votes in the recount.

That's all for the recounts.  Canadian preliminary vote counts are pretty accurate, as usual.  I guess that's what happens when you use simple paper ballots for the election's only race.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 23, 2011, 06:00:17 PM
Now that the writs are returned, we should see some official seating data from Parliament, which is what I've been waiting to see ever since a few hours into ballot counting.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 08:31:15 PM
I heard the NDP won more polls than the Liberals in Toronto Centre, as the Tories won Rosedale and the NDP won the rest of the riding, so the Liberals won the riding by finishing 2nd in both areas.

I wouldn't be surprised if the same thing happened in Vancouver Centre.  The Tories are strong in Coal Harbour and Yaletown where you have a lot of the expensive condos, while the NDP more in the West End where there is the large gay community and a lot of unmarried apartment dwellers.  Also possible to see a similiar scenario in Richmond-Arthabaska as it is in between L'Estrie which the NDP swept and the Appalaches-Chaudieres which went mostly Conservative. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 08:37:45 PM

Its true that the Tories won Etob. North in '95 and '99 - but in each case they won it with just about the low vote share of any riding they won in the province on an almost perfect three-way split. On top of that - that area has changed a lot demographically since the 90s and is now much poorer and more "visible minority" than it was then. I think I read that Etobicoke North is the most Muslim riding in Canada now! Its true that Rob Ford is from that area (well actually he's from the richer more central part of Etobicoke - but he was elected there) - but if he zillions of robo-called etc...were not enough to even come close to electing a Tory in this election when Ford's popularity is still in a honeymoon phase - then I'm sceptical what impact he'll have in 2015 when he may not even be mayor anymore and will in any case have accumulated a lot of the negative baggage that comes from being in power.

I wouldn't be so quick to write off Etob.-Lakeshore for the NDP. That area actually went NDP federally in 1972 and came close to going NDP throughout the 70s and 80s. Provincially it was represented by Ruth Grier of the NDP for many years. The area closer to the lake is very working class. I think the Liberal vote was very inflated from having Ignatieff as the candidate - four years from now the NDP could be the main opposition to the Tories and the Liberal vote could collapse. in that context anything could happen.

I agree on Etobicoke North, but I would be careful about Etobicoke-Lakeshore.  Although it may have gone NDP in the past, it went PC in 1984 and 1988 when Patrick Boyer held the riding and I believe the Liberals came in second both times.  Likewise it went PC provincially in 1995 and 1999 and unlike Etobicoke North, the PCs got in the upper 40s.  Also I am not so sure how big an effect Ignatieff had as in the past five elections it has been one of the weaker Liberal showings in Toronto and one of the sronger Tory showings (in 2000 I took the PC + Alliance vote).  This area is farily white and with an above average income although not as wealthy as Mississauga South which is clearly a Liberal/Tory battleground.  I agree the Tories could lose this, but it would be to the Liberals not NDP.  It is only 20% visible minority, although 40% are immigrants, but many are Eastern European immigrants, particulary Polish, Ukrainian, and Hungarian who have been living in Canada for over 30 years and according to an Ipsos exit poll the NDP won amongst immigrants who came in the last ten years, but the Tories amongst those who have lived in Canada for over ten years.  Likewise average imcones amongst immigrants who came prior to 1980 is generally higher than that of native born Canadians, by contrast incomes amongst immigrants who have arrived in the last ten years is only 2/3 of what a native Canadian makes thus why they might be more inclined to vote NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 08:50:10 PM
Adding to those who talk about the NDP taking many former Liberal seats in Toronto, I would be careful here.  In BC you have a left/right split and the city Vancouver pretty much splits evenly between the BC Liberals and BC NDP, so if the Liberal vote implodes I suspect you would see a similiar scenario in Toronto.  Also I don't buy the idea the NDP will necessarily replace the Liberals.  Outside Quebec, the NDP lead over the Liberals is much smaller and as we have seen in the past Quebec can swing massively in favour of a certain party only to take it away at a minute's notice.  For one thing, Jack Layton will face the following challenge; does he give into Quebec nationalist's demands and alienate his supporters in English Canada, not give into Quebec and lose badly there or find a happy medium like Mulroney tried to do and lose in both.  Remember the Bloc Quebecois and Reform Party were both offshots of the Mulroney PC coalition as many of his Western supporters felt he pandered too much to Quebec while many in Quebec felt he didn't do enough.  I am not saying this will happen, but it certainly could.  Also if the Liberals pull ahead nationally, I expect much of the centre-left vote in Ontario to swing back to them as they are more concerned about defeating the Tories and care less about which party it is.  Also the Tories destroyed Dion and Ignatieff through their attack ads and I assume they will use them against the NDP although probably the party as a whole and some of its members rather than Layton who is well known and fairly popular.  Considering how effective they were against the Liberals, they could work against the NDP.  Also the Liberal Party in many ways has a stronger opposition team.  Bob Rae, unlike Dion or Ignatieff is good at ripping the Tories apart so if he is interim leader I suspect he will do a good job of opposing them.  On finance, Ralph Goodale, Scott Brison, and John McCallum are far superior to any NDP MP, while on health care, you have Kirsty Duncan and Carolyn Bennett who are both former doctors so if on the major issues the Liberals are a more effetive opposition than the NDP that could help them.  As for my personal bias, I am a Democrat supporter in the US and this site is a US site thus why I am listed as a Democrat supporter, but in Canada I have been eligible to vote since 2000 and have voted for both the Tories and Liberals although I won't say which elections I voted for which.  I also tend to look at my local candidate too.  Still I try to look at things from a non-objective point of view, not my personal bias.  After all I was quite happy to see the NDP wipe out the Bloc Quebecois, but that doesn't mean I think the Bloc cannot rebound although I hope they don't.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 23, 2011, 09:08:24 PM
Doesn't matter if you voted Liberal or Tory, you're wrong either way ;-)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 23, 2011, 09:51:15 PM
Doesn't matter if you voted Liberal or Tory, you're wrong either way ;-)

Considering those are the only two parties to have ever former government, it must mean many other Canadians are wrong too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 23, 2011, 10:30:39 PM
The Liberals were, generally, able to keep "English Canada" and Quebec happy at the same time - that is, outside the West. Given the current CPC dominance on the Prairies (3 opposition seats out of 56 total) I don't think that the threat of "losing the west" is a serious concern for the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 23, 2011, 10:34:39 PM
Doesn't matter if you voted Liberal or Tory, you're wrong either way ;-)

Considering those are the only two parties to have ever former government, it must mean many other Canadians are wrong too.

Yup! :D


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on May 23, 2011, 11:57:23 PM
The Liberals were, generally, able to keep "English Canada" and Quebec happy at the same time - that is, outside the West. Given the current CPC dominance on the Prairies (3 opposition seats out of 56 total) I don't think that the threat of "losing the west" is a serious concern for the NDP.

What about BC? Or is that not what you think of when talking about the "West"?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: King of Kensington on May 24, 2011, 01:26:09 AM
This was a historic election.  With the decimation of the Liberals, Canada does indeed seem likely headed towards a social democratic-conservative polarization like that in the UK and Western Europe.  This was of course a long-time goal of the NDP: they were very much inspired by the Labour Party.  And Harper has indeed united the right side of the spectrum - Reform, PC and "blue Liberals."  Whatever reservations there were from "socially liberal and fiscally conservative" business types about Harper seems to have evaporated.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 24, 2011, 07:10:55 AM
This was a historic election.  With the decimation of the Liberals, Canada does indeed seem likely headed towards a social democratic-conservative polarization like that in the UK and Western Europe.  This was of course a long-time goal of the NDP: they were very much inspired by the Labour Party.  And Harper has indeed united the right side of the spectrum - Reform, PC and "blue Liberals."  Whatever reservations there were from "socially liberal and fiscally conservative" business types about Harper seems to have evaporated.

British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba also have similiar polarization at the provincial level.  I suspect both parties wanted this as the Tories have a better chance of winning against the NDP than Liberals thus if Harper's goal was to make the Tories the natural governing party this would make it easier.  Likewise, if the Liberals are gone, the NDP can win at least sometimes.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 24, 2011, 09:29:12 AM
The Liberals were, generally, able to keep "English Canada" and Quebec happy at the same time - that is, outside the West. Given the current CPC dominance on the Prairies (3 opposition seats out of 56 total) I don't think that the threat of "losing the west" is a serious concern for the NDP.

What about BC? Or is that not what you think of when talking about the "West"?

BC is very different, or at least urban/coastal BC is. And the opposition only has two seats (Skeena and Southern Interior) in rural BC. Western Alienation really only applies to rural western Canada--even Calgary doesn't really qualify, although it is Conservative for other reasons. Historically the rural West was competitive, but these days it isn't, and the NDP or Liberals don't need to win anything in the rural West to win nationally.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 24, 2011, 09:32:38 AM
Its worth noting that for all the talk about so-called "vote splitting" and about this mythical "progressive vote" in western Canada - when provincial Liberal parties vanished in BC (the party called BC Liberal is really Social Credit) and Sask. and Manitoba - their people tended to join with rightwing conservatives to create a non-NDP party. Make no mistake about it - if Harper had fallen short of a majority - the Liberals under Ignatieff would have quickly pulled a Nick Clegg and propped up Harper indefinitely. Of course the Liberals would also have promptly fallen into single digits - but so what - the Liberal Party would rather see Harper rule for the next 50 years than ever see the NDP in power.

I think the remnants of the Liberal party should just do what comes naturally and merge with the Tories and create a new Liberal-Conservative party.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 24, 2011, 09:33:24 AM
By 'historically' you of course mean 'until the late 1950s, with a handful of exceptions'.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 24, 2011, 03:21:50 PM
Its worth noting that for all the talk about so-called "vote splitting" and about this mythical "progressive vote" in western Canada - when provincial Liberal parties vanished in BC (the party called BC Liberal is really Social Credit) and Sask. and Manitoba - their people tended to join with rightwing conservatives to create a non-NDP party. Make no mistake about it - if Harper had fallen short of a majority - the Liberals under Ignatieff would have quickly pulled a Nick Clegg and propped up Harper indefinitely. Of course the Liberals would also have promptly fallen into single digits - but so what - the Liberal Party would rather see Harper rule for the next 50 years than ever see the NDP in power.

I think the remnants of the Liberal party should just do what comes naturally and merge with the Tories and create a new Liberal-Conservative party.

But wouldn't just supporting a (presumably reduced) Conservative government fatally damage what remains of their national support? The Liberal Party campaigned almost entirely by slamming Harper and presenting themselves as the only alternative (until another alternative rocketed overnight).

I suspect they will have salvage some face and offer to form a formal "grand coalition" but only after demanding that Harper leave as party leader with the implicit understanding that his successor be formed out of a real contest and not by backroom deal. That way they could credibly claim to have removed Harper from power and anyways discontent within Conservative Party ranks would have created a serious threat to him.

By making such an offer the Liberals would have, minimum, created a media frenzy about divisions in the Conservative caucus and whether or not Harper still has grassroots party support to remain as party leader. This would quite likely be self-fulfilling, taking attention off the Liberals' own dreadful situation and perhaps undoing the entire "Unite the Right" movement. It would have been amusing to think that only the NDP would not be embroiled in intra-party warfare or dilemmas about whether it should continue existing.

But enough fantasising...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: King of Kensington on May 24, 2011, 04:33:18 PM
But wouldn't just supporting a (presumably reduced) Conservative government fatally damage what remains of their national support? The Liberal Party campaigned almost entirely by slamming Harper and presenting themselves as the only alternative (until another alternative rocketed overnight).

Ignatieff could have PM in 2009, but instead continued to prop up Harper.  If the Conservatives had been reduced to another minority, I think it's pretty clear the Liberals would rather prop up Harper than play second fiddle to the NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 24, 2011, 07:46:13 PM
I agree on Etobicoke North, but I would be careful about Etobicoke-Lakeshore.  Although it may have gone NDP in the past, it went PC in 1984 and 1988 when Patrick Boyer held the riding and I believe the Liberals came in second both times.  

Actually, not 1988--but that was an exceptional circumstance: the Liberal candidate withdrew under a cloud at the last minute, too late for a new candidate to be fielded.  As a result, it became a straight PC-vs-NDP race which Boyer won by a narrow margin--but the NDP got, by default, their highest Toronto share, as did the Libertarians and the "rejected"!  (Well, not *entirely* by default; besides the 70s representation, most of the seat was provincially held by Ruth Grier at the time, so the NDP had enough of a competitive gloss going into that election that compensated for the Liberals' absence.)

I'd be careful, too, but in both directions, and it all depends on how the NDP "establishes" itself over the next few years--in the end, any breakthrough here might have less to do with the now-decimated 70s-style "working class" than with a little Millerite Parkdale-High Park yupscale energy spilling over the Humber.  Or other factors--after all, a "validated" NDP could, with the right candidates and campaigns, wind up making critical breakthroughs in parts of Brampton/Mississauga that aren't Bramalea-Gore-Malton.  Remember that there may be a pool of "latent/potential" 905ish NDP support that was still suppressed this past election, due to uncertainty about an untested brand and untested local candidates and maybe residual memories of 1990...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 25, 2011, 12:19:19 AM
YOu're quite right adma. There are factories and working class voters all over 905 - its just that up until now the NDP has been totally out of the picture and has not run serious campaigns with serious candidates. Its quite possible that in the next election the NDP will target a few seats in 905 beyond Oshawa and B-G-M and try to scoop up the last vestiges of the Liberal vote.   


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on May 25, 2011, 01:12:32 AM
What about Quebec? Will the Bloc Quebecois believe they have no purpose in the federal sphere and disband, or will they think they can regain their status as Quebec's protest party? If the former occurs, Quebec could become as safe NDP as the prairies are safe Alliance/CPC. If the latter, which parts of Quebec would the Bloc try to regain seats?

And are the charges that the NDP is now beholden to Quebec now that over half of its caucus is from there true or not?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 25, 2011, 09:29:54 AM

And are the charges that the NDP is now beholden to Quebec now that over half of its caucus is from there true or not?

It goes without saying that all parties tend to be more sensitive to the needs of the regions of the country where the bulk of their support comes from. The NDP will inevitably be more "beholden" to the following: Quebecers, women, younger people, visible minorities, people with lower incomes, people who work in the public sector, union members etc... The Tories on the other hand are "beholden" to the following: Albertans, rural people, older men, rich people, evangelical Christians, Bay St.

Tell me something i didn't already know. Quebecers tend to have very leftwing view son most issues. All the NDP has to do to "represent" Quebec in Parliament is to keep on being itself!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 25, 2011, 05:59:29 PM

And are the charges that the NDP is now beholden to Quebec now that over half of its caucus is from there true or not?

It goes without saying that all parties tend to be more sensitive to the needs of the regions of the country where the bulk of their support comes from. The NDP will inevitably be more "beholden" to the following: Quebecers, women, younger people, visible minorities, people with lower incomes, people who work in the public sector, union members etc... The Tories on the other hand are "beholden" to the following: Albertans, rural people, older men, rich people, evangelical Christians, Bay St.

Tell me something i didn't already know. Quebecers tend to have very leftwing view son most issues. All the NDP has to do to "represent" Quebec in Parliament is to keep on being itself!

Partially true although a successful party use triangulation.  The Tories would throw a bone to their base every now and then, but much of their focus was on the swing voters who might vote Tory but weren't a lock.  By contrast the Liberals spent too much time focusing on their base and not enough on the swing voters thus why they continued to decline.  The Tories off course ignored those who would never vote them.  If the NDP is to succeed, they need to use a similiar strategy although from the opposite side of the spectrum.  While Quebec is more left wing than the rest of Canada, it doesn't always vote for left wing parties.  The ADQ who were pretty right wing nearly won in 2007 and back in 1984 and 1988, Quebec went for the Mulroney PCs who were centre-right so I think the success of the NDP was due a to a cominbation of liking Jack Layton personally and the dissatisfaction with the alternatives.  I think either the Tories or Liberals could win big in Quebec if they had a leader who was well liked there and had policies that were popular.  I don't think Quebec as that much more left wing than the 80s.  Compared to the 50s when the Union Nationale won, yes and it is true more of those voters were still alive in the 80s, but Quebec swung hard to the left in the 60s and has been so since then.  The only change is some of the holdouts have died off thus causing the right wing base to dwindle.  Also the right wing in Quebec today is more libertarian whereas in the 60s they were mostly socially conservative Catholics.  Off course both were in a minority in their time and not large enough to win more than a handful of seats outside their core constituencies.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 25, 2011, 10:27:40 PM
Believe it or not, some of the Quebec Tory MPs of the 80s were quite left wing. Look at current BQ MP Louis Plamondon who got his start with the Tories of the 80s.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 25, 2011, 11:29:52 PM
Believe it or not, some of the Quebec Tory MPs of the 80s were quite left wing. Look at current BQ MP Louis Plamondon who got his start with the Tories of the 80s.
  Its true a lot of the nationalist who supported Mulroney were on the left, although some were on the right too i.e. Jean-Pierre Blackburn (who was a Harper cabinet minister until recently), Pierrette Venne (was kicked out of the BQ and generally at odds with the party), and Nic Leblanc (ran for the BQ in 1993, switched to the Canadian Alliance in 2000).  In fact that was part of the reason the Mulroney coalition imploded so spectacularly in 1993 as there was no way you could hold together a coalition that diverse.  One that spreads from Blue Liberals to Reformers is possible, but not Left wing Nationalist in the same caucus as your Western libertarians and social conservatives.  In addition back in the early days, not all Bloc MPs were on the left.  Under Bouchard they were more of a sovereigntists party than a left wing one.  It was more under Duceppe that they moved to the left. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 26, 2011, 12:40:27 AM
Believe it or not, some of the Quebec Tory MPs of the 80s were quite left wing. Look at current BQ MP Louis Plamondon who got his start with the Tories of the 80s.

No. I don't think so.
Louis Plamondon is on the right-wing of the BQ, I think.

As the former right-wing Bloc MPs, I can cite Pierre Brien, MP for Témiscamingue for 1993 to 2003, when he resigned to run for the ADQ in Rouyn-Noranda--Témiscamingue, before leaving in 2008, because he thought than ADQ was a dead end.

He was hired as a special councillor to Christian Paradis, the "leader" of Quebec CPC in 2009, and resigned after three months.

He returned to BQ and PQ after that and recently wrote in the newspapers than the only solution, no matter if we are on the left or on the right is BQ/PQ, because Ontario is ruling all Canada, in short.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 26, 2011, 10:31:54 AM
Believe it or not, some of the Quebec Tory MPs of the 80s were quite left wing. Look at current BQ MP Louis Plamondon who got his start with the Tories of the 80s.

No. I don't think so.
Louis Plamondon is on the right-wing of the BQ, I think.

As the former right-wing Bloc MPs, I can cite Pierre Brien, MP for Témiscamingue for 1993 to 2003, when he resigned to run for the ADQ in Rouyn-Noranda--Témiscamingue, before leaving in 2008, because he thought than ADQ was a dead end.

He was hired as a special councillor to Christian Paradis, the "leader" of Quebec CPC in 2009, and resigned after three months.

He returned to BQ and PQ after that and recently wrote in the newspapers than the only solution, no matter if we are on the left or on the right is BQ/PQ, because Ontario is ruling all Canada, in short.

From Wikipedia

Quote
Plamondon was also on the socially liberal wing of the Progressive Conservative Party. He voted against a motion to re-introduce capital punishment in 1987 and later opposed efforts to restrict abortion services.[8] He strongly supported the Mulroney government's efforts to strengthen official bilingualism and criticized dissident anglophone Tory MPs who tried to weaken the government's reforms.[9]

Plamondon was one of the more pro-labour members of the Tory caucus. In 1985, he promoted a partnership between the federal and Quebec governments and the Quebec Federation of Labour's Solidarity Fund.[10] Two years later, he stood with striking letter carriers in Sorel and criticized his own government's decision to approve replacement workers.[11] He was also prominent among a group of Quebec Tory MPs who tried to reduce the party's reliance on corporate donations.[12] Ricardo López, a right-wing Quebec Tory MP, once suggested that Plamondon would be more suited to the social democratic New Democratic Party.[13]

Anyways, the NDP shadow cabinet is being announced, and our first post-election poll!

http://abacusdata.ca/2011/05/26/federal-vote-intentions-cpc-40-ndp-33-lpc-16/

Cons: 40
NDP: 33 :D
Lib: 16
BQ: 6
Grn: 5



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 26, 2011, 04:41:16 PM
Says NDP are at 31% in Ontario whereas Liberals are at 20%... wait, this doesn't really matter, the election is in 4 years. :P Maybe some of that will spill over into the provincial election in the fall, but whatever. *shrug*


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:33:19 PM
04-06-08-11 (excluding byelections): Maritimes

AVALON *
Lib 63527 (46.11)
Con 54634 (39.65)
NDP 17679 (12.83)
GP 1659 (1.20)
Ind 276 (.20)
137775
 
BONAVISTA-GANDER-GRAND FALLS-WINDSOR
Lib 73902 (56.39)
Con 42111 (32.13)
NDP 13218 (10.09)
GP 1479 (1.13)
Ind 344 (.26)
131054
 
HUMBER-ST BARBE-BAIE VERTE
Lib 70103 (59.74)
Con 27033 (23.04)
NDP 17944 (15.29)
GP 976 (.83)
NLFP 964 (.82)
Ind 332 (.28)
117352
 
LABRADOR
Lib 20895 (53.99)
Con 10799 (27.90)
NDP 5391 (13.93)
Ind 919 (2.37)
GP 701 (1.81)
38705
 
RANDOM-BURIN-ST GEORGE'S
Lib 51506 (48.65)
Con 30165 (28.49)
NDP 22527 (21.28)
GP 1669 (1.58)
105867
 
ST JOHN'S EAST
NDP 76657 (47.04)
Con 47217 (28.98)
Lib 35918 (22.04)
GP 2230 (1.37)
PC 578 (.35)
NLFP 347 (.21)
162947
 
ST JOHN'S SOUTH-MOUNT PEARL ** **
Lib 50224 (34.79)
NDP 48714 (33.74)
Con 43181 (29.91)
GP 1662 (1.15)
NLFP 402 (.28)
Ind 179 (.12)
144362
 
=========================
 
CARDIGAN
Lib 43197 (52.99)
Con 27580 (33.83)
NDP 7358 (9.03)
GP 2286 (2.80)
Ind 1101 (1.35)
81522
 
CHARLOTTETOWN
Lib 34946 (47.27)
Con 23389 (31.63)
NDP 12373 (16.73)
GP 2621 (3.55)
CHP 413 (.56)
MP 193 (.26)
73935
 
EGMONT *
Lib 34560 (45.84)
Con 29931 (39.70)
NDP 8019 (10.64)
GP 2668 (3.54)
Ind 219 (.29)
75397
 
MALPEQUE
Lib 36478 (47.18)
Con 28156 (36.41)
NDP 8674 (11.22)
GP 4014 (5.19)
77322
 
==============================
 
CAPE BRETON-CANSO
Lib 75488 (50.38)
Con 36791 (24.55)
NDP 31952 (21.32)
GP 5608 (3.74)
149839
 
CENTRAL NOVA
Con 73343 (46.68)
NDP 41392 (26.34)
Lib 25949 (16.51)
GP 15702 (9.99)
CHP 427 (.27)
CAP 196 (.12)
ML 124 (.08)
157133
 
CUMBERLAND-COLCHESTER-MUSQUODOBOIT VALLEY
Con 67161 (41.26)
Lib 31498 (19.35)
NDP 30700 (18.86)
Ind 27303 (16.77)
GP 4264 (2.62)
Ind 1074 (.66)
PC 399 (.25)
CHP 375 (.23)
162775
 
DARTMOUTH-COLE HARBOUR *
Lib 67649 (39.76)
NDP 56546 (33.23)
Con 38809 (22.81)
GP 6395 (3.76)
PC 415 (.24)
CHP 219 (.13)
ML 126 (.07)
170159
 
HALIFAX
NDP 84759 (45.77)
Lib 56955 (30.75)
Con 33021 (17.83)
GP 9980 (5.39)
ML 478 (.26)
185193
 
HALIFAX WEST
Lib 74260 (43.48)
NDP 47466 (27.79)
Con 41087 (24.06)
GP 7709 (4.51)
CHP 257 (.15)
170779
 
KINGS-HANTS
Lib 69574 (44.03)
Con 49676 (31.44)
NDP 31135 (19.70)
GP 6184 (3.91)
CHP 1021 (.65)
MP 436 (.28)
158026
 
SACKVILLE-EASTERN SHORE
NDP 87535 (53.56)
Con 38673 (23.66)
Lib 30834 (18.87)
GP 5736 (3.51)
PC 645 (.39)
163423
 
SOUTH SHORE-ST MARGARET'S *
Con 62405 (38.51)
NDP 50318 (31.05)
Lib 40860 (25.22)
GP 6567 (4.05)
CHP 1889 (1.17)
162039
 
SYDNEY-VICTORIA
Lib 71740 (47.86)
NDP 37493 (25.01)
Con 34598 (23.08)
GP 5323 (3.55)
MP 474 (.32)
Ind 264 (.18)
149892
 
WEST NOVA **
Con 68414 (39.51)
Lib 66894 (38.63)
NDP 30326 (17.51)
GP 6018 (3.48)
Ind 844 (.49)
Ind 682 (.39)
173178
 
==================================
 
ACADIE-BATHURST
NDP 106968 (57.61)
Lib 46297 (24.93)
Con 29141 (15.69)
GP 2688 (1.45)
Ind 362 (.19)
Ind 219 (.12)
185675
 
BEAUSEJOUR
Lib 81404 (46.55)
Con 53840 (30.79)
NDP 31412 (17.96)
GP 7864 (4.50)
Ind 357 (.20)
174877
 
FREDERICTON **
Con 70020 (39.74)
Lib 63123 (35.82)
NDP 34464 (19.56)
GP 7964 (4.52)
Ind 266 (.15)
Ind 198 (.11)
CAP 168 (.10)
176203
 
FUNDY ROYAL
Con 71044 (48.25)
Lib 31055 (26.52)
NDP 30865 (20.35)
GP 6440 (4.53)
Ind 358 (.35)
139286
 
MADAWASKA-RESTIGOUCHE *
Lib 56453 (41.17)
Con 46080 (33.61)
NDP 28982 (21.14)
GP 4304 (3.14)
Ind 1290 (.94)
137109
 
MIRAMICHI **
Con 48868 (39.10)
Lib 46997 (37.61)
NDP 23568 (18.86)
GP 3895 (3.12)
Ind 1640 (1.31)
124968
 
MONCTON-RIVERVIEW-DIEPPE
Lib 81228 (43.94)
Con 58172 (31.47)
NDP 35886 (19.41)
GP 9421 (5.10)
CAP 150 (.08)
184857
 
NEW BRUNSWICK SOUTHWEST
Con 70034 (55.68)
Lib 28762 (22.87)
NDP 21149 (16.81)
GP 5195 (4.13)
CHP 450 (.36)
CAP 194 (.15)
125784
 
SAINT JOHN *
Con 60203 (40.58)
Lib 52176 (35.17)
NDP 30135 (20.31)
GP 4570 (3.08)
MP 699 (.47)
Ind 294 (.20)
Ind 290 (.20)
148367
 
TOBIQUE-MACTAQUAC
Con 68852 (50.53)
Lib 44455 (32.63)
NDP 18347 (13.47)
GP 4602 (3.38)
136256
 
===============================


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:34:52 PM
04-06-08-11: Quebec (A-L)

ABITIBI-BAIE JAMES-NUNAVIK-EEYOU
BQ 43116 (36.97)
Lib 27096 (23.24)
Con 23037 (19.75)
NDP 19144 (16.42)
GP 4221 (3.62)
116614
 
ABITIBI-TEMISCAMINGUE
BQ 85865 (47.04)
NDP 34408 (18.85)
Lib 31872 (17.46)
Con 26103 (14.30)
GP 3986 (2.18)
Ind 302 (.17)
182536
 
AHUNTSIC **
BQ 73171 (37.92)
Lib 71307 (36.95)
NDP 25437 (13.18)
Con 17370 (9.00)
GP 4985 (2.58)
MP 314 (.16)
Rhi 299 (.15)
ML 102 (.05)
192985
 
ALFRED-PELLAN *
BQ 82622 (38.35)
Lib 63675 (29.55)
NDP 35191 (16.33)
Con 27732 (12.87)
GP 5437 (2.52)
Ind 593 (.28)
Ind 204 (.09)
215454
 
ARGENTEUIL-PAPINEAU-MIRABEL
BQ 99418 (46.05)
NDP 37583 (17.41)
Lib 37504 (17.37)
Con 32002 (14.82)
GP 8551 (3.96)
Ind 342 (.16)
ML 284 (.13)
CHP 202 (.09)
215886
 
BAS-RICHELIEU-NICOLET-BECANCOUR
BQ 105109 (53.33)
Con 30696 (15.57)
Lib 30494 (15.47)
NDP 24980 (12.67)
GP 5247 (2.66)
MP 580 (.29)
197106
 
BEAUCE
Con 103688 (50.25)
BQ 38843 (18.82)
Lib 35059 (16.99)
NDP 23031 (11.16)
GP 5739 (2.78)
206360
 
BEAUHARNOIS-SALABERRY
BQ 98051 (45.30)
Lib 39119 (18.07)
Con 37380 (17.27)
NDP 35393 (16.35)
GP 6046 (2.79)
MP 480 (.22)
216469
 
BEAUPORT-LIMOILOU **
BQ 67790 (34.40)
Con 58636 (29.75)
NDP 36105 (18.32)
Lib 26987 (13.69)
GP 5895 (2.99)
Ind 610 (.31)
MP 585 (.30)
ML 356 (.18)
CHP 124 (.06)
197088
 
BERTHIER-MASKINONGE
BQ 97236 (45.40)
Con 42475 (19.83)
Lib 34898 (16.29)
NDP 33060 (15.44)
GP 6126 (2.86)
Rhi 373 (.17)
214168
 
BOURASSA
Lib 75051 (46.09)
BQ 45821 (28.14)
NDP 19356 (11.89)
Con 17815 (10.94)
GP 3809 (2.34)
ML 578 (.35)
MP 403 (.25)
162833
 
BROME-MISSISQUOI **
BQ 64867 (33.24)
Lib 60124 (30.81)
NDP 30937 (15.85)
Con 30327 (15.54)
GP 6636 (3.40)
PC 1921 (.98)
Ind 354 (.18)
195166
 
BROSSARD-LA PRAIRIE **
Lib 80424 (34.80)
BQ 72953 (31.57)
NDP 39586 (17.13)
Con 31724 (13.73)
GP 5939 (2.57)
ML 486 (.21)
231112
 
CHAMBLY-BORDUAS
BQ 118568 (47.41)
NDP 46437 (18.57)
Lib 36441 (14.57)
Con 31911 (12.76)
GP 8893 (3.56)
Ind 7843 (3.14)
250093
 
CHARLESBOURG-HAUTE-SAINT-CHARLES **
BQ 66254 (33.19)
Con 64498 (32.31)
NDP 35380 (17.73)
Lib 26819 (13.44)
GP 4513 (2.26)
Ind 1567 (.79)
MP 376 (.19)
CHP 189 (.09)
199596
 
CHATEAUGAY-SAINT-CONSTANT
BQ 97654 (44.94)
NDP 41986 (19.32)
Lib 40852 (18.80)
Con 29704 (13.67)
GP 6942 (3.19)
ML 162 (.07)
217300
 
CHICOUTIMI-LE FJORD
BQ 74288 (38.24)
Con 44295 (22.80)
Lib 43645 (22.47)
NDP 27442 (14.13)
GP 4237 (2.18)
Rhi 340 (.18)
194247
 
COMPTON-STANSTEAD
BQ 75277 (39.04)
Lib 43956 (22.79)
NDP 34130 (17.70)
Con 32147 (16.67)
GP 7326 (3.80)
192836
 
DRUMMOND
BQ 74268 (41.19)
Con 36302 (20.13)
NDP 35564 (19.72)
Lib 28704 (15.92)
GP 5470 (3.03)
180308
 
GASPESIE-ILES-DE-LA-MADELEINE
BQ 65410 (42.68)
Lib 35930 (23.45)
Con 30609 (19.97)
NDP 17006 (11.10)
GP 4292 (2.80)
153247
 
GATINEAU ** **
BQ 63269 (30.35)
Lib 57192 (27.43)
NDP 56838 (27.26)
Con 25769 (12.36)
GP 4839 (2.32)
MP 453 (.22)
ML 125 (.06)
208485
 
HAUTE-GASPESIE-LA MITIS-MATANE-MATAPEDIA
BQ 58216 (43.84)
Lib 34448 (25.94)
Con 23153 (17.44)
NDP 12678 (9.55)
GP 3341 (2.52)
Ind 778 (.59)
Ind 175 (.13)
132789
 
HOCHELAGA
BQ 90217 (49.11)
NDP 35525 (19.34)
Lib 34150 (18.59)
Con 14800 (8.06)
GP 6340 (3.45)
MP 997 (.54)
ML 652 (.35)
Com 554 (.30)
Rhi 476 (.26)
183711
 
HONORE-MERCIER *
Lib 78030 (39.59)
BQ 60146 (30.52)
NDP 27695 (14.05)
Con 25395 (12.88)
GP 4504 (2.29)
MP 626 (.32)
ML 517 (.26)
Rhi 181 (.09)
197094
 
HULL-AYLMER **
Lib 69512 (32.47)
NDP 59691 (27.88)
BQ 48058 (22.45)
Con 27301 (12.75)
GP 9157 (4.28)
ML 344 (.16)
214063
 
JEANNE-LE BER **
BQ 68686 (34.83)
Lib 61779 (31.33)
NDP 38782 (19.67)
Con 18647 (9.46)
GP 7943 (4.03)
Ind 577 (.29)
MP 520 (.26)
ML 269 (.14)
197203
 
JOLIETTE
BQ 106135 (50.08)
NDP 37129 (17.52)
Con 32364 (15.27)
Lib 27534 (12.99)
GP 8048 (3.80)
MP 701 (.33)
211911
 
JONQUIERE-ALMA **
Con 74687 (37.03)
BQ 74351 (36.87)
NDP 28964 (14.36)
Lib 18564 (9.20)
Ind 2737 (1.36)
GP 2259 (1.12)
Com 121 (.06)
201683
 
LAC-SAINT-LOUIS
Lib 100009 (47.88)
Con 47725 (22.85)
NDP 33849 (16.20)
BQ 13812 (6.61)
GP 12919 (6.18)
MP 578 (.28)
208892
 
LA POINTE-DE-L'ILE
BQ 101532 (53.79)
NDP 34166 (18.10)
Lib 29220 (15.48)
Con 18206 (9.65)
GP 4968 (2.63)
ML 390 (.21)
Rhi 261 (.14)
188743
 
LA SALLE-EMARD
Lib 76955 (43.47)
BQ 44037 (24.88)
NDP 28113 (15.88)
Con 20583 (11.63)
GP 5037 (2.85)
ML 794 (.45)
Ind 674 (.38)
MP 349 (.20)
Ind 281 (.16)
Rhi 208 (.12)
177031
 
LAURENTIDES-LABELLE
BQ 99647 (47.20)
Lib 43387 (20.55)
NDP 34398 (16.29)
Con 25713 (12.18)
GP 7841 (3.71)
ML 149 (.07)
211135
 
LAURIER-SAINTE-MARIE
BQ 97595 (50.08)
NDP 45526 (23.36)
Lib 28323 (14.53)
GP 12101 (6.21)
Con 8432 (4.33)
MP 910 (.47)
Rhi 845 (.43)
ML 486 (.25)
Com 323 (.17)
Ind 157 (.08)
Ind 93 (.05)
Ind 73 (.04)
194864
 
LAVAL
BQ 77109 (38.59)
Lib 53949 (27.00)
NDP 34384 (17.21)
Con 27818 (13.92)
GP 5624 (2.81)
MP 492 (.25)
ML 445 (.22)
199821
 
LAVAL-LES ILES
Lib 77545 (36.84)
BQ 55732 (26.48)
NDP 37846 (17.98)
Con 32157 (15.28)
GP 5453 (2.59)
ML 559 (.27)
MP 498 (.24)
Pir 369 (.18)
Rhi 336 (.16)
210495
 
LEVIS-BELLECHASSE
Con 86000 (39.42)
BQ 60657 (27.80)
NDP 30246 (13.86)
Lib 29796 (13.66)
GP 6938 (3.18)
Ind 4275 (1.96)
Com 163 (.07)
ML 113 (.05)
218188
 
LONGUEUIL-PIERRE-BOUCHER
BQ 94197 (47.01)
NDP 40925 (20.42)
Lib 34864 (17.40)
Con 23234 (11.59)
GP 6042 (3.02)
MP 798 (.40)
ML 331 (.17)
200391
 
LOTBINIERE-CHUTES-DE-LA-CHAUDIERE
Con 85819 (42.04)
BQ 56766 (27.81)
NDP 34131 (16.72)
Lib 21629 (10.60)
GP 5794 (2.84)
204139
 
LOUIS-HEBERT *
BQ 79804 (34.22)
Con 57394 (24.61)
Lib 49630 (21.28)
NDP 37239 (15.97)
GP 7058 (3.03)
Ind 1147 (.49)
Ind 565 (.24)
CHP 378 (.16)
233215
 
LOUIS-SAINT-LAURENT
Con 87590 (43.48)
BQ 50723 (25.18)
NDP 32098 (15.93)
Lib 23529 (11.68)
GP 4828 (2.40)
Ind 1498 (.74)
Ind 563 (.28)
Ind 332 (.16)
CHP 175 (.09)
Com 119 (.06)
201455
 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:35:34 PM
04-06-08-11: Quebec (M-W)

MANICOUAGAN
BQ 63408 (47.49)
NDP 25946 (19.43)
Con 20763 (15.55)
Lib 19930 (14.93)
GP 3278 (2.46)
Ind 195 (.15) 
133520
 
MARC-AURELE-FORTIN
BQ 99439 (44.96)
Lib 43661 (19.74)
NDP 42194 (19.08)
Con 27750 (12.55)
GP 8131 (3.68)
221175
 
MEGANTIC-L'ERABLE *
Con 71094 (39.66)
BQ 54438 (30.37)
Lib 29476 (16.44)
NDP 19351 (10.80)
GP 4637 (2.59)
CAP 250 (.14)
179246
 
MONTCALM
BQ 122486 (53.34)
NDP 48068 (20.93)
Con 26863 (11.70)
Lib 24448 (10.65)
GP 7761 (3.38)
229626
 
MONTMAGNY-L'ISLET-KAMOURASKA-RIVIERE-DU-LOUP
BQ 79488 (43.58)
Con 46485 (25.49)
Lib 29168 (15.99)
NDP 22696 (12.44)
GP 4399 (2.41)
CHP 147 (.08)
182383
 
MONTMORENCY-CHARLEVOIX-HAUTE-COTE-NORD
BQ 85113 (48.04)
Con 41267 (23.29)
NDP 24884 (14.05)
Lib 20984 (11.84)
GP 4910 (2.77)
177158
 
MOUNT ROYAL
Lib 88771 (59.46)
Con 33459 (22.41)
NDP 14034 (9.40)
BQ 7427 (4.98)
GP 4717 (3.16)
ML 406 (.27)
MP 308 (.21)
Com 89 (.06)
NAF 74 (.05)
149285
 
NOTRE-DAME-DE-GRACE-LACHINE
Lib 77748 (43.34)
NDP 33552 (18.70)
BQ 30066 (16.76)
Con 26256 (14.64)
GP 10260 (5.72)
ML 514 (.29)
MP 479 (.27)
Ltn 317 (.18)
Ind 207 (.12)
179399
 
OUTREMONT **
Lib 51166 (33.22)
NDP 48620 (31.57)
BQ 32261 (20.94)
Con 14680 (9.53)
GP 6004 (3.90)
MP 452 (.29)
ML 208 (.14)
Rhi 160 (.10)
Com 143 (.09)
Ind 101 (.07)
PC 94 (.06)
Ind 85 (.05)
Ind 34 (.02)
Ind 22 (.01)
154030
 
PAPINEAU **
Lib 67830 (39.85)
BQ 61825 (36.32)
NDP 22797 (13.39)
Con 10874 (6.39)
GP 4649 (2.73)
ML 714 (.42)
MP 490 (.29)
Ind 267  (.16)
Com 252 (.15)
Ind 250 (.15)
CAP 185 (.11)
NAF 95 (.06)
170228
 
PIERREFONDS-DOLLARD
Lib 90089 (47.91)
Con 40739 (21.67)
NDP 27422 (14.58)
BQ 20076 (10.68)
GP 8917 (4.74)
MP 511 (.27)
ML 278 (.15)
188032
 
PONTIAC * * * *
Con 53392 (29.72)
Lib 43557 (24.25)
BQ 39856 (22.19)
NDP 36107 (20.10)
GP 6252 (3.48)
ML 475 (.26)
179639
 
PORTNEUF-JACQUES-CARTIER **
BQ 56711 (29.68)
Ind 49815 (26.07)
NDP 31590 (16.53)
Lib 25135 (13.15)
Con 20723 (10.84)
GP 6087 (3.19)
Ind 1039 (.54)
191100
 
QUEBEC
BQ 80966 (40.23)
Con 42546 (21.14)
NDP 35625 (17.70)
Lib 32305 (16.05)
GP 7212 (3.58)
Ind 813 (.40)
PC 520 (.26)
MP 512 (.25)
Ltn 325 (.16)
CHP 228 (.11)
ML 223 (.11)
201275
 
REPENTIGNY
BQ 121114 (53.21)
NDP 46847 (20.58)
Lib 27781 (12.21)
Con 25345 (11.14)
GP 5968 (2.62)
MP 539 (.24)
227594
 
RICHMOND-ARTHABASKA
BQ 92623 (45.51)
Con 49615 (24.38)
Lib 28413 (13.96)
NDP 25872 (12.71)
GP 6489 (3.19)
Ind 526 (.26)
203538
 
RIMOUSKI-NEIGETTE-TEMISCOUATA-LES BASQUES
BQ 72841 (44.56)
Lib 29453 (18.02)
NDP 29347 (17.95)
Con 26360 (16.13)
GP 3493 (2.14)
Ind 1966 (1.20)
163460
 
RIVIERE-DES-MILLE-ILES
BQ 92354 (46.82)
NDP 37357 (18.94)
Lib 31387 (15.91)
Con 28205 (14.30)
GP 7967 (4.04)
197270
 
RIVIERE-DU-NORD
BQ 98686 (50.81)
NDP 41473 (21.35)
Lib 24029 (12.37)
Con 23843 (12.27)
GP 5479 (2.82)
MP 459 (.24)
Ind 273 (.14)
194242
 
ROBERVAL-LAC-SAINT-JEAN *
BQ 61437 (40.71)
Con 51967 (34.44)
NDP 16848 (11.16)
Lib 16414 (10.88)
GP 4239 (2.81)
150905
 
ROSEMONT-LA-PETITE-PATRIE
BQ 105522 (50.43)
NDP 45933 (21.95)
Lib 34536 (16.51)
Con 12638 (6.04)
GP 8907 (4.26)
Rhi 736 (.35)
MP 419 (.20)
ML 310 (.15)
Com 145 (.07)
NIL 83 (.04)
209229
 
SAINT-BRUNO-SAINT-HUBERT
BQ 93710 (44.41)
Lib 43278 (20.51)
NDP 38127 (18.07)
Con 27652 (13.10)
GP 7267 (3.44)
MP 596 (.28)
Ind 387 (.18)
211017
 
SAINT-HYACINTHE-BAGOT
BQ 92997 (47.23)
NDP 37611 (19.10)
Con 35866 (18.22)
Lib 24875 (12.63)
GP 5549 (2.82)
196898
 
SAINT-JEAN
BQ 100084 (48.34)
NDP 35781 (17.28)
Lib 33229 (16.05)
Con 30256 (14.61)
GP 7155 (3.46)
Ind 520 (.25)
207025
 
SAINT-LAMBERT
BQ 70672 (39.56)
Lib 48277 (27.02)
NDP 30519 (17.08)
Con 23099 (12.93)
GP 5733 (3.21)
ML 341 (.19)
178641
 
SAINT-LAURENT-CARTIERVILLE
Lib 96340 (58.05)
Con 22319 (13.45)
NDP 21511 (12.96)
BQ 21045 (12.68)
GP 3542 (2.13)
ML 736 (.44)
MP 298 (.18)
CAP 84 (.05)
Com 78 (.05)
165953
 
SAINT-LEONARD-SAINT-MICHEL
Lib 86581 (55.48)
BQ 25166 (16.13)
NDP 21012 (13.46)
Con 18731 (12.00)
GP 3625 (2.32)
ML 813 (.52)
NAF 122 (.08)
156050
 
SAINT-MAURICE-CHAMPLAIN
BQ 81708 (43.14)
Con 39687 (20.95)
Lib 35357 (18.67)
NDP 27017 (14.26)
GP 5094 (2.69)
MP 547 (.29)
189410
 
SHEFFORD
BQ 78392 (38.60)
Lib 46433 (22.86)
NDP 37475 (18.45)
Con 34301 (16.89)
GP 6502 (3.20)
203103
 
SHERBROOKE
BQ 100602 (49.12)
Lib 37312 (18.22)
NDP 35200 (17.19)
Con 26020 (12.71)
GP 4641 (2.27)
Rhi 700 (.34)
Ind 315 (.15)
204790
 
TERREBONNE-BLAINVILLE
BQ 107451 (51.59)
NDP 41091 (19.73)
Lib 27454 (13.18)
Con 25308 (12.15)
GP 6703 (3.22)
Ind 283 (.14)
208290
 
TROIS-RIVIERES
BQ 82963 (42.55)
Con 38007 (19.49)
NDP 36934 (18.94)
Lib 30596 (15.69)
GP 5501 (2.82)
MP 371 (.19)
Ind 346 (.18)
Rhi 256 (.13)
194974
 
VAUDREUIL-SOLANGES
BQ 96425 (38.14)
Lib 61364 (24.27)
Con 43302 (17.13)
NDP 42118 (16.66)
GP 9042 (3.58)
MP 585 (.23)
252836
 
VERCHERES-LES PATRIOTES
BQ 111778 (52.52)
NDP 39010 (18.33)
Lib 28783 (13.52)
Con 26855 (12.62)
GP 5960 (2.80)
MP 463 (.22)
212849
 
WESTMOUNT-VILLE-MARIE
Lib 74608 (46.21)
NDP 34759 (21.53)
Con 24679 (15.29)
BQ 16209 (10.04)
GP 10119 (6.27)
MP 396 (.25)
ML 246 (.15)
Rhi 202 (.13)
Com 176 (.11)
Ind 47 (.03)
161441
 
============================


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:36:17 PM
04-06-08-11: Ontario (A-K)

AJAX-PICKERING *
Lib 90586 (45.19)
Con 74926 (37.38)
NDP 24633 (12.29)
GP 9254 (4.62)
CHP 833 (.42)
Ltn 167 (.08)
UP 71 (.04)
200470
 
ALGOMA-MANITOULIN-KAPUSKASING *
NDP 58291 (40.76)
Lib 45204 (31.61)
Con 33955 (23.74)
GP 5055 (3.53)
FPNP 338 (.24)
Ind 164 (.11)
143007
 
ANCASTER-DUNDAS-FLAMBOROUGH-WESTDALE
Con 100202 (42.90)
Lib 73507 (31.47)
NDP 45521 (19.49)
GP 13515 (5.79)
ML 337 (.14)
Ind 303 (.13)
Ltn 170 (.07)
233555
 
BARRIE
Con 103985 (47.91)
Lib 65534 (30.19)
NDP 30535 (14.07)
GP 16350 (7.53)
Ltn 410 (.19)
ML 166 (.08)
CAP 77 (.04)
217057
 
BEACHES-EAST YORK **
Lib 77106 (39.93)
NDP 68196 (35.32)
Con 34815 (18.03)
GP 11862 (6.14)
ML 422 (.22)
MP 365 (.19)
PC 183 (.09)
Ind 80 (.04)
Com 62 (.03)
193091
 
BRAMALEA-GORE-MALTON *
Lib 84416 (42.57)
Con 67221 (33.90)
NDP 37669 (19.00)
GP 7852 (3.96)
ML 1150 (.58)
198308
 
BRAMPTON-SPRINGDALE **
Lib 74477 (40.48)
Con 68096 (37.01)
NDP 31643 (17.20)
GP 9222 (5.01)
Com 550 (.30)
183988
 
BRAMPTON WEST **
Lib 93116 (42.11)
Con 88948 (40.23)
NDP 29789 (13.47)
GP 8496 (3.84)
Ind 387 (.18)
Ind 371 (.17)
221107
 
BRANT *
Con 90068 (40.02)
Lib 71255 (31.66)
NDP 50221 (22.32)
GP 11139 (4.95)
CHP 1467 (.65)
Ind 586 (.26)
Ind 174 (.08)
Ind 138 (.06)
225048
 
BRUCE-GREY-OWEN SOUND
Con 99263 (49.33)
Lib 47297 (23.50)
GP 27005 (13.42)
NDP 26082 (12.96)
CHP 1581 (.79)
201228
 
BURLINGTON
Con 112991 (45.98)
Lib 86585 (35.23)
NDP 32717 (13.31)
GP 12874 (5.24)
CHP 429 (.17)
ML 140 (.06)
245736
 
CAMBRIDGE
Con 98749 (45.80)
Lib 58580 (27.17)
NDP 45468 (21.09)
GP 11780 (5.46)
CHP 395 (.18)
CAP 217 (.10)
ML 153 (.07)
Ind 134 (.06)
Ind 114 (.05)
215590
 
CARLETON-MISSISSIPPI MILLS
Con 154824 (55.35)
Lib 72192 (25.81)
NDP 33241 (11.88)
GP 18626 (6.66)
MP 426 (.15)
PC 408 (.15)
279717
 
CHATHAM-KENT-ESSEX
Con 81168 (45.67)
Lib 51938 (29.22)
NDP 36712 (20.66)
GP 7764 (4.37)
ML 150 (.08)
177732
 
DAVENPORT *
Lib 63844 (43.70)
NDP 55965 (38.31)
Con 16690 (11.42)
GP 7823 (5.35)
Com 636 (.44)
ML 269 (.18)
MP 251 (.17)
AA 220 (.15)
CAP 219 (.15)
Ind 172 (.12)
146089
 
DON VALLEY EAST
Lib 77121 (48.01)
Con 50066 (31.17)
NDP 25824 (16.08)
GP 6618 (4.12)
CHP 863 (.54)
Com 149 (.09)
160641
 
DON VALLEY WEST
Lib 103887 (49.81)
Con 74806 (35.87)
NDP 20677 (9.91)
GP 8467 (4.06)
Com 348 (.17)
Ltn 226 (.11)
CAP 151 (.07)
208562
 
DUFFERIN-CALEDON
Con 94921 (50.82)
Lib 47190 (25.26)
GP 23368 (12.51)
NDP 20575 (11.02)
CHP 443 (.24)
CAP 284  (.15)
186781
 
DURHAM
Con 108188 (49.24)
Lib 59392 (27.03)
NDP 35429 (16.13)
GP 13936 (6.34)
CHP 2566 (1.17)
Ltn 187 (.09)
219698
 
EGLINTON-LAWRENCE
Lib 92127 (48.93)
Con 66414 (35.27)
NDP 19822 (10.53)
GP 9607 (5.10)
NAF 213 (.11)
CAP 115 (.06)
188298
 
ELGIN-MIDDLESEX-LONDON
Con 95866 (48.95)
Lib 47358 (24.18)
NDP 38210 (19.51)
GP 9676 (4.94)
CHP 3486 (1.78)
PC 502 (.26)
CAP 487 (.25)
Ind 243 (.12)
195828
 
ESSEX
Con 87815 (41.28)
Lib 59874 (28.14)
NDP 57753 (27.15)
GP 7012 (3.30)
ML 290 (.14)
212744
 
ETOBICOKE CENTRE
Lib 106105 (50.23)
Con 74014 (35.04)
NDP 22499 (10.65)
GP 7852 (3.72)
PC 402 (.19)
ML 378 (.18)
211250
 
ETOBICOKE-LAKESHORE *
Lib 91910 (43.58)
Con 74562 (35.35)
NDP 32860 (15.58)
GP 10775 (5.11)
ML 604 (.29)
Com 186 (.09)
210897
 
ETOBICOKE NORTH
Lib 70554 (54.13)
Con 33579 (25.76)
NDP 20151 (15.46)
GP 3015 (2.31)
ML 889 (.68)
CHP 847 (.65)
Ind 582 (.45)
PC 526 (.40)
Ltn 208 (.16)
130351
 
GLENGARRY-PRESCOTT-RUSSELL *
Con 95552 (43.98)
Lib 84410 (38.85)
NDP 26573 (12.23)
GP 10085 (4.64)
CHP 464 (.21)
Ltn 194 (.09)
217278
 
GUELPH *
Lib 91666 (39.50)
Con 68601 (29.56)
NDP 43681 (18.82)
GP 25315 (10.91)
CHP 1172 (.50)
MP 627 (.27)
Ltn 351 (.15)
Com 292 (.13)
AA 189 (.08)
ML 140 (.06)
Ind 58 (.02)
232092
 
HALDIMAND-NORFOLK
Con 92178 (45.67)
Lib 65825 (32.61)
NDP 29612 (14.67)
GP 7303 (3.62)
Ind 4821 (2.39)
CHP 2112 (1.05)
201851
 
HALIBURTON-KAWARTHA LAKES-BROCK
Con 119741 (52.31)
Lib 55192 (24.11)
NDP 39653 (17.32)
GP 13122 (5.73)
CHP 867 (.38)
Ind 330 (.14)
228905
 
HALTON *
Con 129481 (46.85)
Lib 102081 (36.94)
NDP 29834 (10.80)
GP 14382 (5.20)
CHP 586 (.21)
276364
 
HAMILTON CENTRE
NDP 88683 (50.80)
Lib 39248 (22.48)
Con 36481 (20.90)
GP 7069 (4.05)
RM 780 (.45)
Ltn 528 (.30)
CHP 520 (.30)
ML 469 (.27)
NAF 345 (.20)
CAP 332 (.19)
Com 125 (.07)
174580
 
HAMILTON EAST-STONEY CREEK
NDP 78686 (39.48)
Lib 57163 (28.68)
Con 53592 (26.89)
GP 6611 (3.32)
PC 1321 (.66)
Ind 716 (.36)
Com 620 (.31)
Ltn 385 (.19)
ML 95 (.05)
CAP 92 (.05)
199281
 
HAMILTON MOUNTAIN
NDP 87913 (40.24)
Con 65451 (29.96)
Lib 56570 (25.89)
GP 7284 (3.33)
CHP 728 (.33)
ML 346 (.16)
Ind 171 (.08)
218463
 
HURON-BRUCE *
Con 87656 (42.26)
Lib 71918 (34.67)
NDP 36322 (17.51)
GP 7419 (3.58)
CHP 2724 (1.31)
Ind 766 (.37)
MP 638 (.31)
207443
 
KENORA ** *
Con 35994 (36.49)
Lib 31225 (31.65)
NDP 27975 (28.36)
GP 3313 (3.36)
Ind 147 (.15)
98654


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:37:09 PM
04-06-08-11: Ontario (K-P)

KINGSTON AND THE ISLANDS
Lib 103668 (44.04)
Con 68895 (29.27)
NDP 44133 (18.75)
GP 17188 (7.30)
CHP 481 (.20)
CAP 401 (.17)
Ind 396 (.17)
Ind 237 (.10)
235399
 
KITCHENER CENTRE **
Lib 74711 (39.32)
Con 66142 (34.81)
NDP 36834 (19.38)
GP 11067 (5.82)
Com 494 (.26)
Ind 277 (.15)
Ind 215 (.11)
Ind 199 (.10)
ML 92 (.05)
190031
 
KITCHENER-CONESTOGA
Con 87945 (45.51)
Lib 59594 (30.84)
NDP 32906 (17.03)
GP 12807 (6.63)
193252
 
KITCHENER-WATERLOO *
Lib 105859 (42.11)
Con 84841 (33.75)
NDP 40677 (16.18)
GP 18059 (7.18)
CHP 379 (.15)
Ltn 333 (.13)
Ind 297 (.12)
PP 245 (.10)
ML 210 (.08)
Ind 174 (.07)
Ind 107 (.04)
CAP 105 (.04)
Com 105 (.04)
251391
 
LAMBTON-KENT-MIDDLESEX
Con 98520 (48.70)
Lib 55363 (27.37)
NDP 36432 (18.01)
GP 9077 (4.49)
CHP 2888 (1.43)
202280
 
LANARK-FRONTENAC-LENNOX & ADDINGTON
Con 121959 (53.24)
Lib 53965 (23.56)
NDP 36308 (15.85)
GP 13182 (5.75)
MP 1327 (.58)
Ind 820 (.36)
PC 735 (.32)
CAP 429 (.19)
Ind 370 (.16)
229095
 
LEEDS-GRENVILLE
Con 111913 (55.98)
Lib 45542 (22.78)
NDP 29323 (14.67)
GP 12707 (6.36)
PC 426 (.21)
199911
 
LONDON-FANSHAWE *
NDP 67939 (39.65)
Con 51259 (29.91)
Lib 43530 (25.40)
GP 7295 (4.26)
CHP 811 (.47)
PC 453 (.26)
ML 65 (.04)
171352
 
LONDON NORTH CENTRE *
Lib 84402 (39.02)
Con 68825 (31.81)
NDP 48688 (22.51)
GP 13456 (6.22)
PC 503 (.23)
AA 229 (.11)
ML 227 (.10)
216330
 
LONDON WEST **
Con 89256 (37.81)
Lib 85167 (36.08)
NDP 47096 (19.95)
GP 12844 (5.44)
PC 1253 (.53)
CHP 253 (.11)
ML 126 (.05)
UP 65 (.03)
236060
 
MARKHAM-UNIONVILLE
Lib 107936 (55.43)
Con 56067 (28.79)
NDP 23829 (12.24)
GP 5812 (2.98)
Ltn 456 (.23)
PC 321 (.16)
Ind 297 (.15)
194718
 
MISSISSAUGA-BRAMPTON SOUTH
Lib 91922 (48.03)
Con 64334 (33.61)
NDP 26665 (13.93)
GP 7443 (3.89)
ML 1026 (.54)
191390
 
MISSISSAUGA EAST-COOKSVILLE
Lib 84542 (48.89)
Con 56698 (32.79)
NDP 23267 (13.45)
GP 5730 (3.31)
CHP 1245 (.72)
ML 836 (.48)
Ind 496 (.29)
Ind 114 (.07)
172928
 
MISSISSAUGA-ERINDALE **
Lib 100105 (43.30)
Con 93780 (40.56)
NDP 26849 (11.61)
GP 9798 (4.24)
ML 373 (.16)
Ind 289 (.13)
231194
 
MISSISSAUGA SOUTH **
Lib 86557 (44.24)
Con 78272 (40.01)
NDP 21069 (10.77)
GP 9231 (4.72)
NAF 194 (.10)
ML 181 (.09)
CAP 129 (.07)
195633
 
MISSISSAUGA-STREETSVILLE *
Lib 87042 (44.66)
Con 71497 (36.68)
NDP 23739 (12.18)
GP 9730 (4.99)
PC 2040 (1.05)
Ind 431 (.22)
Ind 426 (.22)
194905
 
NEPEAN-CARLETON
Con 153330 (52.90)
Lib 83684 (28.87)
NDP 34254 (11.82)
GP 18002 (6.21)
MP 561 (.19)
289831
 
NEWMARKET-AURORA *
Con 100667 (45.40)
Lib 80463 (36.29)
NDP 24184 (10.91)
GP 12120 (5.47)
PC 3810 (1.72)
CHP 205 (.09)
AA 182 (.08)
CAP 79 (.04)
221710
 
NIAGARA FALLS
Con 96131 (44.72)
Lib 62910 (29.26)
NDP 44756 (20.82)
GP 10915 (5.08)
CHP 259 (.12)
214971
 
NIAGARA WEST-GLANBROOK
Con 110015 (49.46)
Lib 59576 (26.78)
NDP 37646 (16.92)
GP 10472 (4.71)
CHP 4556 (2.05)
CAP 179 (.08)
222444
 
NICKEL BELT
NDP 75235 (43.81)
Lib 54019 (31.45)
Con 34732 (20.22)
GP 5314 (3.09)
PC 1044 (.61)
MP 851 (.50)
ML 218 (.13)
Ind 217 (.13)
Ind 112 (.07)
171742
 
NIPISSING-TIMISKAMING *
Lib 73634 (42.12)
Con 61439 (35.14)
NDP 30985 (17.72)
GP 8353 (4.78)
CAP 408 (.23)
174819
 
NORTHUMBERLAND-QUINTE WEST
Con 108977 (45.77)
Lib 74586 (31.33)
NDP 41197 (17.30)
GP 13328 (5.60)
238088
 
OAK RIDGES-MARKHAM **
Con 127664 (42.19)
Lib 124091 (41.00)
NDP 35152 (11.62)
GP 13362 (4.42)
PC 1900 (.63)
CHP 458 (.15)
302627
 
OAKVILLE **
Con 100751 (44.08)
Lib 93039 (40.71)
NDP 22102 (9.67)
GP 12554 (5.49)
CAP 95 (.04)
228541
 
OSHAWA *
Con 82457 (41.21)
NDP 69219 (34.59)
Lib 38618 (19.30)
GP 8874 (4.44)
ML 360 (.18)
Ltn 260 (.13)
CHP 246 (.12)
CAP 52 (.03)
200086
 
OTTAWA CENTRE
NDP 109547 (42.44)
Lib 68628 (26.59)
Con 56166 (21.76)
GP 21105 (8.18)
MP 1546 (.60)
Com 301 (.12)
ML 275 (.11)
Ind 210 (.08)
Ind 121 (.05)
Ind 121 (.05)
CAP 76 (.03)
258096
 
OTTAWA-ORLEANS **
Con 104938 (42.75)
Lib 98805 (40.25)
NDP 30370 (12.37)
GP 10760 (4.38)
Ind 578 (.24)
245451
 
OTTAWA SOUTH
Lib 108112 (45.44)
Con 82701 (34.76)
NDP 31850 (13.39)
GP 12037 (5.06)
PC 1781 (.75)
MP 495 (.21)
PP 382 (.16)
Ltn 244 (.10)
Ind 225 (.09)
ML 79 (.03)
237906
 
OTTAWA-VANIER
Lib 93476 (43.94)
Con 57061 (26.82)
NDP 46168 (21.70)
GP 14466 (6.80)
MP 558 (.26)
ML 454 (.21)
Ind 227 (.11)
PC 221 (.10)
CAP 100 (.05)
212731
 
OTTAWA WEST-NEPEAN *
Con 98533 (43.01)
Lib 82172 (35.87)
NDP 34635 (15.12)
GP 11526 (5.03)
Ind 905 (.40)
MP 430 (.19)
Ind 414 (.18)
CAP 242 (.11)
Com 150 (.07)
ML 68 (.03)
229075
 
OXFORD
Con 95049 (50.72)
Lib 41079 (21.92)
NDP 35458 (18.92)
GP 8930 (4.77)
CHP 4780 (2.55)
MP 1565 (.84)
Ltn 430 (.23)
CAP 108 (.06)
187399
 
PARKDALE-HIGH PARK **
NDP 78369 (39.68)
Lib 75678 (38.32)
Con 29914 (15.15)
GP 11356 (5.75)
MP 1119 (.57)
CHP 481 (.24)
ML 450 (.23)
NAF 119 (.06)
197486
 
PARRY SOUND-MUSKOKA
Con 82178 (45.65)
Lib 53957 (29.97)
NDP 27215 (15.11)
GP 16120 (8.95)
Ind 325 (.18)
Ind 168 (.09)
ML 54 (.03)
180017
 
PERTH-WELLINGTON
Con 86929 (47.70)
Lib 45899 (25.18)
NDP 33098 (18.16)
GP 11873 (6.51)
CHP 4373 (2.40)
ML 84 (.05)
182256
 
PETERBOROUGH *
Con 98190 (41.16)
Lib 76712 (32.16)
NDP 50081 (21.00)
GP 12521 (5.25)
MP 455 (.19)
NAF 189 (.08)
Ind 179 (.08)
CAP 104 (.04)
ML 98  (.04)
238529
 
PICKERING-SCARBOROUGH EAST
Lib 95918 (49.32)
Con 64270 (33.04)
NDP 25289 (13.00)
GP 8452 (4.35)
CAP 200 (.10)
CHP 191 (.10)
Ind 176 (.09)
194496
 
PRINCE EDWARD-HASTINGS
Con 105508 (48.64)
Lib 62354 (28.74)
NDP 36675 (16.91)
GP 10782 (4.97)
Ind 699 (.32)
Ind 468 (.22)
Ind 276 (.13)
PC 171 (.08)
216933


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:37:57 PM
04-06-08-11: Ontario (R-Y)

RENFREW-NIPISSING-PEMBROKE
Con 113787 (56.75)
Lib 43612 (21.75)
NDP 24307 (12.12)
Ind 9611 (4.79)
GP 6874 (3.43)
Ind 1304 (.65)
MP 714 (.36)
Ind 293 (.15)
200502
 
RICHMOND HILL
Lib 94098 (48.50)
Con 66490 (34.27)
NDP 22630 (11.66)
GP 9743 (5.02)
PC 1074 (.55)
194035
 
ST CATHARINES
Con 88975 (42.00)
Lib 67710 (31.96)
NDP 43384 (20.48)
GP 9633 (4.55)
CHP 1589 (.75)
CAP 204 (.10)
Com 204 (.10)
ML 162 (.08)
211861
 
ST PAULS
Lib 110161 (49.96)
Con 58059 (26.33)
NDP 38646 (17.53)
GP 13037 (5.91)
Ltn 615 (.28)
220518
 
SARNIA-LAMBTON
Con 85648 (43.50)
Lib 53916 (27.38)
NDP 43330 (22.01)
GP 8713 (4.43)
CHP 3986 (2.02)
Ind 749 (.38)
Ind 545 (.28)
196887
 
SAULT STE MARIE *
NDP 67530 (38.68)
Con 54857 (31.42)
Lib 46798 (26.80)
GP 4589 (2.63)
FPNP 460 (.26)
ML 245 (.14)
CHP 111 (.06)
174590
 
SCARBOROUGH-AGINCOURT
Lib 95758 (57.33)
Con 45099 (27.00)
NDP 20275 (12.14)
GP 4855 (2.91)
PC 1048 (.63)
167035
 
SCARBOROUGH CENTRE
Lib 74027 (48.21)
Con 44623 (29.06)
NDP 29284 (19.07)
GP 5450 (3.55)
Com 152 (.10)
153536
 
SCARBOROUGH-GUILDWOOD
Lib 74774 (49.25)
Con 44106 (29.05)
NDP 27060 (17.82)
GP 5102 (3.36)
CAP 298 (.20)
Ind 259 (.17)
Ind 150 (.10)
Ind 82 (.05)
151831
 
SCARBOROUGH-ROUGE RIVER
Lib 89266 (51.88)
Con 37711 (21.92)
NDP 33478 (19.46)
Ind 6962 (4.05)
GP 3255 (1.89)
Ltn 574 (.33)
Ind 467 (.27)
Ind 357 (.21)
172070
 
SCARBOROUGH SOUTHWEST
Lib 65891 (41.99)
Con 42803 (27.27)
NDP 39159 (24.95)
GP 8496 (5.41)
Com 288 (.18)
Ind 151 (.10)
Ind 147 (.09)
156935
 
SIMCOE-GREY
Con 115312 (48.77)
Lib 61391 (25.96)
NDP 29789 (12.60)
GP 15207 (6.43)
Ind 8714 (3.69)
CHP 5645 (2.39)
CAP 244 (.10)
Ltn 143 (.06)
236445
 
SIMCOE NORTH
Con 101745 (45.60)
Lib 71502 (32.04)
NDP 32011 (14.35)
GP 16247 (7.28)
CHP 1483 (.66)
CAP 145 (.06)
223133
 
STORMONT-DUNDAS-SOUTH GLENGARRY
Con 105076 (54.69)
Lib 48749 (25.37)
NDP 26699 (13.90)
GP 8122 (4.23)
Ind 2581 (1.34)
CHP 663 (.35)
Ltn 151 (.08)
CAP 105 (.05)
192146
 
SUDBURY **
NDP 65784 (36.78)
Lib 59864 (33.47)
Con 43294 (24.21)
GP 7989 (4.47)
PC 782 (.44)
FPNP 626 (.35)
Ind 250 (.14)
ML 177 (.10)
Com 70 (.04)
178836
 
THORNHILL**
Con 100419 (45.02)
Lib 94216 (42.24)
NDP 18818 (8.44)
GP 7804 (3.50)
PC 1094 (.49)
Ind 241 (.11)
Ind 233 (.10)
AA 215 (.10)
223040
 
THUNDER BAY-RAINY RIVER *
NDP 56206 (38.02)
Lib 47466 (32.10)
Con 38607 (26.11)
GP 4335 (2.93)
MP 971 (.66)
CHP 267 (.18)
147852
 
THUNDER BAY-SUPERIOR NORTH *
NDP 55352 (37.87)
Lib 45231 (30.95)
Con 36422 (24.92)
GP 7423 (5.08)
MP 1723 (1.18)
146151
 
TIMMINS-JAMES BAY
NDP 67259 (49.57)
Lib 38498 (28.37)
Con 26917 (19.84)
GP 3007 (2.22)
135681
 
TORONTO CENTRE
Lib 111504 (50.74)
NDP 51344 (23.36)
Con 40705 (18.52)
GP 14054 (6.40)
Com 578 (.26)
MP 313 (.14)
ML 299 (.14)
Ltn 277 (.13)
AA 259 (.12)
Ind 146 (.07)
Ind 108 (.05)
NAF 101 (.05)
CAP 63 (.03)
219751
 
TORONTO-DANFORTH
NDP 96168 (50.14)
Lib 58867 (30.69)
Con 20139 (10.50)
GP 15260 (7.96)
AA 562 (.29)
ML 343 (.18)
MP 265 (.14)
Ind 130 (.07)
CAP 54 (.03)
191788
 
TRINITY-SPADINA
NDP 111200 (46.16)
Lib 84515 (35.08)
Con 29455 (12.23)
NDP 12936 (5.37)
Ltn 947 (.39)
PC 923 (.38)
ML 380 (.16)
CAP 173 (.07)
Ind 164 (.07)
Ind 132 (.05)
NAF 89 (.04)
240914
 
VAUGHAN
Lib 116606 (49.26)
Con 85868 (36.27)
NDP 22867 (9.66)
GP 10111 (4.27)
Ltn 1076 (.45)
CAP 192 (.08)
236720
 
WELLAND ** **
NDP 70874 (33.80)
Con 67112 (32.00)
Lib 61480 (29.32)
GP 7527 (3.59)
CHP 1573 (.75)
Ind 569 (.27)
ML 411 (.20)
Ind 169 (.08)
209715
 
WELLINGTON-HALTON HILLS
Con 113709 (53.87)
Lib 55584 (26.34)
NDP 24652 (11.68)
GP 14601 (6.92)
CHP 2162 (1.02)
Ind 355 (.17)
211063
 
WHITBY-OSHAWA
Con 118054 (47.57)
Lib 76057 (30.65)
NDP 39607 (15.96)
GP 13376 (5.39)
Ltn 472 (.19)
CHP 395 (.16)
CAP 217 (.09)
248178
 
WILLOWDALE
Lib 106642 (51.26)
Con 66007 (31.73)
NDP 25897 (12.45)
GP 7242 (3.48)
PC 1747 (.84)
Ind 513 (.25)
208048
 
WINDSOR-TECUMSEH
NDP 85832 (46.12)
Con 47899 (25.74)
Lib 44401 (23.86)
GP 7360 (3.95)
ML 617 (.33)
186109
 
WINDSOR WEST
NDP 86288 (50.40)
Con 39471 (23.06)
Lib 37625 (21.98)
GP 6338 (3.70)
PC 614 (.36)
ML 511 (.30)
Ind 224 (.13)
Com 125 (.07)
171196
 
YORK CENTRE
Lib 74131 (46.01)
Con 57634 (35.77)
NDP 22348 (13.87)
GP 6169 (3.83)
Ind 824 (.51)
161106
 
YORK-SIMCOE
Con 108054 (53.48)
Lib 47965 (23.74)
NDP 28525 (14.12)
GP 14033 (6.95)
CHP 1979 (.98)
PC 1346 (.67)
UP 157 (.08)
202059
 
YORK SOUTH-WESTON
Lib 71021 (49.29)
NDP 39569 (27.46)
Con 27704 (19.23)
GP 5437 (3.77)
Ind 189 (.13)
Com 175 (.12)
144095
 
YORK WEST
Lib 69348 (58.98)
NDP 22036 (18.74)
Con 20259 (17.23)
GP 3764 (3.20)
CHP 1811 (1.54)
Ind 192 (.16)
CAP 170 (.14)
117580
 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:38:50 PM
04-06-08-11: ManSaskTerr

==============================
 
BRANDON-SOURIS
Con 80400 (56.70)
NDP 29168 (20.57)
Lib 19936 (14.06)
GP 10393 (7.33)
CHP 933 (.66)
Ind 611 (.43)
Com 362 (.26)
141803
 
CHARLESWOOD-ST JAMES-ASSINIBOIA
Con 84331 (50.51)
Lib 50000 (29.95)
NDP 25276 (15.14)
GP 6799 (4.07)
MP 337 (.20)
CHP 180 (.11)
Com 49 (.03)
166972
 
CHURCHILL *
NDP 34701 (41.67)
Lib 27137 (32.59)
Con 14914 (17.91)
Ind 4283 (5.14)
GP 2090 (2.51)
Ind 146 (.18)
83271
 
DAUPHIN-SWAN RIVER-MARQUETTE
Con 74784 (59.19)
NDP 26133 (20.68)
Lib 19055 (15.08)
GP 5085 (4.02)
CHP 1189 (.94)
PPP 96 (.08)
126342
 
ELMWOOD-TRANSCONA
NDP 61538 (48.46)
Con 46438 (36.57)
Lib 12770 (10.06)
GP 4786 (3.77)
CHP 1061 (.84)
MP 311 (.24)
Com 74 (.06)
126981
 
KILDONAN-ST PAUL
Con 73527 (48.06)
NDP 40215 (26.28)
Lib 33109 (21.64)
GP 4562 (2.98)
Ind 572 (.37)
CHP 511 (.33)
MP 290 (.19)
Ind 218 (.14)
153004
 
PORTAGE-LISGAR
Con 97593 (70.04)
Lib 16968 (12.18)
NDP 13154 (9.44)
GP 7338 (5.27)
CHP 4161 (2.99)
Com 117 (.08)
139331
 
PROVENCHER
Con 99016 (66.09)
Lib 22228 (14.84)
NDP 20501 (13.68)
GP 6183 (4.13)
CHP 1680 (1.12)
PP 215 (.14)
149823
 
SAINT BONIFACE **
Con 68026 (40.90)
Lib 62448 (37.54)
NDP 28702 (17.25)
GP 5914 (3.56)
CHP 858 (.52)
MP 317 (.19)
Com 77 (.05)
166342
 
SELKIRK-INTERLAKE
Con 90538 (55.38)
NDP 47313 (28.94)
Lib 18678 (11.43)
GP 5814 (3.56)
CHP 852 (.52)
Ind 277 (.17)
163472
 
WINNIPEG CENTRE
NDP 52167 (49.05)
Lib 23019 (21.65)
Con 21795 (20.49)
GP 7768 (7.30)
Com 584 (.55)
MP 346 (.33)
Ind 226 (.21)
FPNP 212 (.20)
Ind 135 (.13)
Ind 92 (.09)
106344
 
WINNIPEG NORTH
NDP 51239 (50.65)
Lib 26415 (26.11)
Con 19730 (19.50)
GP 2838 (2.81)
Com 503 (.50)
CHP 348 (.34)
PPP 90 (.09)
101163
 
WINNIPEG SOUTH **
Con 72892 (44.45)
Lib 65004 (39.64)
NDP 20326 (12.40)
GP 5020 (3.06)
CHP 728 (.44)
163970
 
WINNIPEG SOUTH CENTRE *
Lib 65651 (41.22)
Con 53202 (33.40)
NDP 30760 (19.31)
GP 7599 (4.77)
PC 934 (.59)
MP 293 (.18)
Ind 246 (.15)
Ind 218 (.14)
CAP 180 (.11)
Ind 103 (.06)
Com 81 (.05)
159267
 
=================================
 
BATTLEFORDS-LLOYDMINSTER
Con 66756 (59.73)
NDP 24535 (21.95)
Lib 11608 (10.39)
NAF 4396 (3.93)
GP 3475 (3.11)
CHP 990 (.89)
111760
 
BLACKSTRAP
Con 79065 (49.61)
NDP 46883 (29.42)
Lib 26878 (16.87)
GP 5860 (3.68)
Ind 412 (.26)
CHP 177 (.11)
Com 94 (.06)
159369
 
CYPRESS HILLS-GRASSLANDS
Con 76522 (65.34)
NDP 20619 (17.61)
Lib 14961 (12.77)
GP 5012 (4.28)
117114
 
DESNETHE-MISSINIPPI-CHURCHILL RIVER
Con 36876 (43.26)
Lib 22966 (26.94)
NDP 20826 (24.43)
GP 2366 (2.78)
Ind 1923 (2.26)
FPNP 282 (.33)
85239
 
PALLISER *
Con 56824 (42.50)
NDP 49194 (36.79)
Lib 22536 (16.85)
GP 4586 (3.43)
CHP 451 (.34)
CAP 121 (.09)
133712
 
PRINCE ALBERT
Con 66603 (55.50)
NDP 32867 (27.39)
Lib 16437 (13.70)
GP 3810 (3.18)
CAP 283 (.24)
120000
 
REGINA-LUMSDEN-LAKE CENTRE
Con 58594 (45.07)
NDP 39248 (30.19)
Lib 26258 (20.20)
GP 4399 (3.38)
Ind 1506 (1.16)
130005
 
REGINA-QU'APPELLE
Con 52729 (45.54)
NDP 39310 (33.95)
Lib 19136 (16.53)
GP 4090 (3.53)
CHP 293 (.25)
Ind 127 (.11)
NAF 106 (.09)
115791
 
SASKATOON-HUMBOLDT
Con 66293 (45.72)
NDP 42905 (29.59)
Lib 22438 (15.47)
Ind 7758 (5.35)
GP 5199 (3.59)
Ind 342 (.24)
NAF 71 (.05)
145006
 
SASKATOON-ROSETOWN-BIGGAR **
Con 52089 (46.18)
NDP 47092 (41.75)
Lib 9592 (8.50)
GP 3437 (3.05)
CHP 373 (.33)
Ind 138 (.12)
Ltn 73 (.06)
112794
 
SASKATOON-WANUSKEWIN
Con 72365 (52.82)
NDP 33002 (24.09)
Lib 25656 (18.73)
GP 5684 (4.15)
CHP 307 (.22)
137014
 
SOURIS-MOOSE MOUNTAIN
Con 71479 (60.63)
NDP 18546 (15.73)
Lib 14752 (12.51)
Ind 8399 (7.12)
GP 4526 (3.84)
CHP 191 (.16)
117893
 
WASCANA
Lib 74084 (48.87)
Con 47788 (31.52)
NDP 24750 (16.33)
GP 4966 (3.28)
151588
 
YORKTON-MELVILLE
Con 82406 (65.78)
NDP 25062 (20.01)
Lib 13000 (10.38)
GP 3991 (3.19)
Ind 524 (.42)
Ind 287 (.23)
125270
 
==========================
 
NUNAVUT **
Lib 12100 (37.16)
Con 10490 (32.21)
NDP 6458 (19.83)
GP 1621 (4.98)
Ind 1172 (3.60)
MP 724 (2.22)
32565
 
WESTERN ARCTIC
NDP 24875 (42.26)
Lib 15690 (26.65)
Con 15661 (26.61)
GP 2150 (3.65)
FPNP 252 (.43)
Ind 149 (.25)
AA 87 (.15)
58864
 
YUKON
Lib 24576 (42.85)
Con 16169 (28.19)
NDP 10166 (17.72)
GP 6048 (10.54)
MP 299 (.52)
CHP 100 (.17)
57358
 
============================


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:39:28 PM
04-06-08-11: Alta

CALGARY CENTRE
Con 110891 (54.93)
Lib 42802 (21.20)
GP 24119 (11.95)
NDP 23120 (11.45)
CAP 524 (.26)
Ind 420 (.21)
201876
 
CALGARY CENTRE-NORTH
Con 115121 (55.80)
Lib 31466 (15.25)
NDP 31100 (15.07)
GP 26383 (12.79)
ML 765 (.37)
Ind 763 (.37)
Ltn 345 (.17)
FPNP 206 (.10)
CAP 168 (.08)
206317
 
CALGARY EAST
Con 93346 (65.53)
Lib 20388 (14.31)
NDP 16535 (11.61)
GP 10933 (7.68)
Com 1053 (.74)
CAP 183 (.13)
142438
 
CALGARY NORTHEAST
Con 91560 (58.96)
Lib 36833 (23.72)
NDP 13507 (8.70)
GP 7489 (4.82)
Ind 4836 (3.11)
ML 417 (.27)
Ind 364 (.23)
CAP 291 (.19)
155297
 
CALGARY-NOSE HILL
Con 144316 (68.28)
Lib 33652 (15.92)
NDP 18765 (8.88)
GP 14636 (6.92)
211369
 
CALGARY SOUTHEAST
Con 171428 (74.22)
Lib 23579 (10.21)
NDP 18509 (8.01)
GP 17033 (7.37)
Ind 225 (.10)
WBP 193 (.08)
230967
 
CALGARY SOUTHWEST
Con 158392 (72.29)
Lib 25093 (11.45)
NDP 18437 (8.41)
GP 15351 (7.01)
CHP 1067 (.49)
MP 516 (.24)
Ltn 265 (.12)
219121
 
CALGARY WEST
Con 143917 (58.64)
Lib 55308 (22.54)
GP 23719 (9.66)
NDP 19513 (7.95)
Ind 1790 (.73)
ML 594 (.24)
CAP 580 (.24)
245421
 
CROWFOOT
Con 164316 (82.26)
NDP 15704 (7.86)
Lib 9705 (4.86)
GP 8728 (4.37)
MP 639 (.32)
Ind 463 (.23)
CHP 204 (.10)
199759
 
EDMONTON CENTRE
Con 93903 (45.59)
Lib 68454 (33.24)
NDP 30415 (14.77)
GP 11027 (5.35)
MP 509 (.25)
ML 479 (.23)
PC 456 (.22)
PP 289 (.14)
Ind 221 (.11)
Ind 204 (.10)
205957
 
EDMONTON EAST
Con 90908 (50.07)
NDP 46103 (25.39)
Lib 35092 (19.33)
GP 8927 (4.92)
CHP 538 (.30)
181568
 
EDMONTON-LEDUC
Con 131507 (60.78)
Lib 41629 (19.24)
NDP 29748 (13.75)
GP 13485 (6.23)
216369
 
EDMONTON-MILL WOODS-BEAUMONT
Con 97599 (55.87)
Lib 40139 (22.98)
NDP 27896 (15.97)
GP 7714 (4.42)
Ind 477 (.27)
Com 477 (.27)
Ind 374 (.21)
174676
 
EDMONTON-ST ALBERT
Con 130409 (60.62)
Lib 37489 (17.43)
NDP 33834 (15.73)
GP 13388 (6.22)
215120
 
EDMONTON-SHERWOOD PARK
Con 104213 (50.67)
Ind 32223 (15.67)
Lib 29026 (14.11)
NDP 27238 (13.24)
GP 12742 (6.20)
WBP 222 (.11)
205664
 
EDMONTON-SPRUCE GROVE
Con 147507 (66.91)
Lib 34270 (15.54)
NDP 26498 (12.02)
GP 12183 (5.53)
220458
 
EDMONTON-STRATHCONA **
Con 80500 (40.83)
NDP 74884 (37.98)
Lib 29099 (14.76)
GP 10444 (5.30)
KP 909 (.46)
PC 582 (.30)
ML 447 (.23)
Ind 206 (.10)
Ind 87 (.04)
197158
 
FORT MCMURRAY-ATHABASKA
Con 77490 (65.96)
Lib 17721 (15.08)
NDP 15070 (12.83)
GP 6091 (5.18)
FPNP 570 (.49)
Ind 350 (.30)
CHP 186 (.16)
117478
 
LETHBRIDGE
Con 123713 (63.42)
NDP 31563 (16.18)
Lib 24543 (12.58)
GP 8623 (4.42)
CHP 5347 (2.74)
Ind 735 (.38)
MP 553 (.28)
195077
 
MACLEOD
Con 145101 (76.30)
NDP 14441 (7.59)
Lib 14411 (7.58)
GP 12490 (6.57)
PC 1754 (.92)
Ind 1055 (.55)
CHP 674 (.35)
CAP 235 (.12)
190161
 
MEDICINE HAT
Con 123580 (74.70)
NDP 17044 (10.30)
Lib 15123 (9.14)
GP 7450 (4.50)
Ind 971 (.59)
CHP 680 (.41)
Ind 580 (.35)
165428
 
PEACE RIVER
Con 121827 (66.76)
NDP 24095 (13.20)
Lib 17097 (9.37)
Ind 9882 (5.42)
GP 8180 (4.48)
CAP 373 (.20)
Ind 359 (.20)
Rhi 345 (.19)
Ltn 316 (.17)
182474
 
RED DEER
Con 143070 (74.97)
NDP 21140 (11.08)
Lib 14711 (7.71)
GP 11550 (6.05)
CHP 353 (.18)
190824
 
VEGREVILLE-WAINWRIGHT
Con 145392 (76.15)
NDP 18311 (9.59)
Lib 13133 (6.88)
GP 12973 (6.79)
CHP 691 (.36)
WBP 431 (.23)
190931
 
WESTLOCK-ST PAUL
Con 116121 (71.39)
Lib 20137 (12.38)
NDP 16760 (10.30)
GP 8328 (5.12)
CHP 510 (.31)
Ind 416 (.26)
Ind 381 (.23)
162653
 
WETASKIWIN
Con 137464 (76.89)
NDP 16448 (9.20)
Lib 13169 (7.37)
GP 11031 (6.17)
CAP 659 (.37)
178771
 
WILD ROSE
Con 153362 (72.71)
GP 20294 (9.62)
NDP 18741 (8.89)
Lib 18100 (8.58)
Ltn 246 (.12)
CHP 181 (.09)
210924
 
YELLOWHEAD
Con 115931 (72.23)
NDP 19139 (11.92)
Lib 11186 (6.97)
GP 10959 (6.83)
CHP 2496 (1.56)
CAP 792 (.49)
160503
 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on May 26, 2011, 08:39:56 PM
04-06-08-11: BC

===================================
 
ABBOTSFORD
Con 122758 (63.26)
NDP 31112 (16.03)
Lib 28494 (14.68)
GP 9408 (4.85)
MP 1096 (.56)
CHP 585 (.30)
ML 423 (.22)
CAP 173 (.09)
194049
 
BRITISH COLUMBIA SOUTHERN INTERIOR
NDP 86901 (45.74)
Con 62283 (32.78)
Lib 22857 (12.03)
GP 16647 (8.76)
Ind 591 (.31)
MP 391 (.21)
ML 242 (.13)
CAP 87 (.05)
189999
 
BURNABY-DOUGLAS **
NDP 71885 (37.83)
Con 63069 (33.19)
Lib 45455 (23.92)
GP 7957 (4.19)
Ltn 711 (.37)
Com 616 (.32)
Ind 282 (.15)
ML 57 (.03)
190032
 
BURNABY-NEW WESTMINSTER
NDP 73790 (42.28)
Con 53344 (30.56)
Lib 38329 (21.96)
GP 8058 (4.62)
Ltn 346 (.20)
CAP 312 (.18)
ML 190 (.11)
Com 166 (.10)
174535
 
CARIBOO-PRINCE GEORGE
Con 86425 (50.76)
NDP 45028 (26.45)
Lib 25415 (14.93)
GP 9530 (5.60)
CHP 945 (.56)
Ind 729 (.43)
CAP 687 (.40)
Ind 478 (.28)
Ind 394 (.23)
Rhi 204 (.12)
ML 188 (.11)
Ltn 148 (.09)
FPNP 95 (.06)
170266
 
CHILLIWACK-FRASER CANYON
Con 108296 (57.33)
NDP 40741 (21.57)
Lib 25665 (13.59)
GP 10191 (5.39)
CHP 2744 (1.45)
MP 603 (.32)
ML 495 (.26)
WBP 180 (.10)
188915
 
DELTA-RICHMOND EAST
Con 97214 (51.01)
Lib 49525 (25.99)
NDP 31998 (16.79)
GP 11467 (6.02)
NAF 220 (.12)
Ltn 147 (.08)
190571
 
ESQUIMALT-JUAN DE FUCA ** **
Con 75364 (31.79)
NDP 74936 (31.61)
Lib 66631 (28.10)
GP 18658 (7.87)
CAP 505 (.21)
Ind 309 (.13)
WBP 272 (.11)
Ind 229 (.10)
Ind 181 (.08)
237085
 
FLEETWOOD-PORT KELLS
Con 73968 (40.86)
NDP 49386 (27.28)
Lib 45860 (25.33)
GP 8064 (4.45)
Ind 3202 (1.77)
Ltn 370 (.20)
ML 167 (.09)
181017
 
KAMLOOPS-THOMPSON-CARIBOO
Con 96450 (44.69)
NDP 70380 (32.61)
Lib 36289 (16.81)
GP 12093 (5.60)
Ind 440 (.20)
CHP 191 (.09)
215843
 
KELOWNA-LAKE COUNTRY
Con 120200 (52.77)
Lib 44454 (19.51)
NDP 40438 (17.75)
GP 21551 (9.46)
CAP 494 (.22)
MP 447 (.20)
Com 218 (.10)
227802
 
KOOTENAY-COLUMBIA
Con 90829 (55.42)
NDP 43423 (26.50)
Lib 17334 (10.58)
GP 11528 (7.03)
Ind 636 (.39)
CAP 132 (.08)
163882
 
LANGLEY
Con 121130 (56.69)
NDP 38736 (18.13)
Lib 36080 (16.89)
GP 14133 (6.61)
Ind 2422 (1.13)
CHP 594 (.28)
PP 353 (.17)
CAP 211 (.10)
213659
 
NANAIMO-ALBERNI *
Con 108659 (43.46)
NDP 84332 (33.73)
Lib 34355 (13.74)
GP 19675 (7.87)
Ind 920 (.37)
MP 560 (.22)
ML 410 (.16)
CHP 406 (.16)
PP 363 (.15)
CAP 314 (.13)
249994
 
NANAIMO-COWICHAN
NDP 112527 (46.21)
Con 85884 (35.27)
Lib 26099 (10.72)
GP 17750 (7.29)
CAP 547 (.22)
ML 500 (.21)
Ind 229 (.09)
243536
 
NEWTON-NORTH DELTA ** **
Lib 59006 (33.45)
Con 55370 (31.39)
NDP 53280 (30.20)
GP 7461 (4.23)
Com 447 (.25)
Ind 319 (.18)
Ind 179 (.10)
Ind 126 (.07)
Ind 123 (.07)
Ind 106 (.06)
176417
 
NEW WESTMINSTER-COQUITLAM **
NDP 78817 (39.76)
Con 72262 (36.45)
Lib 34695 (17.50)
GP 9914 (5.00)
Ind 1174 (.59)
CHP 700 (.35)
Ltn 314 (.16)
ML 252 (.13)
Ind 123 (.06)
198251
 
NORTH VANCOUVER **
Con 95936 (41.05)
Lib 87192 (37.31)
NDP 31904 (13.65)
GP 17769 (7.60)
Ind 350 (.15)
ML 189 (.08)
CAP 181 (.08)
Ltn 166 (.07)
233687
 
OKANAGAN-COQUIHALLA
Con 106788 (52.95)
NDP 40258 (19.96)
Lib 34485 (17.10)
GP 18306 (9.08)
Ind 860 (.43)
MP 548 (.27)
CAP 259 (.13)
Ind 180 (.09)
201684
 
OKANAGAN-SHUSWAP
Con 107903 (49.70)
NDP 52698 (24.27)
Lib 33626 (15.49)
GP 19974 (9.20)
NAF 1242 (.57)
CAP 707 (.33)
MP 492 (.23)
Ind 359 (.17)
NAF 104 (.05)
217105
 
PITT MEADOWS-MAPLE RIDGE-MISSION
Con 94751 (46.38)
NDP 69647 (34.09)
Lib 27189 (13.31)
GP 10691 (5.23)
NAF 798 (.39)
MP 327 (.16)
Ltn 300 (.15)
Ind 277 (.14)
Ind 137 (.07)
Ind 101 (.05)
ML 95 (.05)
204313
 
PORT MOODY-WESTWOOD-PORT COQUITLAM
Con 91341 (48.24)
NDP 48237 (25.47)
Lib 36607 (19.33)
GP 9323 (4.92)
Ind 2317 (1.22)
Ltn 1327 (.70)
CAP 111 (.06)
Com 94 (.05)
189357
 
PRINCE GEORGE-PEACE RIVER
Con 89964 (61.07)
NDP 29924 (20.31)
Lib 15839 (10.75)
GP 10424 (7.08)
PP 415 (.28)
Ind 351 (.24)
CAP 301 (.20)
ML 101 (.07)
147319
 
RICHMOND
Con 77829 (45.64)
Lib 58164 (34.11)
NDP 25167 (14.76)
GP 8495 (4.98)
Ind 395 (.23)
CAP 376 (.22)
Ind 91 (.05)
170517
 
SAANICH-GULF ISLANDS
Con 99001 (37.67)
Lib 63800 (24.28)
GP 55827 (21.24)
NDP 43060 (16.39)
WBP 378 (.14)
Ltn 246 (.09)
Ind 214 (.08)
CAP 139 (.05)
CHP 114 (.04)
262779
 
SKEENA-BULKLEY VALLEY
NDP 68852 (47.54)
Con 49742 (34.34)
Lib 15994 (11.04)
GP 5004 (3.45)
CHP 4806 (3.32)
CAP 277 (.19)
ML 161 (.11)
144836
 
SOUTH SURREY-WHITE ROCK-CLOVERDALE
Con 112349 (50.25)
Lib 58237 (26.05)
NDP 36215 (16.20)
GP 14208 (6.35)
PC 794 (.36)
Ind 753 (.34)
CHP 429 (.19)
CAP 272 (.12)
Ind 189 (.08)
Ind 152 (.07)
223598
 
SURREY NORTH *
NDP 51905 (36.56)
Con 41099 (28.95)
Lib 24428 (17.21)
Ind 15089 (10.63)
GP 4833 (3.40)
CHP 1658 (1.17)
Ltn 631 (.44)
Ind 512 (.36)
Ind 451 (.32)
Ind 420 (.30)
PC 373 (.26)
Ind 271 (.19)
CAP 190 (.13)
Com 93 (.06)
141953
 
VANCOUVER CENTRE
Lib 84059 (37.31)
NDP 60796 (26.99)
Con 51334 (22.79)
GP 26363 (11.70)
Ltn 1261 (.56)
CHP 373 (.17)
PC 285 (.13)
MP 259 (.11)
PP 192 (.09)
ML 156 (.07)
CAP 101 (.04)
Com 96 (.04)
225275
 
VANCOUVER EAST
NDP 97679 (57.65)
Lib 32184 (18.99)
Con 24577 (14.51)
GP 12992 (7.67)
ML 489 (.29)
WLP 425 (.25)
MP 399 (.24)
CAP 293 (.17)
CHP 250 (.15)
NAF 147 (.09)
169435
 
VANCOUVER ISLAND NORTH **
Con 94838 (42.14)
NDP 90647 (40.28)
Lib 24010 (10.67)
GP 14733 (6.55)
Ind 666 (.30)
ML 168 (.07)
225062
 
VANCOUVER-KINGSWAY *
NDP 70771 (39.10)
Lib 59289 (32.76)
Con 41292 (22.81)
GP 7719 (4.26)
Ltn 861 (.48)
Com 835 (.46)
NAF 548 (.30)
ML 389 (.21)
CAP 285 (.16)
180989
 
VANCOUVER-QUADRA
Lib 106138 (47.39)
Con 73037 (32.61)
NDP 29719 (13.27)
GP 13930 (6.22)
Ltn 484 (.22)
Ind 263 (.12)
CAP 165 (.07)
MP 158 (.07)
ML 89 (.04)
223983
 
VANCOUVER SOUTH *
Lib 70901 (41.35)
Con 57876 (33.76)
NDP 35171 (20.51)
GP 6116 (3.57)
ML 754 (.44)
CHP 339 (.20)
Com 105 (.06)
NAF 98 (.06)
CAP 90 (.05)
171450
 
VICTORIA
NDP 99054 (41.29)
Con 58569 (24.42)
Lib 55908 (23.31)
GP 25110 (10.47)
MP 311 (.13)
Ind 282 (.12)
CHP 237 (.10)
WBP 208 (.09)
CAP 206 (.09)
239885
 
WEST VANCOUVER-SUNSHINE COAST-SEA TO SKY COUNTRY
Con 99826 (40.33)
Lib 73744 (29.80)
NDP 49478 (19.99)
GP 23012 (9.30)
CAP 385 (.16)
ML 355 (.14)
PC 293 (.12)
Ltn 250 (.10)
WBP 156 (.06)
247499


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 26, 2011, 08:41:05 PM
Looking at the results themselves many make some sense, but I do have some questions which hopefully others can answer.

1.  Why have the Conservatives gained so heavily in Manitoba.  They got 39% in 2004 and 54% in the last election, otherwise a 15% jump more so than Ontario.  They have an NDP government that is reasonably popular, they are still a have not province, and there doesn't seem to be any issue that would drive them towards the Conservatives unlike Saskatchewan which has a strong resource sector, a have province, and has a popular premier who is centre-right.

2.  How come the Liberals held their ground in university towns like Guelph and Kingston & the Islands.  I know those cities are more liberal than the surrounding ridings, but it seems odd the NDP didn't gain there and that the Liberals didn't implode like they did elsewhere in Ontario

3.  What is with Quebec swinging en masse towards a certain party be in the PCs in 1984, BQ in 1993, ADQ in 2007, or NDP in 2011.  You don't see those type of wild swings in English Canada very often.  I know Quebec leans more to the left than the rest of Canada but not by the degree the results suggests.


4.  Since 2004, it appears the vote percentage has been fairly consistent with only minor changes in Ottawa unlike elsewhere.  Is it because they are more politically engaged thus more firm in their views or is there another reason the party support is relatively consistent in Ottawa.

If anyone has the answers to these, it would be greatly appreciated.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 26, 2011, 09:40:34 PM
Well, the OVR are out... just  not online.  We had a meeting today, and the NDP candidate in Ottawa South showed me the poll by poll results, and we won 3 polls and tied 2 others! :D (that's big news for that riding)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 26, 2011, 10:04:45 PM
Well, the OVR are out... just  not online.  We had a meeting today, and the NDP candidate in Ottawa South showed me the poll by poll results, and we won 3 polls and tied 2 others! :D (that's big news for that riding)

Any idea when they will be online.  I went to do the county by county results as well as municipality by municipality as I did for the 2008 election


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: King of Kensington on May 26, 2011, 10:37:35 PM
I'd be careful, too, but in both directions, and it all depends on how the NDP "establishes" itself over the next few years--in the end, any breakthrough here might have less to do with the now-decimated 70s-style "working class" than with a little Millerite Parkdale-High Park yupscale energy spilling over the Humber.  Or other factors--after all, a "validated" NDP could, with the right candidates and campaigns, wind up making critical breakthroughs in parts of Brampton/Mississauga that aren't Bramalea-Gore-Malton.  Remember that there may be a pool of "latent/potential" 905ish NDP support that was still suppressed this past election, due to uncertainty about an untested brand and untested local candidates and maybe residual memories of 1990...

How about David Miller as a federal NDP candidate in 2015?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: King of Kensington on May 26, 2011, 10:39:11 PM
I'd be careful, too, but in both directions, and it all depends on how the NDP "establishes" itself over the next few years--in the end, any breakthrough here might have less to do with the now-decimated 70s-style "working class" than with a little Millerite Parkdale-High Park yupscale energy spilling over the Humber.  Or other factors--after all, a "validated" NDP could, with the right candidates and campaigns, wind up making critical breakthroughs in parts of Brampton/Mississauga that aren't Bramalea-Gore-Malton.  Remember that there may be a pool of "latent/potential" 905ish NDP support that was still suppressed this past election, due to uncertainty about an untested brand and untested local candidates and maybe residual memories of 1990...

How about David Miller as the federal NDP candidate in Etobicoke-Lakeshore?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 26, 2011, 10:43:05 PM
MIller doesn't have any particular tied to Etobicoke-Lakeshore. I think if he ever ran federally for the NDP, the logical place for him to run would be in Toronto Centre


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on May 26, 2011, 11:52:04 PM
1.  Why have the Conservatives gained so heavily in Manitoba.  They got 39% in 2004 and 54% in the last election, otherwise a 15% jump more so than Ontario.  They have an NDP government that is reasonably popular, they are still a have not province, and there doesn't seem to be any issue that would drive them towards the Conservatives unlike Saskatchewan which has a strong resource sector, a have province, and has a popular premier who is centre-right.

There's your answer. Note that the NDP vote share didn't pick up much in Nova Scotia, either.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 26, 2011, 11:53:43 PM
Well, the OVR are out... just  not online.  We had a meeting today, and the NDP candidate in Ottawa South showed me the poll by poll results, and we won 3 polls and tied 2 others! :D (that's big news for that riding)

Any idea when they will be online.  I went to do the county by county results as well as municipality by municipality as I did for the 2008 election

Usually, it is 90 days after the election, on Internet. Numbers are already avaliable for the candidates and the media.

And according to Wikipedia, Miller left NDP in 2007.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 27, 2011, 06:01:10 AM
I thought he left the NDP so to not seem like a partisan mayor... although near the end of his term, I think he had quite a few separate issues.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 27, 2011, 08:26:57 AM
I thought he left the NDP so to not seem like a partisan mayor... although near the end of his term, I think he had quite a few separate issues.

Yeah, Miller's not that popular any more... maybe he should go to Winnipeg to run there (to compensate for the fact that the former mayor of Winnipeg is now the MPP for Toronto Centre)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 27, 2011, 09:40:10 AM
Long term averages always remind me of that great book Henry Pelling did on pre-1918 elections in Britain.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 27, 2011, 10:02:34 AM
1.  Why have the Conservatives gained so heavily in Manitoba.  They got 39% in 2004 and 54% in the last election, otherwise a 15% jump more so than Ontario.  They have an NDP government that is reasonably popular, they are still a have not province, and there doesn't seem to be any issue that would drive them towards the Conservatives unlike Saskatchewan which has a strong resource sector, a have province, and has a popular premier who is centre-right.

There's your answer. Note that the NDP vote share didn't pick up much in Nova Scotia, either.

In Nova Scotia the NDP vote also already very high - I think that in the '08 election the NDP had its highest provincial vote% in Canada in NS with 30% - so it it didn't have all that much room to grow further. In other provinces like BC, Alberta, Ontario, NB and (and of course Quebec) it was clear that the NDP had much more room to grow.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on May 27, 2011, 10:04:49 AM
If we're talking about vote increases, don't forget Saskatchewan either.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 27, 2011, 12:13:05 PM
Cartogram:

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 27, 2011, 12:39:31 PM
looks like a peacock feather!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 27, 2011, 05:59:16 PM
There's your answer. Note that the NDP vote share didn't pick up much in Nova Scotia, either.

True, but the NDP is not very popular in Nova Scotia so it makes sense the Tories would do well much like BC and Ontario (here it was the Liberals, but the NDP did bad either way) in the 90s and Saskatchewan in 2004 and 2006.  However, the NDP did alright in the 90s in Saskatchewan when Roy Romanow was premier and quite popular.  In Manitoba I thought the NDP was fairly popular thus why the heavy swing towards the Tories.  And once the NDP is turfed, do you think Manitoba will be like BC where the Tories maintain a strong base but decline somewhat.  In the last four elections when the NDP was out of power provincially they were unable to match the 49% the Canadian Alliance got in 2000.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 12:33:30 PM
Here are some breakdowns I got so far.  These are different regions and in cases where ridings overlapped, I put them in whichever one was a better fit.

Canada

Atlantic Canada

Con 37.9%
NDP 29.5%
Lib 29.3%

Maritimes (excludes Newfounland & Labrador)

Con 40.1%
NDP 28.8%
Lib 27.3%

English Canada

Con 47.7%
NDP 26.4%
Liberal 20.6%

Eastern English Canada (Atlantic Canada + Ontario i.e. the Liberal former strongholds)

Con 43.3%
NDP 26.3%
Lib 26.0%

Eastern Canada (Everything east of the Manitoba/Ontario border)

Con 33.6%
NDP 32.2%
Lib 21.7%

Central Canada (Ontario + Quebec)

Con 33.1%
NDP 32.6%
Lib 20.8%

Western Canada (excludes the North)

Con 54.7%
NDP 26.5%
Lib 11.9%

Prairies

Con 62.0%
NDP 21.7%
Lib 10.7%

Saskitoba

Con 54.8%
NDP 28.9%
Lib 12.7%

Northern Canada

Con 36.4%
NDP 27.7%
Lib 26.4%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 12:49:42 PM
Here is Atlantic Canada breakdown within the provinces

Newfoundland & Labrador

Newfoundland (excludes Labrador)

Lib 37.8%
NDP 33.2%
Con 27.7%

Rural Newfoundland & Labrador

Lib 50.8%
Con 32.4%
NDP 15.5%

St. John's (the ridings the city itself will have to wait for the poll breakdowns)

NDP 60.2%
Con 21.8%
Lib 17.0%

Avalon Peninsula

NDP 46.2%
Con 27.5%
Lib 25.2%

Nova Scotia

Mainland Nova Scotia (excludes Cape Breton Island ridings)

Con 37.2%
NDP 32.4%
Lib 26.2%

Rural Nova Scotia (excludes the four Halifax area ridings)

Con 43.7%
Lib 30.0%
NDP 22.3%

Halifax

NDP 42.7%
Lib 27.2%
Con 25.8%

Cape Breton Island

Lib 43.1%
Con 34.3%
NDP 19.3%

Rural Mainland Nova Scotia

Con 47.0%
Lib 25.4%
NDP 23.4%

PEI

Rural PEI (excludes Charlottetown)

Con 43.8%
Lib 41.4%
NDP 12.4%

New Brunswick

Urban New Brunswick (Saint John + Moncton-Rivierview-Dieppe)

Con 41.8%
NDP 29.6%
Lib 24.7%

Rural New Brunswick

Con 44.5%
NDP 29.9%
Lib 22.0%

Northern New Brunswick (MDR, Mir, AB, BJ, and MRD)

NDP 34.2% (got slightly more votes than the Conservatives)
Con 34.2%
Lib 28.4%

Southern New Brunswick (the remaining ridings)

Con 54.7%
NDP 24.9%
Lib 16.1%

Francophone New Brunswick (MDR, AB, and Beausejour)

NDP 39.1%
Con 29.1%
Lib 28.8%

Francophone + Bilingual New Brunswick (includes Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe)

NDP 36.2%
Con 30.9%
Lib 29.5%

Anglophone New Brunswick (all Anglophone majority ridings save Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe)

Con 54.4%
NDP 24.6%
Lib 17.0%

Anglophone + Bilingual New Brunswick (includes Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe)

Con 50.9%
NDP 25.4%
Lib 19.7%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 01:08:28 PM
Now here is Quebec.  There are some overlapping ones.  I also tried to use the divisions from DemocraticSpace and Election Prediction and Wikipedia, so if it says Wikipedia it is those ridings and EPP for Election prediction and DP for Democratic Space

Eastern Quebec

NDP 34.3%
BQ 29.0%
Con 21.6%
Lib 13.2%

Eastern Quebec (wikipedia)

NDP 34.1%
Con 27.6%
BQ 25.2%
Lib 11.2%

Appalaches-Chaudieres

Con 45.6%
NDP 32.5%
BQ 13.2%
Lib 6.9%

Gaspesie-Appalaches

Con 35.2%
NDP 33.3%
BQ 20.1%
Lib 9.6%

Eastern Townships (wikipedia)

NDP 42.0%
BQ 23.5%
Con 22.3%
Lib 10.2%

Eastern Townships (EPP)

NDP 43.4%
BQ 28.7%
Con 14.5%
Lib 11.2%

L'Estrie

NDP 45.7%
BQ 26.8%
Con 14.9%
Lib 10.6%

Monteregie

NDP 45.2%
BQ 27.7%
Con 12.5%
Lib 11.0%

Island of Montreal

NDP 38.3%
Lib 27.3%
BQ 18.1%
Con 13.3%

West Island (EPP)

NDP 34.5%
Lib 32.5%
Con 20.2%
BQ 9.2%

Eastern Montreal

NDP 48.6%
BQ 33.1%
Lib 9.8%
Con 5.5%

Eastern Montreal (wikipedia)

NDP 46.2%
BQ 30.3%
Lib 13.8%
Con 6.9%

Northern Montreal

Lib 35.4%
NDP 32.0%
BQ 20.9%
Con 9.5%

Laval

NDP 44.4%
Lib 20.4%
BQ 19.5%
Con 13.2%

Laurentides

NDP 48.3%
BQ 29.6%
Lib 10.0%
Con 9.5%

Outaouis

NDP 56.1%
Lib 15.9%
Con 15.1%
BQ 11.2%

Lanaudiere

NDP 48.2%
BQ 30.9%
Con 9.6%
Lib 8.3%

Centre du Quebec

NDP 44.1%
BQ 31.1%
Con 13.0%
Lib 8.7%

Quebec City

NDP 42.3%
Con 26.8%
BQ 20.4%
Lib 8.4%

Capitale Nationale

NDP 42.4%
Con 22.5%
BQ 20.5%
Lib 8.1%

Nord du Quebec

NDP 41.5%
BQ 26.5%
Con 24.7%
Lib 5.3%

Saguenay

NDP 37.2%
Con 34.6%
BQ 22.8%
Lib 3.8%

Quebec outside Island of Montreal

NDP 44.1%
BQ 24.9%
Con 17.7%
Lib 10.3%

I'll do Ontario later today.  These are just meant to get an idea of how the different areas of the provinces went on the whole.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 29, 2011, 02:08:16 PM
Some surprises include the NDP winning northern New Brunswick with just one seat (wow!) and doing better in the rest of Quebec compared to Montreal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 29, 2011, 02:29:00 PM
Some surprises include the NDP winning northern New Brunswick with just one seat (wow!) and doing better in the rest of Quebec compared to Montreal.
Godin's personal vote is ridiculously massive.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 08:19:56 PM
Some surprises include the NDP winning northern New Brunswick with just one seat (wow!) and doing better in the rest of Quebec compared to Montreal.
  A lot of that has to do with the obscenely large margins Yvon Godin won by.  While some were certainly genuinely NDP votes, I think a fair number were personal votes considering he won in 2000 when the NDP was much weaker.  In fact if you took his riding out, the Conservatives would have gotten 47.6% in New Brunswick making it their best province outside the Prairies, otherwise beating out both BC and Ontario.  The NDP would have gotten 24.4% while the Liberals would have gotten 23.8%, otherwise his riding really pushed the NDP up in New Brunswick.  It could also be argued Egmont did the same for the Tories in PEI who got 173 votes more than the Liberals yet won only one seat.  Also in Saskatchewan, the Liberals got under 9% vs. the NDP's 32% yet due to Ralph Goodale's popularity, the Liberals won a seat but the NDP did not.  In smal provinces if you have a popular candidate in one riding it can skew the results whereas in large provinces things tend to balance out more.


In the case of the NDP doing better outside the Island of Montreal, not a total surprise as the surge as strongest amongst Francophones.  I suspect amongst Francophones only they did better in Montreal than elsewhere.  They did surprisingly well amongst Anglophones, although considering that many are quite wealthy, I think the NDP's ability for growth amongst them is limited.  In fact it appears a large number of Anglophone Liberals swung over to the Tories whereas amongst Francophones they lost votes.  Also North Montreal is where the Liberals still finished ahead so it appears the Liberals maintained their lead amongst Allophoness.  Unlike in the GVRD and GTA neither the NDP or Tories really targeted the ethnic community too heavily in Montreal so it will be interesting to see what happens next time around.  I wouldn't be surprised if the NDP gains heavily amongst the ethnic voters in Montreal.  It will also be interesting to see how much time Jason Kenney spends in Montreal as he spent a lot of time in the GTA and GVRD but not much in Montreal and in many ways he was the key architect behind the Tory breakthrough amongst ethnic voters.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 08:42:59 PM
Okay, here is Ontario in the 416 and 905 area codes, otherwise the Golden Horseshoe

Toronto (416 area code only)

Lib 34.7%
Con 31.0%
NDP 30.7%

Ontario outside 416 area code

Con 47.4%
NDP 24.5%
Lib 23.2%

Etobicoke

Lib 39.1%
Con 38.8%
NDP 19.0%

Scarborough (excludes Pickering-Scarborough East)

Lib 33.7%
Con 33.0%
NDP 30.4%

Suburban Toronto (wikipedia)

Lib 36.6%
Con 36.5%
NDP 24.2%

Central Toronto (wikipdia)

NDP 37.2%
Lib 32.8%
Con 25.4%

Durham Regional Municipality (includes Pickering-Scarborough East)

Con 50.2%
NDP 22.7%
Lib 22.5%

York Regional Municipality (includes all of York-Simcoe)

Con 52%
Lib 26.7%
NDP 16.8%

Peel Regional Muncipality (Excludes Caledon from Dufferin-Caledon)

Con 43.7%
Lib 34%
NDP 19.2%

Brampton (Includes all of Bramalea-Gore-Malton and excludes MBS)

Con 42.3%
Lib 30.7%
NDP 23.6%

Mississauga (excludes BGM and includes all of MBS)

Con 44.6%
Lib 36.2%
NDP 16.3%

Mississauga, Brampton, and Oakville

Con 44.6%
Lib 33.6%
NDP 18.6%

Southern Durham & York (wikipedia)

Con 50%
Lib 27.8%
NDP 18.7%

Halton Regional Municipality (excludes Halton Hills from Wellington-Halton Hills)

Con 53.6%
Lib 26.5%
NDP 16.2%

Hamilton (entire city but excludes the portion in Niagara West-Glanbrook)

NDP 40.4%
Con 37.7%
Lib 17.5%

Hamilton City Core (includes the three NDP ridings only in the city)

NDP 49.4%
Con 32.2%
Lib 14.6%

Niagara Regional Municipality

Con 50.6%
NDP 27.6%
Lib 17%


Hamilton-Niagara

Con 44.4%
NDP 33.8%
Lib 17.3%

The 905 Region (only the GTA portion, excludes the Hamilton-Niagara portion)

Con 49%
Lib 28.3%
NDP 18.8%

Burlington, Hamilton & Niagara (wikipedia)

Con 45.6%
NDP 31.9%
Lib 18%

GTA

Con 41.1%
Lib 31.1%
NDP 24%

905 Belt

Con 47.9%
Lib 25.5%
NDP 22.5%

Ontario outside GTA

Con 46.8%
NDP 26.8%
Lib 21.3%

Golden Horseshoe

Con 41.6%
Lib 29%
NDP 25.6%



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 08:54:15 PM
Here is Ontario outside the GTA

Midwestern Ontario

Con 50.1%
Lib 23.4%
NDP 21.4%

Kitchener-Waterloo Region

Con 47.4%
Lib 26.5%
NDP 21.5%

London (three city ridings only)

Con 39%
NDP 32.3%
Lib 25%

Southwestern Ontario

Con 45.4%
NDP 33.5%
Lib 17.4%

519 Area code

Con 48%
NDP 26.9%
Lib 20.7%

Essex County (excludes Leamington which is Chatham-Kent-Essex)

NDP 45.5%
Con 38.6%
Lib 12.8%

Windsor (includes Tecumseh which is in Windsor-Tecumseh)

NDP 52%
Con 32.7%
Lib 12%

Central Ontario (705 area code)

Con 54.9%
NDP 17.9%
Lib 15.4%

Central Ontario (DS)

Con 55.1%
NDP 21.1%
Lib 16.1%

Central Ontario (wikipedia)

Con 55.4%
NDP 19.7%
Lib 16.5%

Northern Ontario (includes Parry Sound-Muskoka)

NDP 41.6%
Con 35.6%
Lib 18.9%

Southern Ontario

Con 45.1%
Lib 25.8%
NDP 24.4%

Northern Ontario (DS)

NDP 43.9%
Con 32.9%
Lib 19.9%

Ottawa (amalgamated version)

Con 41.7%
Lib 30.9%
NDP 23%

Eastern Ontario (Wikipedia and DS)

Con 53%
Lib 21.3%
NDP 19.7%

613 area code

Con 47.6%
Lib 25.8%
NDP 21.3%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 29, 2011, 08:59:07 PM
Why does everyone include Parry Sound-Muskoka in Northern Ontario? geez. It's hardly northern.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 09:02:10 PM
Here are the Prairie provinces

Manitoba

Winnipeg

Con 46.5%
NDP 27%
Lib 22.9%

Rural Manitoba

Con 63.7%
NDP 24%
Lib 7.4%

Saskatchewan

Rural Saskatchewan

Con 65.7%
NDP 26.7%
Lib 4.9%

Saskatoon (includes the rural portions of ridings that include the city)

Con 53.8%
NDP 37.1%
Lib 6%

Regina (includes the rural portions of ridings that include the city)

Con 47.1%
NDP 34.3%
Lib 15.8%

Southern Saskatchewan (wikipedia)

Con 55.3%
NDP 30.9%
Lib 11%

Northern Saskatchewan (wikipedia)

Con 57.6%
NDP 34.3%
Lib 5.2%

Alberta

Calgary

Con 65.9%
Lib 13.7%
NDP 12.4%

Edmonton (includes all 8 ridings that enter the city including rural portions)

Con 56.1%
NDP 25.6%
Lib 10.4%

Rural Alberta

Con 77.1%
NDP 13.9%
Lib 5.2%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 09:05:17 PM
Why does everyone include Parry Sound-Muskoka in Northern Ontario? geez. It's hardly northern.
  I agree its not really Northern Ontario, although I think in the Ontario re-distributions whereby they kept the 1996 ridings for Northern Ontario and use the 2003 boundaries for Southern Ontario, Parry-Sound-Muskoka was included.  Nonetheless I gave it with Parry Sound-Muskoka and without.  Certainly in term of voting patterns Parry Sound-Muskoka is more like Southern Ontario as the Tories usually win here much like Rural Southern Ontario and the NDP is quite weak unlike Northern Ontario.  I think Algonquin Park which runs directly to the East of much of the riding is usually seen as the dividing point between North and South.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 09:19:09 PM
Here is British Columbia

BC Interior

Con 52.3%
NDP 32.9%
Lib 6.6%

Northern BC (PGPR, CPG, and SKV)

Con 51.8%
NDP 36.1%
Lib 4.7%

Southern Interior

Con 52.4%
NDP 31.8%
Lib 7.4%

Vancouver Island

NDP 38.5%
Con 38.4%
Lib 7.9%

Greater Victoria (SGI, Vic, and ESQ-JDF)

NDP 33.7%
Con 33.4%
GRN 22.9%
Lib 9.9%

Rural Vancouver Island

Con 43.6%
NDP 43.4%
Lib 5.8%

Mainland BC

Con 47.4%
NDP 31%
Lib 14.8%

Lower Mainland

Con 45.4%
NDP 30.2%
Lib 18.2%

Greater Vancouver (includes WVSSC and PMM)

Con 43.8%
NDP 30.9%
Lib 19%

BC outside GVRD

Con 47.5%
NDP 34.2%
Lib 7.6%

Fraser Valley & Southern Lower Mainland (wikipedia and DS)

Con 53%
NDP 26.6%
Lib 14.9%

Vancouver & Northern Lower Mainland (wikipedia and DS)

Con 38.8%
NDP 33.3%
Lib 21.1%

Vancouver

NDP 33.1%
Con 31%
Lib 27.7%

GVRD Suburbs

Con 48.3%
NDP 30.2%
Lib 16%

Coastal BC (LWM + VI)

Con 43.5%
NDP 32.4%
Lib 15.5%

North Shore (WVSSC + NV)

Con 47%
Lib 26%
NDP 20%

Eastern Suburbs

Con 43.7%
NDP 42.1%
Lib 9.4%

Surrey (NND, SSWRC, SN & FPK)

Con 43.5%
NDP 30.5%
Lib 20.4%

Fraser Valley (Langley, Abbotsford, & CFC)

Con 62.3%
NDP 22.1%
Lib 10%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 29, 2011, 09:55:29 PM
Why does everyone include Parry Sound-Muskoka in Northern Ontario? geez. It's hardly northern.

To someone from Toronto, Barrie is in northern Ontario.  The Northern Ontario boundary is a bit tricky; certainly much of Parry Sound District is culturally in Northern Ontario (it is a district, after all). Also, due to this fact, the Ontario government treats the area as if it were Northern Ontario (secondary highways, local services boards, etc). Also, Most of Parry Sound District is considered as part of Northern Ontario when it comes to the Northern Ontario curling team. However, there is that traditional border of the French and Mattawa Rivers. Anyways, I have a cottage in northern Parry Sound District, so I should know ;)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 29, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
Nice to see the NDP win Vancouver, but it's a shame they didn't do better on the island.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 29, 2011, 10:44:16 PM
In large part due to the tactical voting in Saanich, although the NDP has been underperforming in rural Vancouver Island of late as well. Jean Crowder should keep watching her back; bad news for her that the CPC vote went up again without Reed Elley running this time.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 11:34:07 PM
In the case of Vancouver Island, I agree that strategic voting hurt them in Saanich-Gulf Islands.  However in the other two ridings they failed to win, the demographics are far less favourable than 20 years ago.  In Nanaimo-Alberni, the north side of Nanaimo is the more affluent part while the south side in Nanaimo-Cowichan is the working class part thus the split.  Parksville to Qualicum Beach is full of many seniors and rapidly growing thus the Conservative strength here.  In fact I believe Qualicum Beach has the oldest median age of any Canadian municipality.  The NDP has some strength in resource towns like Port Alberni, but their share of the population is not as large as it once was.  In the case of Vancouver Island North, if you took Comox out, the NDP would have won it in all of the last four elections.  Comox also has a large seniors population, while Courtenay, Campbell River, Port McNeil, and Port Hardy have a slightly rightward tilt, but not by much, while the rest of the riding is heavily NDP.  In fact in the 2005 and 2009 provincial election, the media mistakenly called Comox Valley for the NDP as the Comox results were slower to come in, yet the BC Liberals won both times.  Nanaimo-Cowichan I think is less vulnerable as there isn't the large seniors' population and there is still a strong union base.  If anything Saanich-Gulf Islands is probably the most favourable Conservative riding they didn't win.  While the Gulf Islands lean to the left and Saanich is a real mix, Central Saanich and North Saanich are semi-rural with a weak union base, while Sidney has a large senior's population.  Victoria is really the only Vancouver Island riding the Tories have no chance at winning.  They have some support in the more affluent Oak Bay which goes BC Liberal provincially, but get clobbered in Victoria.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 29, 2011, 11:54:56 PM
Nice to see the NDP win Vancouver, but it's a shame they didn't do better on the island.
  Vancouver is sort of an odd one out.  Much like Toronto it was a three way split.  Ironically the BC Liberals finished slightly ahead in both 2005 and 2009.  The NDP strength is really along the Sky Train route excluding the RAV Line.  Vancouver Centre is the only non-NDP riding the Sky Train passes through while Newton-North Delta is the only NDP riding it doesn't pass through.  In addition the areas in non-NDP ridings for both the RAV Line and Sky Train are largely underground so otherwise the areas where the Sky Train is above ground is generally NDP territory.  I've also tried applying transit types to the GTA.  Otherwise the GO Train ridings are mostly Tory.  The subway ridings were mostly Liberal prior to this election, but now a mix.  In fact this was the first election since 1988 the Tories won any of the Subway ridings.  The Streetcar is more your left leaning ridings although St. Paul's and Toronto Centre went Liberal while Etobicoke-Lakeshore went Tory.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on May 30, 2011, 02:55:05 PM
2nd post election poll:

Tories: 38%
NDP: 33% (49% in QC and 32% in ON!)
Liberals: 15%
Greens: 7%
BQ: 5% (22% in QC)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on May 30, 2011, 04:33:52 PM
Cool beans. Doubt that choosing Rae as interim leader and staying in the dark "restructuring" for a few years will really get them out of the mid to high 10's.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 30, 2011, 05:40:03 PM
Cool beans. Doubt that choosing Rae as interim leader and staying in the dark "restructuring" for a few years will really get them out of the mid to high 10's.

I have to say, the Liberals' strategy is baffling. It's as if they believe there is no purpose to a political party other than to campaign for elections--so they don't need a leader until the next election. It just plays into all the stereotypes about the Liberals just being a vessel for personal achievement of power. Except now they are remote from power, so they look pathetic instead.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 30, 2011, 06:09:27 PM
In the case of Vancouver Island, I agree that strategic voting hurt them in Saanich-Gulf Islands.  However in the other two ridings they failed to win, the demographics are far less favourable than 20 years ago.  In Nanaimo-Alberni, the north side of Nanaimo is the more affluent part while the south side in Nanaimo-Cowichan is the working class part thus the split.  Parksville to Qualicum Beach is full of many seniors and rapidly growing thus the Conservative strength here.  In fact I believe Qualicum Beach has the oldest median age of any Canadian municipality.  The NDP has some strength in resource towns like Port Alberni, but their share of the population is not as large as it once was.  In the case of Vancouver Island North, if you took Comox out, the NDP would have won it in all of the last four elections.  Comox also has a large seniors population, while Courtenay, Campbell River, Port McNeil, and Port Hardy have a slightly rightward tilt, but not by much, while the rest of the riding is heavily NDP.  In fact in the 2005 and 2009 provincial election, the media mistakenly called Comox Valley for the NDP as the Comox results were slower to come in, yet the BC Liberals won both times.  Nanaimo-Cowichan I think is less vulnerable as there isn't the large seniors' population and there is still a strong union base.  If anything Saanich-Gulf Islands is probably the most favourable Conservative riding they didn't win.  While the Gulf Islands lean to the left and Saanich is a real mix, Central Saanich and North Saanich are semi-rural with a weak union base, while Sidney has a large senior's population.  Victoria is really the only Vancouver Island riding the Tories have no chance at winning.  They have some support in the more affluent Oak Bay which goes BC Liberal provincially, but get clobbered in Victoria.

Keep in mind though that BC is going to gain six seats in redistribution and the ridings on Vancouver Island are all very overpopulated so there will be at least one and maybe even two new seats created there. I would not be surprised if Comox, Qualicum and Parksville and all got made into a new riding that would be safely Tory but would render the other ridings more NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 30, 2011, 07:56:03 PM
That poll has the NDP performing very strongly. I seem to recall that the Liberals spent a good deal of time in the mid-to-high teens and very little time over 30% (I could be mistaken, however). When was the last time the Canadian Official Opposition performed that well in a poll?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on May 30, 2011, 08:22:18 PM
The Liberals were at 32.7% in a Nanos poll as recently as March 30th. Last time they were over 33% was last May, when they polled at 33.2%.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 30, 2011, 08:45:18 PM
It is fair to say that for most of the past 5 years - the Liberals as opposition tended to be in the high-20s. The NDP seems to be in the low 30s now - and that is when the Tories may still be enjoying a bit of a honeymoon - what happens when they bring in their first really draconian budget next year?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 30, 2011, 09:00:39 PM
It is fair to say that for most of the past 5 years - the Liberals as opposition tended to be in the high-20s. The NDP seems to be in the low 30s now - and that is when the Tories may still be enjoying a bit of a honeymoon - what happens when they bring in their first really draconian budget next year?

Either the Liberals have a revival, or NDP takes the lead, depending of events durng the honeymoon, I suppose.

If nothing change, I think than the NDP takes the lead, for now. Liberals seems to be on a bad way with their very long interim.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 30, 2011, 09:59:21 PM
I expect the NDP will probably take the lead at some point, although the dynamics are somewhat different as the Tories had a 22 point lead in English Canada and 18 point lead in Ontario thus while the NDP could pull ahead in either it will be a lot less common than it was for the Liberals who were usually competitive in Ontario and not that much stronger in Quebec than the Tories unlike the NDP.  I should note Dion routinely pulled even or ahead right up until the election so for whatever reason it seems the Tories always poll lower in between the writ period.  Whether the NDP will swap positions with the Liberals or not remains to be seen.  Also I expect the most unpopular policies of the Tories to be in the first two years.  As for spending cuts, they will no doubt generate a lot of opposition in Quebec, but I am not sure the impact will be totally negative in Ontario.  Harris had an approval rating close to 50% in his first term and the Liberal spending cuts in the 90s proved quite popular, so a lot depends on whether people perceive them as ideological or simply to get things back on track.  If perceived as the former, it will hurt them a lot, but if the latter it may help them.  It could also hurt them in Atlantic Canada although considering how badly wacked the Liberals got in 1997 over the EI changes I suspect the Tories will be careful to ensure any cuts don't hit the region harder than others to avoid facing losing 2/3 of their seats like the Liberals did in 1997. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 31, 2011, 01:34:17 AM
Here is a map showing ridings in which the Conservative Party came either first or second.

2011

()



2008

()



2006

()



2004

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 31, 2011, 01:36:51 AM
Here is a map showing ridings in which the Liberal Party came either first or second.

2011

()



2008

()



2006

()



2004

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 31, 2011, 01:41:32 AM
Here is a map showing ridings in which the NDP came either first or second.

2011

()



2008

()



2006

()



2004

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on May 31, 2011, 01:44:55 AM
Wow at the Liberal map.

They are pretty much dead outside of Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, PEI and Newfoundland.
The slope to come back will be very rough.

The NDP map is the inverse of the Liberal map, too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on May 31, 2011, 02:02:07 AM
The bit I think I found most interesting was New Brunswick on the NDP map. Basically they came second in every riding held by a Conservative prior to the election. The Liberals came first or second only in the seats where they had an incumbent, which potentially doesn't bode well for their strength in the two seats they lost there. Mind you, I think a decline in the Liberal vote in seats they no longer hold is not unsurprising, it's been occurring in Vancouver and I suspect it may also begin in Toronto.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 31, 2011, 07:02:47 AM
Talk about the open holes for the Liberals.  Its amazing that a party that a majority a decade ago is irrelevant in much of the country while a party that barely clung to official party status a decade ago is now competitive in much of the country and even where not competitive at least they are in second and not getting blown out of the water.  I guess that should be a lesson to all parties that you can improve if weak and if in government, don't get too arrogant or what happened to the PCs in 1993 and now the Liberals can happen to your party.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on May 31, 2011, 02:41:23 PM
Read "The Strange Death of Liberal England" its remarkably similar to what happened in Canada this past decade.

Interesting that when the Liberals became a distant 3rd party in the UK - the only seats they tended to hold on to were these rural Celtic fringe seats in Cornwall and the Scottish Highlands - kind of like how the Liberal party of Canada's power base is now rural Newfoundland, PEI and Cape Breton!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on May 31, 2011, 11:52:47 PM
Here is the party by percentages,  I coloured in all the ridings they got above a certain percentage as shown below.  First lets start with the Tories.  Please note these are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent

Tories over 80%.  Only two ridings Wetaskiwin and Crowfoot

()

Conservatives over 75%.  Other than Portage-Lisgar, all of them are in Alberta.  Portage-Lisgar is the riding of Candace Hoeppner who promised to scrap the gun registry.  Also it was the Tories best showing outside Alberta in 2004 and 2006 so arguably the most Conservative riding outside Alberta

()

Conservatives over 70%

Mostly in Alberta, but three outside (Souris-Moose Mountain, Portage-Lisgar, and Provencher

()


Conservatives over 65%:  Mostly in the Prairies.  24 ridings nationally and everyone except Abbotsford which is the in the heart of the Fraser Valley bible belt was in the Prairies

()

Conservatives over 60%: 40 ridings nationally.  30 were in the Prairies, while 3 in BC, 6 in Ontario and one in New Brunswick.

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 01, 2011, 12:44:11 AM
Here is the Tories over 55%.  There were 70 such ridings (1 in NS, 3 in NB, 18 in ON, 7 in MB, 6 in SK, 24 in AB, 10 in BC)

()

Tories over 50%.  2 in NS, 1 in PEI, 4 in NB, 1 in QC (Maxime Bernier's riding), 40 in ON, 9 in MB, 10 in SK, 25 in AB, and 15 in BC a total of 107 seats

()

Conservatives over 45%.  134 nationally of which 131 were in English Canada so the majority there while only 3 in Quebec.  By province (3 NS, 1 PEI, 6 NB, 3 QC, 51 ON, 10 MB, 13 SK, 26 AB, 20 BC, and NU)

()

Cons over 40%.  161 seats so a majority.  The majority west of the Ottawa River + New Brunswick while minority elsewhere in Atlantic Canada and off course Quebec (1 NL, 4 NS, 1 PEI, 7 NB, 4 QC, 69 ON, 10 MB, 13 SK, 28 AB, 24 BC and NU)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 01, 2011, 01:17:53 AM
Here is Tories over 35%.  187 seats nationally, 178 were in English Canada while only 9 in Quebec.  By province (2 NL, 6 NS, 3 PEI, 8 NB, 9 QC, 75 ON, 11 MB, 14 SK, 28 AB, 30 BC, and NU)

()

Conservatives over 30%.  Only 10 in Quebec, but only 30 in English Canada where they got under 30%.  Of that 7 in Atlantic Canada (4 being in Newfoundland & Labrador), 16 in Ontario (9 in Toronto, Hamilton Centre, 4 in Northern Ontario, and 2 in Ottawa) 3 in Manitoba, and 4 in British Columbia (3 in Vancouver + Victoria)

()

Conservatives over 25%.  Only 15 in Quebec, but above that in all but 16 in English Canada (2 St. John's Ridings, 2 Halifax area ridings, Acadie-Bathurst, 8 in Toronto, Ottawa Centre, Victoria, and Vancouver East)

()

Conservatives over 20%.  Only 20 in Quebec, but all but 7 in English Canada (Halifax, Acadie-Bathurst, Parkdale-High Park, Davenport, Trinity-Spadina, Toronto-Danforth, and Vancouver East)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 01, 2011, 01:22:20 AM
Looking great, Miles! One correction, however - I noticed that in your final map, you've included Edmonton-Strathcona as a Conservative-held seat.

I'll edit the post to remove my mention of the correction later.
  I was going percentage of the popular vote, not who won.  In Edmonton-Strathcona the Tories got over 40%, but still lost as it was pretty much a two way race since the Liberals were pretty much non-existent.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 01, 2011, 01:25:21 AM
I will do Tories over 15% and over 10% later.  I know the Tories got over 15% in only 31 in Quebec, but all but two in English Canada (Davenport and Toronto-Danforth were the two they missed and they got 14%) while they got below 10% in 24, all in Quebec.  I will also try to work on the NDP, Liberals, and BQ over the weekend.  Since the Greens were in single digits in most ridings, I won't bother with them.  I can say the Liberals only got above 50% in two ridings which were both in Newfoundland & Labrador and the BQ failed to crack the 40% mark in any riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on June 01, 2011, 03:06:16 AM
Churchill is missing from your >25% map.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 01, 2011, 11:06:11 PM
Churchill is missing from your >25% map.
Fixed.  Let me know if I missed anything else and I will fix it.  I will do Tories over 15% and over 10% tonight.  ON the weekend I plan to do the NDP and maybe the Liberals and Bloc Quebecois depending on how much time I have.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on June 01, 2011, 11:29:46 PM
I took the liberty of mapping the results of the Liberals versus the NDP for the past two elections:

()

()

One can see from these maps that the NDP vote bloomed throughout the St. Lawrence Valley and New Brunswick (the latter caused by continued discontent with the Graham government (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_Graham))

I'll make a more detailed map if there are requests for it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 01, 2011, 11:40:24 PM
Here is the Conservatives over 15%.  Only two ridings in English Canada where they got under 15% which were Davenport and Toronto-Danforth.  By contrast only 31 in Quebec where they got above 15%.

()

Here is the Conservatives over 10%.  Every riding in English Canada, they got over 10%, while there were 24 ridings in Quebec where they failed to crack the 10% mark.  There were also some where they even failed to crack the 5% mark.  3% was their worst result in this was in Laurier-Sainte Marie, otherwise Gilles Duceppe's former riding.

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 02, 2011, 08:20:44 PM
Here are the NDP results,

NDP over 70% - only St. John's East (interestingly enough, both the Liberals and NDP had their best riding in Newfoundland & Labrador)

()

NDP over 65%. Only 2 seats, St. John's East and Acadie-Bathurst

()

NDP over 60%.  Only 5 seats in addition to the 2 above there is also Gatineau, Toronto-Danforth, and Vancouver East

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 02, 2011, 09:15:03 PM
Here is the NDP over 55%.  Only 11 such ridings and kind of random.

()

NDP over 50%.  36 seats  (1 in NL, 2 in NS, 1 in NB, 14 in QC, 10 in ON, 2 in MB, 1 AB, 5 in BC)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 03, 2011, 12:57:00 AM
Here is the NDP over 45% 63 seats, 2 which they didn't win (Elmwood-Transcona and Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar)  (AB 1, BC 8, 3 MB, 1 NB, 2 NL, NT, 2 NS, 16 ON, 28 QC, 1 SK)

()

NDP over 40%, 92 seats (AB 1, BC 11, MB 3, NB 1, NL 2, NT, NS 2, ON 21, QC 47, SK 3) Over half are in Quebec

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 03, 2011, 03:08:33 PM
Because I love post election polls,

Cons: 37%
NDP: 34%
Libs: 15%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 03, 2011, 03:23:00 PM
Nanos is showing different numbers:

Tories: 40
NDP: 30
Libs: 22
Greens: 5
BQ: 3


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on June 03, 2011, 03:28:43 PM
QC's Nanos results:
NDP 39%
Purgs 22%
Libs 20%
Bloc 11%
Greenies 4%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 03, 2011, 11:22:10 PM
Here is the NDP over 35% 122 seats (2 AB, 15 BC, 4 MB, 1 NB, 2 NL, NT, 4 NS, 26 ON, 60 QC, 7 SK)

()

NDP over 30% 143 seats (2 AB, 20 BC, 5 MB, 2 NB, 2 NL, NT, 4 NS, 29 ON, 69 QC, 9 SK)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on June 03, 2011, 11:26:12 PM
Funny facts about MPs names:

There is 4 "Morin" (all NDPers, from Quebec)
3 "Moore" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Brown" (all Conservatives)
3 "Harris" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Duncan" (one NDP, one Conservative, one Liberal)

There is 2 "Davies", both NDPers from Vancouver (East and Kingsway).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 04, 2011, 11:36:43 AM
Funny facts about MPs names:

There is 4 "Morin" (all NDPers, from Quebec)
3 "Moore" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Brown" (all Conservatives)
3 "Harris" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Duncan" (one NDP, one Conservative, one Liberal)

There is 2 "Davies", both NDPers from Vancouver (East and Kingsway).


Aren't there two Harris for the NDP and one for Conservatives?  Also there is a McKay in the Liberals and MacKay in Conservatives.  I think McKay is the Irish spelling and while MacKay is the Scottish if I am not mistaken.  Also two with the surname Weston both from the Conservatives. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 04, 2011, 01:26:40 PM
Here is the NDP over 25% 170 seats (4 in AB, 24 in BC, 8 in MB, 4 in NB, 5 in NS, 41 in ON, 1 in PEI, 73 in QC, 10 in SK)

()

Here is the NDP over 20% 217 seats (6 in AB, 31 in BC, 10 in MB, 8 in NB, 2 in NL, 8 in NS, 65 in ON, 1 in PEI, 74 in QC, 12 in SK)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on June 04, 2011, 01:50:41 PM
Funny facts about MPs names:

There is 4 "Morin" (all NDPers, from Quebec)
3 "Moore" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Brown" (all Conservatives)
3 "Harris" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Duncan" (one NDP, one Conservative, one Liberal)

There is 2 "Davies", both NDPers from Vancouver (East and Kingsway).


Aren't there two Harris for the NDP and one for Conservatives?  Also there is a McKay in the Liberals and MacKay in Conservatives.  I think McKay is the Irish spelling and while MacKay is the Scottish if I am not mistaken.  Also two with the surname Weston both from the Conservatives. 

True for "Harris". I didn't listed all times two names are the same, it happens quite often.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on June 04, 2011, 03:19:44 PM
Funny facts about MPs names:

There is 4 "Morin" (all NDPers, from Quebec)
3 "Moore" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Brown" (all Conservatives)
3 "Harris" (one NDP, two Conservatives)
3 "Duncan" (one NDP, one Conservative, one Liberal)

There is 2 "Davies", both NDPers from Vancouver (East and Kingsway).


Aren't there two Harris for the NDP and one for Conservatives?  Also there is a McKay in the Liberals and MacKay in Conservatives.  I think McKay is the Irish spelling and while MacKay is the Scottish if I am not mistaken.  Also two with the surname Weston both from the Conservatives. 

4.86mio google results for "McKay Scotland", 3.95mio for "MacKay Scotland", 7.29mio for "McKay Ireland", 4.75mio for "MacKay Ireland". And if you still remember who the fucker was that told you that age-old nursery myth about the spellings Mc and Mac having anything to do with Irish and Scottish spelling... shoot him. Now.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: ObserverIE on June 04, 2011, 06:14:23 PM
4.86mio google results for "McKay Scotland", 3.95mio for "MacKay Scotland", 7.29mio for "McKay Ireland", 4.75mio for "MacKay Ireland". And if you still remember who the fucker was that told you that age-old nursery myth about the spellings Mc and Mac having anything to do with Irish and Scottish spelling... shoot him. Now.

The 1911 Irish Census returns (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/) give 2,200 or so McKays as opposed to 300 or so MacKays. From the little that I see of the first page of query results, a lot of both groups were Scots or of Scots origin.

The more common anglicisations of Mac Aodha in Ireland are McHugh, or Hughes, or McKee (the latter particularly in Ulster). "Mac" is probably relatively more common in anglicisations in Scotland than in Ireland, but the "Mc = Irish, Mac = Scottish" rule doesn't hold; "Mc" is more common in both countries.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 04, 2011, 07:07:47 PM
Here is the NDP over 15% 267 seats (11 AB, 34 in BC, 12 in MB, All 10 in NB, 5 in NL, NT, 10 in NS, NU, 93 in ON, 1 in PEI, All 75 in QC, All 14 in SK)

()

Here is the NDP over 10% every riding except Portage-Lisgar and Crowfoot

()

The NDP got over 9% in every riding in Canada.  18 years ago, the NDP averaged only 7% nationally.  Even in Quebec, they averaged 5% in 2004 and 7% in 2006, so talk about things changing.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 04, 2011, 09:21:38 PM
The NDP's worst riding was Crowfoot, and they still managed to finish 2nd there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on June 04, 2011, 09:39:39 PM
The NDP's worst riding was Crowfoot, and they still managed to finish 2nd there.
Well, yes, the Liberal party is a total joke in Alberta, apart from some areas in the northern part of Calgary (although 15% there isn't any better than <5% everywhere else). Same for Saskatchewan. Not that the NDP is any better... just a consistent second place.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 05, 2011, 08:46:42 AM
Here is the Liberals over 55% and also 50% too.  Only 2 seats, Bonavista-Gander-Grand Falls-Windsor and Humber-St. Barbe Baie Verte.  There were many in 2000 and 2004 so shows just how far the party has fallen.

()

Liberals over 45%  7 seats (Humber-St. Barbe-Baie Verte, Bonavista-Gander-Grand Falls, Random-Burin-St. George's, Cape Breton-Canso, Scarborough-Agincourt, York West)

()

Liberals over 40% 21 seats (1 in BC, 4 in NL, 1 in NS, 8 in ON, 2 in PEI, 4 in QC, 1 in SK)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on June 05, 2011, 11:41:03 AM
I'm not too sure what they're doing in the interval between releasing poll results to the select few and releasing them to the general public, but anyway, the Vancouver Sun has poll maps (comparing 2008 and 2011) for Saanich-Gulf Islands (http://www.vancouversun.com/news/saanich2011.html), Esquimalt-Juan De Fuca (http://www.vancouversun.com/news/esquimalt2011.html), Vancouver South (http://www.vancouversun.com/news/vansouth2011.html), and Newton-North Delta (http://www.vancouversun.com/news/newton2011.html).

In the two suburban Victoria ridings the Liberal areas just went en masse to the competitive non-Conservative party, while Newton-North Delta retains its interesting geographical polarization.

(Moderator: I know the situation with these polls is a bit of a mess, so feel free to move this post into a 2011 poll maps thread when a clear one gets started if you like).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on June 05, 2011, 12:21:43 PM
These are interesting maps. Of course in the case of Newton-North Delta I think more of the Liberal vote held because there was an incumbent running for re-election with a big following in the Sikh community. Now that he's out of the picture and the new NDP MP is also Sikh - I think that by 2015 that artificially Liberal vote in NND will evaporate and mostly go NDP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Meeker on June 05, 2011, 04:18:40 PM
Awwwwwwwww

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/06/05/pol-harpers-cat-name.html


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: deansherratt on June 06, 2011, 05:56:15 AM
First off the mark. If you check out interrnational elections, I have the first riding done poll by poll, Ottawa South, one of the 34 Liberals seats...

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=4703



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 06, 2011, 08:22:04 AM
First off the mark. If you check out interrnational elections, I have the first riding done poll by poll, Ottawa South, one of the 34 Liberals seats...

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=4703



Ah, cool. James  McLaren told me the NDP won 3 polls and tied 2 others, so this makes sense.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 07, 2011, 10:18:14 PM
Here is Liberals over 35% 52 seats (otherwise 2% less than they got in 2004)(1 in BC, 2 in MB, 2 in NB, 5 in NL, 6 in NS, 26 in ON, 3 in PEI, 6 in QC, 1 in SK)

()

Here is the Liberals over 30% 76 seats (otherwise what they got in 2006 when they were removed from power)(4 in BC, 4 in MB, 3 in NB, 5 in NL, 6 in NS, 38 in ON, 4 in PEI, 10 in QC, 1 in SK, YK)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 09, 2011, 09:41:18 PM
Here is the Liberals over 25% 95 seats (1 in AB (Calgary of all places), 5 in BC, 4 in MB, 3 in NB, 6 in NL, 7 in NS, NU, 48 in ON, 4 in PEI, 14 in QC, 1 in SK, YK)

()

Liberals over 20% 118 seats (2 in AB, 6 in BC, 5 in MB, 5 in NB, 6 in NL, 7 in NS, NU, 61 in ON, 4 in PEI, 19 in QC, 1 in SK, YK)

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 09, 2011, 09:53:48 PM
Amazing how far the Liberals have fallen.  I think a lot has to do with the fact that when you are in the centre, you can appeal to more, but also have less of a firm base.  Chretien for all his flaws was seen as a fairly strong leader while he faced quite weak opponents.  By contrast Martin, Dion, and Ignatieff were much easier to take down while Layton and Harper were both far stronger opponents than anything Chretien ever faced.  In Ontario it seems they still have a strong base in the GTA and could thus win back a whole wack of seats with not too big an increase in their of the popular vote, but once you get beyond the GTA, they are largely irrelevant in most ridings in Ontario.  In Quebec, much the same as what support they do have is largely on the Island of Montreal.  Off course the NDP has to gain a whole wack of votes before they start picking up several seats in Ontario.  Considering that not all Liberals have the NDP as their second choice, their ability to gain will depend heavily on turnout.  I don't think many Tories will swing to the NDP, but if enough are dissatisfied they could stay home much as many Liberals in 2008 did (although many of those showed up in 2011 but switched).  Any gains would have to come from a stronger youth turnout and also making inroads amongst the immigrant community, particularly those of lower income and in the 416 as opposed to the middle class ones who primarily reside in the 905 belt as I suspect those if they aren't already voting Tory, would go Tory before Liberal.  Asides from New Brunswick which went more heavily Tory than the other provinces, the Liberals seem to still have a fairly strong base in this region.  New Brunswick in many ways voted more in line with the provinces west of the Ottawa River rather than East of it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 12, 2011, 08:52:29 AM
Here is the Liberals over 15% 160 seats (4 in AB, 12 in BC, 7 in MB, 7 in NB, 6 in NL, 3 in the North, 9 in NS, 84 in ON, 4 in PEI, 23 in QC, 1 in SK) Otherwise less than they won in 2000 and 1993

()

As has been the case since 1984, the West and Quebec are clearly the Liberals weakest parts.  On election night, Mulroney mentioned Trudeau's last term as being part of the Liberal weakness as he alienated Quebec by bringing in the constitution without their approval and alienated the West with the National Energy Program and ever since then the Liberals have struggled the most in those two regions.  You can afford to lose one as the Liberals did under Trudeau or the Tories have under Harper, but not both unless you can sweep Ontario as Chretien did and he did this more due to unique circumstances.  You had a divided right and an unpopular NDP provincial government being still fresh in people's memories.  With the NDP unlikely to form government provincially anytime soon and the right likely to remain united, the possibility of the Liberals sweeping Ontario seems remote.  Otherwise they have to find a way to breakthrough in Quebec or the West if they ever want to win a majority government.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on June 12, 2011, 08:54:46 AM
I think they'd be better off trying to work out how to remain a viable force first. They have no easily definable social base now, and that is extremely dangerous.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 12, 2011, 11:12:05 AM
I think they'd be better off trying to work out how to remain a viable force first. They have no easily definable social base now, and that is extremely dangerous.

I agree, although how well they come back or not also depends a lot on their opponents.  I can see two scenarios help making it easier for them, but both are a big if.

1.  The NDP takes a sharp turn to the left and supports many left wing policies that have been abandoned by social democratic parties around the world, thus they drop to 15% and the Tories to take a hard turn to the right and adopt many of the policies the Reform party advocated and they drop to 30% thus creating a opening in the centre once again.

2.  The NDP is unable to appeal to both its Quebec caucus and Western caucus so their support blows up in their face much the way the Mulroney PCs did who tried to do the same thing so the Liberals once again are the main alternative and when people finally get tired of the Tories, they turn to the Liberals.

Finally the NDP and the Liberals may have little choice but to merge as if the Tories win 2 or three majorities and they win 70+ seats in each of them in Ontario, but many with less than 50%, they will merge much the way the PCs and Alliancce merged due to the vote splitting on the right, primarily in Ontario as neither did well in Quebec and the right mostly favoured the PCs in Atlantic Canada while Reform/Alliance in the West.  Either way the Liberals are in dire straits, but I think it has finally dawned on them that their past losses were not accidents, but rather deep structural problems and making cosmetic changes won't be enough, they need a radical overhaul.  Finally with no threat of an election for 4 years, it is a bit easier to do this as opposed to in a minority when there is always the difficult choice of whether to prop up the government or vote them down and face an election.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 12, 2011, 12:01:53 PM
Here is the Liberals over 10% 218 seats (12 in AB, 19 in BC, 8 in MB, 10 in NB, 6 in NL, 3 in the North, 11 in NS, 104 in ON (every riding except Oxford and Oshawa), 4 in PEI, 40 in QC, 1 in SK)

()

Otherwise almost 1 in 3 Liberal candidates failed to get their deposit back as you must get 10% or more to get it back.  In Ontario and Atlantic Canada there were only 3 such ridings, but quite a few in Quebec and Western Canada and also in both cases the Liberals were generally above 10% in most urban ridings, but below in most rural.  Saskatchewan is the most interesting as Ralph Goodale's riding stands out like a sore thumb in all the maps, so it appears he won on personal popularity not party label.  In fact he could probably win as an independent in his riding.  Although I didn't do over 5% for the NDP as they got above 5% in every riding or the Tories whom it was only a few ridings, I will for the Liberals as I suspect there were several where they got under 5%.  I do believe though they got at least 2% in every riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on June 12, 2011, 12:48:53 PM
The Liberal brand is so tarnished in Saskatchewan that Goodale would actually be a good deal safer as an independent.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 12, 2011, 12:52:11 PM
The Liberal brand is so tarnished in Saskatchewan that Goodale would actually be a good deal safer as an independent.
  True in many ways.  If I am not mistaken, the provincial Liberals are now more of a libertarian party than centrist to centre-left and have completely dissociated themselves from the federal counterparts.  The provincial Liberals opposed blocking the takeover of Potash and also favour privatizing government run liquor stores.  Mind you many provincial Liberals on the left went over to the NDP and many on the right went over to the Saskatchewan Party so not much left of the party.  It is true Goodale would probably be safer as an independent, but since there was little chance of the Liberals winning the last two elections anyways, people were probably content to re-elect since they know he would be in opposition and an effective representative.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on June 12, 2011, 12:55:05 PM
True in many ways.  If I am not mistaken, the provincial Liberals are now more of a libertarian party than centrist to centre-left and have completely dissociated themselves from the federal counterparts.

There's still a provincial Liberal party in Saskatchewan? That runs candidates in elections? Amazing.

Of course back in the 60s, the Saskatchewan Liberals were a rural conservative party, much like the Saskatchewan Party is today.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 12, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
True in many ways.  If I am not mistaken, the provincial Liberals are now more of a libertarian party than centrist to centre-left and have completely dissociated themselves from the federal counterparts.

There's still a provincial Liberal party in Saskatchewan? That runs candidates in elections? Amazing.

Of course back in the 60s, the Saskatchewan Liberals were a rural conservative party, much like the Saskatchewan Party is today.
  There are sort of like the Manitoba Liberal Party or even like the BC Liberal party prior to 1991 as the BC Liberals were shut out of the legislature from 1979-1991 and only came back when the Social Credit imploded.  Maybe they are hoping the same happens to the Saskatchewan Party, but I would count on it anytime soon.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on June 17, 2011, 01:41:59 AM
2.  The NDP is unable to appeal to both its Quebec caucus and Western caucus so their support blows up in their face much the way the Mulroney PCs did who tried to do the same thing so the Liberals once again are the main alternative and when people finally get tired of the Tories, they turn to the Liberals.

There are a couple of differences here. The first is that the NDP is no longer a Western party in any meaningful sense; its base of support has shifted entirely, although it remains the only real alternative in most of the West. The second is that the NDP is constituted on an ideological basis, which the Mulroney PCs never had. There are no right-wing NDP MPs who have no real business being in the party; the NDP has always been a social-democratic party, whether its support come from the West or the East. Violent internal spats are far less likely as a result.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 17, 2011, 08:55:47 PM
I agree the NDP is not a Western party, but I wouldn't call it an Eastern party either.  Rather prior to their breakthrough in Quebec, their support was in pockets, in particular the urban cores with a large number of younger renters, provincial capitals with large number of civil servants, heavily unionized towns, and resource communities in the North and Vancouver Island.  Nonetheless historically they were a Western based party.  In 1988, 33 of the 43 seats they won were in the West.  I am not suggesting this will happen, but it could happen and in terms of the national question there are similiarities between Mulroney in the 80s and Layton now, albeit differences too.  Also the PCs under Mulroney had many on the right in Quebec such as Jean-Pierre Blackburn, Nic Leblanc, Pierrette Venne, and Ricardo Lopez and they also had some who were pretty left leaning in English Canada such as Flora Macdonald, David Crombie, and Alan Redway.  Lets remember, prior to the merger with the Alliance, the PCs were never really a right wing party, but rather a centrist one with a slight rightward tilt, but still included many who leaned to the left.  Those on the hard right only supported them due to their being no alternative.  


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on June 18, 2011, 10:40:02 PM
The poll by poll results should be out this week.

Checking the news releases on elections.ca

http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=med&document=dec0408&dir=pre&lang=e
http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=med&document=mar1306&dir=pre&lang=e


the poll results were released under 2 months after the election. (Last 2 elections)

Jan 23/06 --- Mar 13/06 (51 days)
Oct 14/08 --- Dec 4/08  (49 days)

So expect them sometime around June 20


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 01:00:36 AM
Great, then we can start doing by poll by poll maps as well as maps by municipality and county.  Should be interesting to see if anything unusual shows up.  Look forward to this.  Although I have an idea of how things will look, we shall see if they are actually as I expect or different.  Quebec should be especially interesting as the results are so radically different than the previous election so although expect much of the province to be painted Orange, it will be interesting to see where the Red, Blue, and Torquoise is located.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 12:59:51 PM
Here is the Liberals over 5%  Only 20 ridings where they got below 5%, 18 being in the West, mainly Saskatchewan and Alberta and 2 in Quebec (Roberval-Lac Saint Jean and Jonquiere-Alma).  They did get above 2% in every riding however.  I will do the Bloc Quebecois later.

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on June 19, 2011, 01:03:47 PM
Selkirk-Red river (as it was then called) elected a Liberal MP as recently as 1993.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 05:55:23 PM
Selkirk-Red river (as it was then called) elected a Liberal MP as recently as 1993.
  So did Souris-Moose Mountain and Prince Albert as well in 1993.  I think the change there is the Liberals were never strong to begin with and 1993 there was a strong wave with the NDP and PCs being decimated while the Reform Party was still only a BC and Alberta party.  In 1997 the Liberals fared quite poorly in those three ridings suggesting much of the vote was a one time one.  Still does show how far they have fallen nonetheless.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: cinyc on June 19, 2011, 05:56:52 PM
On Polling:

A pollster’s painful reckoning: ‘How could I have screwed up so badly?'  (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/a-pollsters-painful-reckoning-how-could-i-have-screwed-up-so-badly/article2065573/page2/)

Frank Graves, the guy who runs Ekos, studied how he went wrong.  Among his findings, somewhat counter-intuitively, the cell phone sample INCREASED error.  That's because cell phone-only users - generally younger folks - didn't show up to vote.

Canadian pollsters never did seem to have much of a likely voter screen - but a separate Ekos weighting using more of a screen gave better result.

Full report here:
http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/accurate_polling_flawed_forecast.pdf

I haven't read it yet.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on June 19, 2011, 06:04:56 PM
The Purgs were underestimated in 2008, so there's also a definite 'shy Tory' or something element in there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Verily on June 19, 2011, 06:17:07 PM
2.  The NDP is unable to appeal to both its Quebec caucus and Western caucus so their support blows up in their face much the way the Mulroney PCs did who tried to do the same thing so the Liberals once again are the main alternative and when people finally get tired of the Tories, they turn to the Liberals.

There are a couple of differences here. The first is that the NDP is no longer a Western party in any meaningful sense; its base of support has shifted entirely, although it remains the only real alternative in most of the West. The second is that the NDP is constituted on an ideological basis, which the Mulroney PCs never had. There are no right-wing NDP MPs who have no real business being in the party; the NDP has always been a social-democratic party, whether its support come from the West or the East. Violent internal spats are far less likely as a result.

Additionally, the NDP is not in government, and such ideological fractures only come to the fore when a party is in government (and thus has to make decisions).

And by the time the NDP wins government, if they do, the Liberals will already be hopelessly defunct and without the finances to regain power or influence.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 07:37:56 PM
2.  The NDP is unable to appeal to both its Quebec caucus and Western caucus so their support blows up in their face much the way the Mulroney PCs did who tried to do the same thing so the Liberals once again are the main alternative and when people finally get tired of the Tories, they turn to the Liberals.

There are a couple of differences here. The first is that the NDP is no longer a Western party in any meaningful sense; its base of support has shifted entirely, although it remains the only real alternative in most of the West. The second is that the NDP is constituted on an ideological basis, which the Mulroney PCs never had. There are no right-wing NDP MPs who have no real business being in the party; the NDP has always been a social-democratic party, whether its support come from the West or the East. Violent internal spats are far less likely as a result.

Additionally, the NDP is not in government, and such ideological fractures only come to the fore when a party is in government (and thus has to make decisions).

And by the time the NDP wins government, if they do, the Liberals will already be hopelessly defunct and without the finances to regain power or influence.
  Not totally true.  Remember the Canadian Alliance squabbles under Stockwell Day or what about the infighting in the NDP in BC which forced Carole James out despite the fact they were leading in the polls at that time so it can happen in opposition parties too.  Now true Jack Layton seems much more apt at keeping his caucus united than either Carole James or Stockwell Day, but he has also has a much larger and more regionally diverse caucus than he did before.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 07:41:35 PM
On Polling:

A pollster’s painful reckoning: ‘How could I have screwed up so badly?'  (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/a-pollsters-painful-reckoning-how-could-i-have-screwed-up-so-badly/article2065573/page2/)

Frank Graves, the guy who runs Ekos, studied how he went wrong.  Among his findings, somewhat counter-intuitively, the cell phone sample INCREASED error.  That's because cell phone-only users - generally younger folks - didn't show up to vote.

Canadian pollsters never did seem to have much of a likely voter screen - but a separate Ekos weighting using more of a screen gave better result.

Full report here:
http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/accurate_polling_flawed_forecast.pdf

I haven't read it yet.
  That might explain why Nanos which only polls landlines was closer as if you took the Sunday results only, Nanos was actually pretty close to spot on.  A better solution is not to do away with polling cell phones, but rather use the method most US pollsters use.  In the US only those who say they are likely to vote or will definitely vote are included and if this method was used I suspect the numbers would have been closer to what they really were.  Also I would take that into account when weighting the numbers as most pollsters don't report based on the number who say they will vote a certain party, rather than weight each demographic based on what percentage of the population they represent so if seniors are overrepresented in the poll and younger voters under, each younger voters' response would count for more than 1 and each senior less than 1.  The problem here is certain demographics are more likely to show up than others.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on June 19, 2011, 07:44:10 PM
The Purgs were underestimated in 2008, so there's also a definite 'shy Tory' or something element in there.

The Liberals were underestimated by 2-3% in 2004 and 2006, so perhaps it's a shy government factor.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 07:46:58 PM
The Purgs were underestimated in 2008, so there's also a definite 'shy Tory' or something element in there.

The Liberals were underestimated by 2-3% in 2004 and 2006, so perhaps it's a shy government factor.
  True enough.  It also seems much of the underestimation was in Ontario is in all of the past four elections, the results in other parts of Canada weren't that far off or at least it could be attributed to a large margin of error in places like Atlantic Canada.  The problem is a 2-3% swing in Ontario is 15-20 seats thus results in a very different looking parliament.  One blogger mentioned this might be a Rae syndrome otherwise they remember how Bob Rae was accidentally elected in 1990 and thus want to avoid a simliar mistake so they stick with the devil they know rather than the one they don't.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 08:39:21 PM
Here is the BQ over 35% (only 5 such ridings including Gilles Duceppe's former riding)

()

BQ over 30% 22 ridings

()

Interestingly enough the Bloc Quebecois probably could have held their official party status with the same vote percentage had the Liberals and Conservatives done better and this came at the expense of the NDP.  In Ahuntsic it was a tight three way race with the NDP nearly winning and Liberals not far behind.  It will be interesting to see the poll by poll breakdown here as I suspect the Liberals won most of the Allophone polls and the Bloc Quebecois probably more in the heavily Francophone areas while the NDP more in the mixed areas.  In Richmond-Arthabaska this was more the luck of where the riding was.  The NDP dominated the Estrie region while the Tories the Appalaches-Chaudieres and this riding is right on the border between the two regions.  I wouldn't be surprised if the BQ actually won relatively few polls here and rather it was orange in the western half of the riding and blue in the eastern half and the Bloc Quebecois won by coming in second throughout the riding.  These two are definitely one's I look forward to seeing.  I also think in Haute-Gaspesie-La Mitis-Matane-Metapadia, many of Nancy Charest's personal votes would have gone NDP had she not run thus partly why the NDP did so poorly here and the Bloc held this one.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 19, 2011, 09:22:16 PM
Here is BQ over 25% 37 ridings

()

Ironically at the beginning of the campaign this was generally considered the worse case scenario for the BQ.  This just shows how unpredictable Quebec politics can be.

BQ over 20% 48 ridings

()

Otherwise they got over 20% in fewer ridings than they won in 1993, 2004, 2006, and 2008.  I guess a lot of the Bloc Quebecois vote were those parked there due to lack of alternatives and once one arrived they switched.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 20, 2011, 12:35:56 AM
Here is the BQ over 15%, 59 such ridings.

()

Ironically 59 seats back in 2006 prior to the Tory breakthrough and even in 2004 and 2006 was not considered that far fetched for the BQ. 

BQ over 10%, 66 seats

()

BQ over 5% 73 ridings (only Lac-St. Louis and Mount Royal were below 5%

()

If I am not mistaken, I don't believe the BQ has ever gotten over 10% in Mount Royal, otherwise they probably run a paper candidate here anyways.  Likewise it was the NDP's worst riding in Quebec too and even Mulroney in the 80s did rather poorly here despite doing well in Quebec.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 20, 2011, 03:35:01 PM
The NDP isn't that divided, 98% of delegates voted no on a leadership review


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 20, 2011, 04:54:14 PM
The NDP isn't that divided, 98% of delegates voted no on a leadership review
  I agree they are pretty united now, but things can change.  More I was thinking about the voters that if they pander too heavily to Quebec, this could cost them in English Canada, especially in BC and maybe even in Ontario especially outside the GTA.  By the same time Quebec are fickle voters who can switch en masse on a moment's notice so anything from winning even more seats in Quebec to losing almost all them is possible.  You don't need to get into government for this to happen, just look what happened to the ADQ.  Since most NDP voters in Quebec were first time NDP voters, it would naive to assume they will stay with the NDP, but also naive for the other parties to assume they won't.  In English Canada, the NDP won 44 seats which is only one more than Ed Broadbent got in 1988 and never mind as a percentage it is less since there were 220 seats in English Canada in 1988, now there are 233 seats.  Also in 1984, the NDP beat the Liberals in English Canada by a similiar number of seats yet the Liberals came back in 1988 to a stronger opposition and a majority government in 1993 so they can do the same.  It will take more than one election, but my point, is the Liberals are not dead and out yet by any stretch of the imagination.  In fact in both 1958 and 1984, many talked about the death of the Liberal Party yet both times they were wrong and I think they could be wrong again.  After all the NDP only got 9 seats in 1993 and they didn't merge like the PCs did so if they can come back from that to where they are now, I don't see why the Liberals cannot as they are in much better shape than the NDP was in 1993.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on June 20, 2011, 09:23:56 PM
Can you make a similar map for the Greens, just for reference?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 20, 2011, 10:01:50 PM
Can you make a similar map for the Greens, just for reference?
  I could do so, but it could take time.  I know they only got above 10% in a handful of ridings.  If you could list off the ridings I could do one certainly.  I know they got 46% in Elizabeth May's riding, but I don't believe they got above 20% in any other riding and very few above 10%.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on June 20, 2011, 10:17:01 PM
Can you make a similar map for the Greens, just for reference?
 I could do so, but it could take time.  I know they only got above 10% in a handful of ridings.  If you could list off the ridings I could do one certainly.  I know they got 46% in Elizabeth May's riding, but I don't believe they got above 20% in any other riding and very few above 10%.

You're right. Apart from Saanich-Gulf Islands only in Dufferin-Caledon, Calgary Centre-North, Victoria, and Vancouver Centre did they get over 10%. In Bruce Grey-Owen Sound they had 9.99%.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 20, 2011, 10:21:18 PM
Can you make a similar map for the Greens, just for reference?
  I could do so, but it could take time.  I know they only got above 10% in a handful of ridings.  If you could list off the ridings I could do one certainly.  I know they got 46% in Elizabeth May's riding, but I don't believe they got above 20% in any other riding and very few above 10%.

You're right. Apart from Saanich-Gulf Islands only in Dufferin-Caledon did they get over 10%. In Bruce Grey-Owen Sound they had 9.99%.

I may be wrong, but I have the Greens at 18.91% in Yukon, 15.44% in Vancouver Centre, 14.69% in Dufferin - Caldon, 13.07% in Calgary Centre-North, 11.61% in Victoria and 10.68% in Okanagan - Shuswap.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on June 20, 2011, 10:33:31 PM
% of Green Support (Over 5%)

Saanich–Gulf Islands   46.26%
Yukon   18.91%
Vancouver Centre   15.44%
Dufferin–Caledon   14.65%
Calgary Centre-North   13.02%
Victoria   11.60%
Calgary Centre   11.02%
Okanagan–Shuswap   10.69%
Bruce–Grey–Owen Sound   9.98%
Calgary West   9.43%
Okanagan–Coquihalla   9.39%
Kelowna–Lake Country   8.74%
Esquimalt–Juan de Fuca   8.35%
Parry Sound–Muskoka   8.14%
Nanaimo–Cowichan   7.83%
Vancouver East   7.65%
West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country   7.28%
Winnipeg Centre   7.05%
Wild Rose   6.99%
Nanaimo–Alberni   6.83%
Toronto–Danforth   6.46%
Calgary Southeast   6.45%
British Columbia Southern Interior   6.41%
Wellington–Halton Hills   6.37%
Guelph   6.29%
Cariboo–Prince George   6.21%
Calgary–Nose Hill   6.05%
Nipissing–Timiskaming   6.02%
Simcoe North   6.02%
Prince George–Peace River   5.97%
Kootenay–Columbia   5.93%
Calgary East   5.91%
Barrie   5.77%
Brandon–Souris   5.73%
Portage–Lisgar   5.64%
South Surrey–White Rock–Cloverdale   5.52%
Chilliwack–Fraser Canyon   5.49%
Langley   5.42%
Simcoe–Grey   5.41%
York–Simcoe   5.39%
Durham   5.39%
Kamloops–Thompson–Cariboo   5.38%
Vancouver Quadra   5.35%
Toronto Centre   5.33%
Cumberland–Colchester–Musquodoboit Valley   5.33%
Calgary Southwest   5.24%
Leeds–Grenville   5.20%
Red Deer   5.20%
Ottawa–Vanier   5.18%
New Brunswick Southwest   5.17%
Yellowhead   5.15%
Vegreville–Wainwright   5.08%
Vancouver Island North   5.08%
Haliburton–Kawartha Lakes–Brock   5.07%
North Vancouver   5.04%
Ottawa Centre   5.04%
Ancaster–Dundas–Flamborough–Westdale   5.01%
Trinity–Spadina   5.00%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: 2952-0-0 on June 20, 2011, 11:57:00 PM
Interesting that none of the above ridings are in Quebec. There's the perception that the Green Party is one of upper-middle-class WASPs who can afford to eat organic and buy fair trade (but then again that's true with all Green Parties).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on June 21, 2011, 12:38:16 AM
Interesting that none of the above ridings are in Quebec. There's the perception that the Green Party is one of upper-middle-class WASPs who can afford to eat organic and buy fair trade (but then again that's true with all Green Parties).

I think it perhaps has more to do with the catastrophic French of May.
And I suppose than voters which could have leaned Green are exactly the kind of voters which started the NDP surge.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on June 21, 2011, 07:46:57 AM
Interesting that none of the above ridings are in Quebec. There's the perception that the Green Party is one of upper-middle-class WASPs who can afford to eat organic and buy fair trade (but then again that's true with all Green Parties).

The Greeens already did awfully in Quebec in 2008. Most of their weak support is concentrated in the West Island.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on June 21, 2011, 12:23:28 PM
I would imagine that one of the reasons the Greens have always done so poorly in Quebec is that the NDP (before its breakthrough, of course) filled the leftish protest vote niche.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on June 21, 2011, 12:42:50 PM
Also, the Greenies are pretty much an overwhelmingly English party.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 21, 2011, 09:06:18 PM
I will try to work on the Green Party map this evening.  Also if anybody has the data for Independents that would be great.  I know Andre Arthur in Portneuf-Jacques-Cartier and James Ford in Edmonton-Sherwood Park got in the high 20s, Hec Cloutier in Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke in the high teens and Helena Guergis in Simcoe-Grey in the low teens.  Any others over 5%?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 21, 2011, 09:18:10 PM
I will try to work on the Green Party map this evening.  Also if anybody has the data for Independents that would be great.  I know Andre Arthur in Portneuf-Jacques-Cartier and James Ford in Edmonton-Sherwood Park got in the high 20s, Hec Cloutier in Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke in the high teens and Helena Guergis in Simcoe-Grey in the low teens.  Any others over 5%?

There were five ridings in which an independent received >5% of the vote:

Edmonton - Sherwood Park 29.50% (16,263 votes out of 55,136)
Portneuf - Jacques-Cartier 27.82% (14,594 votes out of 52,468)
Renfrew - Nipissing - Pembroke 18.70% (9,611 votes out of 51,398)
Simcoe - Grey 13.54% (8,714 votes out of 64,373)
Chambly - Borduas 11.33% (7,843 votes out of 69,243)

Those results are based on any judicial recounts, or if no recount was required, the validated results.

The independent in Madawaska - Restigouche received above 1,000 votes (1,290 out of 34,997, or 3.69%), and independents received >1% in another six ridings.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 21, 2011, 09:33:34 PM
As promised, here is the Green Party.

Green Party over 45% (only Elizabeth May's riding off course)

()

Greens over 15% 3 ridings

()

I am little perplexed why Yukon went so heavily Green.  Anybody know about the candidate there.  I know for Vancouver Centre, the candidate was Adrienne Carr who was the former provincial Green Party leader so that one makes sense.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 21, 2011, 09:41:18 PM
Here is the Green Party over 10% (only 8 such ridings)

()

Green Party over 5% (57 seats)

()

Interestingly enough it seems BC outside the Lower Mainland, Calgary, and Central Ontario are the Green strongspots.  Ontario is weird as the strongest Green ridings are either downtown Toronto where the Conservatives are weakest or Central Ontario which is the most Conservative part of the province.  I wonder if strategic voting played a part here as in Downtown Toronto there was no chance at a Conservative win while in Central Ontario it was a foregone conclusion the Tories would win so no need to vote strategically.  Also Calgary seems awfully strong for the Greens but not so much Edmonton.  Interestingly enough the Liberals also did better in Calgary than Edmonton while the NDP was much stronger in Edmonton so it seems the centre-left vote united behind the NDP in Edmonton but was more evenly split in Calgary.  Perhaps it was the fiscal policies as the Greens are fairly fiscally conservative and Calgary seems to be quite a bit more fiscally conservative than Edmonton.  In Manitoba two were Conservative strongholds while one was an NDP stronghold so not ridings where there was a risk of vote splitting while the two Atlantic Canada ridings were both Conservative strongholds.  I suspect the Greens did poorly in Newfoundland & Labrador partly due to their stance on the seal hunt as I believe they are the only party opposed to it, and opposing it is political suicide in Newfoundland & Labrador.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 21, 2011, 09:45:33 PM
Here are the Independents over 10%.  I just did one map here.  3 of the five (Andre Arthur, James Ford, and Helena Guergis) are pretty much Conservatives running as independents while Hec Cloutier is a former Liberal but fairly right leaning though.

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on June 21, 2011, 10:00:07 PM
I would imagine that one of the reasons the Greens have always done so poorly in Quebec is that the NDP (before its breakthrough, of course) filled the leftish protest vote niche.

Actually, in much of Quebec in 2004 the Greens did equivalently to or better than the NDP (and maybe with an assist from the Rhino/Natural Law/Marijuana having-fun-with-the-ballot-box impulse among Quebeccers).  But remember that the NDP itself entered that election with such an abysmal AudreyAlexa-era polling history in QC: they were too negligible to fill any "leftish protest vote niche".  You know what *really* filled that niche in those years?  The Bloc.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 21, 2011, 11:56:31 PM
The indy vote %s are all here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_candidates,_2011_Canadian_federal_election I did those a week or so ago.

Right now I'm doing Canada with AV for my blog. Should be ready in a few days. I have the Tories winning a minority with it.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 22, 2011, 12:00:27 AM
Nanos:

Cons: 42%
NDP: 28%
Libs: 22%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on June 22, 2011, 11:00:33 AM
If you want examples of how moribund the Green party is in Quebec - consider how Elizabeth May trotted out some journalist last year to be her Quebec Lieut. he last literally three months then quit the Greens and joined the BQ (maybe he should have gone NDP - he might be in Parliament now). Then May picked some hockey player Georges Laraque with ZERO political experience to be her "deputy leader" in Quebec (his only apparent qualification for being second in command in the Green party was that he was a vegan!). He did not seek a seat and was missing in action the whole campaign.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 22, 2011, 10:29:03 PM
Ah yes, Georges Laracque. Canadians parties like to have hockey players amongst their midst.  I recall at the 2008 NDP convention, Andrew Ferrence spoke to us. No way he could be a candidate though, considering he gave the finger to Montreal fans in the playoffs... and well I'm sure he would hurt in Vancouver.

I guess with Dryden out, the only hockey playing parliamentarian is Sen. Frank Mahovalich?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 24, 2011, 10:36:36 AM
Meanwhile the NDP is at 53% in Quebec: http://www.cyberpresse.ca/actualites/quebec-canada/politique-canadienne/201106/23/01-4411867-le-npd-encore-plus-populaire-quaux-elections.php?utm_categorieinterne=trafficdrivers&utm_contenuinterne=cyberpresse_vous_suggere_4411829_article_POS2


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on June 24, 2011, 04:53:50 PM
53%? That'd nearly be a sweep of all seats. Heh. Also, wow at Bloc in third. Hopefully these numbers can stick until the next election, and the NDP doesn't piss off English Canada in the meantime. :) It'll be quite a balancing act. Well, the election isn't for four years anyway, so whatever.

Here's an English version: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/06/24/ndp-quebec-support-bloc-quebecios_n_883287.html


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 25, 2011, 01:52:37 PM
53%? That'd nearly be a sweep of all seats. Heh. Also, wow at Bloc in third. Hopefully these numbers can stick until the next election, and the NDP doesn't piss off English Canada in the meantime. :) It'll be quite a balancing act. Well, the election isn't for four years anyway, so whatever.

Here's an English version: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/06/24/ndp-quebec-support-bloc-quebecios_n_883287.html
  I wonder if the Canada Post issues is having any impact.  Quebec tends to be far more pro-labour union than English Canada so the NDP may be benefitting from this.  Historically many of the businesses were owned by Anglophones thus Quebec's strong affinity for labour.  On the other hand, the Canada Post issue may hurt the NDP in Ontario where people tend to feel public sector unions get too many benefits compared to similiar jobs in the private sector.  I suspect the slight Tory rise in Quebec is mostly amongst older rural nationalists who voted Bloc Quebecois.  Up until this election, the Bloc overwhelmingly appealed to left of centre voters, but most of that swung to the NDP, thus the 23% who voted Bloc are probably much more evenly split between those on the right and those on the left.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 25, 2011, 03:52:08 PM
The NDP is already back at near normal levels in Ontario.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 25, 2011, 11:53:31 PM
Party Swing Maps:

Conservative

()

There were two ridings where the Conservatives received the same vote as last time - of course, they didn't run in one of the seats at the past two elections, so I probably could have used the Independent's vote as a proxy-Conservative vote, but it doesn't really matter.


Liberal

()


NDP

()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 26, 2011, 12:07:01 AM
Found an error in my earlier map - 2006, New Brunswick Southwest was held by the Conservatives, not the Liberals. I've edited the maps in the gallery to reflect this correction:

()

Earl, you may want to adjust that on your website. Sorry to cause trouble.

Edit: To correct subsequently noted errors.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 26, 2011, 12:59:31 AM
Thanks, mate! :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 26, 2011, 01:42:28 AM
Blog post about your recent map created :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Shilly on June 26, 2011, 01:49:43 AM
Might want to check Ottawa Vanier. :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 26, 2011, 02:06:27 AM
Random-Burin-St. George's is wrong too. *sigh*


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 26, 2011, 02:08:51 AM
Actually, there's quite a few errors. Will have to take a look at this one more closely.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 26, 2011, 03:08:40 AM
My apologies! I'll check over my spreadsheets. I had found a couple of errors previously, which I corrected, but obviously a fair number have slipped past me. Let me know any that you spot and I'll start fixing them up.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 26, 2011, 03:17:54 AM
My apologies! I'll check over my spreadsheets. I had found a couple of errors previously, which I corrected, but obviously a fair number have slipped past me. Let me know any that you spot and I'll start fixing them up.

Ive already fixed them. If I recall, they were also South Shore, Thunder Bay SN, and Victoria. But I may have forgotten some of the errors.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 27, 2011, 09:51:12 PM
My apologies! I'll check over my spreadsheets. I had found a couple of errors previously, which I corrected, but obviously a fair number have slipped past me. Let me know any that you spot and I'll start fixing them up.

Ive already fixed them. If I recall, they were also South Shore, Thunder Bay SN, and Victoria. But I may have forgotten some of the errors.

Plus St John's South - Mount Pearl.

Going through presently, compiling first a list of winners in each riding, then will make a map just showing winners (not margins), then will compare the winners map to my map and try to spot errors, then go back and correct errors in my spreadsheet. Sorry about all of this. Not quite sure how this happened.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 27, 2011, 10:11:34 PM
I caught St. John's too...



Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 28, 2011, 12:08:06 AM
I think the errors are limited to those six ridings:

Random - Burin - St George's
St John's South - Mount Pearl
South Shore - St Margaret's
Ottawa - Vanier
Thunder Bay - Superior North
Victoria (was correct in the spreadsheet, but unshaded on my map).

I'm terribly embarrassed by this. I think the numbers are now correct. I'll update the map in a moment.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on June 28, 2011, 06:06:36 AM
Well, for what it's worth, Joe Comuzzi did switch to the Tories, although he was re-elected as a Liberal.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 30, 2011, 02:07:09 AM
Liberal and NDP swing maps up now (editing doesn't show up as a new post).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on June 30, 2011, 04:35:50 AM
Quebec is very easy to spot on NDP map.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 30, 2011, 08:38:11 AM
The NDP map will be easy to explain (unpopular prov. govts, gun registry). The Liberal map will not be so easy.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on June 30, 2011, 04:18:41 PM
The NDP map will be easy to explain (unpopular prov. govts, gun registry). The Liberal map will not be so easy.

Are there any unpopular provincial NDP governments? According to the latest polls - the Nova Scotia NDP is way ahead of the opposition and is polling about 10% above what the federal party had in NS and the latest Manitoba poll has the NDP at 44% (tied with the Tories) and about 18% higher than the popular vote that the federal NDP had in Manitoba.

I've seen people float this theory before - and it might make sense if these provincial governments showed signs of being unpopular in the first place....


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on June 30, 2011, 04:33:18 PM
The NDP in those provinces did receive significant boosts following the federal election, fwiw. As for the Nova Scotia NDP, it's popular-ish, but not comparable to when it was first elected. But honestly, making comparisons between federal and provincial elections is kind of futile, no?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on June 30, 2011, 09:33:26 PM
In Manitoba, didn't Selinger's handling of the spring floods boost NDP fortunes?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on June 30, 2011, 10:10:01 PM
Also consider that the swings are based on General Election to General Election, and don't include by-election results in seats such as Vaughan and Winnipeg North (or Riviere-du-Loup, for that matter), oh, and of course C-C-MV in NS (I just mention these ones because they changed hands at by-election, unlike, say, Hochelaga). Looking at the strong swing against the NDP in Winnipeg North isn't as big a swing as in the by-election, I think... at least, they almost took it back off the Liberals at the GE. Anyway, much of that swing in Winnipeg North can probably be explained by factors surrounding the by-election, and the loss of an incumbent vote. Some of the big swings to the NDP/against the Liberals are in seats gained by the NDP at the last election, too, such as Vancouver - Kingsway. The so-called "sophomore surge" is probably my thought on a fair amount of that. The southern half of Edmonton seems to be a consolodation of the non-Tory vote (coupled with sophomore surge in E-Strathcona). The drop in NDP vote in Newfoundland may be partially because of a boost to the NDP in the ABC campaign in 2008, with some voters now returning to the Tories.

Elmwood confuses me a little. My first thought was that perhaps if it was seen as being a relatively safe NDP riding, campaign resources may have been diverted from there into the neighbouring Winnipeg North, to regain it from the Liberals. The Tory gain seems to have come from both the NDP and the Liberals, however, so I can't really explain it... maybe some swinging voters in the riding were content with the NDP holding it when the NDP was a third party but didn't want an NDP federal government? I really don't know.

Lethbridge is interesting... I know there's a university down there, and the Liberals hold a Lethbridge seat provincially. The Liberals did better than their average in both Lethbridge seats (as in the town), actually, although federally the riding takes in rural areas, too. I don't think I've uploaded my Alberta provincial maps yet, I might have to do that.

Largish swing against the Liberals in Egmont... incumbent defeated last election so Liberal candidate didn't have the same personal vote, and Tory probably built up a bit of a personal vote (ie, sophomore surge).

St John is interesting. If I remember correct, the NDP almost won a riding or two there in the New Brunswick provincial election. I think the swing fell very nearly on the other side of the margin (and therefore nearly close enough to the next darker shade of green). Perhaps the NDP has a longer-term potential there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 30, 2011, 10:33:21 PM
The NDP map will be easy to explain (unpopular prov. govts, gun registry). The Liberal map will not be so easy.

Are there any unpopular provincial NDP governments? According to the latest polls - the Nova Scotia NDP is way ahead of the opposition and is polling about 10% above what the federal party had in NS and the latest Manitoba poll has the NDP at 44% (tied with the Tories) and about 18% higher than the popular vote that the federal NDP had in Manitoba.

I've seen people float this theory before - and it might make sense if these provincial governments showed signs of being unpopular in the first place....

The Manitoba NDP have become much more popular since the election (floods and the Jets).  And Dexter had had to deal with cancelling the Yarmouth ferry. Dexter is (unfortunately) still one of the least popular premiers in the country.

Of course that unpopularity in both provinces appears to be concentrated in specific areas. 


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on June 30, 2011, 11:39:16 PM
In the case of Nova Scotia, it appears the NDP was hurt most in Rural Nova Scotia, not so much in Halifax.  Otherwise this made Central Nova a safe Tory seat and South Shore-St. Margaret's less vulnerable than it would have been otherwise, however in Halifax it appears the NDP held or gained votes.  In the case of Newfoundland & Labrador, traditionally St. John's has been where they are strongest, but this time around they had their lowest support in those two ridings while did better in the Rural ridings so I suspect a lot of the Tory support in St. John's was more based on tradition than ideology.  My understanding is St. John's is mostly made up of those of Irish descent and Catholic whereas Rural Newfoundland is mostly those of English descent and Protestant and thus St. John's is more nationalistic so they voted against the party that brought Newfoundland into confederation.  If anything the equalization changes would have angered them more than others.  I could be wrong, but that is my speculation.  In the case of Manitoba, Winnipeg North was more a personal vote than partisan vote.  Lets remember that Kevin Lamoureux won in an NDP stronghold provincially too so I suspect many of his votes were personal ones rather than partisan ones.  As for Elmwood-Transcona, the Tories had a strong second place finish in 2008 so not surprisingly I suspect they put a lot of resources into winning this and generally they have a strong success rate of picking up marginal seats.  Also Winnipeg has seen much of its growth along the periphery not urban core and the areas near the perimeter highway are more conservative than those in the urban core thus paritally why Winnipeg has swung to the right.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on July 01, 2011, 12:24:24 PM
The other explanation for what happened in Elmwood is simply that by all accounts Jim Maloway the NDP incumbent is a jerk. I've never heard one good thing about him and a lot of people in the NDP were secretely glad not to have him back in caucus - especially what with having 103 other members to share the workload. In 2015 the NDP can run someone infinitely better there. Who knows maybe Gary Doer will decide to get back into politics.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on July 01, 2011, 06:25:37 PM
And to some extent federally, Elmwood-Transcona was more of a "Blaikie seat" than an NDP seat--that is, compared to the very sui-generis-Winnipeg demos of Winnipeg North, it's more of a generic blue-collar Prairie stronghold in which ReformAllianceConservative populist allegiances would't out of place.  (It's like comparing Vancouver East to Edmonton East.)

As for Lethbridge, I believe the high NDP finish was the "most viable alternative" default result of the invisible Tory candidate (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/lethbridges-man-who-wasnt-there-heading-to-ottawa/article2012157/).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 01, 2011, 11:52:47 PM
Interestingly, a new poll has a tie between the PCs and the NDP in Manitoba :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on July 02, 2011, 12:31:47 AM
And to some extent federally, Elmwood-Transcona was more of a "Blaikie seat" than an NDP seat--

Then again, there are four provincial seats that make up Elmwood-Transcona and all of them are some of the safest NDP seats in the province where NDP candidates routinely rack up wins by 3-1 margins...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on July 02, 2011, 05:41:48 AM
Interestingly, a new poll has a tie between the PCs and the NDP in Manitoba :)

Quite a fightback there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 02, 2011, 12:16:46 PM
Interestingly, a new poll has a tie between the PCs and the NDP in Manitoba :)

Quite a fightback there.

It's all about the Jets, baby. Quite a renewed optimism in the province.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 02, 2011, 11:43:29 PM
Blog post with the NDP change has been posted.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on July 03, 2011, 05:17:43 AM
Interestingly, a new poll has a tie between the PCs and the NDP in Manitoba :)

Quite a fightback there.

It's all about the Jets, baby. Quite a renewed optimism in the province.

Pity they couldn't have sorted that out before the federal election :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 04, 2011, 12:22:00 AM
I've attempted to decipher the Liberal change map in my latest blog post.

(sorry to promote it so much, but I do see the blog as an off shoot of this forum :) )


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on July 04, 2011, 01:22:30 AM
I've attempted to decipher the Liberal change map in my latest blog post.

(sorry to promote it so much, but I do see the blog as an off shoot of this forum :) )

I think your blog is excellent and I for one have no problem with you plugging it here.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Jens on July 04, 2011, 05:04:31 AM
I've attempted to decipher the Liberal change map in my latest blog post.

(sorry to promote it so much, but I do see the blog as an off shoot of this forum :) )

I think your blog is excellent and I for one have no problem with you plugging it here.
I second that - and will add that you might even attract serious posters to the forum ;)
On a more thread relevant note. I find the Canadian party system quite facinating. It seems to be caught between the Anglo-Saxon very personalised system, where it is the person more that the party you vote for, and the "European", where parties are predominant and where it is not uncommon to see elections to parliament where a substatial portion of the MP's are newly elected and unknown to the general public. The average Danish MP scores between 1000 and 8000 personal votes, far from the cirka 20.000 votes a mandate actually "costs"
NDP's Quebec group of virtually unknowns is something that I wouldn't expect to see in a Westminster system.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on July 04, 2011, 08:36:35 AM
Its more the sort of thing that only happens only very occasionally; in Britain the last two General Elections when a considerable number of paper candidates were elected were in 1945 and 1997. In Canada though, you have 1993, 1984...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 04, 2011, 12:54:20 PM
Quebec is quite European, actually in their democracy. OK, they use FPTP, but... look at their election signs. Totally different than the rest of Canada. It's all about the leader. There was probably more outrage about Ruth Ellen Brosseau in the rest of Canada than in Quebec. In fact, she's quite popular in  her riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on July 04, 2011, 12:58:39 PM
Quebec is quite European, actually in their democracy. OK, they use FPTP, but... look at their election signs. Totally different than the rest of Canada. It's all about the leader. There was probably more outrage about Ruth Ellen Brosseau in the rest of Canada than in Quebec. In fact, she's quite popular in  her riding.

No insult to the people of my native region of Lanaudiere, but the people there are often quite shallow. They fall in love with shallow people so easily, especially if they're hot and cute.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 04, 2011, 01:02:54 PM
Quebec is quite European, actually in their democracy. OK, they use FPTP, but... look at their election signs. Totally different than the rest of Canada. It's all about the leader. There was probably more outrage about Ruth Ellen Brosseau in the rest of Canada than in Quebec. In fact, she's quite popular in  her riding.

No insult to the people of my native region of Lanaudiere, but the people there are often quite shallow. They fall in love with shallow people so easily, especially if they're hot and cute.

I guess so. But, she's been surprisingly good since the party let her out of hiding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on July 04, 2011, 04:26:16 PM
Well, I guess it's easy to be non-controversial when you stick to the talking points, are a backbencher and don't put yourself out there for everyone to see. :) Her first question during question period was very much on script, but she's trying. *shrug*


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Foucaulf on July 04, 2011, 05:31:17 PM
On a more thread relevant note. I find the Canadian party system quite facinating. It seems to be caught between the Anglo-Saxon very personalised system, where it is the person more that the party you vote for, and the "European", where parties are predominant and where it is not uncommon to see elections to parliament where a substatial portion of the MP's are newly elected and unknown to the general public. The average Danish MP scores between 1000 and 8000 personal votes, far from the cirka 20.000 votes a mandate actually "costs"
NDP's Quebec group of virtually unknowns is something that I wouldn't expect to see in a Westminster system.

I think this is a consequence of the regionalism that dominates Canadian politics. Uniform national swings are unrealistic - the path to a party's victory depends on building coalitions of voters that pushes a government into majority territory.

This is peculiar among Anglophone nations. Voting coalitions are stabler in the UK (North votes Labour, Southeast vote Tories), the US (Red v. Blue states), South Africa (Blacks vote ANC) and Ireland (Fianna Fáil until 2011). These nations shift electorally when the nations face an existential crisis, and the result is lopsided. This is when paper candidates come into play.

Other countries are small enough that swings are uniform (New Zealand).

The dynamic nature of Canada's voting coalitions mean that there's always a big shift every few elections - the rate is increased once we factor in Canada's demographic changes. When the party leader reels in a region like Mulroney/Layton did to Quebec, the quality of the candidates is forgotten. People can instinctively sense if a candidate's mandate is material or symbolic. But the symbolism triumphs the material, and incumbency is not as effective as observers would think.

(Of course I could be wrong and it's only Quebec being wonky. The Liberal sweep of Ontario can also be the result of discontent over Rae + Harris)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on July 04, 2011, 09:08:23 PM
Quebec is quite European, actually in their democracy. OK, they use FPTP, but... look at their election signs. Totally different than the rest of Canada. It's all about the leader.

And yet it makes them the most paper-candidate-prone of them all in Canada: Mulroney PC in 84, Bloc in 93, NDP in 11, and provincially PQ in 76 and ADQ in 07...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on July 04, 2011, 09:50:45 PM
Quebec is quite European, actually in their democracy. OK, they use FPTP, but... look at their election signs. Totally different than the rest of Canada. It's all about the leader. There was probably more outrage about Ruth Ellen Brosseau in the rest of Canada than in Quebec. In fact, she's quite popular in  her riding.

No insult to the people of my native region of Lanaudiere, but the people there are often quite shallow. They fall in love with shallow people so easily, especially if they're hot and cute.

Good news, Harper isn't cute.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: the506 on July 13, 2011, 07:58:48 PM
The poll-by-poll results are now available here:

http://www.elections.ca/scripts/resval/ovr_41ge_pollbypoll.asp?lang=e

Time to get to work on some maps!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on July 13, 2011, 08:11:02 PM
Dang, you just beat me!
There are not on the main page, you had to go to past elections.

Based on the time stamp they were posted last Friday.


They are not the "Offical Results", they will be posted in August.
The CSV results don't contain the party name just the name of candidate.
THE PDF results do contain the name of the party.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Shilly on July 14, 2011, 12:37:02 AM
Here goes nothing.

Etobicoke—Lakeshore
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on July 14, 2011, 01:21:30 AM
Wow, the riding is small. I would be surprised if there was more than 100 precincts.
And Ignatieff got badly defeated, according to the map.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Shilly on July 14, 2011, 02:00:26 AM
Bramalea—Gore—Malton
()


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on July 14, 2011, 02:21:16 AM
Polarised. Gore and Malton voted NDP, Bramalea voted Conservative.

The seat is way over populated, too, so I suppose than one of the three will be removed before next election.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on July 14, 2011, 05:19:14 AM
I think those should be posted in the dedied thread, research is hard in that big thread.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 14, 2011, 07:15:00 AM
One can easily create an NDP seat out of that. I wonder what the ethnic breakdown is between Malton/Gore and Bramalea. I guess Bramalea is older, and more white, but I thought Malton was too? I will have to do my research...


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on July 14, 2011, 07:19:18 AM
Malton's heavily Asian. Always the "Liberal" half of the riding.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: adma on July 14, 2011, 08:51:14 PM
Wow, the riding is small. I would be surprised if there was more than 100 precincts.

In 2008, it had 189 + 37 "400s" (apt polls and the like).  It only *seems* small.  It's urban, after all.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 05:45:04 AM
I'm curious what people think the results would have been if this
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=138428.0
had been used in the election.

A dozen more NDP seats?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 06:02:58 AM
A first in a series of posts...

I've taken poll by poll results and I'm using it to figure out what vote share each party got in areas of ridings. For example:

Yukon

Whitehorse
Lib-35.1%
Con-31.5%
Grn-20.2%
NDP-13.2%

Rural
Con-36.8%
Lib-30.1%
Grn-17.2%
NDP-15.9%

I'm going to tackle the Regina/Saskatoon seats next, and then perhaps a few others that have large towns in them, and I'm also open to requests.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 06:45:27 AM
Will be doing:
All Regina and Saskatoon seats (unless I fall alseep first) as well as:
Ajax Pickering
This will allow me to determine if there was any Lib/Con split.
Pickering-Scarborough East
This will allow me to combine with the above to find out the total for Pickering, and, allow me to thus remove that from the Toronto results, and hence, determine Toronto.
Thunder Bay-Rainy River
Thunder Bay-Superior North
This will allow me to solve for (Determine the total pop vote in) Thunder Bay
Lethbridge
Solve for the city/town of Lethbridge


Maybe:
Peterborough
Solve for the city of Peterborough (VS the rural area)
Thornhill
Split between Markham and Vaughan
Oak Ridges-Markham
Adding the above and the Markham riding, will allow me to solve for Markham
Mississauga-Brampton South
Bramlea-Gore-Malton
These two will allow me to split Mississauga from Brampton and solve for both.
Cariboo-Prince George
Prince Geroge-Peace River
Solve for Prince George
Western Arctic
Solve for Yellowknife
York South - Weston
Toronto Danforth
Beaches East York
Don Valley West
Davenport
Eglinton-Lawrence
St. Pauls
Solve for Toronto, North York, East York, and York


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 01:25:07 PM
SASKATOON

City:
Con - 47.1%
NDP - 43.2%
Lib - 7.0%
Grn - 2.7%


RIDINGS
Black - R
C - 66.9%
N - 26.5%
L - 4.2%
G - 2.5%

Black - U
C - 49.8%
N - 40.7%
L - 7.1%
G - 2.4%


Wanu - R
C - 69.7%
N - 22.1%
L - 4.8%
G - 3.3%

Wanu - U
C - 48.6%
N - 39.4%
L - 8.3%
G - 3.6%


Rose - R
C - 62.4%
N - 33.3%
G - 2.6%
L - 1.6%

Rose - U
N - 53.4%
C - 41.7%
L - 2.3%
G - 2.2%


Humb - R
C - 64.9%
N - 25.3%
L - 5.2%
G - 2.0%

Humb - U
C - 46.5%
N - 40.1%
L - 9.4%
G - 2.7%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on July 21, 2011, 06:25:01 PM
Teddy, would you mind doing Northern Ontario soon? Not necessarily municipal boundaries or anything, but instead the provincial electorates, so we can compare the provincial results with the federal ones?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 08:25:02 PM
That'd take a loooot of work actually. I can do it, but likely in a month.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on July 21, 2011, 08:38:37 PM
That'd take a loooot of work actually. I can do it, but likely in a month.

I understand. Whenever works, works.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 21, 2011, 10:41:23 PM
Mileslunn was doing something like that last election. He'll probably do it again.

Shouldn't the math be easy, since the results are in an excel file?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 21, 2011, 11:09:33 PM
it's figuring out what goes where


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 22, 2011, 10:56:16 PM
Regina City only (Note that the NDP lost Moose Jaw 50.4% to 43.7%)


Lums
C - 47.6%
N - 41.6%
L - 8.2%
G - 2.7%

Pall
N - 52.9%
C - 36.4%
L - 7.7%
G - 3.0%

Qu'A
N - 49.0%
C - 43.0%
L - 4.8%
G - 2.7%

Wasc
L - 41.8%
C - 35.7%
N - 20.0%
G - 2.5%


Wasc...
Presuming...
25% of Liberal voters, Remain with the Liberal Party.
Of those who leave, 3 of every 4 go to the NDP
N - 43.5%
C - 43.5%
L - 10.4%
G - 2.5%
Which I think is a realistic presumption for what may happen if Goodale retires.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 22, 2011, 11:10:54 PM
Tories won in Ajax, 44-37

In Pickering:
C - 5,078
L - 4,599
N - 1,619


In the Pick-Scar riding...
Pickering:
C - 11,439
L - 9,250
N - 4,586

Scar:
L - 8,466
C - 7,590
N - 4,290


SCARBOROUGH TOTAL:
L - 77,240
C - 74,820
N - 66,054
G - 5,727
O - 617


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 24, 2011, 06:52:07 AM
Montreal (Municipality)
N - 40.6%
L - 25.6%
B - 20.6%
C - 10.3%
O - 2.9%

Montreal Est
N - 51.1%
B - 33.3%
C - 7.0%
L - 6.5%
O - 2.1%

Mont Royal
L - 50.3%
N - 22.1%
C - 18.3%
O - 9.3%

Hampstead
C - 50.2%
L - 38.1%
N - 9.0%
O - 2.6%

Cote St Luc
C - 52.9%
L - 35.0%
N - 10.4%
O - 1.8%

Montreal Ouest
L - 41.4%
N - 29.3%
C - 21.5%
O - 7.8%

Westmount
L - 44.4%
C - 26.3%
N - 23.3%
O - 6.0%

Dollard
C - 34.9%
L - 31.0%
N - 28.9%
O - 5.2%

Dorval
N - 39.6%
L - 31.0%
C - 19.0%
O - 10.4%

Baie D'Urfe
L - 40.8%
C - 30.5%
N - 22.4%
O - 6.3%

Beaconsfield
L - 36.4%
C - 31.0%
N - 26.6%
O - 5.9%

Kirkland
L - 36.2%
C - 31.2%
N - 27.4%
O - 5.2%

Pointe Claire
L - 34.4%
N - 30.3%
C - 27.5%
O - 7.8%

Sainte Anne
N - 39.3%
L - 26.0%
C - 22.9%
O - 11.9%

Senneville
L - 34.3%
C - 28.5%
N - 25.9%
O - 11.3%



Connected Western Municipalities
L - 33.5%
N - 29.9%
C - 29.7%
O - 6.8%


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 24, 2011, 07:09:49 AM
I've decided to not do what's on my list actually.

Thunder Bay is lame. Same as the larger ridings. Lethbridge, I'm just not that interested in. Peterborough? meh. Maybe later. Prince George, Mississauga, Brampton. Why, we already know who won.

What I will be doing however are the ridings on these maps:

()
()

As there is enough variety of vote to keep me interested.

Note that I use this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_by_riding_of_the_Canadian_federal_election,_2011#Southern_Durham_and_York
and this
http://www.elections.ca/scripts/resval/ovr_41ge_pollbypoll.asp?ddlEDRes_prov=35&lang=e
in order to figure everything out if anyone else wants to try some.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on July 24, 2011, 12:10:48 PM
Now that I am back from My European trip, I can also help out on any requests.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on July 24, 2011, 02:24:53 PM
Now that I am back from My European trip, I can also help out on any requests.

My request: everything. Well, basically municipalities. I'd also like to see Ottawa broken down by ward (and perhaps other cities).


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on July 24, 2011, 02:30:12 PM
Bad cities:
Guelph
Barrie
Charlottetown

Where the riding boundary and city boundary are identical, it makes for boring "research"

London is a bit more interesting, as part of the official city boundary is actually located in the Elgin riding, but that part of the city is unpopulated.

Places like Peterborough, Lethbridge, Red Deer, Medicine Hat, Sarnia, Prince Albert, or anything else with 50K people (give or take 50%) is interesting, because they thus make up a large portion of the riding, but there is enough "rural" to possible tip the scale. Other interesting cities to do include Prince George, Oakville, Burlington, or anything else where the city is split, where over a third of it exists in another riding.

Hope that gives you some ideas. The more work you do the less I need to do :P


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on July 24, 2011, 08:06:38 PM
Now that I am back from My European trip, I can also help out on any requests.

My request: everything. Well, basically municipalities. I'd also like to see Ottawa broken down by ward (and perhaps other cities).
  Don't worry I will work these.  It may take some time, but I will get the maps out again.  I am usually outdoors more in the summer months so it may be a bit slow, but once the colder weather arrives, I can finish whatever is left.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 09, 2011, 08:37:00 AM
New Nanos Poll :( :( :(

Cons: 36
Lib: 27
NDP: 27


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hash on August 09, 2011, 09:09:29 AM
Cool!


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on August 09, 2011, 09:55:27 AM
New Nanos Poll :( :( :(

Cons: 36
Lib: 27
NDP: 27

No much of a surprise - the gap between the Conservatives and the NDP is the same 9 point gap it was on election night - the only change is a dead cat bounce by the Liberals. The Liberals have been ahead of the NDP in every election and every poll for the past 50 years - up until about one week before election day this past May. There are still a helluva of a lot of people for whom "Liberal" is still something they identify with and will be default response. Let's also keep in mind that the Liberals are now minus a leader who was ridiculously unpopular and the NDP is minus a leader (at least for now) who is ridiculously popular.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 09, 2011, 11:38:07 AM
New Nanos Poll :( :( :(

Cons: 36
Lib: 27
NDP: 27

The Liberals have been ahead of the NDP in every election and every poll for the past 50 years.

No, this is incorrect. The NDP was #1 in the polls briefly in 1987: http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/parties_leaders/clips/10676/

But, I'm sure you knew that.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on August 09, 2011, 06:55:18 PM
Does it really matter? Things will bounce a lot in four years depending on what's in the news. Now it's the NDP with Turmel, but when something bad happens to the Conservatives.... well, they'll stay still, probably. ::)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Linus Van Pelt on August 09, 2011, 07:32:11 PM
It really is remarkable how badly the Conservatives suck in non-Jewish Montreal.

Mont Royal
L - 50.3%
N - 22.1%
C - 18.3%
O - 9.3%

34% home language English, median family income $112,000, two most common occupational categories are "management occupations" (21%) and "business, finance & administrative occupations" (20%). Cotler would be totally finished if the Conservatives were even at vaguely normal numbers for a place like this.

And then there's:

Baie D'Urfe
L - 40.8%
C - 30.5%
N - 22.4%
O - 6.3%

74% home language English, median family income $194,000, and it's people who choose to live in deepest West Island suburbia instead of in a fancy historic home in Westmount in proximity to art galleries, chic restaurants etc. I mean, come on.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on August 10, 2011, 12:19:23 AM
In Quebec, the wealthy Anglos have long gone Liberal whereas in Toronto it depends.  It is true during the 90s, many of the wealthy WASP areas in Toronto voted Liberal, but those same areas voted for Mike Harris provincially and Mulroney in the 80s, whereas asides from perhaps Mulroney in the 80s, I don't think the wealthy Anglo areas in Montreal ever went Tory and even then I still think the Liberals won there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: DL on August 10, 2011, 07:00:13 AM
I think there are two reasons for this: firstly, Montreal is an extremely socially liberal place. Surveys have shown that Anglo-montrealers are just about the most post modern socially liberal segment in all of Canada. Second of all the Tories tend to be associated with provincial rights and decentralization and if you are wealthy Montreal Anglo you probably are not crazy about that.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 10, 2011, 12:08:25 PM
Angus Reid:

Tories: 39
NDP: 31
Libs: 19
BQ: 6
Grn: 4

Vastly different from Nanos :)


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on August 10, 2011, 08:53:09 PM
Angus Reid:

Tories: 39
NDP: 31
Libs: 19
BQ: 6
Grn: 4

Vastly different from Nanos :)
  Both pollsters in the past have been pretty close to accurate in terms of their final polls and the actual election results.  Interesting enough Angus-Reid gives numbers almost identical to what the results were this past election.  Either way I don't expect numbers to change much until something dramatic happens.  Probably after next year's budget when the spending cuts are announced is when we will start to see numbers move.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 12, 2011, 11:03:49 PM
Harris Decima

Cons: 37
NDP: 29
Libs: 20
Grns: 7
BQ: 5


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Smid on August 13, 2011, 07:13:12 AM
So Angus Reid and Harris Decima seem to agree. Perhaps the Liberal figure in Nanos is a typo? The other figures seem to fit reasonably, but perhaps the Liberal figure should read 17, not 27?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 13, 2011, 08:46:55 AM
So Angus Reid and Harris Decima seem to agree. Perhaps the Liberal figure in Nanos is a typo? The other figures seem to fit reasonably, but perhaps the Liberal figure should read 17, not 27?

Nope, it's no typo.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on August 13, 2011, 02:44:08 PM
Harris Decima

Cons: 37
NDP: 29
Libs: 20
Grns: 7
BQ: 5
regional breakdown?


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 13, 2011, 05:12:10 PM

I don't know, here is the article: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/127474143.html

Apparently the Tories lead everywhere except "Quebec and the GTA"


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Holmes on August 13, 2011, 10:06:50 PM
Oh? I wonder who's leading in the GTA, then.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on August 14, 2011, 01:47:24 AM
Oh? I wonder who's leading in the GTA, then.

Depends on how you define the GTA.  If just Toronto it could be either the NDP or Liberals, but if you include the 905, then it would have the be the Liberals considering how weak the NDP is in most parts of the 905 save a few ridings here and there.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: trebor204 on August 17, 2011, 04:15:13 PM
The OFFICAL RESULTS and along with the Offical Report are now on the Election Canada website.

http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=pas/41ge&document=index&lang=e


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 22, 2011, 09:40:07 AM
Obviously mentioned elsewhere, but... RIP Jack Layton.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Nichlemn on August 22, 2011, 09:52:09 AM
Wow, I never expected it to be that quick. RIP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on August 22, 2011, 10:38:18 AM
Not entirely unexpected, but very sad. And this thread's the first I hear of it. RIP.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: MaxQue on August 26, 2011, 01:43:37 AM
I knew than Yvon Godin is very popular in his riding, but not to that point.

He got 88% in a few precincts.

NDP got very good results in all Coastal Northern New Brunswick, too.


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 31, 2011, 11:40:07 AM
New poll

NDP 33%!
Cons 33%
Lib: 21%

First time since 1987 I believe where the NDP was tied or leading.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/public-grief-over-layton-puts-ndp-even-with-tories-in-poll/article2148563/


Title: Re: Canadian Election Results Thread
Post by: mileslunn on September 24, 2011, 11:50:10 PM
I haven't posted anything in a while, but as the weather gets colder and I am out less, I will try and work on some more maps.